Anglikan Siyaset Düşüncesinde Devlet Kavramına Farklı Yaklaşımlar: Bütüncül Devlet, Çoğulcu Devlet ve Sosyal Devlet Anlayışının Anglikan Yorumları

Öz

Anglikan siyasi düşüncesi, kurulduğu günden beri, yaşanan siyasi ve toplumsal olayları yorumlayarak diğer Hıristiyan siyasi düşüncelerinden farklı anlayış geliştirmiştir. Siyaseten kurulmuş bir resmi kilise olarak, siyasi koşulları dini açıdan değerlendirmiş ve İngiliz siyasetçilerine sunmuştur. En büyük katkısı ise İngiliz siyasetini dini temelde yorumlayarak İngiliz politikalarının güçlenmesini sağlamak olmuştur. İngiliz Kraliyetinin resmi dini olan Anglikan Kilisesi tarih boyunca benimsediği ve öğrettiği devlet anlayışı ile İngiltere siyasi düşüncesinde yer almıştır. Reform sonrası kuruluş döneminde, Kraliyetin din için önemini ve gerekliliğini savunduğu bütüncül bir devlet yaklaşımı benimsemiştir. Ancak 17. yüzyıl sonrası yaşanan gelişmeler bütüncül anlayışı farklı kimliklerin de gözetildiği çoğulcu bir devlet tanımına bırakmıştır. Birinci ve İkinci Dünya Savaşları sonrası ise, yine yaşanan toplumsal olayların etkisiyle, devlete yol gösterici olacak bir sosyal devlet anlayışı Anglikan siyasi düşüncesinde yerini almıştır. Bu çalışmada, Anglikan siyasi düşüncesi tarihsel olaylarla şekillenen devlet kavramının farklı dönemlerde nasıl tanımlandığı ve bu değişimin nelerden etkilendiği hususları analiz edilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bütüncül Devlet
• Anglikan Kilisesi
• Çoğulcu Devlet
• Sosyal Devlet

Different Approaches to The Concept of The State in Anglican Political Thought: Anglican Interpretations of Monistic State, Pluralist State and Social State Concepts

Öz

Anglican political thought has developed a different understanding from other Christian political thoughts by interpreting the political and social events since its inception. As a politically established official church, it evaluated the political conditions in terms of religion and presented it to British politicians. His greatest contribution was to strengthen British policies by interpreting British politics on a religious basis. The Anglican Church, which is the official religion of the British Crown, has taken place in British political thought with the understanding of the state it has adopted and taught throughout history. In the post-reform establishment period, it adopted a holistic state approach in which the Crown defended its importance and necessity for religion. However, the developments after the 17th century left the holistic understanding to a pluralist state definition in which different identities were also observed. After the First and Second World Wars, with the effect of social events, a social state understanding that would guide the state took its place in Anglican political thought. In this study, it is analyzed how the concept of the state, which is shaped by historical events in Anglican political thought, is defined in different periods and how this change is affected.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Monistic State
• Anglican Church
• Monistic State
• Social State
• Pluralist State

Kaynakça

1. Andrewes, Lancelot (2006), “Sermons”. Project Canterbury. Erişim:29.06.2022. http://www.luminarium.org/sevenlit/andrewes/lancebib.htm
2. Araya, Guillermo René Cavieses (2019). A (New) Ecclesiology of the Anglican Communion: Rediscovering the Radical and Transnational Nature of the Anglican Communion. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Leeds Ünivesritesi, Sanat Fakültesi, Felsefe, din ve Tarih Bilimi Anabilim Dalı, İngiletere
3. Baker, A. E ve Bell George (1946). William Temple and his Message. Penguin
4. BBC Türkçe (2008, 12 Şubat). İngiltere’de Şeriat Tartışması. erişim 28.12.2021 https://www.bbc.co.uk/turkish/europe/story/2008/02/080212_williams_sharia.shtml
5. Becic, Marlyn Jean (1959). Richard Hooker and His Theory of Anglicanism. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Loyola Üniversitesi, Chicago
6. Biggar, Nigel (2011), Why the establishment of The Church of England is Good for a Liberal Society?, Mark
7. Chapman Judith Maltby ve William Whyte (ed.). The Established Church Past, Present and Future (ss: 1-23) T&T Clark.
8. Boucher, David ve Vincent, Andrew (2012). British Idealism: A Guide For The Perplexed. Amnet International.

