Sürekli Erişilebilirlik Baskısının (Telebaskı) Akademik Personelde Dijital Bağımlılık Üzerindeki Etkisi

Öz

Bu çalışma, yükseköğretim kurumlarında görev yapan akademik personel arasında algılanan sürekli erişilebilirlik baskısının dijital bağımlılık üzerindeki etkisini incelemektedir. Araştırma, ilişkisel tarama modeline dayalı nicel bir tasarımla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veri toplama aracı demografik ve mesleki değişkenler, Telebaskı Ölçeği ve uyarlanmış İnternet Bağımlılığı Testi’nden (IAT) oluşmaktadır. Veri analizi kapsamında betimsel istatistikler, normallik testleri, Pearson korelasyon analizi ve çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi uygulanmıştır. Bulgular, telebaskı ile dijital bağımlılık arasında anlamlı ve pozitif bir ilişki olduğunu göstermektedir (r=0.58, p<0.01). Regresyon analizi sonuçları, telebaskı’nın dijital bağımlılık üzerinde güçlü ve anlamlı bir etkiye sahip olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır (β=0.46, p<0.01). Model, dijital bağımlılıktaki varyansın önemli bir kısmını açıklamaktadır (R² = 0.48). Ayrıca günlük dijital kullanım süresi (β=0.29, p<0.01) ve e-posta kontrol sıklığı (β=0.22, p<0.01) dijital bağımlılığı pozitif yönde etkilerken, yaş değişkeninin negatif etkisi bulunmaktadır (β=-0.11, p<0.05). Sonuç olarak, telebaskı akademik personelin dijital davranışlarını şekillendiren önemli bir faktör olarak öne çıkmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sürekli erişilebilirlik baskısı
• Dijital bağımlılık
• Sorunlu internet kullanımı
• Zorlayıcı dijital davranış
• Akademik personel

The Effect of Constant Connectivity Pressure (Telepressure) on Digital Addiction Among Academic Staff

Öz

This study examines the effect of perceived telepressure on digital addiction among academic staff in higher education institutions. The study employs a quantitative research design based on a relational survey model. The survey instrument included demographic and professional variables, the Workplace Telepressure Scale, and an adapted version of the Internet Addiction Test (IAT). Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, normality tests, Pearson correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression analysis. The findings reveal a significant and positive relationship between telepressure and digital addiction (r=0.58, p<0.01). Regression analysis further indicates that telepressure has a strong and significant effect on digital addiction (β=0.46, p<0.01). In addition, daily digital use (β=0.29, p<0.01) and email checking frequency (β=0.22, p<0.01) positively influence digital addiction, while age has a negative effect (β=-0.11, p<0.05). The overall model explains a substantial proportion of variance in digital addiction (R²=0.48). Overall, the results suggest that telepressure is a key determinant of digital addiction among academic staff.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Telepressure
• Digital addiction
• Problematic internet use
• Compulsive digital behavior
• Academic staff

Kaynakça

1. Agger, B. (2011). iTime: Labor and life in a smartphone era. Time & Society, 20(1), 119-136.
2. Altıntaş, M., and Altıntaş, B. (2026). Aile ve Denge: Havayolu Kabin Memurlarında İş Yaşam Dengesi, Teknostres ve Kariyer Stresi İlişkisi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(Aile Özel Sayısı), 318-337.
3. Andreassen, C. S. (2015). Online social network site addiction: A comprehensive review. Current Addiction Reports, 2(2), 175-184.
4. Andreassen, C. S., Pallesen, S., and Griffiths, M. D. (2017). The relationship between addictive use of social media, narcissism, and self-esteem: Findings from a large national survey. Addictive Behaviors, 64, 287-293.
5. Bakker, A. B., and Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328.
6. Barber, L. K. and Santuzzi, A. M. (2015). Please respond ASAP: Workplace telepressure and employee recovery. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20(2), 172-189.
7. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., and Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252-1265.
8. Billieux, J., Maurage, P., Lopez-Fernandez, O., Kuss, D. J., and Griffiths, M. D. (2015). Can disordered mobile phone use be considered a behavioral addiction? An update on current evidence and a comprehensive model for future research. Current Addiction Reports, 2(2), 156-162.

