Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

ALGILANAN AŞIRI NİTELİKLİLİĞİN YENİLİKÇİ İŞYERİ DAVRANIŞLARI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE KOLEKTİF ŞÜKRANIN ROLÜ

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2, 141 - 161, 30.06.2018
https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.397924

Öz

Bu çalışmada algılanan
aşırı nitelikliliğin yenilikçi (inovatif) davranışlar üzerindeki etkisinde
kolektif şükranın şartlı değişken etkisi incelenmiştir. İlgili alanyazın
incelendiğinde önceki çalışmalar genellikle algılanan aşırı nitelikliliğin
çalışanların olumsuz davranışlar ya da tutumlar sergilemesinde önemli bir öncül
olduğunu vurgulamaktadır. Ancak, algılanan aşırı nitelikliliğin uygun koşular
altında olumlu davranış ya da tutumlara yol açacağını gösteren çalışmalar
ilginç bir şekilde sınırlı düzeydedir. Bu bağlamda bu araştırmanın amacı
alanyazında oldukça yeni olan bir duygu durum değişkeni olan kolektif şükranın
düzenleyici etkisini kişi-iş uyumu kavramsal çerçevesinde araştırarak ilgili
alanyazındaki boşluğu doldurmaktır. Araştırma İstanbul İlindeki bir sigorta
şirketinde çalışmakta olan 121 beyaz yakalı çalışan üzerinde uygulanmıştır.
Araştırmada elde edilen veri PROCESS SPSS makrosu kullanılarak analiz
edilmiştir. Araştırma bulguları göstermiştir ki algılanan aşırı nitelikliliğin
yenilikçi davranışlar üzerindeki olumsuz etkisi kolektif şükran düzeyi düşük
olan çalışanlarda daha güçlü iken, yüksek olan çalışanlarda istatistiksel açıdan
anlamlı değildir. Araştırma sonucunda yönetici ve uygulayıcılar için çeşitli
öneriler sunulmuştur.

Kaynakça

  • KAYNAKÇAAiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
  • Abrahamsen, B. (2010). Employment Status and Commitment to Work in Professions. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 31(1), 93-115.
  • Abstein, A., Heidenreich, S., & Spieth, P. (2014). Innovative Work Behaviour: The Impact of Comprehensive HR System Perceptions and the Role of Work-Life Conflict. Industry and Innovation, 21(2), 91-116.
  • Adler, M. G., & Fagley, N. S. (2005). Appreciation: Individual differences in finding value and meaning as a unique predictor of subjective well‐being. Journal of Personality, 73(1), 79-114.
  • Agarwal, U. A. (2014). Linking Justice, Trust and Innovative Work Behaviour to Work Engagement. Personnel Review, 43(1), 41-73.
  • Akbıyık, B. Ü. (2016). Otelcilik Sektöründe Algılanan Aşırı Nitelikliliğin Görev Performansına Etkisi: Alternatif iş fırsatlarının biçimlendirici değişken rolü. Journal of Tourism Theory and Research, 2(1), 26-41.
  • Akgün, A. E., Erdil, O., Keskin, H., & Müceldilli, B. (2016). The Relationship Among Aratitude, Hope, Connections, and Innovativeness. Service Industries Journal, 36(3/4), 102-123-123. Akın, A., & Ulukök, E. (2016). Fazla Nitelikliliğin Bireysel ve Örgütsel Sonuçlarının İncelenmesine Yönelik Kavramsal Bir Değerlendirme. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(4), 71-86.
  • Allen, N. J. and Meyer, J. P. (1990), The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63: 1-18.
  • Anderson, C., Spataro, S. E., & Flynn, F. J. (2008). Personality and Organizational Culture as Determinants of Influence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 702.
  • Bartlett, M. Y., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Gratitude and Prosocial Behavior: Helping When it Costs You. Psychological Science, 17(4), 319-325.
  • Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (1999). The Synergistic Effect Of Market Orientation And Learning Orientation On Organizational Performance. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 411-427.
  • Battistelli, A., Montani, F., Odoardi, C., Vandenberghe, C., & Picci, P. (2014). Employees' Concerns About Change And Commitment To Change Among Italian Organizations: The Moderating Role Of Innovative Work Behavior. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(7), 951-978.
