SAĞLIK HİZMETLERİNDE KURUMSAL PERFORMANS YÖNETİMİ VE BİR UYGULAMA

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3, 426 - 442, 30.12.2020

Özlem Güdük Emrah Önder

Öz

Performans yönetimi kurumların başarısında önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Bu nedenle yöneticiler kurumlarının performansını artırmak için çaba sarf etmektedirler. Kurumsal performansı etkileyen bazı faktörler arasında personelin örgütsel bağlılığı, iş tatmini ve devir hızları yer almaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, personelin örgütsel bağlılık (ÖB) ve iş tatmini (İT) düzeyleri ile hastanelerin personel devir hızlarının (PDH) hastanenin kurumsal performansına etkilerini araştırmaktır. Kurumsal performans için kalite, verimlilik ve algılanan kurumsal performans (AKP) düzeyleri incelenmiştir. Hastanelerin yatak kapasitesi, yatak doluluk oranları ve eğitim araştırma hastanesi (EAH) olma durumları kontrol değişkenleri olarak analize dahil edilmiştir. 38 hastane çalışmanın örneklemini oluşturmaktadır. Veriler SPSS v.22 programında analiz edilmiştir.
Bu çalışmada İT ile AKP arasında olumlu yönde ve orta düzeyde anlamlı bir ilişki görülmüştür (p=0,000). İT’de her bir birimlik artış, algılanan AKP düzeyinde %58’lik bir artışa neden olmaktadır (B=0,579). Örgütsel bağlılığın performansa etkisi bulunmamıştır (p>0,05). PDH ile AKP arasında pozitif yönlü ve anlamlı bir ilişki vardır (p=0,046). PDH'da her bir birimlik artış, AKP üzerinde %25’lik bir artış sağlamaktadır (Beta=0,256). EAH olmayanların ortalama verimlilik düzeyi, olan hastanelere göre anlamlı derecede yüksektir (t=1,797, sd=33 ve p=0,041). Verimlilik ve AKP arasında anlamlı ve pozitif yönlü bir korelasyon (p=0,021, r=0,388) bulunmaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kurumsal Performans, Örgütsel Bağlılık, İş Tatmini, Performans Yönetimi, Sağlık Hizmetleri

CORPORATE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES AND AN APPLICATION

Öz

Performance management plays an important role in the success of organizations. Therefore, managers make an effort to increase the performance of their institutions. Among the factors affecting corporate performance are the organizational commitment of the staff, job satisfaction and turnover rates. The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of organizational commitment (OC) and job satisfaction (JS) levels of staff and staff turnover rates (TR) on the institutional performance of the hospital. Quality, efficiency and perceived corporate performance (PCP) levels were examined for corporate performance. The bed capacity, bed occupancy rates and the status of educational research hospital (ERH) of the hospitals were included in the analysis as control variables. The sample consists of 38 public hospitals. The data were analyzed in SPSS v.22 program.
In the study, a positive and moderately significant relationship was observed between JS and PCP (p = 0,000). Each unit increase in JS causes a 58% increase in the PCP level (B = 0.579). Organizational commitment had no effect on performance (p> 0.05). There was a positive and significant relationship between TR and PCP (p = 0.046). Each unit increase in TR provides an increase of 25% on PCP (Beta = 0,256). The average efficiency level of non ERH hospitals was significantly higher than the others (t = 1.797, sd = 33 and p = 0.041). There was a significant and positive correlation between efficiency and PCP (p = 0.021, r = 0.388).

Anahtar Kelimeler

Corporate Performance, Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction, Performance Management, Healthcare Services

