Dijital Çağda Kültürel Mirasın Korunması: Dijital İkiz ve 3D Baskı Uygulamaları Üzerine Bir Derleme

Öz

Dijital İkiz ve 3D Baskı teknolojileri, dijital modelleme, simülasyon ve otomatik fabrikasyonu entegre eden ve çeşitli sektörlerde devrim yaratan gelişmiş yöntemlerdir. Bu teknolojiler hassas, verimli ve sürdürülebilir çözümler sunmakta ve kültürel mirasın korunması uygulamalarını geliştirmek için önemli bir potansiyel barındırmaktadır. Dijital İkiz teknolojisi, gerçek zamanlı izleme, öngörücü bakım ve bilinçli restorasyon planlamasını destekleyen ayrıntılı dijital modellerin oluşturulmasını sağlar. Üç Boyutlu Baskı ise karmaşık mimari unsurların ve eserlerin doğru bir şekilde yeniden üretilmesini sağlayarak dijital dokümantasyon ve fiziksel restorasyon arasındaki boşluğu etkili bir şekilde doldurmaktadır. Bu derleme, yapısal olmayan eserlerin kopyalanması, yapısal rehabilitasyon ve malzeme dayanıklılık değerlendirmeleri de dahil olmak üzere önemli araştırma alanlarını incelemektedir. Toplamda, pratik uygulamaları içeren ve bu derlemenin kapsamıyla ilgili olan 31 çalışma derlendi. Sayısız faydalarına rağmen, yüksek maliyet, uzmanlık gerektiren teknik beceriler ve mirasın korunmasında etik hususlar gibi güçlükler bulunmaktadır. Çalışma aynı zamanda otonom restorasyon için akıllı malzemeler, artırılmış gerçeklik ve robotik entegrasyonu gibi gelecekteki gelişmeleri de öngörmektedir. Bu çalışma, mevcut uygulamaları ve zorlukları değerlendirerek Dijital İkiz ve 3D Baskı teknolojilerinin dijital çağda daha etkili, sürdürülebilir koruma uygulamalarını nasıl teşvik edebileceğine dair içgörüler sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kültürel miras
• dijital ikiz
• tarihi yapılar
• 3D baskı
• restorasyon
• sürdürülebilirlik

CULTURAL HERITAGE CONSERVATION IN DIGITAL ERA: A REVIEW OF DIGITAL TWIN AND 3D PRINTING APPLICATIONS

Öz

Digital Twin and 3D Printing technologies are advanced methods that integrate digital modeling, simulation, and automated fabrication and revolutionize various sectors. These technologies offer precise, efficient, and sustainable solutions, holding significant potential for enhancing preservation practices. Digital Twin technology enables the creation of detailed digital models, supporting real-time monitoring, predictive maintenance, and informed restoration planning. Meanwhile, 3D Printing allows the accurate reproduction of intricate architectural elements and artifacts, effectively bridging the gap between digital documentation and physical restoration. This review explores key research areas, including the replication of non-structural artifacts, structural rehabilitation, and material durability assessments. In total, 31 studies that included practical applications relevant to this study's scope were reviewed. Despite their numerous benefits, challenges such as high costs, specialized technical skills, and ethical considerations in heritage preservation remain. The study also anticipates future advancements, such as integrating smart materials, augmented reality, and robotics for autonomous restoration. This study provides insights into how Digital Twin and 3D Printing technologies can promote more effective, sustainable conservation practices in the digital age by evaluating current applications and challenges.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Cultural heritage
• digital twin
• historical buildings
• 3D printing
• restoration
• sustainability

Kaynakça

1. Altadonna, A., Cucinotta, F., Raffaele, M., Salmeri, F., and Sfravara, F. (2023). Environmental Impact Assessment of Different Manufacturing Technologies Oriented to Architectonic Recovery and Conservation of Cultural Heritage. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(18). doi:10.3390/su151813487
2. Attaran, M. (2017). The rise of 3-D printing: The advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing. Business Horizons, 60(5), 677–688. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.011
3. Baeriswyl, M. V. C., Palacios, G. T., Lannefranque, J. A., Tagliabue, L., and Rinaldi, S. (2023). Regeneration of a former prison in melipilla, Chile: use of digital technology in a heritage restoration project. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computing in Construction, 4. doi:10.35490/EC3.2023.318
