BOREDOM REVISITED: A CRITICAL REVISION OF WENDELL O’BRIEN’S ORIGINAL FORMULATION OF BOREDOM

Yıl 2025, Sayı: Advanced Online Publication, 911 - 917

Argun Abrek Canbolat

https://doi.org/10.47525/ulasbid.1750411

Öz

Boredom has largely been neglected within the analytic tradition. In his 2014 article entitled “Boredom,” Wendell O’Brien offered a conceptualization of this phenomenon, but he later revised this approach in a work published in 2022. The present study proposes several modifications to O’Brien’s original account and offers reasons why his 2022 revision should be rejected. By means of a thought experiment, it is argued that boredom may arise not only from objects or situations in which we lack interest, but also from elements that initially evoke curiosity or capture attention. In this context, O’Brien’s earlier formulation is revisited and partially revised with the aim of rendering it more comprehensive and holistic.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Boredom , interest , curiosity , weariness , restlessness.

CAN SIKINTISINA YENİDEN BAKIŞ: WENDELL O’BRİEN’IN CAN SIKINTISINA DAİR ORİJİNAL FORMÜLASYONUNUN ELEŞTİREL BİR REVİZYONU

Öz

Can sıkıntısı, analitik gelenek içerisinde büyük ölçüde göz ardı edilmiş bir konu olmuştur. Wendell O’Brien, 2014 tarihli “Can Sıkıntısı” başlıklı makalesinde bu olguya dair bir kavramsallaştırma sunmuş, ancak bu yaklaşımını 2022 yılında yayımladığı çalışmasında yeniden gözden geçirmiştir. Bu çalışmada, O’Brien’ın özgün görüşüne çeşitli değişiklikler önerilmekte ve 2022 tarihinde revize ettiği konumunun neden reddedilmesi gerektiğine dair gerekçeler sunulmaktadır. Bir düşünce deneyi aracılığıyla, can sıkıntısının yalnızca ilgi duymadığımız nesne ya da durumlar nedeniyle değil, başlangıçta merak ya da dikkat uyandıran unsurlar neticesinde de ortaya çıkabileceği ileri sürülmektedir. Bu bağlamda, O’Brien’ın önceki formülasyonu yeniden ele alınmakta ve daha kapsayıcı ve bütüncül olması amacıyla kısmen revize edilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Can sıkıntısı , ilgi , merak , bezginlik , huzursuzluk.

Kaynakça

• Bargdill, R. W. (2000). The study of life boredom. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 31(2), 188–219. doi: 10.1163/15691620051090979
• Bench, S.W., Lench, H.C. (2013). On the function of boredom. Behavioral Sciences, 3(3), 459–472. doi: 10.3390/bs3030459
• Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict arousal and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Eastwood, J. D., Frischen, A., Fenske, M. J., Smilek, D. (2012). The unengaged mind: Defining boredom in terms of attention. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 482–495. doi: 10.1177/1745691612456044
• Farmer, R., Sundberg, N. D. (1986). Boredom proneness: the development and correlates of a new scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50(1), 4–17. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5001_2
• Hunter, J. A., Abraham, E. H., Hunter, A. G., Goldberg, L. C., Eastwood, J. D. (2016). Personality and boredom proneness in the prediction of creativity and curiosity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 48-57. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2016.08.002
• İnan, İ. (2012). Philosophy of curiosity. New York: Routledge
• Litman, J. A., Silvia, P. J. (2006). The latent structure of trait curiosity: Evidence for interest and deprivation curiosity dimensions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86(3), 318–328. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8603_07 O’Brien, W. (2014). Boredom. Analysis, 74, 236-244. doi: 10.1093/analys/anu041
• O’Brien, W. (2022). Boredom, interest and meaning in life in (ed.) Elpidorou, A. The Moral Psychology of Boredom. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
• Philips, R. (2015). Curiosity: Care, virtue and pleasure in uncovering the new. Theory, Culture & Society, 32(3), 149-161. doi: 10.1177/0263276414565718
• Rafaelli, Q., Mills, C., Christoff, K. (2018). The knowns and unknowns of boredom: A review of literature. Experimental Brain Research, 236, 2451-2462. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4922-7
• Stevenson, A. (2010). Oxford English dictionary. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Stringaris, A. (2016). Editorial: Boredom and developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(12), 1335–1336. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12664
• Svendsen, L. (2005). A philosophy of boredom. London: Reaktion Books.
• Toohey, P. (2011). Boredom: a lively history. Boston: Yale University Press.
• Troutwine, R., O’Neal, E. C. (1981). Volition, performance of a boring task and time estimation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 52, 865-866. doi: 10.2466/pms.1981.52.3.865
• Ulich, E. (1987). Umgang mit monotonie und komplexität, Technische Rundschau, 5, 8-13.
• Van Aaart, J., Bartneck, C., Hu, J., Rauterberg, M., Salem, B. (2010). How to behave as Alice in Wonderland-about boredom and curiosity. Entertainment Computing, 1, 125-137. doi: 10.1016/j.entcom.2010.09.003
• Westgate, E. C., Wilson, T. D. (2018). Boring thoughts and bored minds: The MAC model of boredom and cognitive engagement. Psychological Review, 125(5), 689-713. doi: 10.1037/rev0000097