POPÜLİZMİN VE POPÜLİST SÖYLEMİN KRİZ DÖNEMLERİNDE DEMOKRATİK SİYASAL SİSTEME ETKİ DÜZEYİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 46, 279 - 296, 12.02.2025

Taylan Can Doğanay

https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.1597547

Öz

Popülizmi inceleyen ilk teorik çalışmalar, kavramın siyasal, toplumsal ve ekonomik boyutlarını anlamaya yönelik geniş bir analitik çerçeve sunmuş ve popülizmi bir ideoloji, söylem veya siyasal strateji olarak ele almıştır. 20. yüzyılın ortalarına kadar, popülizm çoğunlukla tarihsel ve bağlamsal bir fenomen olarak incelenirken, alternatif yaklaşımlar kavramın genel özelliklerini sistematik bir şekilde analiz etmeye başlamıştır. Bu çalışma, popülizmi ve popülist söylemi ampirik ve pratik bulgulara dayalı olarak inceleyen çalışmaları içerik analizine tabi tutarak popülizmin dönüştürücü potansiyelini ve demokrasiyle karmaşık etkileşimini incelemektedir. Çalışmanın amacı ise, popülizmin ve popülist söylemin demokratik normlara meydan okumasını, bu meydan okumanın demokrasinin yapısal ve kurumsal dengeleri üzerindeki etkilerini değerlendirmek ve demokratik siyasal sistemin popülizm karşısındaki direnç kapasitesini tartışmaktır. Araştırma bulgularına göre popülizmin ve popülist söylemin demokratik siyasal sistemi etkisi, krizlerin farklı aşamalarında belirginleşmekte ve bu dönüşüm, sistematik olarak değerlendirildiğinde popülizmin siyasal sistemlerde nasıl bir devinim oluşturduğunu anlamak mümkün hale gelmektedir. Araştırma, bu süreçleri kriz başlangıcı, kriz dönemi ve kriz sonrası olmak üzere üç ana aşamada incelemiş ve popülizmin her bir aşamada farklı düzeylerdeki etkilerini araştırma kapsamında ortaya koymuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Popülizm, Demokrasi, Demokratik Normlar, Siyasal Sistem, Kriz

A STUDY ON THE IMPACT LEVEL OF POPULISM AND POPULIST DISCOURSE ON DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL SYSTEM

Öz

The early theoretical studies examining populism provided a broad analytical framework to understand the political, social, and economic dimensions of the concept, treating populism as an ideology, discourse, or political strategy. This study examines works that analyze populism and populist discourse based on empirical and practical findings, aiming to explore the transformative potential of populism and its complex interaction with democracy. The purpose of the study is to evaluate populism's and populist discourse's challenge to democratic norms, assess the impact of this challenge on the structural and institutional balances of democracy, and discuss the democratic political system's resilience in the face of populism. According to the research findings, the impact of populism and populist discourse on the democratic political system becomes evident during different phases of crises, and when this transformation is systematically evaluated, it becomes possible to understand how populism generates momentum in political systems. The study examines these processes in three main stages crisis onset, crisis period, and post-crisis and reveals the varying levels of populism's impact at each stage within the scope of the research.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Popülism, Democracy, Democratic Norms, Political System, Crisis