4. Barazzetti, L., and Banfi, F. (2017). Historic BIM for Mobile VR/AR Applications. In Mixed Reality and Gamification for Cultural Heritage (pp. 271–290). Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49607-8_10
5. Barsanti, G., Mousavi, Y., Gharineiat, Z., Agha Karimi, A., McDougall, K., Rossi, A., and Gonizzi Barsanti, S. (2024). Digital Twin Technology in Built Environment: A Review of Applications, Capabilities and Challenges. Smart Cities 2024, 7(5), 2594–2615. doi:10.3390/SMARTCITIES7050101
6. Bekele, M. K., Pierdicca, R., Frontoni, E., Malinverni, E. S., and Gain, J. (2018). A Survey of Augmented, Virtual, and Mixed Reality for Cultural Heritage. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH), 11(2). doi:10.1145/3145534
7. Boje, C., Guerriero, A., Kubicki, S., and Rezgui, Y. (2020). Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research. Automation in Construction, 114, 103179. doi:10.1016/J.AUTCON.2020.103179
8. Bourgeois, I., Ascensão, G., Ferreira, V., and Rodrigues, H. (2024). Methodology for the Application of 3D Technologies for the Conservation and Recovery of Built Heritage Elements. International Journal of Architectural Heritage. doi:10.1080/15583058.2024.2341327

9. Bruno, S., De Fino, M., and Fatiguso, F. (2018). Historic Building Information Modelling: performance assessment for diagnosis-aided information modeling and management. Automation in Construction, 86, 256–276. doi:10.1016/J.AUTCON.2017.11.009
10. Camacho, D. D., Clayton, P., O’Brien, W. J., Seepersad, C., Juenger, M., Ferron, R., and Salamone, S. (2018). Applications of additive manufacturing in the construction industry – A forward-looking review. Automation in Construction, 89, 110–119. doi:10.1016/J.AUTCON.2017.12.031
11. Cascone, S., Parisi, G., and Caponetto, R. (2024). BIM-Based Strategies for the Revitalization and Automated Management of Buildings: A Case Study. Sustainability 2024, 16(16), 6720. doi:10.3390/SU16166720
12. Chaves, E., Aguilar, J., Barontini, A., Mendes, N., and Compán, V. (2024). Digital Tools for the Preventive Conservation of Built Heritage: The Church of Santa Ana in Seville. Heritage 2024, 7(7), 3470–3494. doi:10.3390/HERITAGE7070164
13. Chiabrando, F., Lo Turco, M., and Santagati, C. (2017). Digital invasions: from point clouds to historical building object modeling (h-bom) of a unesco whl site. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII-2-W3(2W3), 171–178. doi:10.5194/ISPRS-ARCHIVES-XLII-2-W3-171-2017
14. Codarin, S. (2020). Additive Manufacturing Technologies in Restoration: An Innovative Workflow for Interventions on Cultural Heritage. Cubic Journal, (3), 32-55. doi:10.31182/cubic.2020.3.023
15. Codarin, S., and Daubmann, K. (2021). Robotic Fabrication in Conservation: Digital Workflows and Skills Evaluation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 12642 LNCS, 241–253. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-73043-7_20
16. Comes, R, Grec, C., Neamțu, C., Găzdac, C., and Mateescu-suciu, l. (2021). Intangible heritage?...not anymore, from photo to 3d printed cultural heritage assets replicas. The two missing iron discs from the dacian hillfort of piatra roșie (romania). Journal of ancıent hıstory and archaeology, 8(1). doi:10.14795/j.v8i1.622
17. Dang, X., Liu, W., Hong, Q., Wang, Y., and Chen, X. (2023). Digital twin applications on cultural world heritage sites in China: A state-of-the-art overview. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 64, 228–243. doi:10.1016/J.CULHER.2023.10.005
18. Di Paola, F., Milazzo, G., and Spatafora, F. (2017). Computer aided restoration tools to assist the conservation of an ancient sculpture, The colossal statue of zeus enthroned. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, 42(2W5), 177–184. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W5-177-2017
19. Dore, C., and Murphy, M. (2017). Current state of the art historic building information modelling. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 185–192. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W5-185-2017
