Development of a Speaking Self-Efficacy Scale in the Context of Teaching Turkish to Foreigners

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1 , 116 - 141 , 27.04.2026

Hasan Hüseyin Mutlu , Enes Çinpolat

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19323861

https://izlik.org/JA67NJ27HZ

Öz

The aim of this study is to develop a new scale to assess the speaking self-efficacy of foreign students learning Turkish. The scale’s item pool was formed based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages and the B1 and B2 level outcomes of the Türkiye Maarif Foundation Turkish as a Foreign Language Teaching Curriculum. The items were refined in line with the opinions of field experts and a pilot study. Subsequently, data collection with a large sample was conducted. A total of 435 international students studying at Turkish language teaching centers at various Turkish universities participated in the study. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM) analyses confirmed the two-factor structure of the scale (oral interaction and oral production). EFA was performed on the first sample (n = 192), while CFA was conducted on the second sample (n = 243). For the ESEM analysis, as well as for reliability, criterion validity, and measurement invariance analyses, the combined dataset (n = 435) was used. Convergent validity was analyzed using AVE and CR coefficients. Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s Omega values indicating the scale’s internal consistency were found to be high. Additionally, the scale demonstrated measurement invariance between gender and language level groups, particularly about its structure. Criterion validity analyses revealed significant positive relationships between speaking self-efficacy and willingness to speak Turkish. Consequently, the developed scale can be considered a valid and reliable instrument for use in the field of teaching Turkish to foreigners.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Factor analysis , scale development , speaking self-efficacy , teaching Turkish to foreigners , validity and reliability

Etik Beyan

Ordu University Educational Research Ethics Committee, Date: 25.03.2025, Number: 2025-53

Yabancılara Türkçe Öğretimi Bağlamında Konuşma Öz Yeterliği Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi

https://izlik.org/JA67NJ27HZ

Öz

Araştırmada Türkçe öğrenen yabancı öğrencilerin konuşma öz yeterliklerini değerlendirmek amacıyla yeni bir ölçek geliştirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Ölçeğin madde havuzu, Diller İçin Avrupa Ortak Başvuru Metni ve Türkiye Maarif Vakfı Türkçenin Yabancı Dil Olarak Öğretimi Programı B1 ve B2 seviyesi kazanımları temel alınarak oluşturulmuştur. Alan uzmanlarının görüşleri ve pilot uygulama ile madde havuzuna son şekli verilmiştir. Böylelikle geniş örneklemle uygulamaya geçilmiştir. Araştırmaya, Türkiye’deki çeşitli üniversitelerin Türkçe öğretim merkezlerinde öğrenim gören toplam 435 uluslararası öğrenci katılmıştır. Açımlayıcı faktör analizi (AFA), doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) ve açımlayıcı yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (AYEM) analizleri ile ölçeğin iki faktörlü yapısı (sözlü etkileşim ve sözlü üretim) doğrulanmıştır. AFA, 192 kişilik birinci örneklemde yapılırken DFA ise 243 kişilik ikinci örneklemle yürütülmüştür. AYEM’de güvenirlikte, ölçüt geçerliğinde ve ölçüm değişmezliğinde de iki örneklemin birleştirilmesiyle elde edilen 435 kişilik örneklem kullanılmıştır. Yakınsak geçerliği AVE ve CR katsayıları ile incelenmiştir. Ölçeğin iç tutarlığını belirten Cronbach Alfa ve McDonald Omega değerleri yüksek bulunmuştur. Ayrıca ölçeğin cinsiyet ve dil seviyesi grupları arasında özellikle yapı açısından ölçüm değişmezliğini sağladığı görülmüştür. Ölçüt geçerliği analizleri sonucunda konuşma öz yeterliği ile Türkçe iletişim kurma istekliliği arasında anlamlı pozitif ilişkiler belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak geliştirilen ölçeğin yabancılara Türkçe öğretimi alanında kullanılabilecek güvenilir ve geçerli bir ölçme aracı olduğu ortaya konmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Faktör analizi , geçerlik ve güvenirlik , konuşma öz yeterliği , ölçek geliştirme , yabancılara Türkçe öğretimi

Etik Beyan

Ordu Üniversitesi Eğitim Araştırmaları Etik Kurulu, Tarih: 25.03.2025, Sayı: 2025-53

