TCMB’nin Para Politikası Duruşunun Alternatif Açıklaması: Parasal Durum Endeksi(MCI)

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

TCMB’nin Para Politikası Duruşunun Alternatif Açıklaması: Parasal Durum Endeksi (MCI)

Öz

İktisadi birimlerin beklentilerinin bilinmesi, politika otoriteye iktisadi ve siyasi kararlar karşısında tepkilerin değerlendirebilmesini sağlar. Bu nedenle, özellikle faiz oranının bir araç olarak kullanıldığı durumlarda, TCMB dahil olmak üzere tüm dünya merkez bankaları kamuoyu beklentilerini öğrenmek ve bu beklentileri tekrar kullanarak insanları etkilemek istemektedir. Öte yandan, ekonominin istikrarı için, merkez bankaları daha esnek ve etkin politik enstrümanlar ile reel değişkenleri de hesaba katmak istemektedirler. Üstelik reel değişkenler toplumun refahı ile doğrudan ilişkilidir. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, son 10 yılda TCMB’nin para politikası duruşuna ilişkin politika kurallarının, büyüme ve fiyatlar genel seviyesini de etkileyen toplam talebi göz önünde bulundurup bulundurmadığını incelemektir. Bu amaçla, TCMB’den alınan veriler ARDL yöntemi ile ekonometrik olarak analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmanın sonucuna göre TCMB resmi söyleminin aksine son 10 yılda Parasal Durum Endeksi’ni (MCI) izlediğini göstermektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Para politikası, Parasal Durum Endeksi (MCI), TCMB, ARDL

Kaynakça

1. Aktaş, Z., Alp, H., Gürkaynak, R., Kesiyerli, M., ve Orak, M. (2009), “Türkiye'de Para Politikasının Aktarımı: Para Politikasının Mali Piyasalara Etkisi”, İktisat İşletme Finans, 24 (278), 9-24.
2. Aydemir O., Demirhan, E. (2009), “The Relationship Between Stock Prices and Exchange Rate Evidence From Turkey”, Journals of Finance and Economics, 23, 207-215.
3. Aydın, S. (2011), “Finansal Piyasalarda Gürültücüler”, İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 26(304),9-36.
4. Ball, L. (1998), “Policy Rules for Open Economies”, NBER Working Paper, 6760
5. Bernanke, B., Gertler, M. (1999), “Monetary Policy and Asset Volatility”, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review, 84(4), 17-52.
6. Bernanke, B., Gertler, M. (2001), “Should Central Banks Respond to Movements in Asset Prices?”, The American Economic Review, 91(2), 253-257.
7. Berument H., Kutan., A. (2007), “The Stock Market Channel of Monetary Policy in Emerging Markets: Evidence from The İstanbul Stock Exchange”, Scientific Journal of Administrative Development, 5, 117-144.
8. Burger, P., Knedlik, T. (2004), “The MCI As A Monetary Polıcy Guide In A Small, Open Emergıng Market Economy”. The South African Journal of Economics, 72(2), 365-383.