9. Brian, Cummings (2018). The Book of Common Prayer: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford Üniversitesi Yayınları
10. Cerny, P.G.(2006). Plurality, Pluralism and Power: Elements of Pluralist Analysis in an Age of Globalization. Rainer Eisfeld (Ed.), Pluralism: Developments in Theory and Practice of Democracy (s. 81-110). Barbara Budrich
11. Chapman, Mark (2011a). A Free Church in a Free Society, Anglo-Catholicism and Establishment, Mark
12. Chapman Judith Maltby ve William Whyte (ed.) The Established Church Past, Present and Future (ss:56-74). T&T Clark.
13. Chapman, Mark D. (2011b). Rowan Williams’s Political Theology: Multiculturalism and Interactive Pluralism. Journal of Anglican Studies 9(01), 61 – 79
14. Chapman, Mark (2011b). Rowan Williams’s Political Theology: Multiculturalism and Interactive Pluralism. Journal of Anglican Studies 9(01), 61 – 79
15. Chaplin, Jonathan (2008). Legal Monism and Religious Pluralism: Rowan Williams on Religion, Loyalty and Law. International Journal of Public Theology (2), 418–441.
16. Cumming, Geoffrey, J. (2018). The Book of Common Prayer: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford Üniversitesi Yayınları
17. D’entreves, Alexander Passerin (1959), Medieval Contribution to Political Thought, The Humanities Yayınları.
18. Eppley, Daniel (2007). Defending Royal Supremacy andcDiscerning God’s Will in Tudor England. Ashgate
19. Figgis, John Neville (1896). The Divine Right of Kings. Torchboo Yayıncılık
20. Figgis, John Neville (1907). Studies of political thought from Gerson to Grotius, 1414-1625. Cambridge Üniversitesi Yayınları
21. Figgis, John Neville (1914). Churches in the Modern State. 2. Baskı. Longsman Green Yayıncılık.
22. Green, Thomas Hill (1911). Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation. Project Gutenberg.
23. Guy, John (2000). The Tudors: Very Short Introduction. Oxford Üniversitesi Yayınları
24. Hastings, Adrian (2012) Temple, William (1881–1944): Archbishop of Canterbury. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, erişim 14.01.2022. https://www.oxforddnb.com/view/10.1093/ref:odnb/9780198614128.001.0001/odnb-9780198614128-e-36454
25. Hempton, David (1996). Religion and Political Culture: From the Glorious Revolution to the Decline of Empire. Cambridge Üniversitesi Yayınları
26. Hobbes, Thomas (2010). Leviathan. Çeviren Semih Lim. Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
27. Hooker, Richard (1867). Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity. Editör John Keble. Clarendon Basımevi
28. Hooker, Richard (2019). The Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity in Modern English, 1. Kısım. Editörler Bradford Littlejohn, Bradley Belschner, and Brian Marr. The Davenant Press
29. Hughes, Philip (1993). The Reformation in England. Burns and Oats Ltd.A B
30. Hume, David (1997). İnsan Doğası Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Çeviren A. Yardımlı. İdea Yayınevi.
31. Hylson-Smith, Kenneth (1988). Evangelicals in the Church of England 1734-1984. T&T Clark. Kennedy, Simon (2018). Richard Hooker as Political Naturalist. Tarih Dergisi, 62(2), 1-18
32. Kirby, W. J. Torrance (2005). Richard Hooker: Reformed and Platonist. Routledge
33. Kirby, W. J. Torrance (2008). Reason and Law. Torance Kirby ve Rowan Williams(ed). A Companion to Richard Hooker (ss: 251- 273). BRILL.
34. Laborde, Cecile (2000). The Concept of the State in British and French Political Thought. Macmillan Yayıncılık.
35. Locke, John (2004). Hükümet Üzerine İkinci İnceleme. Çeviren Fahri Bakırcı. Ebabil Yayıncılık
36. Lockyer, Roger (2004). Tudor and Stuart Britain_ 1485-1714. Routledge
37. Marshall, Peter (2012). Reformation England 1480-1642. Bloomsbury Academic.
38. Moorman J. R. H. (1994) A History of the Church in England. Morehouse Yayınları
39. Muñiz-Fraticelli, Víctor M. (2014). The Structure of Pluralism. Oxford Üniveristesi Yayınları.
