Wisdom and Life Satisfaction in Old Age

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2, 61 - 72, 31.12.2025

Velittin Kalınkara , Ahu Arıcıoğlu

https://doi.org/10.46414/yasad.1781883

Öz

Objective living conditions such as physical health, socioeconomic status, financial resources, physical environment, and social participation cannot fully explain life satisfaction in older adults. Instead, personality traits and developmental processes appear to have a stronger impact on life satisfaction. In this context, wisdom has re-emerged as an important predictor of life satisfaction. Traditionally regarded as a characteristic of older age, wisdom has recently been conceptualized as a multidimensional construct encompassing cognitive, reflective, and compassionate components. Previous findings indicate a positive association between wisdom and coping in later life. The present study examined the relationship between wisdom and life satisfaction. The sample consisted of 260 participants aged 60–89 years (M=69.76, SD=4.65) residing in the Aegean region of Turkey, 55.6% of whom were female. Data were collected using the San Diego Wisdom Scale, the Satisfaction with Life Scale, and a socio-demographic questionnaire. Reliability analyses yielded Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of 0.733 for the Wisdom Scale and 0.825 for the Life Satisfaction Scale. Results revealed a significant relationship between life satisfaction and wisdom (r=.250, p<0.05). In addition, wisdom scores significantly differed by income level (KWH=9.470, p=0.001) and coping with difficulties (z=-3.301, p=0.001), whereas life satisfaction scores significantly differed by education (KWH=10.877, p=0.012), income level (KWH=8.064, p=0.018), and coping with difficulties (z=-3.182, p=0.001). In conclusion, both life satisfaction and wisdom emerge as crucial resources for coping in older adulthood. Findings suggest that wisdom enhances life satisfaction independently of objective conditions, highlighting that successful aging in later life is more strongly linked to lifelong psychosocial development than to current circumstances.

Anahtar Kelimeler

old age , wisdom , life satisfaction , coping

Yaşlılıkta Bilgelik ve Yaşam Doyumu

Öz

Fiziksel sağlık, sosyoekonomik durum, mali koşullar, fiziksel çevre ve sosyal katılım gibi nesnel yaşam koşulları yaşlı bireylerin yaşam doyumunu tam olarak açıklayamamaktadır. Bunun yerine, kişilik özellikleri ve gelişimsel etkilerin yaşam doyumu üzerinde daha güçlü bir etkisi olduğu görülmektedir. Bu bağlamda, bilgelik yaşam doyumunun önemli bir öngörücüsü olarak yeniden ilgi görmektedir. Uzun yıllardır yaşlı bireylerin bir özelliği olarak kabul edilen bilgelik, son dönemde bilişsel, yansıtıcı ve şefkat boyutlarını içeren çok boyutlu bir yapı olarak psikolojik araştırmaların odağı haline gelmiştir. Bulgular, bilgelikle yaşlılıkta başa çıkma arasında pozitif bir ilişki olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu çalışmada, bilgelik ile yaşam doyumu arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. Araştırmaya Ege Bölgesi’nde yaşayan 60–89 yaş arası 260 katılımcı (ortalama=69,76, ss=4,65) dahil edilmiş olup, katılımcıların %55,6’sı kadındır. Veriler, San Diego Bilgelik Ölçeği, Yaşam Doyumu Ölçeği ve sosyo-demografik anket ile toplanmıştır. Analizler sonucunda Bilgelik Ölçeği için Cronbach Alpha=0.733, Yaşam Doyumu Ölçeği için 0.825 bulunmuştur. Yaşlılıkta yaşam doyumu ve bilgelik arasında anlamlı bir ilişki saptanmıştır (r=.250, p<0.05). Ayrıca bilgelik puanları ile gelir durumu (KWH=9.470, p=0.001) ve zorluklarla başa çıkma (z=-3.301, p=0.001) arasında anlamlı farklılıklar bulunmuştur. Yaşam doyumu puanları ise eğitim (KWH=10.877, p=0.012), gelir durumu (KWH=8.064, p=0.018) ve zorluklarla başa çıkma (z=-3.182, p=0.001) ile anlamlı düzeyde ilişkilidir. Sonuç olarak, yaşam doyumu ve bilgelik yaşlılıkla başa çıkmada önemli kaynaklar olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Bilgeliğin nesnel koşullardan bağımsız şekilde yaşam doyumunu güçlendirdiği görülmektedir. Bu bulgular, yaşamın son döneminde iyi yaşlanmanın, mevcut koşullardan çok yaşam boyu psikososyal gelişime bağlı olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

