Circularity Performance of Türkiye: A Comparative Investigation with the European Union Countries

Yıl 2023, DÖNGÜSEL EKONOMİ VE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK, 187 - 204, 05.01.2023

Ferhan Sayın , Utku Utkulu

https://doi.org/10.51551/verimlilik.1110168

Cited By: 1

Öz

Purpose: This study aims to calculate the circularity performance of Türkiye, a negotiating candidate country, in terms of the indicators included in the monitoring framework of the Circular Economy by the European Commission. In line with this purpose, Türkiye’s circularity potential is revealed by comparing the evidence of the European Union (EU) countries.

Methodology: In the first stage, the circular development of Türkiye is examined in a comparison with descriptive style over the EU countries. In the second stage, the circular performance of the country is investigated and compared by means of a synthetic index (Index of National Economies Circularity-INEC) constructed within the framework of five basic indicators announced for Türkiye.

Findings: Both descriptive and index findings seem to be compatible. Although the empirical findings of the Index (INEC) suggest that Türkiye ranks behind the member countries in terms of the circularity performance in average, there appears to be an increase in favour of the country’s circularity during the period (2016-2018) examined.

Originality: In the literature, no study is found in which Türkiye’s circular potential and performance are investigated and compared with the EU countries through an index constructed based on the EU Circular Economy indicators. For this reason, it is considered that the original and widespread effects of the work are going to be significant.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Circular Economy, Index of National Economies Circularity, Circularity Performance

Türkiye’nin Döngüsellik Performansı: Avrupa Birliği Ülkeleri ile Karşılaştırmalı Bir Araştırma

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma, müzakereci aday ülke olan Türkiye’nin, Avrupa Komisyonu tarafından döngüsel ekonomiye ilişkin izlem çerçevesinde yer alan göstergeler açısından döngüsellik performansının hesaplanmasını amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda Avrupa Birliği (AB) ülkeleri bulguları ile karşılaştırma yapılarak Türkiye’nin döngüsellik potansiyeli ortaya konulmaktadır.

Yöntem: İlk aşamada; AB ülkeleri karşısında Türkiye’nin döngüsellik gelişimi betimsel olarak karşılaştırılarak incelenmektedir. İkinci aşamada, AB döngüsel ekonomi göstergelerinden Türkiye için açıklanan beş temel gösterge çerçevesinde oluşturulan bir sentetik endeks (Ulusal Ekonomiler Döngüsellik Endeksi-INEC) vasıtasıyla ülkenin döngüsellik performansı araştırılmaktadır.

Bulgular: Betimsel ve endeks bulgularının birbiriyle uyumlu olduğu görülmektedir. Endeks (INEC) bulguları, Türkiye’nin döngüsellik performansında AB ortalamasının gerisinde kaldığına işaret etse de incelenen dönemde (2016-2018) ülkedeki döngüselliğin artışı lehine bir eğilim görülmektedir. Türkiye’nin; Birlik içinde 2018 yılı itibarıyla en düşük döngüsellik düzeyine sahip olan Malta, Güney Kıbrıs Rum Yönetimi ve Estonya’dan daha yüksek döngüsellik endeksine sahip olduğu hesaplanmıştır.

Özgünlük: Yazında, AB döngüsel ekonomi göstergeleri temelinde oluşturulan bir endeks vasıtasıyla Türkiye’nin döngüsellik performansının araştırıldığı ve AB ülkeleri ile karşılaştırmasının yapıldığı bir çalışmaya rastlanılmamıştır. Bu nedenle çalışmanın ilgili alandaki özgün ve yaygın etkisinin önemli olacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Döngüsel Ekonomi, Ulusal Ekonomiler Döngüsellik Endeksi, Döngüsellik Performansı