40. Nes, W. H. (1926). Lancelot Andrewes and the English Church. Theology, 13(75). 147-159.
41. Nicholls, David (1975). The Pluralist State.The Macmillan Yayıncılık.
42. Oakley, Francis (1996) Anxieties of Influence: Skinner, Figgis, Conciliarism and Early Modern Constitutionalism. Past & Present, (151) Mayıs, 60-110
43. Oakley, Francis (2008) Gerson’s Hope: FifteenthCentury Conciliarism and its Roots. Oxford Üniversitesi Yayınları
44. Oakeshott, Michael (1993). Morality and Politics in Modern Europe. Editör S.R. Letwin. Yale Üniversitesi Yayınları.
45. Palamarchuk, Anastasia ve Fadeyev, Ivan (2018). Richard Hooker’s Doctrine of Royal Supremacy in the Church of England. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg Üniversitesi Tarih Dergisi, 63(1), 158–173. priorPreston, Ronald (1981). William Temple as a Social Theologian. Theology 84(701), 334-341.
46. Prior, Charles W. A. (2005). Ecclesiology And Political Thought In England, 1580–c. 1630. The Historical Journal, 48 (4 ). 855–884; doi:10.1017/S0018246X05004838 Rogerson, J. W. (1981). William Temple as Philosopher andTheologian. Theology, 84 (701), 324-334.
47. Örs, Birsen (1997). Birey, Toplum ve Devlet İlişkileri Çerçevesinde Yeni İngiliz İdealizmi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, (16-17-18-19) erişim 14.01.2022 https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iusiyasal/issue/618/6270
48. SACH William L. (1993), Transformation of Anglicanism From state Church to Global Communion. Cambridge Üniversitesi Yayınları
49. Schlotterbeck, Bianca (2012, 6 Şubat). Highlights From the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee. CNBC. erişim 28.12.2021 https://www.cnbc.com/2012/06/05/highlights-from-the-queens-diamond-jubilee.htm
50. Suggate, Alan (2004). William Temple. Editörler Peter Scott ve William T. Cavanaugh. The Blackwell Companion to Political Theology (165-179). Blackwell Yayıncılık.
51. Smith Maynard and Oxon D (1963), Pre-Reformation England. Palgrave Macmillan.
52. Temple, William (1944). Christianity and Social Order. SCM Yayıncılık
53. Tulejski, Tomasz (2018). The Law and the Origins of Political Order in Richard Hokker’s Political Theology. Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa, Lodz Üniversitesi, Polonya, Ward, Paul (2010). Sovereignty: A Study of Contemporary Political Notion. Routledge. Ü
54. Warner, R. Stephen (1993). Work in Progress Toward a New Paradigm for the Sociological Study of Religion in the United States. American Journal of Sociology. 98 (5), 1044-1093
55. Wesley, John (2019). Sermons. 1. Bölüm. Project Gutenberg. Erişim:29.06.2022. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/59743
56. Williams, Anthony J. (2021). Christian Socialism as Political Ideology: The Formation of the British Christian Left, 1877–1945. I.B. TAURIS.
57. Williams, Rowan (2004, 9 Eylül), Resmi internet sitesi, erişim 28.12.2021 http://rowanwilliams.archbishopofcanterbury.org/articles.php/1566/dr-williams-to-visit-egypt.html
58. Williams, Rowan (2005, 8 Kasım). “Religion, Culture, Diversity and Tolerance: Shaping the New Europe”, Anglikan Klisesi 104. Başpiskoposu Rowan William’ın Resmi İnternet Sitesi, erişim, 28.212.2021 http://rowanwilliams.archbishopofcanterbury.org/articles.php/1179/religion-culture-diversity-and-tolerance-shaping-the-new-europe-address-at-the-european-policy-centr.html
59. Wilson, Derek (2012). The Reformation: A Brief History. Running Press
60. Winship, Michael P. (2017) North America to 1662. Rowan Strong (ed.) The Oxford History of Anglicanism,(ss: 266- 280). Oxford Üniversitesi Yayınları
61. Wright, Stephen (2004), Willymat, Williaam, Oxford Dictinary of National Biography, https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/29617
62. Wolin, Sheldon S. (1953). Richard Hooker and English Conservatism. The Western Political Quarterly, 6(1), Mawolinrt, 28-47.
63. Wooding, Lucy (2009) Henry VIII. Abingdon Yayınları