Kaynakça

• Abts, K.ve Rummens, S. (2007). Populism Versus Democracy. Political Studies, 55(2), 405-424.
• Akkerman, A., Mudde, C. ve Zaslove, A. (2013). How Populist are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters. Comparative Political Studies, 47(9), 1324-1355.
• Aslanidis, P. (2016). Is Populism an Ideology? A Refutationand a Newperspective. Political Studies, 64(1), 88-104.
• Barr, R. R. (2009). Populists, Outsiders, and Anti-Establishment Politics. Party Politics, 15(1), 29-48.
• Blyth, M. ve Matthijs, M. (2017). Black Swans, Lame Ducks, and the Mystery of IPE's Missing Macroeconomy. Review of International Political Economy, 24(2), 203-231.
• Bonikowski, B. (2017). Ethno-Nationalist Populism and the Mobilization of Collective Resentment. The British Journal of Sociology, 68(S1), 181-213.
• Brubaker, R. (2017). Between Nationalism and Civilizationism: The European Populist Moment in Comparative Perspective. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(8), 1191-1226.
• Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2-16.
• Caprotti, F., Cowley, R., Datta, A., Castán Broto, V., Gao, E., Georgeson, L., Herrick, C., Odendaal, N. ve Joss, S. (2017). The New Urban Agenda: Key Opportunities and Challenges for Policy and Practice. Urban Research & Practice, 10(1), 3-19.
• Castanho Silva, B., Jungkunz, S., Helbling, M. ve Littvay, L. (2019). An Empirical Comparison of Seven Populist Attitudes Scales. Political Research Quarterly, 1(1), 1-16.
• Elçi, E. (2024). Right-Wing Populism in Turkey and the 2023 Elections. Journal of Political Studies, 12(3), 40-50.
• Engesser, S., Fawzi, N., Schmid-Petri, H. ve Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Populism and Social Media: How Politicians Spread a Fragmented Ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1279-1296.
• Finchelstein, F. ve Urbinati, N. (2018). On Populism and Democracy. Populism, 1(1), 15-37.
• Germani, G. (1965). Authoritarianism, Fascism, and Populism. S. P. Huntington ve C. H. Moore (Eds.), Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society: The Dynamics of Established One-Party Systems içinde (s. 235-263). New York: Basic Books.
• Gidron, N. ve Hall, P. A. (2017). The Politics of Social Status: Economic and Cultural Roots of the Populist Right. The British Journal of Sociology, 68(S1), 57-84.
• Guriev, S. ve Papaioannou, E. (2022). The Political Economy of Populism. Journal of Economic Literature, 60(3), 753-832.
• Hobolt, S. B. (2016). The Brexit Vote: A Divided Nation, a Divided Continent. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1259-1277.
• Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). The End of Liberal International Order? International Affairs, 94(1), 7-23.
• Jagers, J. ve Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(1), 319-345.
• Kaltwasser, C. R. (2012). The Ambivalence of Populism: Threat and Corrective for Democracy. Democratization, 19(2), 184-208.
• Kriesi, H. (2014). The Populist Challenge. West European Politics, 37(2), 361-378.
• Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
• Levitsky, S. ve Loxton, J. (2013). Populism and Competitive Authoritarianism in the Andes. Democratization, 20(1), 107-136.
• McCoy, J., Rahman, T. ve Somer, M. (2018). Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics, and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 16-42.
• Moffitt, B. ve Tormey, S. (2014). Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and Political Style. Political Studies, 62(1), 381-397.
• Mols, F. ve Jetten, J. (2016). Explaining the Appeal of Populist Right-Wing Parties in Times of Economic Prosperity. Political Psychology, 37(2), 275-292.
• Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541-563.
• Mudde, C. ve Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2013). Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48(2), 147-174.
• Mudde, C. ve Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2018). Studying Populism in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 51(13), 1667-1693.
• Nurdin, A., Setiawan, A. ve Nugraha, A. R. (2024). The Rise of Populism and Its Impact on Democratic Institutions: A Comparative Analysis of Global Trends. International Journal of Social and Human, 1(2), 67-84.
• Onis, Z. (2012). The Triumph of Conservative Globalism: The Political Economy of the AKP Era. Turkish Studies, 13(2), 135-152.
• Rico, G., Guinjoan, M. ve Anduiza, E. (2017). The Emotional Underpinnings of Populism: How Anger and Fear Affect Populist Attitudes. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(4), 444-461.
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018). The Revenge of the Places That Don’t Matter (and What to Do About It). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 189-209.