20. Echavarria, K. R., Song, R., Few, D., and E Sáy, A. M. (2016). Restoration of Architectural Ornament for Historic Buildings. GraDiFab 2016 - Eurographics Workshop on Graphics for Digital Fabrication, 39–48. doi:10.2312/gdf.20161077
21. El-Sayegh, S., Romdhane, L., and Manjikian, S. (2020). A critical review of 3D printing in construction: benefits, challenges, and risks. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 20(2), 1–25. doi:10.1007/S43452-020-00038-W
22. Falcone, M., Origlia, A., Campi, M., and DI Martino, S. (2021). From architectural survey to continuous monitoring: graph-based data management for cultural heritage conservation with digital twins. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLIII-B4-2021(B4-2021), 47–53. doi:10.5194/ISPRS-ARCHIVES-XLIII-B4-2021-47-2021
23. Fico, D., Rizzo, D., Montagna, F., and Esposito Corcione, C. (2023). Fused Filament Fabrication and Computer Numerical Control Milling in Cultural Heritage Conservation. Materials, 16(8). doi:10.3390/ma16083038
24. Fragkos, S., Tzimtzimis, E., Tzetzis, D., Dodun, O., and Kyratsis, P. (2018). 3D laser scanning and digital restoration of an archaeological find. MATEC Web of Conferences, 178. doi:10.1051/matecconf/201817803013
25. Funari, M. F., Hajjat, A. E., Masciotta, M. G., Oliveira, D. V., and Lourenço, P. B. (2021). A Parametric Scan-to-FEM Framework for the Digital Twin Generation of Historic Masonry Structures. Sustainability 2021, 13(19), 11088. doi:10.3390/SU131911088
26. Gao, W., Zhang, Y., Ramanujan, D., Ramani, K., Chen, Y., Williams, C. B., Wang, C. C. L., Shin, Y. C., Zhang, S., and Zavattieri, P. D. (2015). The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Computer-Aided Design, 69, 65–89. doi:10.1016/J.CAD.2015.04.001
27. Garcia-Leon, J., Murrieri, P., and Collado-Espejo, P. E. (2023). Hbim as a tool for the analysis and conservation of architectural heritage. Case study: the rame tower’s digital twin. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLVIII-M-2–2023(M-2–2023), 637–644. doi:10.5194/ISPRS-ARCHIVES-XLVIII-M-2-2023-637-2023
28. Higueras, M., Carrasco-Huertas, A., Calero-Castillo, A. I., Moreno Alcaide, M., and Collado Montero, F. J. (2024). Study of liquid photopolymer 3D printing resins exposed to accelerated aging for cultural heritage purposes. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 30(7), 1476–1485. doi:10.1108/RPJ-01-2024-0015
29. Huang, L., Krigsvoll, G., Johansen, F., Liu, Y., and Zhang, X. (2018). Carbon emission of global construction sector. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 1906–1916. doi:10.1016/J.RSER.2017.06.001
30. Kantaros, A., Ganetsos, T., and Petrescu, F. I. T. (2023). Three-Dimensional Printing and 3D Scanning: Emerging Technologies Exhibiting High Potential in the Field of Cultural Heritage. Applied Sciences 2023, 13(8), 4777. doi:10.3390/APP13084777
31. Kantaros, A., Soulis, E., and Alysandratou, E. (2023). Digitization of Ancient Artefacts and Fabrication of Sustainable 3D-Printed Replicas for Intended Use by Visitors with Disabilities: The Case of Piraeus Archaeological Museum. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(17). doi:10.3390/su151712689
32. Khajavi, S. H., Motlagh, N. H., Jaribion, A., Werner, L. C., and Holmstrom, J. (2019). Digital Twin: Vision, benefits, boundaries, and creation for buildings. IEEE Access, 7, 147406–147419. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2946515
33. Khan, S. A., Koç, M., and Al-Ghamdi, S. G. (2021). Sustainability assessment, potentials and challenges of 3D printed concrete structures: A systematic review for built environmental applications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 303, 127027. doi:10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.127027
34. La Russa, F. M., and Santagati, C. (2020). Historical sentient – building information model: a digital twin for the management of museum collections in historical architectures. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLIII-B4-2020(B4), 755–762. doi:10.5194/ISPRS-ARCHIVES-XLIII-B4-2020-755-2020
