İyonküre Bozulmaları: 2023 Kahramanmaraş Depremleri Öncesinde ve Sırasında Etki, Tespit ve Değişkenlik

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye genelindeki 15 TUSAGA-Aktif (Türkiye Ulusal Temel GNSS Ağı-Aktif) istasyonundan elde edilen Toplam Elektron İçeriği (TEİ) kestirimleri kullanılarak, 06 Şubat 2023'teki yıkıcı Kahramanmaraş depremleri (Mw 7,8 ve Mw 7,5) öncesi ve sırasındaki iyonküre bozulmaları incelenmiştir. TEİ verilerindeki zamansal değişimleri analiz ederek sismik öncesi iyonküre aykırılıklarını tespit etmek ve nicellemek için TEİ’nin Diferansiyel Oranı (DROT) algoritması uygulanmıştır. Sonuçlar, iyonküre bozulmalarında önemli mekânsal ve zamansal örüntüler ortaya koymuştur; DROT değerleri depremlerden önceki 48-72 saat içinde %50-60'tan %60-70'e doğru kademeli olarak artmıştır. Deprem merkezlerine en yakın istasyonlar, özellikle ELAZ, ERGN ve HAT2, belirgin anomaliler sergilerken, coğrafi olarak dağılmış istasyonlarda eşzamanlı olarak bozulmaların ortaya çıktığı gözlemlenmiştir. Jeomanyetik ve sismik dönemin sakin referans dönemle karşılaştırması, bu bozulmaların sismik kökenini sunarak potansiyel Litosfer-Atmosfer-İyonküre Bağlaşımı hipotezini desteklemektedir. Bulgularımız, TEİ değişimlerinin DROT tabanlı analizinin, sismik-iyonküresel etkileşimler hakkında önemli bulgular sağladığını ve deprem öncüsü çalışmalarını ve erken uyarı yeteneklerini geliştirme potansiyeli taşıdığını göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İyonküre Bozulmaları
• Toplam Elektron İçeriği
• DROT
• Kahramanmaraş Depremleri
• Sismik Öncüller
• GNSS

IONOSPHERIC DISTURBANCES: IMPACT, DETECTION AND VARIABILITY BEFORE AND DURING 2023 KAHRAMANMARAŞ EARTHQUAKES

Öz

This study investigates ionospheric disturbances before and during the devastating February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş earthquakes (Mw 7.8 and Mw 7.5) using Total Electron Content (TEC) estimates from 15 TNPGN-Active (Turkish National Permanent GNSS Network-Active) stations across Türkiye. The Differential Rate of TEC (DROT) algorithm is applied to detect and quantify pre-seismic ionospheric anomalies by analyzing temporal variations in TEC data. Results reveal significant spatial and temporal patterns in ionospheric disturbances with DROT values progressively increasing from 50-60% to 60-70% within 48-72 hours preceding the earthquakes. Stations closest to the epicenter, particularly ELAZ, ERGN and HAT2, exhibited pronounced anomalies, while a concurrent appearance of disturbances across geographically dispersed stations is observed. Comparison with geomagnetically and seismically quiet reference periods suggests the seismic origin of these disturbances, supporting potential Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere Coupling hypothesis. Our findings demonstrate that DROT-based analysis of TEC variations provides valuable insights into seismic-ionospheric interactions and holds potential for enhancing earthquake precursor studies and early warning capabilities. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ionospheric Disturbances
• Total Electron Content
• DROT
• Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes
• Seismic Precursors
• GNSS