Kaynakça

• Blomsma, F. ve Brennan, G. (2017). “The Emergence of Circular Economy: A New Framing Around Prolonging Resource Productivity”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 603-614.
• Boulding, K. (1966). “The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth”, Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy—Essays from the Sixth RFF Forum, Editor: Jarrett, H., The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, USA.
• Braungart, M. ve McDonough, W. (2002). “Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things”, North Point Press, New York.
• Brennan, G., Tennant, M. ve Blomsma, F. (2015). “Business and Production Solutions: Closing Loops and the Circular Economy”, Sustainability (Editors: Kopnina, H. ve Shoreman-Ouimet, E.), Routledge: EarthScan, Londra, 219-239.
• Buckminster Fuller, R. (1969). “Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth”, Southern Illinois University Press, USA.
• Carson, R. (1962). “Silent Spring”, A Crest Reprint, Fawcett Publications, Inc., Greenwich, Conn. Member of American Book Publishers Council, Inc., https://library.uniteddiversity.coop/More_Books_and_Reports/Silent_Spring-Rachel_Carson-1962.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 17.04.2020).
• Circle Economy, (2020a). “The Circularity Gap Report”, The Platform for Accelerating the Circular Economy (PACE), Ruparo, Amsterdam, https://assets.website-files.com/5e185aa4d27bcf348400ed82/5e26ead616b6d1d157ff4293_20200120%20-%20CGR%20Global%20- %20Report%20web%20single%20page%20-%20210x297mm%20-%20compressed.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 05.05.2020).
• Circle Economy, (2020b). “The Power of Countries to Closa the Circularity Gap”, https://circularity-gap.world/countries, (Erişim Tarihi: 05.05.2020).
• Circle Economy, (2021). “The Circularity Gap Report”, https://www.circularity-gap.world/2021, (Erişim Tarihi: 30.03.2022).
• Commoner, B. (1971). “The Closing Circle: Nature, Man, and Technology”, Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
• Eco-Innovation Observatory (EIO), (2016). “Policies and Practices for Eco-innovation Uptake and Circular Economy Transition”, EIO Bi-annual Report, https://www.pac.gr/bcm/uploads/eio_2016_report_small.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 07.08.2020).
• Elia, V., Grazia Gnoni, M. ve Tornese, F. (2017). “Measuring Circular Economy Strategies Through Index Methods: A Critical Analysis”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4), 2741-2751.
• Ellen MacArthur Foundation, (2015). “Towards a Circular Economy: Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition”, https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/TCE_Ellen-MacArthur-Foundation_9-Dec-2015.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 07.04.2020).
• European Commission (EC), (2008). “Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on Waste and Repealing Certain Directives”, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32008L0098&from=EN, (Erişim Tarihi:07.08.2020).
• European Commission (EC), (2015). “Closing the Loop—An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy (COM/2015/0614 final)”, https://www.eea.europa.eu/policy-documents/com-2015-0614-final, (Erişim Tarihi: 10.04.2020).
• European Commission (EC), (2017). “Guidance on Municipal Waste Data Collection”, Eurostat - Unit E2 - Environmental Statistics and Accounts; Sustainable Developmant, May 2017, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/342366/351811/Municipal+Waste+guidance/bd38a449-7d30-44b6-a39f-8a20a9e67af2, (Erişim Tarihi: 30.05.2022).
• European Commission (EC), (2019). “Circular Economy”, DG GROW, https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/sustainability/circular-economy_en, (Erişim Tarihi: 07.08.2020).
• European Commision (EC), (2020). “Circular Economy Action Plan”, https://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/pdf/new_circular_economy_action_plan.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 22.11.2020).
• European Union (EU), (2020). “Fasıl 27: Çevre ve İklim Değişikliği”, Avrupa Birliği’nin Çevre ve İklim Değişikliği Politikası, https://www.ab.gov.tr/fasil-27-cevre_92.html, (Erişim Tarihi: 28.09.2020).
• Eurostat, (2021). “Atıkla İlgili Göstergeler”, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/waste/data/indicators, (Erişim Tarihi: 10.05.2021).
• Eurostat, (2022a). “Circular Economy-Overview”, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/circular-economy, (Erişim Tarihi: 02.03.2022).
• Eurostat, (2022b). “Circular Economy-Indicators”, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/circular-economy/indicators, (Erişim Tarihi: 02.03.2022).