Kaynakça

• Aksan, Y., Aksan, M., Mersinli, U., & Demirhan, U. (2017). A frequency dictionary of Turkish. Routledge.
• American Educational Research Association. (2011). Code of ethics. Web: https://www.aera.net/About-AERA/AERA-Rules-Policies/Professional-Ethics adresinden 14 Mayıs 2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
• American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association.
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 397-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008204
• Avrupa Konseyi. (2021). Diller için Avrupa ortak başvuru metni: Öğrenme, öğretme ve değerlendirme - Tamamlayıcı cilt (S. Çelik, Y. Kırkgöz, D. Çopur, P. İrgin ve Ş. Erbay Çetinkaya, Çev.). T.C. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. (Orijinal eserin yayın tarihi 2020).
• Bandura A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-hall.
• Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
• Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for creating self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307-337). IAP-Information Age Publishing.
• Brown H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. Pearson Education.
• Cervone, D. (2000). Thinking about self-efficacy. Behavior Modification, 24(1), 30-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500241002
• Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
• Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
• Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
• Çinpolat, E., Mutlu, H. H., & Uygur, M. E. (2024). Türkçenin yabancı dil olarak öğretimi bağlamında iletişim kurma istekliliği: Ölçek uyarlama çalışması. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 22(3), 1954-1972. https://doi.org/10.37217/tebd.1547814
• de Jong, N. H. (2023). Assessing second language speaking proficiency. Annual Review of Linguistics, 9, 541-560. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030521-052114
• de Jong, N. H., Steinel, M. P., Florijn, A. F., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2012). Facets of speaking proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(1), 5-34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263111000489
• Elahi Shirvan, M., Khajavy, G.H., MacIntyre, P.D., & Taheiran (2019). A meta-analysis of l2 willingness to communicate and its three high-evidence correlates. J Psycholinguist Res, 48, 1241-1267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09656-9
• Gan, Z., Yan, Z., & An, Z. (2022). Development and validation of an EFL speaking self-efficacy scale in the self-regulated learning context. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 19(1), 35–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2022.19.1.3.35
• Goetze, J., & Driver, M. (2022). Is learning really just believing? A meta-analysis of self-efficacy and achievement in SLA. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(2), 233-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.2.4
• González, V. (2001). The role of socioeconomic and sociocultural factors in language minority children’s development: An ecological research view. Bilingual Research Journal, 25(1-2), 1-30.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
• Harris, J. (2022). Measuring listening and speaking self-efficacy in EFL contexts: The development of the Communicative SE Questionnaire. Language Teaching Research, 29(3), 1210-1234. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221091608 (Original work published 2025)
• Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 191-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104263675
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejbrm/article/view/1224
• Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447
• Kimberlin, C. L., & Winterstein, A. G. (2008). Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. American journal of health-system pharmacy, 65(23), 2276-2284.
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford publications.
• Kodden, B. (2020). The importance of sustainable development. In, The art of sustainable performance. springer briefs in business (pp. 1-8). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46463-9_1
• Kurudayıoğlu, M. ve Güngör, H. (2017). Yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğrenenlerin konuşma öz yeterliklerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim (TEKE) Dergisi, 6(2), 1105-1121. https://doi.org/10.7884/teke.3858
• Leeming, P. (2017). A longitudinal investigation into English speaking self-efficacy in a Japanese language classroom. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-017-0035-x
• Lindley, L. D. (2006). The paradox of self-efficacy: Research with diverse populations. Journal of Career Assessment, 14(1), 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072705281371
• MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545-562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x
• Maddux, J. E. (1995). Self-efficacy theory: An introduction. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 3–33). Plenum Press.
• Margolis, H., & McCabe, P. P. (2004). Self-efficacy: A key to improving the motivation of struggling learners. The Clearing House, 77(6), 241-249. https://doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.77.6.241-249
• Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J., Parker, P. D., & Kaur, G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual review of clinical psychology, 10, 85-110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700
• Mei, L., & Masoumeh, A. (2017). An analysis of factors influencing learners’ English speaking skill. International Journal of Research in English Education, 2(1), 34-41. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.ijree.2.1.34
• Mills, N. (2014). Self-efficacy in second language acquisition. In S. Mercer & M. Williams (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA (pp. 6-26). Multilingual Matters.
• Millsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. Routledge.
• Ocak, G., & Olur, B. (2018). The scale development study on foreign language speaking self-efficacy perception. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 3(1), 50-60. https://zenodo.org/records/1170932
• Pajares, F. (1996). Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543
• Sallabaş, M. E. (2013). Türkçeyi yabancı dil olarak öğrenenler için konuşma öz yeterlik ölçeği: Geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (36), 261-270.
• Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_2
• Schunk, D. H. (1995). Self-efficacy and education and instruction. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 281-303). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6868-5_10
• Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 15-31). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50003-6
• Sevim, O. ve Varışoğlu, B. (2023). Türkçe öğrenen yabancı öğrenciler için üretici dil becerisi öz yeterlilik ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Firat University Journal of Social Sciences, 33(1), 187-202. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.1214107
• Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240-261. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.240
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Tavşancıl, E. (2014). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi (5. Baskı). Nobel Yayınevi.
• Turanlı, A. (2007). Yabancı dil öğrencilerinin sözel katılımını etkileyen etmenler ve algılanan etki düzeyleri (Öğrenci ve öğretmen algıları). Eğitim ve Bilim, 32(146), 39-53.
• Türkiye Maarif Vakfı. (2020). Türkçenin yabancı dil olarak öğretimi programı (2. baskı). Matsis Matbaa.
• Wang, C., & Sun, T. (2020). Relationship between self-efficacy and language proficiency: A meta-analysis. System, 95, 102366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102366
• Wang, C., Kim, D.-H., Bai, R., & Hu, J. (2014). Psychometric properties of a self-efficacy scale for English language learners in China. System, 44, 24-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.01.015
• Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00136
• Zhang, X., Ardasheva, Y., Egbert, J., & Ullrich-French, S. C. (2019). Building assessments for self-efficacy in English public speaking in China. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(5), 411-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00441-9
• Zhou, L., Xi, Y., & Lochtman, K. (2020). The relationship between second language competence and willingness to communicate: the moderating effect of foreign language anxiety. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 44(2), 129-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1801697