Kaynakça

1. Arikan, F., Erol, C. B., & Arikan, O. (2003). Regularized estimation of vertical total electron content from Global Positioning System data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 108(A12), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009605
2. Arikan, F., Erol, C. B., & Arikan, O. (2004). Regularized estimation of vertical total electron content from GPS data for a desired time period. Radio Science, 39(6), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004RS003061
3. Basu, S., Basu, S., Valladares, C. E., Yeh, H.-C., Su, S.-Y.,& et al. (2001). Ionospheric effects of major magnetic storms during the International Space Weather Period of September and October 1999: GPS observations, VHF/UHF scintillations and in situ density structures at middle and equatorial latitudes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 106(A12), 30389-30413. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JA001116
4. Budak, C., Karatay, S., Erken, F., & Cinar, A. (2024). Classification of the Ionospheric Disturbances Caused by Geomagnetic and Seismic Activity with K-Nearest Neighbors Algorithm. Wireless Personal Communications , 134, 1551–1569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-024-10965-z
5. Cherniak, I., Zakharenkova, I., & Krankowski, A. (2014). Approaches for modeling ionosphere irregularities based on the TEC rate index. Earth, Planets and Space, 66, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-014-0165-z
6. Chowdhury, S., Bose, A. G., Das, A., & Deb, A. (2024). A study of some research work on soil radon concentration and ionospheric total electron content as earthquake precursors. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 333, 1633–1659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-024-09409-6
7. Davies, K., & Baker, D. M. (1965). Ionospheric effects observed around the time of the Alaskan earthquake of March 28, 1964. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 70(9), 2251-2253. https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ070i009p02251
8. Efendi, E., & Arikan, F. (2017). A fast algorithm for automatic detection of ionospheric disturbances: DROT. Advances in Space Research, 59(12), 2923-2933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.03.018