9. Cecchetti, S., Genberg, H., Lipsky, J., ve Wadhwani, S. (2000), “ Asset prices and central bank policy”. London: International. Center for Monetary and Banking Studies.
10. Chadha, J., Sarno, L., ve Valente, G. (2004), “Monetary Policy Rules, Asset Prices, and Exchange Rates”, IMF Staff Paper, 53(3), 529-552. Chadha, J., Sarno, L., ve Vatente, G., (2003), “Monetary Polivy Rules, Assets Prices and Exchange Rates”, CDMA Working Paper, 0403
11. De Grauwe, P., Gross D. (2009) “ A New Two-Pillar Strategy for the ECB”, CEPS Policy Brief, No.191, June
12. Duran, M., Gülserim, Ö., Özlü, P., ve Ünalmış, D. (2010), “Measuring The Impact of Monetary Policy on Asset Prices in Turkey”, CBRT Working Paper, 10/17.
13. Fratzscher, M., Juenal, L., ve Sarno, L. (2007), “Asset Pirce, Exchange Rates and The Current Account”, ECB Working Paper, 790.
14. Gan, P. T., Kian-Teng, K. (2008), “Estimating Monetary Policy Rules: An Optimal Monetary Conditions Index For Malaysia”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 12, 196-210.
15. Gerlach, S., Smets, F. (2000), “ MCIs and Monetary Policy”, European Economic Review, 44, 1677-1700.
16. Goodhart, C., (2000), “Asset Price and the Conduct of Monetary Policy”, Working Paper London of School, Retrieved Octoner 15, 2011, from http://repec.org/res2002/Goodhart.pdf
17. Goodhart, C., Sunirand, P., ve Tsomocos, D.P. (2009), “The Pptimal Monetary Instrument for Prudential Purposes”. Journal of Financial Stability, 2, 70-77.
18. Goodhart, C., Hofmann, B. (2000), “Financial Variables and The Conduct of Monetary Policy”, Sveriges Riksbank Working Paper, 12.
19. Hsieh, D., Miller. M. (1990), “Margin Regulation and Stock Market Volatility”, Journal of Finance, 45, 3-30.
20. Kesiyerli, M., Koçaker, İ.İ. (1999), “ Monetary Condıtıons Index: A Monetary Polıcy Indıcator For Turkey”, CBRT Discussion Paper, 9908.
21. Ilzetzki, E., Mendoza, E., Vegh, C. (2009), “ How Big Are Fiscal Multiplier”, CEPR Working Paper, 39.
22. Kontonikas, A., Ioannidis, C. (2005), “Should Monetary Policy Respond to Asset Price Misalignments”, Economic Modelling, 22, 1105– 1121.
23. Mishkin, F. (1997), “The Causes and Propagation of Financial Instability: Lessons for Policymakers”, The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 117-128, Retrieved October 24, 2011, from http://www.kc.frb.org/publicat/sympos/1997/pdf/s97disc2.pdf.
24. Mishkin, F. (2008), “How Should we Respond to Asset Price Bubbles?. Speech at the Wharto Financial Institutions Center”, Retrieved October 25, 2011, from http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/mishkin20080515a.htm.
25. Narayan, P. K. (2005), “The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests”, Applied Economics, 37(17), 1979-1990.
26. Pavlova, A., & Rıgborn, R. (2003), “Asset Pirces and Exchange Rates”, NBER Working Paper, 9834.
27. Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., & Smith. R.J. (2001), “Bound Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Long Run Relationships”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289-326.
28. Pesaran, M.H. & Shin, Y. (1999), “An Autoregressive Distributed Lag Modelling Approach to Cointegration Analysis”, in S. Storm, (Ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
29. Poole, W. (1970), “Optimal Choice of Monetary Policy Instruments in a Simple Stochastic Macro Model”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 197-216.
30. Poon, W.C. (2005) “Agumented MCI: An Indıcator of Monetary Policy Stance for Asean 5”, Monash University Discussion Paper, 25/10. /10
31. Svensson, L. (1997), “Optimal Inflation Targets, `Conservative' Central Banks, and Linear Inflation Contracts”, NBER Working Paper, 5251
32. Svensson, L. (2004). Targeting Rules v.s. Instruments Rules for Monetary Policy: What is Wrong With Mccallum and Nelson. NBER Working Paper, 10747.
33. Svensson, L. (2010), “How Has Our View of Central Banking Changed with the Recent Financial Crisis?” CEPR/ESI 14th Annual Conference of Central Bank of Turkey, Retrieved December 2, 2011, from http://www.cepr.org/meets/wkcn/1/1745.
34. Svensson, L. (2011), ” Monetary Policy after the Crisis”, Speech at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. Retrieved November 23 2011, from http://people.su.se/~leosven/
35. Siklos, P. (2000). Is The MCI a Useful Sigal for Monetary Policy Conditions? An Empirical Investigation. International of Finance, 3(3), 417-437.
36. Smets, F. (1997), “ Financial Asset Prices And Monetary Policy: Theory And Evıdence”, Bank For Internatıonal Settlements Monetary And Economic Department, 47.
37. Stark, J. (2008), “Main Challenges for Monetary Policy ina Globalised World”, Proceeding of yhe Monetary Policy in sub Sahran Africa, Retrieved November 23, 2011, from http://www.bis.org/review/r080331e.pdf.
38. Süslü, B. (2005), Türkiye’de Enflasyona Karşı İzlenilecek Para Politikalarında Nominal Çapaların Olası Rolü, Muğla Üniversitesi Sos. Bil.Enst Yayınlanmamış Doktora tezi.
39. TCMB. (2006-2009). Enflasyon Raporu. Ankara: TCMB.
40. TCMB. (2003-2005). Para Politikası Raporu. Ankara: TCMB.
41. Yeldan, E.(2011), “Şu Cari Açık ve Reel Kur Meseles”, İktisat ve Toplum, 2(13), 32-35.
42. Walsh, C. E. (2003). Monetary Theory and Policy, USA: The MIT Press.
43. Woodford, M. (2003). Interest and Prices Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy, USA: Princeton Univ. Press. Diognastik Testler R2: 0.81,R:0.74
44. DW İstatistik: 1.9141
45. Serial Correlation = 0.68799[0.611]
46. Functional Form= 6.6471[0.18]
47. Heteroscedasticity= 2.8754[0.100]
48. Normality= 2.3676[0.306]
49. F İstatistiği. 126.5688[0.000]
50. Plot of Cumulative Sum of Recursive Residuals
51. The straight lines represent critical bounds at 5% significance level 2011Q2
52. Plot of Cumulative Sum of Squares of Recursive Residuals
53. The straight lines represent critical bounds at 5% significance level 2011Q2