Comparison of Unforced Errors during Competition of U17 and U19 Male National Badminton Players'

Öz

In this study, it is aimed to compare the unforced errors of the U17 and U19 male national badminton players during the competition. 18 male badminton players from the U19 category (age average 17,39±0,50) and 20 male badminton players from the U17 category (age average 15,52±0,51) participated in the study voluntarily. For simple error analysis, 35 men single matches in the U19 category and 31 men single matches in the U17 category were evaluated. Unforced errors were recorder in the unforced error table as TE ( error in total), TPL (total point lost), ETLPP (unforced error percentage of the total number lost ),  EFC (error in front court), EMC (error in mid court), EBC (error in back court), AEFC ( aut error in front court), AEMC (aut error in mid court), AEBC (aut error in back court), TAE ( aut error in total), NEFC ( net error in front court), NEMC (net error in mid court), NEBC (net error in back court), TNE ( net error in total). During the competition, the matches of the research group were followed and unforced errors were made in the unforced error analysis table according to the region where they were made. All data were collected using simple error analysis table. The obtained data were transferred to the SPSS 22 packet program and the minimum, maximum, mean and standard deviation values for the descriptive statistics were calculated. Mann Withney U test was used to analyze the difference between the categories and the winner and the loser. There was a significant difference between the TPL (p<0.05), TE, TAE and AEMC values of the winners and loser in the U19 category (p <0.05). There was a significant difference between the TPL values of the winners and the losers in the U17 category (p <0.01). As a result, in the U19 group, the athletes in the mid-court area and in total fewer out-of-mistakes ended up winning the competition.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Badminton,unforced error,national,competition

U17 ve U19 Erkek Milli Badmintoncuların Müsabaka Ortamında Yaptıkları Basit Hataların Karşılaştırılması

Öz

Bu çalışmada 17 ve 19 yaş grubu erkek milli badmintoncuların maç ortamında yaptıkları basit hataların karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmaya, U19 kategorisinden yaş ortalaması 17,39±0,50 yıl olan 18 ve U17 kategorisinden yaş ortalaması 15,52±0,51 yıl olan 21 erkek milli Badminton oyuncusu gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. Basit hata analizi için U19 kategorisinde 35 tek erkek maçı ve U17 kategorisinde 31 tek erkek maçı değerlendirilmiştir. Basit hatalar, TH (toplamda yapılan basit hata), KTS (kaybedilen toplam sayı), BKTSY (basit hataların kaybedilen toplam sayıdaki yüzdesi), HÖK (hata ön kort), HOK (hata orta kort), HAK (hata arka kort), HAÖK (hata aut ön kort), HAOK (hata aut orta kort), HAAK (hata aut arka kort), TAH (toplamda aut hatası), HFÖK (hata file ön kort), HFOK (hata file orta kort), HFAK (hata file arka kort), TFH (Toplamda File Hatası) olarak basit hata analiz tablosuna kaydedilmiştir. Elde edilen veriler SPSS 22 paket programına aktarılmış ve tanımlayıcı istatistikleri için minimum, maksimum, ortalama ve standart sapma değerleri hesaplanmıştır. Kategoriler arası ve kazanan ve kazanamayan sporcular arası hatalara ait farkın analizi için Mann Withney U testi kullanılmıştır. U17 ve U19 yaş gruplarının yaptıkları tüm basit hata değerleri benzer bulunmuştur (p>0.05). U17 kategorisinde kazanan ve kazanamanyan sporcuların KTS değerleri arasında anlamlı fark bulunmuştur (p<0.01). U19 kategorisinde kazanan ve kazanamanyan sporcuların KTS (p<0.01), TH, TAH ve HAOK değerleri arasında anlamlı fark bulunmuştur (p<0.05). Çalışma sonucunda, U19 grubunda, orta kort bölgesinde aut hatası (HAOK), toplamda aut hatası (TAH) ve toplam hata (TH) değerleri daha az olan sporcuların müsabakaları galip olarak bitirdikleri bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Badminton,Basit hata,Milli,müsabaka

Kaynakça

1. Abian, P., Castanedo, A., Feng, XQ., & Abian-Vicen, J. (2014). Notational comparison of men’s singles badminton matches between Olympic Games in Beijing and London. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 14(1), 42-53.
2. Abian-Vicen, J., Castanedo, A., Abian, P., & Sampedro, J. (2013). Temporal and notational comparison of badminton matches between men’s singles and women’s singles. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 13(2), 310-320.
3. Butterworth, DA., Turner, J.D., & Johnstone, A.J. (2017). Coaches’ perceptions of the potential use of performance analysis in badminton. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 12(2), 452-467.
4. BWF. (2011). BWF coaches’ manual level 1, Badminton World Federation, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
5. Cabello-Manrique, D., & González-Badillo, J.J. (2003). Analysis of the characteristics of competitive badminton. British journal of sports medicine, 37(1), 62-66.
6. Chiminazzo, J.G.C., Barreira, J., Luz, L.S.M., Saraiva, W.C., & Cayres J.T. (2018). Technical and timing characteristics of badminton men’s single: comparison between groups and play-offs stages in 2016 Rio Olympic Games. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 18(2), 245-254.
7. Cosan, F., ve Demir, G. (2016). Sporda atletik hazırlığın denetimi ve değerlendirilmesinde yenilikçi yaklaşımlar. Razgrat-Bulgaria: Razgrat-polygraph Ltd.
8. Cümşütoğlu, R.M. ve Kale, R. (1994). Uçan tüytop badminton. İstanbul: Başak Ofset. .

9. Hotaman, F., Özgür, B. ve Coşan, F. (2018). 17 yaş grubu milli badmintoncuların müsabaka sırasında yaptıkları basit hatalar ile fiziksel performansları arasındaki ilişki, Spor Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), (1), 73-84.
10. Laffaye, G., Phomsoupha, M., & Dor, F. (2015). Changes in the game characteristics of a badminton match: a longitudinal study through the olympic game finals analysis in men’s singles. J Sports Sci Med, 14(3), 584–590.
11. Larsen, K. (2006). Badminton europe coach education level one. Denmark: Broendby.
12. Ming, C.L., Keong, C.C., & Ghosh, A.K. (2008). Time motion and notational analysis of 21 point and 15 point badminton match play. International journal of sports science and engineering, 2(4), 216-222.
13. Omveer. (2017). A study on prediction of playing ability in badminton from selected anthropometrical physical and physiological characteristics among inter collegiate players. International Journal of Advanced Research and Development, 2(5), 50-54.
14. S, M. (2016). Relative importance of anthropometric biomotor and skill performance to playing ability of college badminton players. International journal of physical education, sports and health, 3(2), 156-158.
15. Tong, Y.M., & Hong, Y. (2000). The playing pattern of world’s top single badminton players. In Youlian H, DP Johns, R Sanders (Eds). 18th International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports (p, 1-6). Hong Kong.
16. Yadav, S.K., & Shukla, Y.M. (2011). Analysis of unforced errors in relation to performance in singles in badminton. International Journal of Physical Education, 4(2), 117-119.