Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

TÜRKİYE’DEKİ DEVLET ÜNİVERSİTELERİNİN PERFORMANSLARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ VE GÖRELİ ETKİNLİKLERİNİN BELİRLENMESİ

Yıl 2006, Sayı: 2, 0 - 0, 01.05.2006

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’deki faaliyet gösteren 50
devlet üniversitesinin göreli etkinliklerini belirlemek için Veri Zarflama
Analizi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. 2003 ve 2004 yıllarına ait veriler kullanılarak
üniversitelerin her iki yıla ait performansları değerlendirilmiş ve elde edilen
sonuçlar karşılaştırmalı olarak verilmiştir

Kaynakça

  • 1. Ahn, T., Seiford, L.M., 1993, Sensitivity of DEA to models and variable sets in a hypothesis testing setting: The efficiency of university operations, In: Yuji Ijiri (Ed.), Creative and Innovative Approaches to the Sciences of Management. Quorum Books, Westport.
  • 2. Breu, T.M., Raab, R.L., 1994, Efficiency and perceived quality of the nation’s ‘top 25’ national universities and national liberal art colleges: An application of data envelopment analysis to higher education. Socio-Economic Planning Science 28, 33-45.
  • 3. Cave, M., Hanney, S., Kogan, M., Trevett, G., 1988, The use of performance indicators in higher education:A critical analysis of developing Practice. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London.
  • 4. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E., 1978, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 668-697.
  • 5. Guemes, D., 2001, An efficiency-based decision making model for higher education funding in Mexico.
  • 6. Kwimbere, F.J., 1987, Measuring efficiency in not-for-profit organizations: An attempt to evaluate efficiency in selected UK university departments using data envelopment analysis (DEA), MSc thesis, School of Management, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
  • 7. Rhodes, E.L., Southwick, L., 1986, Determinants of efficiency in public and private universities, Working paper, School of Environmental and Public Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
  • 8. Sexton, T.R., 1986, The methodology of data envelopment analysis, In: R.H. Silkman (Ed.), Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
  • 9. Sinuany-Stern, Z., Mehrez, A., Barboy, A., 1994, Academic departments efficiency via DEA, Computers and Operations Research 21, 543-556.
  • 10. Tomkins, C., Green, R., 1988, An experiment in the use of data envelopment analysis for evaluating the efficiency of UK university departments of accounting, Fin. Accountability Management 4(2), 147-164.
  • 11. Yolalan, R., 1993, İşletmeler Arası Göreli Etkinlik Ölçümü, MPM Yayınları, Ankara.
Yıl 2006, Sayı: 2, 0 - 0, 01.05.2006

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Ahn, T., Seiford, L.M., 1993, Sensitivity of DEA to models and variable sets in a hypothesis testing setting: The efficiency of university operations, In: Yuji Ijiri (Ed.), Creative and Innovative Approaches to the Sciences of Management. Quorum Books, Westport.
  • 2. Breu, T.M., Raab, R.L., 1994, Efficiency and perceived quality of the nation’s ‘top 25’ national universities and national liberal art colleges: An application of data envelopment analysis to higher education. Socio-Economic Planning Science 28, 33-45.
  • 3. Cave, M., Hanney, S., Kogan, M., Trevett, G., 1988, The use of performance indicators in higher education:A critical analysis of developing Practice. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London.
  • 4. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E., 1978, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 668-697.
  • 5. Guemes, D., 2001, An efficiency-based decision making model for higher education funding in Mexico.
  • 6. Kwimbere, F.J., 1987, Measuring efficiency in not-for-profit organizations: An attempt to evaluate efficiency in selected UK university departments using data envelopment analysis (DEA), MSc thesis, School of Management, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
  • 7. Rhodes, E.L., Southwick, L., 1986, Determinants of efficiency in public and private universities, Working paper, School of Environmental and Public Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
  • 8. Sexton, T.R., 1986, The methodology of data envelopment analysis, In: R.H. Silkman (Ed.), Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
  • 9. Sinuany-Stern, Z., Mehrez, A., Barboy, A., 1994, Academic departments efficiency via DEA, Computers and Operations Research 21, 543-556.
  • 10. Tomkins, C., Green, R., 1988, An experiment in the use of data envelopment analysis for evaluating the efficiency of UK university departments of accounting, Fin. Accountability Management 4(2), 147-164.
  • 11. Yolalan, R., 1993, İşletmeler Arası Göreli Etkinlik Ölçümü, MPM Yayınları, Ankara.
Toplam 11 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Mehmet Emin Baysal Bu kişi benim

Bahriye Alçılar Bu kişi benim

Hakan Çerçioğlu Bu kişi benim

Bilal Toklu Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Mayıs 2006
Gönderilme Tarihi 28 Temmuz 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2006 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Baysal, M. E., Alçılar, B., Çerçioğlu, H., Toklu, B. (2006). TÜRKİYE’DEKİ DEVLET ÜNİVERSİTELERİNİN PERFORMANSLARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ VE GÖRELİ ETKİNLİKLERİNİN BELİRLENMESİ. Verimlilik Dergisi(2).

                                                                                                          23139       23140           29293

22408  Verimlilik Dergisi Creative Commons Atıf-GayrıTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY-NC 4.0) ile lisanslanmıştır.