Türkiyenin Bölgelerinde Girişimcilik ve Yaratıcı Yıkım

Öz

Girişimcilik faaliyetlerindeki bölgesel farklılıklar, istihdam, inovasyon ve ekonomik kalkınma üzerindeki etkileri nedeniyle araştırmacıların ilgisini çekmiştir. Ampirik veriler, yoğun yeni firma kuruluşu ile karakterize edilen bölgelerin, küçük işletme sektörlerinde daha yüksek istihdam seviyelerine sahip olma eğiliminde olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu çalışma, 2010–2024 döneminde Türkiye’deki on iki NUTS 2 bölgesinde yeni işletme oluşumunun belirleyicilerini ve istihdam üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektedir. Çalışma, çekme (Schumpeterci) ve itme (mülteci veya esnaf) etkilerini birbirinden ayırarak, Türkiye’de girişimciliğe girişin öncelikle fırsat temelli teşviklerden mi yoksa olumsuz işgücü piyasası koşullarından mı kaynaklandığını araştırmaktadır. İşgücü piyasası yaklaşımına dayalı korelasyon analizi ve regresyon modelleri kullanılarak elde edilen bulgular, bölgeler genelinde itme etkilerinin baskın olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Korelasyon sonuçları t ve t+1 zamanlarında Schumpeterci dinamiklerin işaretlerini gösterirken, regresyon tahminleri, çalışma dönemi boyunca işsizlik kaynaklı girişimciliğin firma oluşum modellerini şekillendirmede daha önemli bir rol oynadığını doğrulamaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• girişimcilik
• yeni firm kuruluşu
• çekme/itme etkisi

Entrepreneurship and Creative Destruction in Turkish Regions

Öz

Regional disparities in entrepreneurial activity have attracted research due to their implications for employment, innovation, and economic development. Empirical evidence suggests that regions characterized by intensive new firm formation tend to display higher employment levels within small business sectoral. This study examines the determinants and employment effects of new business formation across twelve NUTS 2 regions in Turkey over the period 2010–2024. Distinguishing pull (Schumpeterian) and push (refugee or shopkeeper) effects, the paper investigates whether entrepreneurial entry in Turkey is primarily driven by opportunity based incentives or by adverse labour market conditions. Using correlation analysis based on labour market approach and regression models, the findings reveal a prevailing dominance of push effects across regions. While correlation results indicate signs of Schumpeterian dynamics at time t and t+1, regression estimations confirm that unemployment induced entrepreneurship plays a more significant role in shaping firm formation patterns during the study period

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Entrepremeurship
• firm entry
• push/pull effect

Kaynakça

1. Abdesselam, Rafik, Jean Bonnet, and Patricia Renou-Maissant..(2014)“Typology of the French Regional Development: Revealing the Refugee versus Schumpeter Effects in New-Firm Start-Ups.” Applied Economics 46 (28): 3437–51. doi:10.1080/00036846.2014.931920.
2. Armington C. and Acs Z. J. (2002) The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation, Regional Studie 36, 33–45. doi:10.1080/00343400120099843.
3. Acs Z.J., Armington C. (2004) The impact of geographic differences in human capital on service firm formation rates, Journal of Urban Economics, Volume 56, Issue 2, Pages 244-278, ISSN 0094-1190, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2004.03.008.
4. Ashcroft B, James H. Love H.J., (1996) Firm Births and Employment Change in the British Counties: 1981–89, Papers in Regional Science, Volume 75, Issue 4, Pages 483-500, ISSN 1056-8190, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5597.1996.tb00675.x.
5. Audretsch D.B. and Fritsch M. (1994) On the Measurement of Entry Rates Empirica 21:105-113
6. Audretsch, David B., and Michael Fritsch(1994) “The Geography of Firm Births in Germany.” Regional Studies 28 (4): 359–65. doi:10.1080/00343409412331348326.
7. Audretsch, D.B.; Carree, M.A.; Thurik, A.R. (2001) : Does Entrepreneurship reduce Unemployment? Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, No. 01-074/3, Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam and Rotterdam
8. Audretsch D.B.,Dohse,D,Niebuhr A. (2014) ‘Regional Unemployment Structure and New Firm Formation’ Kiel Working Papers Kiel Institute for the World Economy No:1924