9. Fejer, B., Farley, D., Woodman, R., & Calderon, C. (1979). Dependence of equatorial F region vertical drifts on season and solar cycle. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 84(A10), 5792-5796. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA084iA10p05792
10. GFZ. (1992). GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences. Retrieved 05 5, 2026, from https://www-app3.gfz-potsdam.de/kp_index/Kp_ap_since_1932.txt
11. Guo, J., Yu, H., Li, W., Liu, X., Kong, Q., & Zhao, C. (2017). Total Electron Content Anomalies Before Mw 6.0+ Earthquakes in the Seismic Zone of Southwest China Between 2001 and 2013. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 45(1), 131-139 . https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20160032
12. IONOLAB. (2007). Ionosphere Research Laboratory. Retrieved 05 5, 2026, from www.ionolab.org
13. Jones, R. M., Ostrovsky, L. A., & Bedard, A. J. (2017). Ionospheric effects of magneto-acoustic-gravity waves: Dispersion relation. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 159, 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.04.004
14. Kaladze, T., Pokhotelov, O., Shah, H., Khan, M., & Stenflo, L. (2008). Acoustic-gravity waves in the Earth's ionosphere. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 70(13), 1607-1616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2008.06.009
15. Karatay, S. (2020). Detection of the ionospheric disturbances on GPS-TEC using Differential Rate Of TEC (DROT) algorithm. Advances in Space Research, 65(10), 2372-2390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.01.042
16. Karatay, S. and Gul, S. E. (2023). Prediction of GPS-TEC on Mw > 5 Earthquake Days Using Bayesian Regularization Backpropagation Algorithm. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 20, 1-5. doi:10.1109/LGRS.2023.3262028
17. Karatay, S., Arikan, F. and Arikan, O. (2010). Investigation of total electron content variability due to seismic and geomagnetic disturbances in the ionosphere. Radio Science, 45(5), 1-12. doi:10.1029/2009RS004313
18. Karatay, S., Arikan, F. and Pirti, A. (2025a). Spatio-temporal evaluation of ionospheric disturbances before, during and after earthquakes using differential rate of TEC (DROT) from GPS measurements. Environmental Earth Sciences, 84, 1-15. doi:10.1007/s12665-025-12216-1
19. Karatay, S., Cinar, A., and Arikan, F. (2017). Ionospheric responses during equinox and solstice periods over Turkey. Advances in Space Research, 60(9), 1958-1967. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2017.07.038
20. Karatay, S., Avci, S. and Bayram, B. (2025b). LSTM-Based One-Day-Ahead Prediction of Ionospheric TEC Variations Associated with Major Earthquake Events in Japan and China. Journal of Advanced Applied Sciences, 4(1-2), 51-66. doi: 10.61326/jaasci.v4i1-2.432
21. Karatay, S., Arikan, F. and Arikan, O. (2026). Spectral tracks in the ionosphere: Fast Fourier Transform analysis of seismo-ionospheric coupling through GPS Total Electron Content variations. Tectonophysics, 933, 1-26. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2026.231240
22. Karpov, I. V., Kshevetsky, S. P., Borchevkina, O. P., Radievsky, A. V., & Karpov, A. I. (2016). Disturbances of the upper atmosphere and ionosphere caused by acoustic-gravity wave sources in the lower atmosphere. Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry B , 10, 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1134/S199079311601005X
23. Kil, H., Paxton, L. J., Pi, X., Hairston, M. R., & Zhang, Y. (2003). Case study of the 15 July 2000 magnetic storm effects on the ionosphere-driver of the positive ionospheric storm in the winter hemisphere. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 108(A11), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009782
24. Kintner, P. M., Ledvina, B. M., & Paula, E. R. (2007). GPS and ionospheric scintillations. Space Weather, 5(9), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006SW000260
25. Koroglu, M., & Arikan, F. (2020). Spatio-temporal analysis of ionospheric disturbances for ground based augmentation systems over a midlatitude region. Advances in Space Research, 65(9), 2099-2118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.10.024
26. Lastovicka, J. (2009). Lower ionosphere response to external forcing: A brief review. Advances in Space Research, 43(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2008.10.001
27. Lean, J. L., White, O. R., Livingston, W. C., & Picone, J. M. (2001). Variability of a composite chromospheric irradiance index during the 11-year activity cycle and over longer time periods. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 106(A6), 10645-10658. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JA000340
28. Leonard, R. S., & Jr, R. A. (1965). Observation of ionospheric disturbances following the Alaska earthquake. Journal of Geophysical Research, 70(5), 1250-1253. https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ070i005p01250
29. Liu, J. Y., Chen, Y. I., Chen, C. H., Liu, C. Y., Chen, C. Y., & et al. (2009). Seismoionospheric GPS total electron content anomalies observed before the 12 May 2008 Mw7.9 Wenchuan earthquake. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 114(A4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013698
30. Liu, J., Huang, J., & Zhang, X. (2014). Ionospheric perturbations in plasma parameters before global strong earthquakes. Advances in Space Research, 53(5), 776-787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.12.029
31. Lundstedt, H., Liszka, L., & Lundin, R. (2005). Solar activity explored with new wavelet methods. Annales Geophysicae, 23(4), 1505–1511. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-23-1505-2005
