Evli Bireylerde Bağlanma Stilleri ve Evlilik Doyumu Arasındaki İlişki

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, evli bireylerin bağlanma stilleri ile evlilik doyumu arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Araştırma, çeşitli demografik özelliklere sahip 205 evli bireyin gönüllü katılımıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Katılımcıların %82.4’ü kadın, %53.7’si 30-39 yaş aralığında, %42.4’ü orta gelir düzeyine sahip olup, %50.7’si 10 yıl ve üzeri süredir evlidir. Verilerin analizinde, cinsiyet, yaş ve gelir durumu değişkenlerine göre bağlanma stilleri ve evlilik doyumu düzeyleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır. Benzer şekilde, evlilik süresi değişkenine göre bağlanma stillerinde anlamlı bir fark saptanmamıştır. Ancak, evlilik süresi ile evlilik doyumu arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark olduğu görülmüştür. Çocuk sahibi olma değişkeni açısından, çocuk sahibi olmayan evli bireylerin evlilik doyumu ile çocuk sahibi olan evli bireylerin evllilik doyumu arasında anlamlı fark bulunmuştur. Ayrıca, bağlanma stilleri ile evlilik doyumu arasında düşük düzeyde fakat anlamlı ilişkiler belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, bağlanma stillerinin evlilik doyumu üzerinde belirli bir etkisi olabileceğini, ancak bu etkinin sınırlı düzeyde kaldığını göstermektedir. Bu çalışma, bağlanma kuramı perspektifinden evlilik ilişkilerini anlama sürecine katkı sağlamakta ve ileride yapılacak araştırmalar için önemli bir temel sunmaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Evlilik
• Bağlanma stilleri
• Evlilik doyumu

The Relationship Between Attachment Styles and Marital Satisfaction in Married Individuals

Öz

The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between attachment styles and marital satisfaction among married individuals. The study was conducted with the voluntary participation of 205 individuals with diverse demographic characteristics. Among the participants, 82.4% were women, 53.7% were aged between 30 and 39, 42.4% had a medium income level, and 50.7% had been married for over 10 years. Data analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in attachment styles or marital satisfaction scores based on gender, age, or income level. Similarly, no significant differences were found in attachment styles based on the duration of marriage. However, a statistically significant difference was identified in marital satisfaction according to the duration of marriage. Regarding the variable of having children, a significant difference was found in marital satisfaction between married individuals without children and those with children. Furthermore, weak yet statistically significant relationships were found between attachment styles and marital satisfaction. The findings suggest that while attachment styles may have an impact on marital satisfaction, this influence appears to be limited. This study contributes to the understanding of marital relationships from the perspective of attachment theory and provides a valuable foundation for future research in the field.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Marriage
• Attachment styles
• Marital satisfaction

Kaynakça

1. Ainsworth, M.D.S., Blehar, M.C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Erlbaum.
2. Akçabozan Kayabol, N.B., Çağ, P., Akbaş, U., Hatipoğlu Sümer, Z., Özbay, Y., Karacan Özdemir, N., Tatlı, C., Eker Durmuş, E., & Aydın, G. (2023). Evlilik Doyumu Ölçeği’nin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13(1), 309-324.
3. Alpay, A. (2009). Yakın ilişkilerde bağışlama: Bağışlamanın; bağlanma, benlik saygısı, empati ve kıskançlık değişkenleri yönünden incelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
4. Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L.M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226-244.
5. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.
6. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger. Basic Books.
7. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. Basic Books.
8. Bretherton, I., & Munholland, K.A. (2016). The internal working model construct in light of contemporary neuroimaging research. In J. Cassidy & P.R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment (3rd ed., pp.63-88). Guilford Press.

9. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (24. baskı). Pegem Akademi.
10. Collins, N.L., & Feeney, B.C. (2004). Working models of attachment shape communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 878-891.
11. Collins, N.L., & Laursen, W. (2003). Adolescents’ relationships with parents. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22(1), 58-65.
12. Conger, R.D., Rueter, M.A., & Elder Jr, G.H. (1999). Couple resilience to economic pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 54-71.
13. Çelik, M. & Türk, N. (2024). Bağlanma Stilleri Ölçeği Kısa Formu’nun psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi. Journal of History School, 73, 3121-3141.
14. Del Giudice, M. (2019). Sex differences in attachment styles: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(2), 255-273.
15. Doss, B.D., & Rhoades, G.K. (2017). The transition to parenthood: Impact on couples’ romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 25-28.
16. Falconier, M.K., & Kuhn, R. (2019). Dyadic coping in couples: A conceptual integration and a review of the empirical literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 571.
17. Feeney, B.C., & Collins, N.L. (2015). A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(2), 113-147.
18. Feeney, B.C., & Collins, N.L. (2015). A new look at social support as a mechanism of relationship maintenance. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 22-28.
19. Feeney, J.A. (1999). Adult romantic attachment and couple relationships. In J. Cassidy & P.R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp.355-377). Guilford Press.
20. Feeney, J.A., Noller, P., & Hanrahan, M. (1994). Assessing adult attachment. In M. B. Sperling & W. H. Berman (Eds.), Attachment in adults: Clinical and developmental perspectives (pp.128-152). Guilford Press.
21. Fincham, F.D., & Beach, S.R. (2010). Marriage in the new millennium: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 630-649.
22. Fowers, B.J. (1993). Psychology as public philosophy: An illustration of the moral dimension of psychology with marital research. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 13(2), 124.
23. Fowers, B.J., & Olson, D.H. (1993). ENRICH Marital Satisfaction Scale: A brief research and clinical tool. Journal of Family Psychology, 7(2), 176-185.
24. Girgin, B., & Şık, B.A. (2018). Çatalca’da yaşayan evli bireylerin bağlanma stilleri, romantik kıskançlık düzeyleri ve evlilik doyumları arasındaki ilişki. Aydın Sağlık Dergisi, 4(2), 41-54.
25. Glenn, N.D. (1998). The course of marital success and failure in five American 10-year marriage cohorts. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 569-576.
26. Greeff, A.P. (2000). Characteristics of families that function well. Journal of Family Issues, 21(8), 948-962.
27. Hazan, C., & Shaver, P.R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511-524.
28. Huston, T.L., Caughlin, J.P., Houts, R.M., Smith, S.E., & George, L.J. (2001). The connubial crucible: Newlywed years as predictors of marital delight, distress, and divorce. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 237-252.
29. Iwanaga, K., Blake, J., Yaghmaian, R., Umucu, E., Chan, F., Brooks, J.M., Rahimi, M., & Tansey, T.N. (2018). Preliminary validation of a short-form version of the attachment style questionnaire for use in clinical rehabilitation counseling research and practice. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 61(4), 205-216.
30. Johnson, S.M. (2019). Attachment theory in practice: Emotionally focused therapy (EFT) with individuals, couples, and families. Guilford Press.
31. Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: Kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler (15. bs.). Nobel Yayıncılık.
32. Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (24. Baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
33. Kesebir, S., Kavzoğlu, S.Ö., & Üstündağ, M.F. (2011). Bağlanma ve psikopatoloji. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 3(2), 321-342.
34. Lavner, J.A., & Bradbury, T.N. (2017). Protecting relationships from stress. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 11-14.
35. Markman, H.J., & Rhoades, G.K. (2012). Relationship education research: Current status and future directions. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(1), 169-200.
36. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P.R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. Guilford Press.
37. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P.R. (2019). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
38. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P.R. (2019). Attachment orientations and emotion regulation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 25, 6-10.
39. Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P.R., & Pereg, D. (2020). Attachment theory and affect regulation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 25, 86-91.
40. Overall, N.C., & Simpson, J.A. (2015). Attachment and dyadic regulation processes. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 61-66.
41. Overall, N.C., Fletcher, G.J.O., & Simpson, J.A. (2021). Attachment and relationship dynamics. Journal of Personality, 89(1), 63-77.
42. Papp, L.M., Cummings, E.M., & Goeke-Morey, M.C. (2017). Economic stress and marital conflict. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(2), 208-219.
43. Robles, T.F., Slatcher, R.B., Trombello, J.M., & McGinn, M.M. (2014). Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 140-187.
44. Shaver, P.R., & Mikulincer, M. (2002). Attachment-related psychodynamics. Attachment & Human Development, 4(2), 133-161.
45. Simpson, J.A., & Rholes, W.S. (2017). Adult attachment, stress, and romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 19-24.
46. Stanton, S.C.E., Campbell, L., & Pink, J.C. (2022). Attachment insecurity and relationship functioning: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 26(1), 3-28.
47. Tavşancıl, E. (2014). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi (5. baskı). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
48. Terry, J., & Kottman, M. (1995). Working with families. In Guidance and counseling in the elementary and middle schools (pp.254-281). Brown & Benchmark Publishers.
49. Trillingsgaard, T., Baucom, K.J.W., & Heyman, R.E. (2018). Predictors of change in relationship satisfaction during the transition to parenthood. Journal of Family Psychology, 32(2), 160-171.
50. Twenge, J.M., Campbell, W.K., & Foster, C.A. (2003). Parenthood and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 574-590.
51. Wiebe, S.A., & Johnson, S.M. (2016). A review of the research in emotionally focused therapy. Family Process, 55(3), 390-407.
52. Williamson, H.C., & Lavner, J.A. (2020). Trajectories of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(5), 920-940.