yaşlılık , bilgelik , yaşam doyumu , başa çıkma

Kaynakça

• Akkaya, A. (2019). Psikososyal gelişim alanı olarak bilgelik gelişiminin incelenmesi [The development of wisdom of individuals psyc-hosocial development processes]. [Unpub-lished master's thesis]. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kocaeli.
• Al-Khamaiseh, O. S. (2024). Wisdom and its relationship to life satisfaction among the older people in Jordan. Journal of Educa-tional and Social Research, 14(4), 246-256. doi:10.36 941/jesr-2024-0100
• Ardelt, M. (1997). Wisdom and life satisfaction in old age. The Journals of Gerontology: Se-ries B, 52B(1), P15–P27. doi:10.1093/gero nb/52B.1.P15
• Ardelt, M. (2016). Disentangling the relations between wisdom and different types of well-being in old age: Findings from a short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(5), 1963-1984. doi:10.1007/s109 02-015- 9680-2
• Ardelt, M. (2000). Antecedents and effects of wisdom in old age: A longitudinal perspec-tive on aging well. Research on Aging, 22, 360-394.
• Ardelt, M. (2003). Empirical assessment of a three-dimensional wisdom scale. Research on Aging, 25, 275–324.
• Ardelt, M. (2019). The relation between age and three-dimensional wisdom: Variations by wisdom dimensions and education. Under revision for this volume. Unpublished manu-script.
• Ardelt, M., & Jeste, D. V. (2022). Wisdom as a resiliency factor for subjective well-being in later life. Psychosoziale und Medizinische Rehabilitation, 118, 13-28.
• Baltes, P. B., & Staudinger, U. M. (2000). Wis-dom: A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orches-trate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55(1), 122-136.
• Becker, N. H. (Ed.) (2013). Handbook of family resilience: Resilience in aging, moving through challenge to wisdom. New York: Springer.
• Brudek, P., Steuden, S., & Kaleta, K. (2023). Wisdom and wellbeing in polish older adults: the mediating role of forgiveness. Front. Psychol, 14, 1163113. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.116 3113
• Brugman, G. M. (2000). Wisdom: Source of nar-rative coherence and eudaimonia. Delft, the Netherlands: Eburon.
• Canda, B. (2003). Life Satisfaction and Self-Concept of Elderly Living in Congregate and Non-Congregate Housing inKnox Country, Tennessee. Ph.D., Thesis The University of Tennessee. Knoxville.
• Cheng, S.-L., Zhang, X., Liu, S., Zhao, C., & Bi, S. (2025). Integration and completion: life wisdom and happiness of Chinese older adults from a life course perspective. Front. Public Health, 13:1575099. doi:10.3389/fpubh. 2025.1575099
• Cohn, M. A., Fredrickson, B. L., Brown, S. L., Mikels, J. A., & Conway, A. M. (2009). Hap-piness unpacked: Positive emotions increase life satisfaction by building resilience. Emo-tion, 9(3), 361-368. doi:10.1037/a 0015952
• Dağlı, A., & Baysal, N. (2016). Yaşam doyumu ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(59), 1250-1262. doi:10.177 55/esosder.75955
• Daneshpayeh, M., Naderi, D., Ramzi, F., & Che-raghi Tofigh, F. (2025). The prediction of life satisfaction based on wisdom components through the mediating role of meaning in life and moral foundations in older adults. Aging Psychology, 11(2), 212-193. doi:10.22126/ jap.2025.11950.1848
• Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Grif-fin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
• Erikson, E. (1964). Inner and outer space: Re-flections on woman-hood. Daedulus, 93 (Spring), 582-606.
• Etezadi, S., & Pushkar, D. (2013). Why are wise people happier? An explanatory model of wisdom and emotional well-being in older adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 929-950. doi:10.1007/s10902-012-9362-2
• Ferrari, M., Kahn, A., Benayon, M., & Nero, J. (2011). Phronesis, sophia, and hochma: De-veloping wisdom in Islam and Judaism. Re-search in Human Development, 8(2), 128-148. doi:10.1080/ 15427609.2011.56886 9
• Glück, J., Weststrate, N. M., & Scherpf, A. (2022). Looking beyond linear: A closer ex-amination of the relationship between wis-dom and wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies, 23(1), 3285-3313. doi:10.1007/s10902-022-00540-3
• Greitens, E. (2015). Resilience: Hard-won wis-dom for living a better life (1st ed.). http://www.nationalreview.com/article/415144/resilience-meansgrowing-stronger-not-just-bouncing-backinterview Grimm, S. R. (2015). Wisdom. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 93, 139–154. doi:10.1080/ 00048402.2014.937449
• Gurven, M., Buoro, Y., Rodriguez, D. E., Sayre, K., Trumble, B., Pyhala, A., Kaplan, H., An-gelsen, A., Stieglitz, J., & Reyes-
• Garcia, V. (2024). Subjective well-being across the life course among non-industrialized popula-tions. Sci Adv., 10(43), eado0952. doi:10.1126/sciadv. ado0952
• Hayat, S. Z., Khan,S., & Sadia, R. (2016). Resili-ence, wisdom, and life satisfaction in elderly living with families and in old-age homes. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 31(2), 475-494.
• Jonson, H., & Magnusson, J. A. (2001). A new age of old age? Gerotranscendence and re-enchantment of aging. Journal of Aging Stud-ies, 15, 317-331.
