Effects of manufacturing defects on thermoformed product quality

Yıl 2014, , 61 - 68, 27.07.2014

Olcay Ekşi Ertuğrul Selçuk Erdoğan -

https://doi.org/10.12748/uujms.201416501

Öz

In this study, 5% and 15% in weight carbon fiber reinforced polypropylene (PP) sheets were formed under appropriate vacuum and temperature conditions by using truncated cone-shaped thermoforming mold. In addition to this, 5% in weight glass fiber reinforced High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) sheets were formed using truncated cone-shaped, cylindrical, and cubic shaped thermoforming molds by thermoforming. Composite sheets used in this work were produced with a laboratory-type plastic extruder which has a screw diameter of 50 mm. In production of HDPE composite sheets, as a reinforcing material, chopped glass fibers (E-glass) which were provided from glass fiber manufacturer SISECAM A.S. Company were used. Using the same procedure PP (Borealis BE50-7032) thermoplastic granules were used as a matrix material in production of carbon fiber composite sheets. In carbon fiber reinforced sheets, chopped fibers were added during manufacturing. After thermoforming, composite semi-products were examined by visual inspection. Visual defects that affect product quality were obtained. Also carbon fiber distribution was investigated on different sections which were taken from the thermoformed semi-products by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Through this experimental study, it is aimed to investigate the effect of defects during plastic extrusion on thermoformed product quality.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Polypropylene (PP), High Density Polyethylene (HDPE), glass fiber, carbon fiber, thermoforming

Kaynakça

• Throne JL. Thermoforming, Hanser Publishers, Munich, 1987.
• Throne JL. Technology of Thermoforming, Hanser&Gardner Publications, Inc., USA, 1996.
• Klein PW. Fundamentals of Plastics Thermoforming, Morgan&Claypool Publishers, USA, 2009.
• Throne, JL. Understanding Thermoforming, Hanser&Gardner Publications, Inc., USA, 2008.
• Crawford RJ. Plastics Engineering, 3rd edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 19 Osswald TA. Polymer Processing Fundamentals, Hanser&Gardner Publications, USA, 1998.
• Kim G, Lee K, and Kang S. Prediction of the film thickness distribution and pattern change during film insert thermoforming. Polymer Engineering and Science, 2009; 49(11): 2195 – 2203.
• Song Y, Zhang KF, Wang R, Diao FX, Yan YN, and Zhang RJ, Coupled thermomechanical analysis for plastic thermoforming, Polymer Engineering and Science, 2000; 40(8): 1736 – 1746.
• Kamal MR, Tan V, and Kalyon D. Measurement and calculation of parison dimensions and bottle thickness distribution during blow molding. Polymer Engineering and Science, 1981; 21(6): 331 – 338.
• Ayhan Z and Zhang H. Wall thickness distribution in thermoformed food containers produced by a benco aseptic packaging machine. Polymer Engineering and Science, 2000; 40(1): 1 – 10.
• Lieg KL and Giacomin AJ. Thermoforming triangular troughs. Polymer Engineering and Science, 2009; 49(1): 189 – 199.
• Lim TC, Ramakrishna S and Shang HM. Analytical modelling for sheet thermoforming of knitted fabric reinforced PMC. Journal of Materials Science, 2002; 37(4): 871 – 877.
• Rosenzweig N, Narkis M, and Tadmor Z. Wall thickness distribution in thermoforming. Polymer Engineering and Science, 1979; 19(13): 946 – 951.