9. Brand, M., Wegmann, E., Stark, R., Müller, A., Wölfling, K., Robbins, T. W.,and Potenza, M. N. (2019). The interaction of person-affect-cognition-execution (I PACE) model for addictive behaviors: Update, generalization, and specification. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 104, 1-10.
10. Çömlekçi, M. G., and Bozkurt, S. (2024). Dijital liderlik ve bireysel yenilikçilik ilişkisinde işgücü çevikliğinin rolü. Akademik Hassasiyetler, 11(24), 75-97.
11. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., and Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499-512.
12. Derks, D., and Bakker, A. B. (2010). The impact of e-mail communication on organizational life. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 4(1), Article 4. https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4233
13. Derks, D., van Duin, D., Tims, M., and Bakker, A. B. (2015). Smartphone use and work-home interference: The moderating role of social norms and employee work engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(1), 155-177.
14. Grawitch, M. J., Werth, P. M., Palmer, S. N., Erb, K. R., and Lavigne, K. N. (2018). Self-imposed pressure or organizational norms? Further examination of the construct of workplace telepressure. Stress and Health, 34(2), 306-319.
15. Griffiths, M. D. (2005). A ‘components’ model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. Journal of Substance Use, 10(4), 191-197.
16. Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524.
17. Kuss, D. J., and Griffiths, M. D. (2011). Online social networking and addiction: A review of the psychological literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(9), 3528-3552.
18. Kuss, D., D Griffiths, M., Karila, L., and Billieux, J. (2014). Internet addiction: A systematic review of epidemiological research for the last decade. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 20(25), 4026-4052.
19. Kutlu, M., Savcı, M., Demir, Y., and Aysan, F. (2016). Young internet bağımlılığı testi kısa formunun türkçe uyarlaması: Üniversite öğrencileri ve ergenlerde geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 17(1), 69-76.
20. Lemmens, J. S., Valkenburg, P. M., and Peter, J. (2009). Development and validation of a game addiction scale for adolescents. Media Psychology, 12(1), 77-95.
21. Manca, S., and Ranieri, M. (2016). Is Facebook still a suitable technology-enhanced learning environment? An updated critical review of the literature from 2012 to 2015. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(6), 503-528.
22. Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., and Yates, J. (2013). The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organization Science, 24(5), 1337-1357.
23. Meijman, T. F., and Mulder, G. (1998). Psychological aspects of workload. In P. J. D. Drenth and H. Thierry (Eds.), Handbook of work and organizational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 5-33). Psychology Press.
24. Montag, C., and Hegelich, S. (2021). Understanding detrimental aspects of social media use: Will the real problem please stand up? Frontiers in Sociology, 6, Article 660641.
25. Pirkkalainen, H., Tarafdar, M., Salo, M., and Makkonen, M. (2022). Proximal and distal antecedents of problematic information technology use in organizations. Internet Research, 32(7), 139-168.
26. Santuzzi, A. M., and Barber, L. K. (2018). Workplace telepressure and worker well-being: The intervening role of psychological detachment. Occupational Health Science, 2(4), 337-363.
27. Schaufeli, W. B., and Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.
28. Sonnentag, S. (2012). Psychological detachment from work during leisure time: The benefits of mentally disengaging from work. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(2), 114-118.
29. Sonnentag, S., and Fritz, C. (2007). The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 204-221.
30. Stich, J. F., Tarafdar, M., Stacey, P., and Cooper, C. L. (2019). Appraisal of email use as a source of workplace stress: A person-environment fit approach. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(2), 132-167.
31. Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., and Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007). The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301-328.
32. van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Bolle, C. L., Hegner, S. M., and Kommers, P. A. M. (2015). Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior: The role of smartphone usage types, emotional intelligence, social stress, self-regulation, age, and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 411-420.
33. Wood, W., and Neal, D. T. (2007). A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface. Psychological Review, 114(4), 843-863.
34. Yıkılmaz, İ., Güleryüz, İ., and Efe, Y. (2023). Workplace fear of missing out and telepressure: How digital workplace challenges contribute to employee burnout? Journal of University Research, 6(3), 347-355.
35. Young, K. S. (1998). Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 1(3), 237-244.