Tez Özeti

The Interaction Between Islamic Legal Methodologies and Social Context in the Light of the Contemporary Practice of Iftā’ A Case Study of two Institutions

Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2 31 Aralık 2020
PDF İndir
EN TR

The Interaction Between Islamic Legal Methodologies and Social Context in the Light of the Contemporary Practice of Iftā’ A Case Study of two Institutions

Öz

The non-binding Islamic legal rulings or opinions (fatwās), which are issued by Muslim scholars or Islamic religious institutions in response to questions of Muslim individuals may be said to represent the most dynamic genre of (past or present) Islamic legal literature. It was traditional case that the practice of iftā’ resided in the individual authority and effort of Muslim scholars. However, after the establishment of national and international Islamic religious institutions at the beginning of the twentieth century, this practice has largely become the responsibility of specific bodies tasked with issuing fatwās from that day to this. Saudi Arabia’s Dār al-Iftā’ (the General Presidency of Scholarly Research and Iftā’) and Turkey’s Diyanet (the Presidency of Religious Affairs) are concrete outcomes of the twentieth century. Both insti-tutions provide an idiosyncratic insight into the practice of iftā’ and more specifically its development and application within two quite different societies. One of the primary concerns of this thesis is there-fore to identify the authority, function and role of the two institutions and their official fatwās in their respective environments.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Islamic law, Diyanet, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Dār al-Iftā’, Fatwā

Destekleyen Kurum

Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı

Kaynakça

  1. Yakar, Emine Enise. The Interaction Between Islamic Legal Methodologies and Social Context in the Light of the Contemporary Practice of Iftā’: A Case Study of Two Institutions. PhD. Dissertation, University of Exeter, Institute of Arab and Islamic Studies, Exeter, United Kingdom, 2018.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Yakar, E. E. (2020). The Interaction Between Islamic Legal Methodologies and Social Context in the Light of the Contemporary Practice of Iftā’ A Case Study of two Institutions. ULUM, 3(2), 481-486. https://doi.org/10.54659/ulum.791150
AMA
1.Yakar EE. The Interaction Between Islamic Legal Methodologies and Social Context in the Light of the Contemporary Practice of Iftā’ A Case Study of two Institutions. ULUM. 2020;3(2):481-486. doi:10.54659/ulum.791150
Chicago
Yakar, Emine Enise. 2020. “The Interaction Between Islamic Legal Methodologies and Social Context in the Light of the Contemporary Practice of Iftā’ A Case Study of two Institutions”. ULUM 3 (2): 481-86. https://doi.org/10.54659/ulum.791150.
EndNote
Yakar EE (01 Aralık 2020) The Interaction Between Islamic Legal Methodologies and Social Context in the Light of the Contemporary Practice of Iftā’ A Case Study of two Institutions. ULUM 3 2 481–486.
IEEE
[1]E. E. Yakar, “The Interaction Between Islamic Legal Methodologies and Social Context in the Light of the Contemporary Practice of Iftā’ A Case Study of two Institutions”, ULUM, c. 3, sy 2, ss. 481–486, Ara. 2020, doi: 10.54659/ulum.791150.
ISNAD
Yakar, Emine Enise. “The Interaction Between Islamic Legal Methodologies and Social Context in the Light of the Contemporary Practice of Iftā’ A Case Study of two Institutions”. ULUM 3/2 (01 Aralık 2020): 481-486. https://doi.org/10.54659/ulum.791150.
JAMA
1.Yakar EE. The Interaction Between Islamic Legal Methodologies and Social Context in the Light of the Contemporary Practice of Iftā’ A Case Study of two Institutions. ULUM. 2020;3:481–486.
MLA
Yakar, Emine Enise. “The Interaction Between Islamic Legal Methodologies and Social Context in the Light of the Contemporary Practice of Iftā’ A Case Study of two Institutions”. ULUM, c. 3, sy 2, Aralık 2020, ss. 481-6, doi:10.54659/ulum.791150.
Vancouver
1.Emine Enise Yakar. The Interaction Between Islamic Legal Methodologies and Social Context in the Light of the Contemporary Practice of Iftā’ A Case Study of two Institutions. ULUM. 01 Aralık 2020;3(2):481-6. doi:10.54659/ulum.791150