  • Bektaş, H. (2017). Açıklayıcı Faktör Analizi, 1. Baskı, Beta,İstanbul.
  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life: Transaction Publishers.
  • Bono, G., & McCullough, M. E. (2006). Positive Responses to Benefit and Harm: Bringing Forgiveness and Gratitude into Cognitive Psychotherapy. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 20(2), 147-158.
  • Brkich, M., Jeffs, D., & Carless, S. A. (2002). A Global Self-report Measure of Person-job Fit. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(1), 43.
  • Brynin, M., & Longhi, S. (2009). Overqualification: Major or Minor Mismatch? Economics of Education Review, 28(1), 114-121. Caldwell, D.F.,& O’Reilly, C.A. (1990). Measuring Person-job Fit with a Profile-Comparison Process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 648–657.
  • Carmeli, A., Meitar, R., & Weisberg, J. (2006). Self-leadership Skills and Innovative Behavior at Work. International Journal of Manpower, 27(1), 75-90.
  • Carmeli, A., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2009). Trust, Connectivity, and Thriving: Implications for Innovative Behaviors at Work. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(3), 169-191.
  • Chapman, D. S., Uggerslev, K. L., Carroll, S. A., Piasentin, K. A., & Jones, D. A. (2005). Applicant Attraction to Organizations and Job Choice: A Meta-analytic Review of the Correlates of Recruiting Outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (5), 928-944.
  • Choi, S. B., Kim, K., Ullah, S. M. E., & Kang, S. W. (2016). How Transformational Leadership Facilitates Innovative Behavior of Korean Workers Examining Mediating and Moderating Processes. Personnel Review, 45(3), 459-479.
  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences: Routledge.
  • Crosby, F. (1984). Relative Deprivation in Organizational Settings. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 6, pp. 51–93). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
  • Çelikkol, H., & Dalkiliç, N. (2010). Türkiye’de Sigorta Sektöründe İstihdam, Eğitim Ve Geleceğe Ilişkin Öneriler. Ekonomi Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(2). 73-80.
  • Dutton, J. E., & Heaphy, E. D. (2003). The Power Of High-quality Connections. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline (Vol. 3, pp. 263-278): San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
  • Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (Eds.). (2004). The Psychology of Gratitude. Oxford University Press.
  • Erdoğan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2009). Perceived Overqualification and Its Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Empowerment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 557-565.
  • Erdogan, B., Bauer, T. N., Peiró, J., & Truxillo, D. M. (2011). Overqualified Employees: Making the Best of a Potentially Bad Situation for Individuals and Organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4(2), 215-232.
  • West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). lnnovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies. NY: John Wiley & Sons, 265-267.
  • Fernandez, S., & Moldogaziev, T. (2012). Using Employee Empowerment To Encourage Innovative Behavior In The Public Sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 155-187.
  • Fine, S., & Nevo, B. (2008). Too Smart For Their Own Good? A Study Of Perceived Cognitive Overqualification In The Workforce. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 346–355.
  • Fitzgerald, P. (1998). Gratitude and Justice. Ethics, 109(1), 119-153.
  • Fredickson, B. (2001). The Role Of Positive Emotions In Positive Psychology. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226.
  • Gratton, L., Hope-Hailey, V., Truss, K., Stiles, P., & Hailey, V. H. (1999). Strategic Human Resource Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Green, F., & Zhu, Y. (2010). Overqualification, Job Dissatisfaction, And Increasing Dispersion In The Returns To Graduate Education. Oxford Economic Papers, 62(4), 740-763.
  • Guest, D. E. (1987). Human Resource Management and Industrial Relations. Journal of Management Studies, 24(5), 503-521.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C, Babin, B. J. ve Anderson, R. E., (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective ,7th Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1989). Strategic Intent. Harvard Business Review, May-June, 63-76.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based Approach: Guilford Press.
  • Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., & Tidd, S. T. (2002). The Relationship Between Work Status Congruence And Work-related Attitudes And Behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 903–915.
  • Hu, J., Erdogan, B., Bauer, T. N., Jiang, K., Liu, S., & Li, Y. (2015). There are Lots of Big Fish in this Pond: The Role of Peer Overqualification on Task Significance, Perceived Fit, and Performance for Overqualified Employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1228-1238.