9. Baptista R, Thurik A.R., (2007) The relationship between entrepreneurship and unemployment: Is Portugal an outlier? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages 75-89, ISSN 0040-1625,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.04.003.
10. R. Baptista and M. T. Preto, (2006) "The Dynamics of Causality between Entrepreneurship and Employment," 2006 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, Singapore, pp. 66-70, doi: 10.1109/ICMIT.2006.262221.
11. Carree, M. A. (2002). Does unemployment affect the number of Establishments? A Regional Analysis for U.S. States. Regional Studies, 36, 389-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400220131151
12. Carree, M., & Dejardin, M. (2020). Firm entry and exit in local markets: ‘Market pull’ or ‘unemployment push’ effects, or both? International Review of Entrepreneurship, 18, 371–386.
13. Çetintaş, H., Bicil, İ. M., & Türköz, K. (2018). Türkiye’de Girişimcilik İle İşsizlik Arasindaki Nedensellik İlişkisi. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 13(2), 124-134.
14. Dilanchiev, Azer (2014) Relationship between Entrepreneurship and Unemployment: The Case of Georgia Journal of Social Sciences 3(2) 5-9
15. Dunne, P., M. J. Roberts and L. Samuelson, (1989) Plant turnover and gross employment flows in the US manufacturing sector, Journal of Labor Economics 7, 48. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=R%26D_expenditure.
16. Fritsch, Michael (1992) “Regional Differences in New Firm Formation: Evidence from West Germany.” Regional Studies 26 (3): 233–41. doi:10.1080/00343409212331346931.
17. Fritsch, M. (1997) New Firms and Regional Employment Change. Small Business Economics 9, 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007942918390
18. Fritsch Michael. (1996) “Turbulence and Growth in West Germany: A Comparison of Evidence by Regions and Industries.” Review of Industrial Organization 11, no. 2 , 231–51. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41803600.
19. Gawel A (2010) “The Relationship between Entrepreneurship and Unemployment in the Business Cycle”, Journal of International Studies, Vol. 3, No 1, pp. 59-69.
20. Gerlach, Knut and Joachim Wagner, (1993) *Gross and Net Employment Flows in Manufacturing Industries', Zeitschrifi fur Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften 113, 17-28.
21. Güner, H. and Korkmaz, A. (2011). “İstihdamın Arttırılmasında Girişimciliğin Önemi: Girişimcilik Destekleme Modeli Olarak İŞGEM’LER”, Çalışma İlişkileri Dergisi, 2(1), s.42-65.
22. Hart, Mark and Eric Hanvey, (1995) 'Job Generation and New and Small Firms: Some Evidence from the Late 1980s', Small Business Economics 7, 97-109.
23. Johnson, P. S., and D. G. Cathcart. (1979) “The Founders of New Manufacturing Firms: A Note on the Size of Their `Incubator’ Plants.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 28, no.2 219–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2098039.
24. Kum, H. and Karacaoğlu, K. (2012), “Relationship Between Entrepreneurship and Unemployment in Turkey: A Dynamic Analysis”. Actual Problems of Economics, 12(138), 399-405
25. Lotti, F., Santarelli, E. & Vivarelli, M. (2003) Does Gibrat's Law hold among young, small firms?. J. Evol. Econ. 13, 213–235 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-003-0153-0
26. Moiz, M., & Ileri, Ş. G. (2025). The Relationship Between Firm Formation and Unemployment: Evidence from Türkiye. Economies, 13(2), Article 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13020028.
27. O’Leary, D. (2022) “Unemployment and Entrepreneurship across High-, Middle- and Low-Performing European Regions.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 9 (1): 571–80. doi:10.1080/21681376.2022.2118072.
28. Reynolds, Paul D. and Wilbur R. Maki, (1990) Business Volatility and Economic Growth (Final Project Report), Minneapolis.
29. Reynolds, Paul D., Brenda Miller, and Wilbur R. Maki (1995). “Explaining Regional Variation in Business Births and Deaths: U.S. 1976-88.” Small Business Economics 7, no.5, 389–407. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40228793.
30. Schumpeter J.A. (1911) The Theory of Economic Development An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit , Interest and the Business Cyle Translated from German by Redvers Opie 1934 available online at https://share.google/YC47fTWJf7SaYhj8z
31. Schumpeter J.A. (1942) Capitalism , Socialism and Democracy publish in the Taylor and Frances e-library 2003 available online at https://share.google/CP8YG1RENGeKWzBgG
32. Storey D.J. (1991)The Birth of New Firms – Does Unemployment Matter? A review of the Evidence Small Business Economics 3:167-178 Thurik R.A. , Carree M.A.,van Stel A., Audretsch D.B.,(2008) Does self-employment reduce unemployment?, Journal of Business Venturing, Volume 23, Issue 6,Pages 673-686, ISSN 0883-9026, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.01.007.
33. Van Stel, A., Thurik, R., Verheul, I., & Baljeu, L. (2007). The relationship between entrepreneurship and unemployment in Japan (No. 07-080/3). Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper.
34. Van Stel van Stel, A., Suddle, K.(2008) The impact of new firm formation on regional development in the Netherlands. Small Bus Econ 30, 31–47 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9054-1
35. Verheul, I., van Stel, A., Thurik, R., & Urbano, D. (2006). The Relationship between Business Ownership and Unemployment in Spain: A Matter of Quantity or Quality? Estudios de Economia Aplicada, 24(2), 105-127.
36. https://www.tobb.org.tr/BilgiErisimMudurlugu/Sayfalar/KurulanKapananSirketistatistikleri.php
37. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/bolgeselistatistik/sorguSayfa.do?target=degisken
38. https://ka.gov.tr/sayfalar/kalkinma-planlamasinda-istatistiki-bolge-birimleri-siniflandirmasi--24