• Eurostat, (2022c). “Circular Economy Indicators”, Production and Consumption, Generation of Municipal Waste Per Capita, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/cei_pc031/default/table?lang=en, (Erişim Tarihi: 02.03.2022).
• Eurostat, (2022d). “Database”, Tables by Themes, Population (National Level), Population 1 January, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tps00001/default/table?lang=en, (Erişim Tarihi: 04.03.2022).
• Eurostat (2022e). “Circular Economy Indicators”, Production and Consumption, Generation of Waste Excluding Major Mineral Wastes Per GDP Unit, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/cei_pc032/default/table?lang=en, (Erişim Tarihi: 04.03.2022).
• Eurostat, (2022f). “Circular Economy Indicators”, Production and Consumption, Generation of Waste Excluding Major Mineral Wastes Per Domestic Material Consumption, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/cei_pc033/default/table?lang=en, (Erişim Tarihi: 04.03.2022).
• Eurostat, (2022g). “Circular Economy Indicators”, Waste Management, Recycling Rate of Municipal Waste, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/cei_wm011/default/table?lang=en, (Erişim Tarihi: 04.03.2022).
• Eurostat, (2022h). “Circular Economy Indicators”, Waste Management, Recycling of Biowaste, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/cei_wm030/default/table?lang=en, (Erişim Tarihi: 04.03.2022).
• Eurostat, (2022ı). “Circular Economy Indicators”, Competitiveness and Innovation, Private Investments, Jobs and Gross Value Added Related to Circular Economy Sectors, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/CEI_CIE010__custom_3198581/default/table?lang=en, (Erişim Tarihi: 04.03.2022).
• Figge, F., Thorpe, A.S., Givry, P., Canning, L. ve Franklin-Johnson, E. (2018). “Longevity and Circularity as Indicators of Eco- Efficient Resource Use in the Circular Economy”, Ecological Economics, 150, 297-306.
• Garcia-Bernabeu, A., Hilario-Caballero, A., Pla-Santamaria, D. ve Salas-Molina, F. (2020). “A Process Oriented MCDM Approach to Construct a Circular Economy Composite Index”, Sustainability, 12(2), 618. Doi: 10.3390/su12020618.
• Gaustad, G., Krystofik, M., Bustamante, M. ve Badami, K. (2018). “Circular Economy Strategies for Mitigating Critical Material Supply Issues, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 24-33.
• Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C. ve Ulgiati, S. (2016). “A Review on Circular Economy: the Expected Transition to a Balanced Interplay of Environmental and Economic Systems”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11-32.
• Global Footprint Network, (2022). “Earth Overshoot Day”, https://www.footprintnetwork.org/our-work/earth-overshoot-day/, (Erişim Tarihi: 13.08.2022).
• Grzebyk, M. ve Stec, M. (2015). “Sustainable Development in EU Countries: Concept and Rating of Levels of Development”, Sustainable Development, 23, 110-123.
• Hardin, G. (1968). “The Tragedy of the Commons”, Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248.
• Hellwig, Z. (1968). “Zastosowanie Metody Taksonomicznej Do Typologicznego Podziału Krajów Ze Względu Na Poziom Ich Rozwoju Oraz Zasoby I Strukturę Wykwalifikowanych Kadr”, Przegląd Statystyczny, 4(1968), 307-326.
• Jawahir, I.S. ve Bradley, R. (2016). Technological Elements of Circular Economy and The Principles of 6R-Based Closed-Loop Material Flow in Sustainable Manufacturing”, Procedia CIRP, 40(1), 103-108.
• Kasztelan, A. (2020). “How Circular Are the European Economies? A Taxonomic Analysis Based on the INEC (Index of National Economies’ Circularity)”, Sustainability, 12(18), 7613. Doi: 10.3390/su12187613.
• King, A.M., Burgess, S.C., Ijomah, W. ve McMahon, C.A. (2006). “Reducing Waste: Repair, Recondition, Remanufacture or Recycle?”, Sustainable Development, 14(4), 257-267. Doi: 10.1002/sd.271.
• Kirchherr, J., Reike, D. ve Hekkert, M. (2017). “Conceptualizing the Circular Economy: An Analysis of 114 Definitions”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221-232.
• Lieder, M. ve Rashid, A. (2016). “Towards Circular Economy Implementation: A Comprehensive Review in Context of Manufacturing Industry”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 115, 36-51.
• Mann Borgese, E. (1988). “The Mediterranean Blue Plan: Some Furter Comments”, Environmental Conservation, 15(2), 179-180, Cambrige University Press. Doi: 10.1017/S0376892900029052.
• Moraga, G., Huysveld, S., Mathieux, F., Blengini, G.A., Alaerts, L., Van Acker, K., De Meester, S. ve Dewulf, J. (2019). “Circular Economy Indicators: What Do They Measure?”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 452- 461, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092134491930151X. Doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.045.
