FARKLI YÖNTEMLER İLE TÜRK KONTEYNER LİMANLARININ VERİMLİLİĞİ

Öz

Küresel ekonomide önemli bir yere sahip olan konteyner taşımacılığında konteyner limanlarının etkin ve verimli işlev görmesi son derece önem arz etmektedir. Konteyner terminallerinin etkinliğinin belirlenmesinde Veri Zarflama Analizi (VZA) ve Serbest Atılabilir Zarf Modeli (Free Disposable Hull, FDH) kullanımı yaygın olan yöntemlerdendir. Bu çalışmanın amacı; gelişmekte olan ekonomiye sahip Türkiye’nin konteyner terminallerinin 2012 yılı verilerine göre göreceli etkinlik durumlarını VZA ve FDH yöntemleri ile belirlemektir. Ayrıca çalışmada süper etkinlik modelleri yardımıyla Türk konteyner terminallerinin etkinlik sıralamaları da belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Serbest Atılabilir Zarf Modeli (FDH)
• Veri Zarflama Analizi
• Konteyner Terminali
• Süper Etkinlik

CALCULATION OF CONTAINER PORTS EFFICIENCY IN TURKEY WITH DIFFERENT METHODS

Öz

Effective and productive functioning of container ports has been crucially important in container transportation which has an important place in global economy. Free Disposable Hull (FDH) and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) are widely used methodologies to determine the container terminal’s efficiency. The purpose of this study; is to determine the efficiency of container ports of Turkey, which has a developing economy, by using the DEA and FDH methodology for the 2012 period . The super efficiency method is also used in this study to determine the efficiency levels of Turkish container ports. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Free Disposable Hull (FDH)
• Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)
• Container Terminal
• The Super Efficiency

Kaynakça

1. • AL-ERAQİ AS., MUSTAFA A., KHADER AT., BARROS CP., (2008), Efficiency of Middle Eastern ve East African Seaports: Application of DEA Using Window Analysis, European Journal of Scientific Research ISSN 1450- 216X Vol.23 No.4(597 12).
2. • ALLEN R., ATHANASSOPOULOS A., DYSON RG., THANASSOULIS E., (1997), Weights Restrictions and Value Judgments in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, Development and Future Directions, Annals of Operational Research, Vol. 73, p. 13-34. doi: 10.1023/A:1018968909638
3. • ASHAR A., (1997), Counting the Moves, Port Development International, November, s. 25-29.
4. • ATEŞ A., (2010), Türkiye Konteyner Terminallerinde Verimlilik Analizi, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, Erzurum.
5. • ATEŞ A., ESMER S., (2011), DEA with Efficiency Analysıs of Turkey Container Terminals, 12th International Symposium on Econometrics Statistics and Operations Research, May 26-29 2011 Denizli.
6. • ATEŞ A., ESMER, S., (2013), Liman İşletmelerinde Performans Ölçümü, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi Yayınları, Rize
7. • ATEŞ A., (2013), Veri Zarflama Analizi: Karadeniz Konteyner Terminalleri Uygulaması, II. Ulusal Lojistik ve Tedarik Zinciri Kongresi 16-18 Mayıs, Aksaray.
8. • ATEŞ A., ESMER S., ŞAHİN T., (2013a), VZA Malmquist Toplam Faktör Verimlilik Ölçüsü: Karadeniz Konteyner Terminalleri Uygulaması, I.Ulusal Liman Kongresi “Küresel Rekabette Tedarik Zinciri Etkinliği” 1-2 Kasım 2013 – İzmir.