Kaynakça

• Abdullah, D. F. ve Sofian, S. (2012). The relationship between intellectual capital and corporate performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 537-541.
• Adair, C. E., Simpson, E., Casebeer, A. L., Birdsell, J. M., Hayden, K. A. ve Lewis, S. (2006). Performance measurement in healthcare: part I–concepts and trends from a state of the science review. Healthcare Policy, 1(4), 85.
• Agus, A. (2001). A linear structural modelling of total quality management practices in manufacturing companies in Malaysia. Total Quality Management, 12(5), 561-573.
• Alatawi, M. A. (2017). Can transformational managers control turnover intention?. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(1), 1-6.
• Al-dalahmeh, M., Khalaf, R. ve Obeidat, B. (2018). The effect of employee engagement on organizational performance via the mediating role of job satisfaction: The case of IT employees in Jordanian banking sector. Modern Applied Science, 12(6), 17-43.
• Alexander, J. A., Bloom, J. R. ve Nuchols, B. A. (1994). Nursing turnover and hospital efficiency: an organization‐level analysis. Industrial relations: a journal of economy and society, 33(4), 505-520.
• Alsharari, Y. S., bin Aziz, F. S., Taib, C. A. B., ve Yusoff, R. Z. (2018). The Impact of Attitudes towards Healthcare Service Quality on Organisational Performance: Evidence from the Saudi Arabia.5(1),1-12.
• Altaş, S. S. ve Çekmecelioğlu, H. G. (2015). Örgütsel adalet algısının iş tatmini, örgütsel bağlılık ve iş performansı üzerindeki etkileri: Okul öncesi öğretmenleri üzerinde bir araştırma. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 29(3), 421-439.
• Ateş, H., Kırılmaz, H. ve Aydın, S. (2007). Sağlık Sektöründe Performans Yönetimi Türkiye Örneği (1. Baskı). Ankara: Asil.
• Bakotic, D. (2016). Relationship between job satisfaction and organisational performance. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 29(1), 118-130.
• Baycan, A. (1985). An analysis of the several aspects of job satisfaction between different occupational groups. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi SBE Doktora Tezi, İstanbul.
• Brah, S. A., Li Wong, J., ve Madhu Rao, B. (2000). TQM and business performance in the service sector: a Singapore study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(11), 1293-1312.
• Brah, S. A., ve Ying Lim, H. (2006). The effects of technology and TQM on the performance of logistics companies. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 36(3), 192-209.
• Buchan, J. (2010). Reviewing the benefits of health workforce stability. Human resources for health, 8(1), 29.
• Chamanifard, R., Nikpour, A., ve Chamanifard, S. (2015). The effect of social capital on organizational performance: The mediating role of employee’s job satisfaction. International Review of Management and Business Research, 4(3), 853-860.
• Chang, W. J. A. ve Huang, T. C. (2010). The impact of human resource capabilities on internal customer satisfaction and organisational effectiveness. Total Quality Management, 21(6), 633-648.
• Cole, L. E. ve Cole, M. S. (2005). Employee satisfaction and organisational performance: A summary of key findings from applied psychology. Retrieved September, 2(2011), 1-11.
• Dalton, D. R. ve Todor, W. D. (1979). Turnover turned over: An expanded and positive perspective. Academy of management review, 4(2), 225-235.
• Dow, D., Samson, D. ve Ford, S. (1999). Exploding the myth: do all quality management practices contribute to superior quality performance?. Production and operations management, 8(1),1-27.
• Ferguson, K. L. ve Reio Jr, T. G. (2010). Human resource management systems and firm performance. Journal of Management Development, 29(5), 471-494.
• Gümüş, S. (2012). Motivasyonun Örgütsel Bağlılığa ve Performansa Etkisi (Vol. 51). İstanbul: Hiperlink Eğit. İlet. Yay. San. Tic. ve Ltd. Şti.
• Hayes, L. J., O’Brien-Pallas, L., Duffield, C., Shamian, J., Buchan, J., Hughes, F., ... & North, N. (2012). Nurse turnover: a literature review–an update. International journal of nursing studies, 49(7), 887-905.
• Hefty, T. R. (1969). Returns to scale in hospitals: a critical review of recent research. Health Services Research, 4(4), 267.
• Jones, M. K., Jones, R. J., Latreille, P. L. ve Sloane, P. J. (2009). Training, job satisfaction, and workplace performance in Britain: Evidence from WERS 2004. Labour, 23, 139-175.
• Karaman, R. (2009). İşletmelerde performans ölçümünün önemi ve modern bir performans ölçme aracı olarak balanced scorecard. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(16), 410-427.
• Katou, A. A. ve Budhwar, P. S. (2010). Causal relationship between HRM policies and organisational performance: Evidence from the Greek manufacturing sector. European management journal, 28(1), 25-39.
• Khanka, S. S. (2006). Organisational Behaviour. S. India: Chand Publishing.
• Kim, S. (2004). Individual-level factors and organizational performance in government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2), 245-261.
