Araştırma Makalesi

Abū Bakr al-Khaffāf and His Thought of Uṣūl al-Fiqh

Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2 31 Aralık 2021
PDF İndir
EN TR

Abū Bakr al-Khaffāf and His Thought of Uṣūl al-Fiqh

Öz

Abū Bakr al-Khaffāf is one of the Shāfi‘ī scholars who lived in the Iraqi region in the fourth/tenth century. The region of Iraq became one of the important centers of attraction for the Shāfi‘ī madhhab in those times, and leading jurists of the madhhab, particularly ‘Abū'l-‘Abbās Ibn Surayj and his stu-dents, began to appear in this region. Being one of the centers of many theological and philosophical movements, the Iraqi region left an impact on the thoughts of the early Iraqi Shāfi‘īs. An important indication of this is Abū Bakr al-Khaffāf, about whom there is little information in both classical and modern sources. In the introduction of his concise work titled al-Aqsām wa-l-khiṣāl in the field of fiqh, he briefly addresses the main issues of fiqh. Al-Khaffāf's inclusion of fiqh methodology in this particular work is noteworthy in that it reflects the theological perspective that was popular among Shāfi‘ī scholars of his time, as well as providing important data on the development of Shāfi‘ī fiqh method after Shāfi‘ī. This study aims not only to show this impact and but also to introduce this Shāfi‘ī jurist and his methodical thought, neglected in both classical and modern sources.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Shāfi‘ī School, Iraqi Region, Uṣūl al-Fiqh, Abū Bakr al-Khaffāf, al-Aqsām wa-l-khiṣāl

Kaynakça

  1. Aybakan, Bilal. İmam Şâfiî ve Fıkıh Düşüncesinin Mezhepleşmesi. İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık, 2007.
  2. Beroje, Sahip. “İmam Şâfiî’nin Nesh Anlayışı ve İlk Şâfiî Usülcülerin Buna Yönelik Eleştirileri”. Dicle Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 9/1 (2007), 55-82.
  3. Burton, John. The Sources of Islamic Law Islamic: Theories of Abrogation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1990.
  4. al-Juwaynī, Imām al-Ḥaramayn Abū al-Maʿālī Rukn al-Dīn ʿAbd al-Mālik ibn ʿAbdillāh ibn Yūsuf. al-Burhān fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Ed. ‘Abd al-‘Azīm Maḥmūd al-Dīb. 2 Volumes. Egypt: Dār al-Wafā’, 2012/1433.
  5. al-Juwaynī, Imām al-Ḥaramayn Abū al-Maʿālī Rukn al-Dīn ʿAbd al-Mālik ibn ʿAbdillāh ibn Yūsuf. Nihāyat al-maṭlab fī dirāyat al-madhhab. Ed. ‘Abd al-‘Azīm Maḥmūd al-Dīb. 21 Volumes. Beirut: Dār al-Minhāj, 2007/1428.
  6. Abū al-Baqā' al-Damīrī, Muḥammad b. Mūsā b. ʿĪsā Kamāl al-Dīn. Al-Najm al-wahhāj fī sharh al-Minhāj. 10 Volumes. Jeddah: Dār al-Minhāj, 2007/1428.
  7. El Shamsy, Ahmed. “Bridging the Gap: Two Early Texts of Islamic Legal Theory”. Journal of the American Oriental Society 137. 3 (2017), 505-536
  8. Eşit, Davut. Hicrî IV.-V. Asırlarda Irak-Horasan’da Şâfi‘î Fıkıh Usûlünün Gelişimi. Ankara: Ankara University, Social Sciences Institute, Doctoral Dissertation, 2017.
  9. Eşit, Davut. Şâfi‘î Fıkıh Usûlünün Gelişimi. Ankara: Ankara Okulu Yayınları, 2019.
  10. Eşit, Yusuf. Kavleyn Literatürü Bağlamında Şâfiî Savunusu. Ankara: Fecr yayınları, 2019.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Eşit, D. (2021). Abū Bakr al-Khaffāf and His Thought of Uṣūl al-Fiqh. ULUM, 4(2), 219-243. https://doi.org/10.54659/ulum.1051147
AMA
1.Eşit D. Abū Bakr al-Khaffāf and His Thought of Uṣūl al-Fiqh. ULUM. 2021;4(2):219-243. doi:10.54659/ulum.1051147
Chicago
Eşit, Davut. 2021. “Abū Bakr al-Khaffāf and His Thought of Uṣūl al-Fiqh”. ULUM 4 (2): 219-43. https://doi.org/10.54659/ulum.1051147.
EndNote
Eşit D (01 Aralık 2021) Abū Bakr al-Khaffāf and His Thought of Uṣūl al-Fiqh. ULUM 4 2 219–243.
IEEE
[1]D. Eşit, “Abū Bakr al-Khaffāf and His Thought of Uṣūl al-Fiqh”, ULUM, c. 4, sy 2, ss. 219–243, Ara. 2021, doi: 10.54659/ulum.1051147.
ISNAD
Eşit, Davut. “Abū Bakr al-Khaffāf and His Thought of Uṣūl al-Fiqh”. ULUM 4/2 (01 Aralık 2021): 219-243. https://doi.org/10.54659/ulum.1051147.
JAMA
1.Eşit D. Abū Bakr al-Khaffāf and His Thought of Uṣūl al-Fiqh. ULUM. 2021;4:219–243.
MLA
Eşit, Davut. “Abū Bakr al-Khaffāf and His Thought of Uṣūl al-Fiqh”. ULUM, c. 4, sy 2, Aralık 2021, ss. 219-43, doi:10.54659/ulum.1051147.
Vancouver
1.Davut Eşit. Abū Bakr al-Khaffāf and His Thought of Uṣūl al-Fiqh. ULUM. 01 Aralık 2021;4(2):219-43. doi:10.54659/ulum.1051147