• Neugebauer, S., Martinez-Blanco, J., Scheumann, R. ve Finkbeeiner, M. (2015). “Enhancing the Practical Implementation of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment-Proposal of a Tiered Approach”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, 165-176. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.053.
• Núñez-Cacho, P., Górecki, J., Molina, V. ve Corpas-Iglesias, F.A. (2018). “New Measures of Circular Economy Thinking in Construction Companies”, Journal of EU Research in Business. Doi: 10.5171/2018.909360.
• Okorie, O., Salonitis, K., Charnley, F., Moreno, M., Turner, C. ve Tiwari, A. (2018). “A Data-Driven Approaches for Circular Economy in Manufacturing for Digital Technologies: A Review of Current Research and Proposed Framework”, Preprints, 2018080159. Doi: 10.20944/preprints201808.0159.v1.
• Organisation Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), (2019). “OECD Çevresel Performans İzlemeleri: Türkiye 2019”, https://www.oecd.org/env/country-reviews/Highlights-Turkiye-2019-TURKISH-WEB.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 04.03.2022).
• Pearce, D.W. ve Turner, R.K. (1990). “Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment”, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore MD.
• People’s Republic of China (PRC), (2008). “Çin Halk Cumhuriyeti Döngüsel Ekonomiyi Teşvik Yasası”, https://www.lawinfochina.com/display.aspx?id=7025&lib=law, (Erişim Tarihi: 14.08.2022).
• Plastinina, I., Teslyuk, L., Dukmasova, N. ve Pikalova, E. (2019). “Implementation of Circular Economy Principles in Regional Solid Municipal Waste Management: The Case of Sverdlovskaya Oblast (Russian Federation)”, Resources, 8(2), 90. Doi: 10.3390/resources8020090.
• Potting, J., Hekkert, M.P., Worrell, E. ve Hanemaaijer, A. (2017). “Circular Economy: Measuring Innovation in the Product Chain”, 2544, PBL Publishers, Hague.
• Sady, M. (2016). “Understanding the Concept of Circular Economy”, Challenges for Contemporary Management, Editors: Trifonova, N.V., Teczke, J.ve Bula, P., International Management Foundation, Cracow-Saint Petersburg.
• Sayın, F. (2020). “Giriş Yerine: Döngüsel Ekonomiye Doğru”, Döngüsel Ekonomi-Makro ve Mikro İncelemeler, Editör: Sayın, F., Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, Ankara, 1-15.
• Sayın, F. ve Çelik, O. (2020). “Döngüsel Ekonomi Perspektifinde Eko-inovasyon: Türkiye ve Avrupa Birliği Ülkeleri Karşılaştırmalı Analizi”, Ekonomik ve Teknolojik Değişim Sürecinde İnovasyon, Editör: Muratoğlu, G., Gazi Kitabevi, Ankara, 523-556.
• Scarpellini S., Valero-Gil J., Moneva J.M. ve Andreaus M. (2020). “Environmental Management Capabilities for a “Circular Eco-innovation””, Business Strategy and Environment, 29(1), 1-15. Doi: 10.1002/bse.2472.
• Sihvonen, S. ve Ritola, T. (2015). “Conceptualizing ReX for Aggregating End-of-Life Strategies in Product Development”, Procedia CIRP, 29, 639–644. Doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.01.026.
• Stahel, W. ve G. Reday-Mulvey. (1981). “Jobs for Tomorrow: The Potential of Substituting Energy for Manpower”, Vantage, Brussels, New York.
• Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı, (2019). On Birinci Kalkınma Planı (2019-2023), https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/On_Birinci_Kalkinma_Plani-2019-2023.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 14.08.2022).
• Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı, (2021). Orta Vadeli Program (2022-2024), https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Orta-Vadeli-Program-2022-2024.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 14.08.2022).
• Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Kalkınma Bakanlığı, (2018). On Birinci Kalkınma Planı (2019-2023), Çevre ve Doğal Kaynakların Sürdürülebilir Yönetimi Çalışma Grubu Raporu, https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Cevre_ve_DogalKaynaklarinSurdurulebilirYonetimiCalismaGrubuRaporu.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 14.08.2022).
• Toxopeus, M.E., De Koeijer, B.L.A. ve Meij, A.G.G.H. (2015). “Cradle to Cradle: Effective Vision vs. Efficient Practice?”, Procedia CIRP, 29, 384-389. https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/15053582/cradle.pdf.
• Utkulu, U. ve Türköz, K. (2020). “Döngüsel Ekonomiye Geçiş Sürecinin Uluslararası Ticarete Yansımaları: Türkiye Örneği”, Döngüsel Ekonomi-Makro ve Mikro İncelemeler, Editör: Sayın, F., Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, Ankara, 113-142.
• Van Buren, N., Demmers, M., der Heijden, R.V. ve Witlox, F. (2016). “Towards a Circular Economy: The Role of Dutch Logistics Industries and Governments”, Sustainability, 8(7), 647. http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/7/647, (Erişim Tarihi: 11.10.2019).