• Koç, T. (2011). The relationship between TQM and performance in SMEs: the mediation effect of failure. International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Theory, Applications and Practice, 18(4), 203-218.
• Koçel, T. (2015). İşletme Yöneticiliği 16. Baskı. İstanbul: Beta Yayınevi.
• Koparal, C. (ed). (2004). Yönetim Organizasyon. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Açıköğretim Fakültesi.
• La Forgia, G. M. ve Couttolenc, B. F. (2008). Hospital Performance in Brazil The Search for Excellence. Washington: The Word Bank.
• Latif, M. S., Ahmad, M., Qasim, M., Mushtaq, M., Ferdoos, A., ve Naeem, H. (2013). Impact of employee’s job satisfaction on organizational performance. European Journal of Business and Management, 5(5), 166-171.
• Martins, H., ve Proença, T. (2012). Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire– Psychometric properties and validation in a population of Portuguese hospital workers. FEP Journal–Economics & Management: Working Paper, 471, 123.
• Miyagawa, M., ve Yoshida, K. (2010). TQM practices of Japanese-owned manufacturers in the USA and China. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 27(7), 736-755.
• Nayar, P. ve Ozcan, Y. A. (2008). Data envelopment analysis comparison of hospital efficiency and quality. Journal of medical systems, 32(3), 193-199.
• Özcan, A. P. D. I., Aba, A. P. D. G., ve Ateş, M. (2016). Hemşirelerin örgütsel bağlılık düzeyinin ve iş doyumunun beklenen personel devir hızı üzerine etkisi. Sağlık Ekonomisi, 4, 465-70.
• Papanicolas, I, ve Smith, P. C. (Ed.) (2013). Health System Performans Comparison An Agenda for Policy, Information and Research.
• European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Series. Open University Press. The USA.
• Park, T. Y. ve Shaw, J. D. (2013). Turnover rates and organizational performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 98(2), 268-309.
• Pinho, J. C., Rodrigues, A. P., & Dibb, S. (2014). The role of corporate culture, market orientation and organisational commitment in organisational performance. Journal of Management Development.
• Porter, M. (2010). What is value in health care? The New England Journal of Medicine, 363 (26), 2477-2481.
• Powell, M., Dawson, J., Topakas, A., Durose, J. ve Fewtrell, C. (2014). Staff Satisfaction and OrganisationalPerformance: Evidence From a Longitudinal Secondary Analysis of The NHS Staff Survey andOutcome Data. Health Serv Deliv Res 2(50).
• Roh, C. Y., Jae Moon, M. ve Jung, C. (2010). Measuring performance of US nonprofit hospitals: do size and location matter?. Public Performance & Management Review, 34(1), 22-37.
• Russo, A. T. (2000). Minimizing Employee Turnover by Focusing on the New Hire Process. Universal-Publishers. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). North Central University, Arizona.
• Samwel, J. O. (2018). Effect Of Job Satisfaction on Employees’ Commitment and Organizational Performance - Study of Solar Energy Companies in Lakezone Regions, Tanzania. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management. 6(4) 823-835.
• Scuffham, P. A., Devlin, N. J. ve Jaforullah, M. (1996). The structure of costs and production in New Zealand public hospitals: and application of the transcendental logarithmic vaiable cost funcation. Applied Economics, 28(1), 75-85.
• Shaw, J. D., Gupta, N. ve Delery, J. E. (2005). Alternative conceptualizations of the relationship between voluntary turnover and organizational performance. Academy of management journal, 48(1), 50-68.
• Smith, P. C., Mossialos, E., Papanicolas, I. ve Leatherman, S. (2009). Performance Measurement for Health System Improvement Experiences, Challenges and Prospects. the UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Sur, H. ve Palteki, T. (Ed.).(2013). Hastane Yönetimi. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri.
• Torlak, N. G., Kuzey, C. ve Ragom, M. (2018). Human resource management, commitment and performance links in Iran and Turkey. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(9), 1994-2017.
• Vigoda-Gadot, E. ve Drory, A. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of Organizational Politics. The UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Wasti, S. A. (2000). Meyer ve Allen’in üç boyutlu örgütsel bağlılık ölçeğinin geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik analizi. 8. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi, 25-27.
• West, M., ve Dawson, J. (2012). Employee engagement and NHS performance. London: King's Fund.
• Wilson, P. W. ve Carey, K. (2004). Nonparametric analysis of returns to scale in the US hospital industry. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19(4), 505-524.
• Yücel, İ. ve Koçak, D. (2015). Örgüt Kültürü, Personel Güçlendirme ve Örgütsel Bağlılık. Türkiye: Eğitim Yayınevi.
• Zhu, C. J., Cooper, B. K., Thomson, S. B., De Cieri, H. ve Zhao, S. (2013). Strategic integration of HRM and firm performance in a changing environment in China: the impact of organisational effectiveness as a mediator. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(15), 2985-3001.