• Köker, S. (1991). Normal ve Sorunlu Ergenlerin Yaşam Doyumu Düzeyinin Karşılaştırılma-sı. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Ankara Üniversite-si, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Kusumi, T. (2018). Wisdom as expertise: Devel-opment and application of wisdom knowledge scale. Japanese Psychological Review, 61(3), 251-271. doi:10.24602/sjpr.61. 3251
• Kütük, H., Hatun, O., Ekşi, H., & Ekşi, F. (2023). Investigation of the relationships between mindfulness, wisdom, resilience and life sat-isfaction in Turkish adult population. J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther, 41, 536–551. doi:10.1007/s10942-022-00468-w
• Lee, O., & Chan, K. (2009). Resilience and aging. Aging Health, 3(3), 309- 323.
• Lim, L. L., & Kua, E. H. (2011). Living alone, loneliness, and psychological well-being of older persons in Singapore. Current Geron-tology and Geriatrics Research, 1(2011), 673181. doi:10.1155/2011/673181
• Meeks, T. W., & Jeste, D. V. (2009). Neurobiolo-gy of wisdom: A literature overview. Ar-chives of General Psychiatry, 66(4), 355-365.
• Mickler, C., & Staudinger, U. M. (2008). Person-al wisdom: Validation and age-related differ-ences of a performance measure. Psychology and Aging, 23(4), 787-799. doi:10.1037/ a0013928
• Nasser, A. (2003). Ego integration among older people and its relationship to some varia-bles. (unpublished master's thesis). Univer-sity of Baghdad, College of Arts, Baghdad, Iraq.
• Ng, S. T., Tey, N. P., & Asadullah, M. N. (2017). What matters for life satisfaction among the oldest-old? Evidence from China. PLoS ONE 12(2), e0171799. doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0171799
• Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E.P. (2004). Char-acter Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Inc.
• Pranda, K., & Lachman, M. (2001). Planning for the future: A life management strategy for increasing control and life satisfaction in adulthood. Psychology & Aging, 16(2), 206-216.
• Radwan, S., & Hariri, A. (2001). The relation-ship between social support and each of the manifestations of depression, self-esteem, and life satisfaction. Psychology Journal, Egyptian General Book Authority, 15(58), 72-109.
• Rani, G. S., & Banu, N. (2018). Relationship between life-satisfaction and wisdom of re-tired professionals. International Journal of Educational Science and Research (IJESR), 8(1), 19-24.
• Ryan, S. (2014). Wisdom. In E. N. Zal-ta (Ed.). The Stanford encyclopedia of phi-losophy. Open-access publication. https://plato.stanford. edu/archives/win2014/entries/wisdom/ Erişim: 30.04.2025.
• Sawin, L., Corbett, L., & Carbine, M. (2015). Jung and aging: Possibilities and potentials for the second half of life. Journal of Analyti-cal Psychology, 60(3), 419-440.
• Schoklitsch, A., & Baumann, U. (2011). Genera-tivity and aging: A promising future re-search topic? Journal of Aging Studies, 26, 262-272.
• Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Authentic Happiness: Using The New Positive Psychology to Real-ize Your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment. New York: Simon and Schuster.
• Shimizu, Y., Suzuki, M., Hata, Y., & Sakaki, T. (2025). Wisdom's moderating role in the as-sociation between perceived ageism and life satisfaction among older adults in Japan: A pre-registered study. Archives of Gerontolo-gy and Geriatrics Plus, 2(1), 100110. doi:10.1016/j.aggp.2024.100110
• Staudinger, U. M., & Glück, J. (2011). Psycholog-ical wisdom research: Commonalities and differences in a growing field. Annual Re-view of Psychology, 62, 215–241. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.121208. 131659
• Staudinger, U. M., & Kunzmann, U. (2005). Posi-tive adult personality development: Adjust-ment and/or growth? European Psycholo-gist, 10(4), 320–329. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.10. 4.320
• Sternberg, R. J. (1998). A balance theory of wis-dom. Review of General Psychology, 2(4), 347-365.
• Thomas, M. L., Bangen, K. J., Palmer, B. W., Sir-kin, A., Avanzino, J., Depp, C. A., Glorioso, D., Daly, R. E., & Jeste, D. V. (2017). A new scale for assessing wisdom based on common do-mains and a neurobiological model: The San Diego wisdom scale (SD-WISE). Journal of Psychiatric Research, 108, 40–47. doi:10.1016/j.jpsy chires.2017.09.005
• Tornstam, L. (1996). Caring for the elderly: Introducing the theory of gerotranscend-ence as a supplementary frame of reference for caring for the elderly. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 10, 144-150.
• Webster, J. D. (2007). Measuring the character strength of wisdom. The International Jour-nal of Aging and Human Develop-ment, 65(2), 163-183. doi:10.2190/AG.65.2.d
• Webster, J. D., Westerhof, G. J., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2012). Wisdom and mental health across the lifespan. Journal of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Scienc-es, doi:10.1093/geronb/gbs121
• Zadworna, M. (2023). Effects of wisdom on mental health in old age: Exploring the pathways through developmental tasks at-tainment and self-rated health. Psychol Res Behav Manag, 16, 4541-4554. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S429918
• Zadworna, M., & Stetkiewicz-Lewandowicz, A. (2023). The relationships between wisdom, positive orientation and health-related be-havior in older adults. Sci Rep, 13, 16724. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-43868-3