9. • ATEŞ A., ESMER S., ÇAKIR E., BALCI K., (2013b), Karadeniz Konteyner Terminallerinin Göreceli Etkinlik Analizi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 5 (1). S.1-22.
10. • BANKER RD., CHARNES A., COOPER WW., (1984), Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis, Management Science, Vol. 30, pp. 1078-1092.
11. • BARROS CP., ATHANASSİOUS M., (2004), Efficiency in European Seaports with DEA: Evidence From Greece and Portugal, Maritime Economics and Logistics, 6(2),122-140.
12. • BARROS CP., (2006), A Beachmark Analysis of Italian Seaports Using Data Envelopment Analysis, Maritime Economics & Logistics, 8. pp. 347-365.
13. • BARUTÇUGİL İ., (2002), Bilgi Yönetimi, Kariyer Yayıncılık, İstanbul, s.13.
14. • BAYAR S., (2005), Veri Zarflama Analizi Kullanılarak Liman Verimliliğinin Ölçülmesi: Türk Limanlarından Bir Örnek, İstanbul Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
15. • BAYSAL ME., UYGUR M., TOKLU B., (2004), Veri Zarflama Analizi ile TCDD Limanlarında Bir Etkinlik Ölçümü Çalışması, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 19, No 4, 437-442.
16. • BENDALL H., STENT A., (1987), On Measuring Cargo Handling Productivity, Maritime Policy and Management, 14(4), s. 337-343. doi: 10.1080/03088838700000046.
17. • CAZALS C., FLORENS JP., SIMAR L., (2002), Nonparametric Frontier estimation: A Robust Approach, Journal of Econometrics, 106, 1, pp:1-25. doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00080-X.
18. • CHARNES A., COOPER WW., RHODES E., (1978), Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 2, pp. 429-444. doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.
19. • CULLINANE K., SONG DW., WANG T., (2005), The Application of Mathematical Programming Approaches to Estimating Container Port Production Efficiency. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 24, s.73–92. doi:10.1007/s11123-005-3041-9.
20. • CULLINANE KPB., WANG TF., (2006), The efficiency of European container ports: A cross-sectional data envelopment analysis, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications Vol. 9, No. 1, 19–31. doi: 10.1080/13675560500322417.
21. • ÇAĞLAR V., (2012), Türk Özel Limanlarının Etkinlik ve Verimlilik Analizi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İzmir.
22. • ESMER S., (2010), Optimization of Logistics Processes at the Container Terminals and a Simulation Model, Dokuz Eylül University Press, İzmir.
23. • HERRERA S., PANG G., (2008), Efficiency of Infrastructure: The Case of Container Ports, EconomiA, Brasilia (DF), v.9, n.1, p.165-194.
24. • KAISAR E., PATHOMSIRI S., HAGHANI A., KOURKOUNAKIS P., (2006), Developing Measures of Us Ports Productivity and Performance: Using DEA and FDH Approaches. Transportation Research Forum, March 23-25.
25. • KIM M., SACHISH A., (1986), The Structure of Production, Technical change and Productivity in a Port, Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(2), 209-223.
26. • NIAVIS S., TSEKERIS T., (2012), Ranking and causes of inefficiency of container seaports in South-Eastern Europe, Eur. Trnsp. Res. Rev., 4:235-244. doi: 10.1007/s12544-012-0080-y
27. • PRINS DDE., SIMAR L., TULKENS H., (1984), Measuring Labour Efficiency, in Post Offices in The Performance of Public Enterprises: Concepts and Measurement (P. Pestieau and H. Tulkens M. Marchand), North Holland, Amsterdam, pp.243-267.
28. • ROLL Y., HAYUTH Y., (1993), Port Performance Comparison Applying Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 20, No. 2, 153-161. doi:10.1080/03088839300000025
29. • SAYIŞTAY., (2002), Sayıştay'ın Performansının Ölçümüne İlişkin Ön araştırma Raporu, Sayıştay Yayını, Ankara, s.9.
30. • SEIFORD LM., THRALL RM., (1990), Recent Development in DEA: the Mathematical Programming Approach to Frontier Analysis, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 46, Vol. 1-2(October/November), pp. 7-38.doi:10.1016/0304-4076(90)90045-U
31. • SHERMAN HD., (1984), Data Envelopment Analysis as a New Managerial Audit Methodology- Test and Evaluation, Auditing 4(1):35
32. • TABERNACLE JB., (1995), A Study of the Changes in Performance of Quayside Container Cranes, Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 115-124. doi:10.1080/03088839500000044
33. • TALLEY WK., (1994), Performance Indicators and Port Performance Evaluation, Logistics and Transportation Review, 30(4), 339-352.
34. • TALLEY WK., (1998), Optimum throughput and performance evaluation of marine terminals, Maritime Policy and Management 15 (4), 327– 331. doi:10.1080/03088838800000010.
35. • TONGZON JL., (1995), Determinants of port performance and efficiency, Transportation Research A: Policy and Practice 29 (3), 245–252. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0965-8564(94)00032-6.
36. • TONGZON J., (2001), Efficiency Measurement of Selected Australian and Other International Ports Using Data Envelopment Analysis, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 35(2),pp. 113-128.
37. • TONGZON J., HENG W., (2005), Port Privatization, Efficiency and Competitiveness: Some Emprical Evidence from Container Ports(Terminals), Transportation Research Part A: 39 pp. 405-424.
38. • TULKENS H., (1993), On FDH Efficiency Analysis: Some Methodological Issues and Applications to Retail Banking, Courts and Urban Transit, Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 4, pp. 183-210.doi: 10.1007/BF01073473.
39. • TRUJİLLO L., TOVAR B., (2007), The European Port Industry: An Analysis of its Economic Efficiency, Maritime Economics and Logistics. 9(2): pp. 148-171.
40. • WANG T., SONG DW., CULLINANE K., (2003), Container Port Production Efficiency: A Comparative Study of DEA and FDH Approaches. Journal of the Eastern Asian Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 5, pp. 698-713.
41. • WANKE PF., BARBASTEFANO RG., HIJJAR FM., (2011), Determinants of Efficiency at Major Brazilian Port Terminals, Transport Reviews, Vol. 31, No. 5, 653–677, September 2011. doi:10.1080/01441647.2010.547635
42. • VALENTINE VF., GRAY R., (2001), The Measurement of Port Efficiency Using Data Envelopment Analysis, Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Transport Research, Seoul, South Korea, 22-27 July, 2001.
43. • YEŞİLYURT C., ALAN MA., (2003), Fen Liselerinin 2002 Yılı Göreceli Etkinliğinin Veri Zarflama Analizi Yöntemiyle ile Ölçülmesi, C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 4,2. s.91-104.