32. Mannucci, A. J., Wilson, B. D., Yuan, D. N., Ho, C. H., Lindqwister, U. J., & Runge, T. F. (1998). A global mapping technique for GPS-derived ionospheric total electron content measurements. Radio Science, 33(3), 565-582. https://doi.org/10.1029/97RS02707
33. Moore, T. E., Peterson, W. K., Russell, C. T., Chandler, M. O., Collier, M. R., & et al. (1999). Ionospheric mass ejection in response to a CME. Geophysical Research Letters, 26(15), 2339-2342. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900456
34. Moussas, X., Polygiannakis, J., Preka-Papadema, P., & Exarhos, G. (2005). Solar cycles: A tutorial. Advances in Space Research, 35(5), 725-738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.03.148
35. Namgaladze, A. A., Klimenko, M. V., Klimenko, V. V., & Zakharenkova, I. E. (2009). Physical mechanism and mathematical modeling of earthquake ionospheric precursors registered in total electron content. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 49, 252–262. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793209020169
36. Nayir, H., Arikan, F., Arikan, O., & Erol, C. B. (2007). Total Electron Content Estimation with Reg-Est. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 112(A11), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012459
37. Omori, Y., Yasuoka, Y., Nagahama, H., Kawada, Y., Ishikawa, T., Tokonami, S., & Shinogi, M. (2007). Anomalous radon emanation linked to preseismic electromagnetic phenomena. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 7(5), 629–635. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-7-629-2007
38. Ondoh, T. (2009). Investigation of precursory phenomena in the ionosphere, atmosphere and groundwater before large earthquakes of M > 6.5. Advances in Space Research, 43(2), 214-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2008.04.003
39. Pap, J., Tobiska, W. K., & Bouwer, S. D. (1990). Periodicities of solar irradiance and solar activity indices, I. Solar Physics, 129, 165–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154372
40. Paul, K. S., Rafi, M. H., Haralambous, H., & Mostafa, M. G. (2024). Correlation of Rate of TEC Index and Spread F over European Ionosondes. Atmosphere, 15(3), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15030331
41. Pulinets, S. (1998). Seismic activity as a source of the ionospheric variability. Advances in Space Research, 27(6), 903-906. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(98)00121-5
42. Pulinets, S. A., & Legen'ka, A. D. (2003). Spatial–Temporal Characteristics of Large Scale Disturbances of Electron Density Observed in the Ionospheric F-Region before Strong Earthquakes. Cosmic Research, 41, 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024046814173
43. Pulinets, S., & Ouzounov, D. (2011). Lithosphere–Atmosphere–Ionosphere Coupling (LAIC) model – An unified concept for earthquake precursors validation. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 41(4/5), 371-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.03.005
44. Rapoport, Y., Gotynyan, O., Ivchenko, V., Kozak, L., & Parrot, M. (2004). Effect of acoustic-gravity wave of the lithospheric origin on the ionospheric F region before earthquakes. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 29(4-9), 607-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2003.10.006
45. Ridley, A., Zeeuw, D. D., Manchester, W., & Hansen, K. (2006). The magnetospheric and ionospheric response to a very strong interplanetary shock and coronal mass ejection. Advances in Space Research, 38(2), 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2006.06.010
46. Sezen, U., Arikan, F., Arikan, O., Ugurlu, O., & Sadeghimorad, A. (2013). Online, automatic, near-real time estimation of GPS-TEC: IONOLAB-TEC. Space Weather, 11(5), 297-305. https://doi.org/10.1002/swe.20054
47. Shah, M., Ahmed, A., Ehsan, M., Khan, M., Tariq, M. A., Calabia, A., & Rahman, Z. ur. (2020). Total electron content anomalies associated with earthquakes occurred during 1998–2019. Acta Astronautica, 175, 268-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.06.005
48. Sun, L., Wan, W., Ding, F., & Mao, T. (2007). Gravity wave propagation in the realistic atmosphere based on a three-dimensional transfer function model. Annales Geophysicae, 25(9), 1979–1986. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-25-1979-2007
49. Swamy, K. C., Devanaboyina, V. R., Nallagarla, R., Shaik, T. A., & Turpati, S. (2024). Correlation between rate of TEC index and positioning error during solar flares and geomagnetic storms using navigation with Indian constellation receiver measurements. Journal of Applied Geodesy, 19(1), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2024-0022
50. Tete, S., Otsuka, Y., Zahra, W. K., & Mahrous, A. (2024). Leveraging machine learning techniques and GPS measurements for precise TEC rate predictions. GPS Solutions , 28, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-024-01652-4
51. USGS. (1879). United States Geological Survey. Retrieved 05 05, 2026, from https://www.usgs.gov/
52. WDC. (1957). WDC for Geomagnetism, Kyoto. Retrieved 05 05, 2026, from https://wdc.kugi.kyoto-u.ac.jp///dstae///wwwtmp/WWW_dstae03340870.dat
53. Yasyukevich, Y., Astafyeva, E., Padokhin, A., Ivanova, V., Syrovatskii, S., & Podlesnyi, A. (2018). The 6 September 2017 X-Class Solar Flares and Their Impacts on the Ionosphere, GNSS and HF Radio Wave Propagation. Space Weather, 16(8), 1013-1027. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018SW001932
54. Zakharenkova, I., Shagimuratov, I., Tepenitzina, N., & Krankowski, A. (2008). Anomalous modification of the ionospheric total electron content prior to the 26 September 2005 Peru earthquake. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 70(15), 1919-1928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2008.06.003