35. Liu, B., Guo, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, Q., Hu, Y., Wang, L., and Qian, K. (2024). Study on the compression performance of 3D printing concrete permanent formwork composite columns. Journal of Building Engineering, 98, 111245. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111245
36. Liu, S., Tu, Y., Wang, X., Qin, B., Xie, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhang, H., and Hu, D. (2022). Transparent reversible prosthesis, a new way to complete the conservation–restoration of a Black Ding bowl with application of 3D technologies. Heritage Science, 10(1). doi:10.1186/s40494-022-00646-0
37. Luca, D. De, Giudice, M. Del, Grasso, N., Matrone, F., Osello, A., and Piras, M. (2019). Handheld volumetric scanner for 3D printed integrations of historical elements: comparison and results. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, 42(2/W15), 381–388. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-381-2019
38. Ma, X., Zhao, J., Wang, P., Du, J., Liu, J., and Zhao, D. (2024). Digital twin of wooden heritage through multidimensional model construction and integration. Structural Health Monitoring, 14759217241262969. doi:10.1177/14759217241262969
39. Mahmoodian, M., Shahrivar, F., Setunge, S., and Mazaheri, S. (2022). Development of Digital Twin for Intelligent Maintenance of Civil Infrastructure. Sustainability, 14(14), 8664. doi:10.3390/su14148664
40. Mansi, E., Terranova, G., Linardi, D., Marfia, S., Monaldo, E., Ricci, M., Imbimbo, M., Pelliccio, A., Brunetin, A., and D’Amato, R. (2023). Development of 3D printed nanomaterials for restoration of exterior artworks. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2579(1). doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2579/1/012004
41. Marienkov, M., Kaliukh, I., and Trofymchuk, O. (2024). The digital twin use for modeling the multi‐storey building response to seismic impacts. Structural Concrete, 25(3), 2079–2096. doi:10.1002/suco.202300695
42. Moyano, J., Carreño, E., Nieto-Julián, J. E., Gil-Arizón, I., and Bruno, S. (2022). Systematic approach to generate Historical Building Information Modelling (HBIM) in architectural restoration project. Automation in Construction, 143, 104551. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104551
43. Munoz-Pandiella, I., Bosch, C., Guardia, M., Cayuela, B., Pogliani, P., Bordi, G., Paschali, M., Andujar, C., and Charalambous, P. (2022). Digital Twins for Medieval Monuments: Requirements from Art Historians and Technical Challenges for Analysis and Restoration. 2022 International Conference on Interactive Media, Smart Systems and Emerging Technologies, IMET 2022 - Proceedings. doi:10.1109/IMET54801.2022.9929510
44. Ngo, T. D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K. T. Q., and Hui, D. (2018). Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites Part B: Engineering, 143, 172–196. doi:10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2018.02.012
45. Parfenov, V., Igoshin, S., Masaylo, D., Orlov, A., and Kuliashou, D. (2022). Use of 3D Laser Scanning and Additive Technologies for Reconstruction of Damaged and Destroyed Cultural Heritage Objects. Quantum Beam Science, 6(1). doi:10.3390/qubs6010011
46. Perrot, A., Rangeard, D., and Courteille, E. (2018). 3D printing of earth-based materials: Processing aspects. Construction and Building Materials, 172, 670–676. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.017
47. Puzatova, A., Shakor, P., Laghi, V., and Dmitrieva, M. (2022). Large-Scale 3D Printing for Construction Application by Means of Robotic Arm and Gantry 3D Printer: A Review. Buildings 2022, 12(11), 2023. doi:10.3390/BUILDINGS12112023
48. Rizzo, D., Fico, D., Montagna, F., Casciaro, R., and Esposito Corcione, C. (2023). From Virtual Reconstruction to Additive Manufacturing: Application of Advanced Technologies for the Integration of a 17th-Century Wooden Ciborium. Materials, 16(4). doi:10.3390/ma16041424
49. Rocca, I., Forti, I., D’Acunto, G., and Saetta, A. (2023). Survey, diagnostics, monitoring methodology and digital twin for the conservation of the facade of the church of santa maria di nazareth in venice. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLVIII-M-2–2023(M-2–2023), 1331–1336. doi:10.5194/ISPRS-ARCHIVES-XLVIII-M-2-2023-1331-2023
