Cultural Analytics of Non-Pictorial Data: A Layered Representation Model

Öz

Cultural analytics visualizes units that are already visual media objects. For data lacking pictorial correspondence, the transition from statistical pattern to perceptible representation remains underexplored. Drawing on Drucker’s concept of ‘capta’, the study proposes a gradual model from abstract numerical value to concrete spatial context. Using a practice-based research design, the model was tested on Sentinel-2-derived NDVI, NDBI, and GLCM metrics across eight faculty areas at Dokuz Eylül University Main Campus. Non-parametric analyses revealed clear distributional divergence. Spatial dependence was assessed with Moran’s I, and the divergence across faculty areas persisted under a spatially constrained permutation test. Its visual counterpart is an open-access HTML5 Canvas and D3.js interface, structured around three representation layers and four viewing modes. The model positions the researcher’s design decisions as constitutive components of representation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• cultural analytics
• data visualization
• new media
• capta
• information design

Etik Beyan

I hereby declare that this study has been prepared in accordance with research and publication ethics, that it does not involve any process requiring ethics committee approval, and that all sources used have been cited in accordance with the principles of scholarly citation.

Piktoral Olmayan Verilerin Kültürel Analitiği: Katmanlı Bir Temsil Modeli

Öz

Kültürel analitik görselleştirmeleri, analiz biriminin görsel bir medya nesnesi olması üzerine kuruludur. Piktoral karşılıktan yoksun verilerde istatistiksel örüntü ile algılanabilir temsil arasındaki yapısal geçiş, görselleştirme yazınında yeterince ele alınmamıştır. Drucker’ın ‘capta’ kavramından hareket eden çalışma, soyut sayısal değerden somut mekânsal bağlama uzanan kademeli bir temsil modeli önermektedir. Pratiğe dayalı araştırma tasarımıyla geliştirilen model, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Merkez Kampüsü'ndeki sekiz fakülte alanında Sentinel-2 türevli NDVI, NDBI ve GLCM metrikleriyle sınanmıştır. Parametrik olmayan analizler fakülteler arasında belirgin dağılımsal ayrışma göstermiştir. Mekânsal bağımlılık Moran’s I ile değerlendirilmiş, mekânsal kısıtlı permütasyon testinde fakülteler arası ayrışma korunmuştur. Ampirik zeminin fotografik karşılığı, HTML5 Canvas ve D3.js tabanlı açık erişimli arayüzde üç temsil katmanı ve dört görüntüleme modu olarak kurulmuştur. Önerilen model, araştırmacının tasarım kararlarını temsilin kurucu bileşenleri olarak konumlandırmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• kültürel analitik
• veri görselleştirme
• yeni medya
• capta
• bilgi tasarımı

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışmanın araştırma ve yayın etiğine uygun olarak hazırlandığını, çalışma kapsamında etik kurul onayı gerektiren bir süreç bulunmadığını ve kullanılan tüm kaynaklara bilimsel atıf ilkeleri doğrultusunda yer verildiğini beyan ederim.

Kaynakça

1. Bennett, M. M., Chen, J. K., Alvarez León, L. F., & Gleason, C. J. (2022). The politics of pixels: A review and agenda for critical remote sensing. Progress in Human Geography, 46(3), 729-752. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325221074691
2. Bivand, R. S., Pebesma, E., & Gómez-Rubio, V. (2013). Applied spatial data analysis with R (2. baskı). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7618-4
3. Bostock, M., Ogievetsky, V., & Heer, J. (2011). D3: Data-driven documents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12), 2301-2309. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.185
4. Candy, L., & Edmonds, E. (2018). Practice-based research in the creative arts: Foundations and futures from the front line. Leonardo, 51(1), 63-69. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_01471
5. Copernicus Sentinel-2. (2021). MSI Level-2A BOA Reflectance Product: Collection 1 [Veri seti; ESA tarafından işlenmiştir]. European Space Agency. https://doi.org/10.5270/S2_-znk9xsj
6. Çakmak, E., Jäckle, D., Schreck, T., Keim, D. A., & Fuchs, J. (2022). Multiscale visualization: A structured literature analysis. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 28(12), 4918-4929. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3109387
7. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi. (2026). Dokuz Eylül University sustainability report 2025-2026. https://greencampus.deu.edu.tr/tr/surdurulebilirlik-hakkinda/deu-surdurulebilirlik-raporu/ adresinden erişilmiştir.
8. Drucker, J. (2014). Graphesis: Visual forms of knowledge production. Harvard University Press.

