DETERMINATION OF COMPENSATION FOR INTER-STATE DAMAGES IN THE LAW ON STATE RESPONSIBILITY

Yıl 2022, Sayı: 1, 1 - 30, 31.01.2022

Hakkı Hakan Erkiner Muhammed Halid Kavak

Öz

This study examines compensation for inter-state damages in the context of the law on international responsibility. In this context, this study examines only inter-state damages from all harmful consequences caused by the internationally wrongful act of the State. First of all, the concept of reparation, state’s obligation to reparation and method of reparation in the international responsibility law regime will be examined. Then, the obligation to reparation and its legal consequences will be expressed. Types of damage falling within the scope of the obligation to reparation will be explained. This determination directly affects the calculation of compensation, the amount of it and even the form of it. In addition, determining the feature and amount of the damage to be repaired with compensation is the preliminary process of the calculation of compensation. Besides, the unique form of compensation in international law and the principles applied in the calculation of compensation will be specified and examined. It should be noted that the scope of this study is the inter-state damages arising from the internationally wrongful act of the states. Therefore, the reparation of damages to international organizations and natural/legal persons; also, damages resulting from certain activities not prohibited by international law are out of the scope of this study.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Compensation in International Law, Damage in International law, Law of International Responsibility, Reparation in International law, Inter-state damage, Interstate Compensation

ULUSLARARASI SORUMLULUK HUKUKUNDA DEVLETLERARASI ZARARLARA YÖNELİK TAZMİNATIN BELİRLENMESİ

Öz

Bu çalışma uluslararası sorumluluk esasları çerçevesinde onarım yöntemlerinden biri olan tazminatın devletlerarası zararlar açısından incelemesini yapmaktadır. Çalışma bu bağlamda devletlerin uluslararası haksız fiilleri neticesinde meydana gelen zararlardan yalnızca devletlerin maruz kaldığı zararlar kapsamında bir incelemedir. Bu kapsamda, öncelikle uluslararası sorumluluk hukuku rejiminde zararın onarımı, onarım yükümlülüğü ve onarım yöntemleri incelenmiştir. Onarım yükümlülüğünün mahiyeti, kapsamı ve sonuçlarından bahsedildikten sonra tazminata tabi zararın kapsamı ve zarar türleri belirtilmiştir. Anılan hususlar, tazminatın hesaplanmasını, tazminat miktarını ve hatta tazminatın şeklini doğrudan etkilemektedir. Ayrıca tazminat ile onarılacak zararın mahiyetinin ve miktarının belirlenmesi tazminatın hesaplanması aşamasının ön sürecidir. Bunun devamında eldeki çalışmada tazminatın uluslararası hukuka özgü niteliği ve tazminat miktarının hesaplanmasında başvurulan ilke ve esaslar belirtilip incelenmiştir. Vurgulamak gerekir ki bu çalışmanın kapsamına devletlerin uluslararası haksız fiillerinden kaynaklanan ve yalnızca başka devlet ve devletlere yönelik zararlar girmektedir. Dolayısıyla uluslararası örgütlere, gerçek veya hükmî şahıslara yönelik zararlar ile uluslararası hukuka uygun birtakım faaliyetlerden kaynaklanan zararların onarılması bu incelemenin kapsamı dışındadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Uluslararası Hukukta Tazminat, Uluslararası Hukukta Zarar, Uluslararası Sorumluluk Hukuku, Uluslararası Hukukta Zararın Onarımı, Devletlerarası Zarar, Devletlerarası Tazminat