50. Sacks, R., Brilakis, I., Pikas, E., Xie, H. S., and Girolami, M. (2020). Construction with digital twin information systems. Data-Centric Engineering, 1(6), e14. doi:10.1017/DCE.2020.16
51. Sakin, M., and Kiroglu, Y. C. (2017). 3D Printing of Buildings: Construction of the Sustainable Houses of the Future by BIM. Energy Procedia, 134, 702–711. doi:10.1016/J.EGYPRO.2017.09.562
52. Segreto, T., Bottillo, A., Teti, R., Galantucci, L. M., Lavecchia, F., and Galantucci, M. B. (2017). Non-contact Reverse Engineering Modeling for Additive Manufacturing of Down Scaled Cultural Artefacts. Procedia CIRP, 62, 481–486.doi:10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.042
53. Sherratt, F., Dowsett, R., and Sherratt, S. (2020). Construction 4.0 and its potential impact on people working in the construction industry. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Management, Procurement and Law, 173(4), 145–152. doi:10.1680/JMAPL.19.00053
54. Tarhan, Y., and Perrot, A. (2023). Reinforcement of 3D printable earth-based mortar with natural textile material. Materials Today: Proceedings. doi:10.1016/J.MATPR.2023.08.056
55. Tarhan, Y., and Şahin, R. (2019). Developments of 3D concrete printing process. International Civil Engineering and Architecture Conference. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333673859
56. Tarhan, Y., and Şahin, R. (2021). Fresh and Rheological Performances of Air-Entrained 3D Printable Mortars. Materials 2021, 14(9), 2409. doi:10.3390/MA14092409
57. Tarhan, Y., Tarhan, İ. H., Jacquet, Y., and Perrot, A. (2024). Mechanical behaviour of 3D printed and textile-reinforced eco-friendly composites. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 1–19. doi:10.1080/21650373.2024.2396420
58. Tarhan, İ. H., and Tarhan, Y. (2025). Nonlinear in-plane response of 3D-printed concrete walls with varied infill patterns: Experimental mix design and numerical structural assessment, Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 11(3), 160-173. doi:10.20528/cjsmec.2025.03.005
59. Themistocleous, K., Evagorou, E., Mettas, C., and Hadjimitsis, D. G. (2022). The use of digital twin models to document cultural heritage monuments. In Earth Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing/GIS Applications XIII, Vol. 12268, pp. 55-64). SPIE. doi:10.1117/12.2636332
60. Tucci, G., Bonora, V., Tesi, V., and Pagnini, B. (2019, December). Additive manufacturing of marble statues: 3D replicas for the preservation of the originals. IMEKO TC-4 International Conference on Metrology for Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 288-293.
61. Wu, P., Wang, J., and Wang, X. (2016). A critical review of the use of 3-D printing in the construction industry. Automation in Construction, 68, 21–31. doi:10.1016/J.AUTCON.2016.04.005
62. Xu, J., Ding, L., and Love, P. E. D. (2017). Digital reproduction of historical building ornamental components: From 3D scanning to 3D printing. Automation in Construction, 76, 85–96. doi:10.1016/J.AUTCON.2017.01.010
63. Yastikli, N. (2007). Documentation of cultural heritage using digital photogrammetry and laser scanning. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 8(4), 423–427. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2007.06.003
64. You, Z., and Feng, L. (2020). Integration of Industry 4.0 Related Technologies in Construction Industry: A Framework of Cyber-Physical System. IEEE Access, 8, 122908–122922. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3007206
65. Zhang, J., Poon, K. H., Kwok, H. H. L., Hou, F., and Cheng, J. C. P. (2023). Predictive control of HVAC by multiple output GRU - CFD integration approach to manage multiple IAQ for commercial heritage building preservation. Building and Environment, 245, 110802. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110802
66. Zuo, Z., De Corte, W., Huang, Y., Chen, X., Zhang, Y., Li, J., Zhang, L., Xiao, J., Yuan, Y., Zhang, K., Zhang, L., and Mechtcherine, V. (2024). Strategies towards large-scale 3D printing without size constraints. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 19(1). doi:10.1080/17452759.2024.2346821