  • Hsu, J. L., & Wang, J. H. (2015). Exploring The Effects of Organizational Justice on Employees' Innovative Behavior in Hospitality Industry from the Aspect of Organizational Support. Revista De Cercetare Si Interventie Sociala, 49, 113-126.
  • Imran, R., Saeed, T., Anis-Ul-Haq, M., & Fatima, A. (2010). Organizational Climate as a Predictor of Innovative Work Behavior. African Journal of Business Management, 4(15), 3337-3343.
  • Jackson, L. (2016). Why Should I Be Grateful? The Morality of Gratitude in Contexts Marked by Injustice. Journal of Moral Education, 45(3), 276-290.
  • Jafri, M. H. (2010). Organizational Commitment and Employee's Innovative Behavior: A Study In Retail Sector. Journal of Management Research, 10(1), 62.
  • Janssen, O. (2004). How Fairness Perceptions Make Innovative Behavior More or Less Stressful. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 201-215.
  • Johnson, G. J., & Johnson, W. R. (1997). Perceived Overqualification, Emotional Support, And Health. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1906–1918.
  • Johnson, G. J., & Johnson, W. R. (2000). Perceived Overqualification and Dimensions of Job Satisfaction: A Longitudinal Analysis. The Journal of Psychology, 134(5), 537-555.Johnson, W. R., Morrow, P. C., & Johnson, G. J. (2002). An Evaluation Of A Perceived Overqualification Scale Across Work Settings. Journal of Psychology, 136, 425–441.Kang, J. H., Matusik, J. G., Kim, T. Y., & Phillips, J. M. (2016). Interactive Effects Of Multiple Organizational Climates On Employee Innovative Behavior In Entrepreneurial Firms: A Cross-level Investigation. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(6), 628-642.
  • Kanter, R. M. (1988). When A Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, Collective, And Social Conditions For Innovation In Organization. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 169-211): Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Khan, L. J., & Morrow, P. C. (1991). Objective and Subjective Underemployment Relationships to Job Satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 22(3), 211-218. Kreft, I. G., De Leeuw, J., & Aiken, L. S. (1995). The Effect of Different Forms of Centering in Hierarchical Linear Models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30(1), 1-21.
  • Leonard-Barton, D. A. (1992). Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111-125.
  • Lobene, E. V., & Meade, A. W. (2013). The Effects of Career Calling and Perceived Overqualification on Work Outcomes for Primary and Secondary School Teachers. Journal of Career Development, 40(6), 508-530.
  • Lobene, E. V., Meade, A. W., & Pond, S. B. (2015). Perceived Overqualification: A Multi-Source Investigation of Psychological Predisposition and Contextual Triggers. Journal of Psychology, 149(7), 684-710.
  • Luksyte, A., & Spitzmueller, C. (2016). When Are Overqualified Employees Creative? It Depends on Contextual Factors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, 635-653.
  • Luksyte, A., Spitzmueller, C., & Maynard, D. C. (2011). Why Do Overqualified Incumbents Deviate? Examining Multiple Mediators. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(3), 279-296.
  • Marques, T., Galende, J., Cruz, P., & Ferreira, M. P. (2014). Surviving Downsizing and Innovative Behaviors: A Matter of Organizational Commitment. International Journal of Manpower, 35(7), 930-955.
  • Martinez, P. G., Lengnick-Hall, M. L., & Kulkarni, M. (2014). Overqualified? A Conceptual Model of Managers' Perceptions of Overqualification in Selection Decisions. Personnel Review, 43(6), 957-974.
  • Maynard, D. C., Joseph, T. A., & Maynard, A. M. (2006). Underemployment, Job Attitudes, and Turnover Intentions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 509-536.
  • Maynard, D. C., & Parfyonova, N. M. (2013). Perceived Overqualification and Withdrawal Behaviours: Examining The Roles of Job Attitudes and Work Values. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(3), 435-455.
  • Moon, H., Kamdar, D., Mayer, D. M., & Takeuchi, R. (2008). Me or We? The Role of Personality and Justice As Other-centered Antecedents to Innovative Citizenship Behaviors Within Organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 84-94.
  • Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity Syndrome: Integration, Application, and Innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27.
  • Müceldili, B., Erdil, O., Akgün, A. E., & Keskin, H. (2015). Collective Gratitude: Positive Organizational Scholarship Perspective. International Business Research, 8(8).