9. Giuliani, G., Petri, E., Interwies, E., Vysna, V., Guigoz, Y., Ray, N., & Dickie, I. (2021). Modelling accessibility to urban green areas using open Earth observations data: A novel approach to support the urban SDG in four European cities. Remote Sensing, 13(3), 422. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030422
10. Google Earth Engine. (2024, 30 Mayıs). Resampling and reducing resolution. Google for Developers. 6 Haziran 2026 tarihinde https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/guides/resample adresinden erişilmiştir.
11. Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., & Moore, R. (2017). Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 202, 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031
12. Haralick, R. M., Shanmugam, K., & Dinstein, I. (1973). Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-3(6), 610-621. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314
13. Hochman, N., & Manovich, L. (2013). Zooming into an Instagram city: Reading the local through social media. First Monday, 18(7). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i7.4711
14. İncekara, A. H., Başaran, E. Y., & Şeker, D. Z. (2022). The potential contribution of remotely sensed images for GreenMetric ranking. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 9(4), 138-150. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.1141366
15. Jofre, A., Berardi, V., Bennett, C., Reale, M., & Cole, J. (2020). Faces extracted from Time Magazine 1923-2014 [Veri seti]. Journal of Cultural Analytics, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.12265
16. Kassambara, A. (2023). rstatix: Pipe-friendly framework for basic statistical tests (Sürüm 0.7.2) [R paketi]. CRAN. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rstatix
17. Loke, T., Teramoto, Y., Camargo, C. Q., & Eccles, K. (2022). Heritage site-seeing through the visitor’s lens on Instagram. Journal of Cultural Analytics, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.38966
18. Manovich, L. (2011). What is visualisation? Visual Studies, 26(1), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2011.548488
19. ━━━━━━. (2020). Cultural analytics. MIT Press.
20. Ogle, D. H., Doll, J. C., Wheeler, A. P., & Dinno, A. (2023). FSA: Simple fisheries stock assessment methods (Sürüm 0.9.5) [R paketi]. CRAN. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=FSA
21. Pebesma, E. (2018). Simple features for R: Standardized support for spatial vector data. The R Journal, 10(1), 439-446. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-009
22. Perlin, K., & Fox, D. (1993). Pad: An alternative approach to the computer interface. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques içinde (ss. 57-64). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/166117.166125
23. R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
24. Ravina, M. (2023). Algorithmic maps and the political geography of early-modern Japan. Journal of Cultural Analytics, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.84860
25. Rouse, J. W., Haas, R. H., Schell, J. A., & Deering, D. W. (1974). Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. S. C. Freden, E. P. Mercanti, & M. A. Becker (Ed.), Third Earth Resources Technology Satellite-1 Symposium: Technical presentations, Volume I, Section A içinde (ss. 309-317). National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
26. Shneiderman, B. (1996). The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages içinde (ss. 336-343). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/VL.1996.545307
27. Skains, R. L. (2018). Creative practice as research: Discourse on methodology. Media Practice and Education, 19(1), 82-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/14682753.2017.1362175
28. Tomczak, M., & Tomczak, E. (2014). The need to report effect size estimates revisited: An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. Trends in Sport Sciences, 21(1), 19-25.
29. Vitale, V. (2023). Searching maps by words: How machine learning changes the way we explore map collections. Journal of Cultural Analytics, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.74293
30. Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis (2. baskı). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4
31. Wigard, J., Arnold, T., & Tilton, L. (2023). Understanding Peanuts and Schulzian symmetry: Panel detection, caption detection, and gag panels in 17,897 comic strips through distant viewing. Journal of Cultural Analytics, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.87560
32. Yedekçi, B. (2026). DEU Main Campus Environmental Analytics Reproducibility Package (Sürüm v1) [Veri seti]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20548068
33. Yedekçi, B., & Boztepe Mutlu, P. (2026). Toprak kromatografisi baskı yöntemi ve fotoğraf sanatı etkileşimi. Art-e Sanat Dergisi, (37), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.21602/sduarte.1663075
34. Zha, Y., Gao, J., & Ni, S. (2003). Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(3), 583-594. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160304987