Kaynakça

• Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2007, ss. 43-239. <https://www.icj- cij.org/public/files/case-related/91/091-20070226-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf> s.e.t. 03.10.2021.
• Barker, John (2010) “The Different Forms of Reparation: Compensation”,Crawford, James/Pellet, Alain/Olleson, Simon (Editörler), The Law of International Responsibility, 1. Baskı, Oxford, Oxford University Press, s.599-611.
• Boyle, Alan (2010), “Liability for Injurious Consequences of Acts Not Prohibited by International Law”, Crawford, James/Pellet, Alain/Olleson, Simon (Editörler), TheLaw of International Responsibility, 1. Baskı, Oxford, Oxford University Press, s.94-105.
• Crawford, James (2014) State Responsability: The General Part, 2. Edition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Crawford, James “Third Report On State Responsibility”, ILC Document A/CN.4/507 and Add. 1–4, 2000, s.52. <https://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_507.pdf> s.e.t. 03.10.2021.
• Convention on the International Liability for Damage Causedby Space Objects, UN Treaty Series, Vol. 961, No. 13810, (https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%20961/volume -961-I-13810-English.pdf ) s.e.t. 03.10.2021.
• Eagleton, Clyde (1929) “Measure of Damages in Internatıonal Law”, Yale Law Journal, C:39, S:1, s.52-75.
• Erkiner, Hakkı Hakan (2010) Devletin Haksız Fiilden Kaynaklanan Uluslararası Sorumluluğu, 1. Baskı, İstanbul, On İki Levha Yayıncılık.
• Gabcikovo-Nagimaros Project Davası, ICJ Reports, 1997, Judgement, ss. 7-84. (https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/92/092-19970925- JUD-01-00-EN.pdf ) s.e.t. 03.10.2021.
• Graefrath, Bernhard(1984)Responsibility and Damages Caused: Relationship between Responsibility and Damages, 1. Edition, Hague, In Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law (Vol. 185).
• ILC. “DraftArticles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, with Commentaries 2001”. Yearbook of the International Law Commission. Vol. 2, Part II, 2001,<https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_6_ 2001.pdf> s.e.t. 03.10.2021.
• ILC. “Draftarticles on Stateresponsibility”, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Vol. 2, Part II, 1996, s.57-72. <https://legal.un.org/ilc/publications/yearbooks/english/ilc_1996_v2_p 2.pdf> s.e.t. 03.10.2021.
• ILC, “Draftarticles on Prevention of Transboundary Harm from Hazardous Activities”, Yearbook of the International LawCommission, 2001, Vol. 2, Part II, s.143-170.
• <https://legal.un.org/ilc/publications/yearbooks/english/ilc_2001_v2_p 2.pdf> s.e.t. 03.10.2021.
• ILC, “Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection”, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 2006, Vol. II, Part Two, s.23-55. <https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft_articles/9_8_2 006.pdf> s.e.t. 03.10.2021.
• I’m Alone Case (Canada v. United States), Reports of International Arbitral Awards (RIAA), 30 June 1933 and 5 January 1935, Vol. III, s.1609-1618. <https://legal.un.org/riaa/cases/vol_III/1609-1618.pdf>s.e.t. 03.10.2021.
• Maier, Harold G. (1989) “Ex Gratia Payments and the Iranian Airline Tragedy”, TheAmericanJournal of International Law, C:83, S:2, s.325- 332.
• Mensah, Thomas, Max Planck Encyclopedias of International Law, United Nations Compensation Comission, <https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law- 9780199231690-e424?prd=EPIL> s.e.t. 03.10.2021.
• Moutier-Lopet, Anaïs (2010), “Contribution to the Injury”, Crawford, James/Pellet, Alain/Olleson, Simon (Editörler), The Law of International Responsibility, 1. Baskı, Oxford, Oxford University Press, s.639-648.
• Müller, Daniel (2010), “Other Specific Regimes of Responsibility: The Iran-US Claims Tribunal”,Crawford, James/Pellet, Alain/Olleson, Simon (Editörler), The Law of International Responsibility, 1. Baskı, Oxford, Oxford UniversityPress, s.843-848.
• Pazarcı, Hüseyin (2014) Uluslararası Hukuk, 13. Baskı, Ankara, Turhan, s.413. Pirim, Ceren Zeynep (2016) “Uluslararası Hukukta Manevi Zarar”, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi. S:127, Kasım-Aralık, s.339-374.
• Rainbow Warrior,RIAA, 30 April 1990, Volume XX, ss. 215-284, <https://legal.un.org/riaa/cases/vol_XX/215-284.pdf> s.e.t. 03.10.2021.
• Shelton, Dinah (2012) “Remedies and Reparation”, Langford, Malcolm/ Vandenhole, Wouter/ Scheinin, Martin ve vanGenugten,Willem (Editörler), Global Justice, StateDuties, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, s.367-390.
• Stern, Brigitte (2010) “The Elements of An Internationally Wrongful Act”,Crawford, James/Pellet, Alain/Olleson, Simon (Editörler), The Law of International Responsibility, 1. Baskı, Oxford, Oxford University Press, s.193-218.
• UN Doc. A/Res /56/83 <https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/56/83> s.e.t. 03.10.2021.
• Uzun, Elif (2021) Milletlerarası Hukuka Aykırı Eylemlerinden Dolayı Devletin Sorumluluğu, 3. Baskı, Ankara, Seçkin Yayınları.
• Verzijl, J.H.W. (1973) International Law in Historical Perspective (Vol. 6): Juridical Facts as Sources of International Rights and Obligations, 1. Edition, Leiden, Sitjhoff Publication, s.735.
• Wittich, Stephan (2004) “Non-Material Damage and Monetary Reparation in International Law”, Klabbers, Jan (Editör), Finnish Yearbook Of International Law Volume XV, Leiden/Boston, Martınus Nıjhoff Publishers, s.321-371.
• Wittich, Stephan, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Compensation,<https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/978019 9231690/law-9780199231690-e424?prd=EPIL> s.e.t. 03.10.2021.
• Wyler, Eric/ Papaux, Allain (2010) “The Different Forms of Reparation: Satisfaction”, Crawford, James/Pellet, Alain/Olleson, Simon (Editörler), The Law of International Responsibility, 1. Baskı, Oxford, Oxford University Press, s.623-635.