  • Nisula, A. M., & Kianto, A. (2016). The Antecedents of Individual Innovative Behaviour in Temporary Group Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25(4), 431-444.
  • Pons, F. J., Ramos, J., & Ramos, A. (2016). Antecedent Variables of Innovation Behaviors in Organizations: Differences Between Men and Women. European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee, 66(3), 117-126.
  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, May-June, 79-91.
  • Rand, D. G., Kraft-Todd, G., & Gruber, J. (2015). The Collective Benefits of Feeling Good and Letting Go: Positive Emotion and (dis)Inhibition Interact to Predict Cooperative Behavior. Plos One, 10(1). 1-12.
  • Resick, C. J., Baltes, B. B., & Shantz, C. W. (2007). Person-organization Fit and Work-related Attitudes And Decisions: Examining Interactive Effects With Job Fit and Conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1446.
  • Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. (2012). Essentials of Organizational Behavior: Pearson Essex.
  • Russell, Z. A., Ferris, G. R., Thompson, K. W., & Sikora, D. M. (2016). Overqualified Human Resources, Career Development Experiences, and Work Outcomes: Leveraging An Underutilized Resource With Political Skill. Human Resource Management Review, 26(2), 125-135.
  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
  • Seibert, S. E., Wang, G., & Courtright, S. H. (2011). Antecedents and Consequences of Psychological and Team Empowerment in Organizations: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 981-1003.
  • Sheldon, K. M., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2006). How to Increase and Sustain Positive Emotion: The Effects of Expressing Gratitude and Visualizing Best Possible Selves. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(2), 73-82.
  • Sierra, M. J. (2011). A Multilevel Approach to Understanding Employee Overqualification. Industrial And Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 243–246.
  • Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2005). The Stressor-Emotion Model of Counterproductive Work Behavior (CWB). In S. Fox. & P. E. Spector (Eds.). Counterproductive Work Behavior: Investigations of Actors and Targets (pp. 151–174). Washington, DC: APA Press.
  • Steindl-Rast, D. (2004). Gratitude as Thankfulness and as Gratefulness. In R. A. Emmons & M. E. McCullough (Eds.), The Psychology of Gratitude (pp. 282-290): New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Stone, E. F., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (1989). Clarifying Some Controversial Issues Surrounding Statistical Procedures for Detecting Moderator Variables: Empirical Evidence and Related Matters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 3.
  • Sun, J. J. M., Wang, Z., Sun, J. M., & Zhang, R. J. (2012). The Relationship Between Commitment-based Human Resource Management, Job Engagement and Individual Innovative Behaviour. International Journal of Psychology, 47, 545-545.
  • Tudge, J. R. H., Freitas, L. B. L., & O'Brien, L. T. (2015). The Virtue of Gratitude: A Developmental and Cultural Approach. Human Development, 58(4-5), 281-300.
  • Turnipseed, P. H., & Turnipseed, D. L. (2013). Testing the Proposed Linkage between Organizational Citizenship Behaviours and an Innovative Organizational Climate. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), 209-216.
  • Uçar, Z. (2016). Kontrol Algısı - Psikolojik Sahiplenme İlişkisi Üzerinde Algılanan Aşırı Vasıflılığın Düzenleyicilik Etkisi. International Journal of Applied Business and Management Studies, 1(1), 40-58.
  • Ülgen, H., & Mirze, S. K. (2010). İşletmelerde Stratejik Yönetim, Beta Basım, Yayın, Dağıtım AŞ, 5. Baskı. İstanbul.
  • Ünsal Akbıyık, B. S. (2016). Algılanan Aşırı Nitelikliliğin İş Performansına Etkisi Örgütsel Desteğin Biçimlendirici Değişken Rolü. Journal of International Social Research, 9(42), 1712-1720.
  • Van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central Problems in the Management of Innovation. Management Science, 32(5), 590-607.
  • Vaisey, S. (2006). Education and Its Discontents: Overqualification in America, 1972–2002. Social Forces, 85, 835–864.
  • Vecchio, R. P., & Boatwright, K. J. (2002). Preferences for Idealized Styles of Supervision. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 327–342.
  • Verhaest, D., & Omey, E. (2006). The Impact of Overeducation and Its Measurement. Social Indicators Research, 77, 419–448.
  • Xerri, M. J., & Brunetto, Y. (2013). Fostering Innovative Behaviour: The Importance of Employee Commitment and Organisational Citizenship Behaviour. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(16), 3163-3177.
  • Yıldız, B., Özdemir, F., Habib, E., & Çakı, N. (2017). Aşırı Nitelikliliğin İşten Ayrılma Niyeti üzerindeki Etkisinde Kolektif Şükranın Moderator Etkisi. Örgütsel Davranış Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 40-61.
  • Yıldız, B., Uzun, S., & Coşkun, S. S. (2017). Drivers of Innovative Behaviors: The Moderator Roles of Perceived Organizational Support and Psychological Empowerment. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 6(3), 34-360.
  • Young, L. D. (2012). How to Promote Innovative Behavior at Work? The Role of Justice and Support Within Organizations. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(3), 220-243.
  • Yu, C., Yu, T. F., & Yu, C. C. (2013). Knowledge Sharing, Organizational Climate, and Innovative Behavior: A Cross-Level Analysis of Effects. Social Behavior and Personality, 41(1), 143-156.
Toplam 92 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Özlem Ayaz Arda 0000-0002-2836-6317

Bora Yıldız 0000-0002-0373-6457

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Ayaz Arda, Ö., & Yıldız, B. (2018). ALGILANAN AŞIRI NİTELİKLİLİĞİN YENİLİKÇİ İŞYERİ DAVRANIŞLARI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE KOLEKTİF ŞÜKRANIN ROLÜ. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(2), 141-161. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.397924
AMA Ayaz Arda Ö, Yıldız B. ALGILANAN AŞIRI NİTELİKLİLİĞİN YENİLİKÇİ İŞYERİ DAVRANIŞLARI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE KOLEKTİF ŞÜKRANIN ROLÜ. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. Haziran 2018;16(2):141-161. doi:10.11611/yead.397924
Chicago Ayaz Arda, Özlem, ve Bora Yıldız. “ALGILANAN AŞIRI NİTELİKLİLİĞİN YENİLİKÇİ İŞYERİ DAVRANIŞLARI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE KOLEKTİF ŞÜKRANIN ROLÜ”. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 16, sy. 2 (Haziran 2018): 141-61. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.397924.
EndNote Ayaz Arda Ö, Yıldız B (01 Haziran 2018) ALGILANAN AŞIRI NİTELİKLİLİĞİN YENİLİKÇİ İŞYERİ DAVRANIŞLARI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE KOLEKTİF ŞÜKRANIN ROLÜ. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 16 2 141–161.
IEEE Ö. Ayaz Arda ve B. Yıldız, “ALGILANAN AŞIRI NİTELİKLİLİĞİN YENİLİKÇİ İŞYERİ DAVRANIŞLARI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE KOLEKTİF ŞÜKRANIN ROLÜ”, Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 16, sy. 2, ss. 141–161, 2018, doi: 10.11611/yead.397924.
ISNAD Ayaz Arda, Özlem - Yıldız, Bora. “ALGILANAN AŞIRI NİTELİKLİLİĞİN YENİLİKÇİ İŞYERİ DAVRANIŞLARI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE KOLEKTİF ŞÜKRANIN ROLÜ”. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 16/2 (Haziran 2018), 141-161. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.397924.
JAMA Ayaz Arda Ö, Yıldız B. ALGILANAN AŞIRI NİTELİKLİLİĞİN YENİLİKÇİ İŞYERİ DAVRANIŞLARI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE KOLEKTİF ŞÜKRANIN ROLÜ. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2018;16:141–161.
MLA Ayaz Arda, Özlem ve Bora Yıldız. “ALGILANAN AŞIRI NİTELİKLİLİĞİN YENİLİKÇİ İŞYERİ DAVRANIŞLARI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE KOLEKTİF ŞÜKRANIN ROLÜ”. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 16, sy. 2, 2018, ss. 141-6, doi:10.11611/yead.397924.
Vancouver Ayaz Arda Ö, Yıldız B. ALGILANAN AŞIRI NİTELİKLİLİĞİN YENİLİKÇİ İŞYERİ DAVRANIŞLARI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE KOLEKTİF ŞÜKRANIN ROLÜ. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2018;16(2):141-6.