Kurumlar-Arası Sistem Kullanımının İşletme Performansı Üzerindeki Etkisinde Tedarik Zinciri İşbirliğinin Aracılık Rolünün Analizi: Türk İnşaat Sektöründe Bir Uygulama

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 1, 57 - 95, 15.04.2016

Cengiz Yılmaz Erman Tümtürk

https://doi.org/10.18657/yecbu.65228

Öz

Genel olarak kurumlar-arası sistemler (KS) olarak bilinen internet tabanlı teknolojiler, işletmeleri tedarik zincirlerindeki ortaklar ile bütünleştirirler ve işletmelere süreçlerini optimize edebilme fırsatı verirler. Bu çalışmada, işletmelerin kendi başarıları yerine tedarik zincirinin bütünününde elde edilebilecek başarıyı hedef alarak, kurumlar-arası sistemlerin işletme performansına olan etkisinde tedarik zinciri işbirliğinin aracılık rolü hakkında daha fazla bilgi sahibi olabilmek için Türk inşaat sektöründe yapılan bir uygulama çalışmasını konu edinmektedir. Türk inşaat sektöründe yapılan bu çalışmadan 138 tane kullanılabilir anket elde edilmiştir ve çalışma analizleri bu anketlerin verilerine göre yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (Lisrel ile) kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları, KS kullanımı işletme performansına etki ederken tedarik zinciri işbirliğinin tam bir aracılık rolü üstlendiğini desteklemektedir. Çalışma, bu nedenle tedarik zinciri işbirliğinin kullanımında ve yönetilmesinde ortaklaşa yapılan çalışmaların önemini vurgulamaktadır. Araştırmanın sonunda ise ileride yapılabilecek çalışmalar için öneriler sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tedarik Zinciri İşbirliği, İnşaat Tedarik Zinciri, Kurumlar-arası Sistem

Kaynakça

• Ailawadi, K.L., Farris, P.W., Parry, M.E., (1999) “Market share and ROI: observing the effect of unobserved variables”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16 (1), , 17–33
• Angeles, R., Nath, R., (2001) “Partner congruence in electronic data interchange (EDI) enabled relationships”, Journal of Business Logistics ,22 (2), 109–127.
• Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R. D. (2001). “Intrapreneurship: construct refinement and cross-cultural validation”. Journal of business venturing, 16(5), 495-527.
• Bafoutsou, G. ve Mentzas, G., (2002) “Review and functional classification of collaborative systems”, International Journal of Information Management, 22(4), 281 – 306.
• Barney, J.B., (1995) “Firm resources and sustainable competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, v17 n2, pp 285-309.
• Barringer, B.R., Harrison, J.S., (2000) “Walking a tightrope: creating value through interorganizational relationships” Journal of Management,26 (3), 367–403.
• Barua, A., Konana, P., Whinston, A.B., Yin, F., (2004) “An empirical investigation of net-enabled business value”, MIS Quarterly ,28 (4),585–620.
• Björnfot, A., & Torjussen, L. (2012). Extent and effect of horizontal supply chain collaboration among construction sme. Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 2 (1): 47-55.
• Boonstra, Albert, and Jan De Vries. (2005), "Analyzing inter-organizational systems from a power and interest perspective." International Journal of Information Management 25.6, 485-501.
• Bryniolfsson, E., and Hitt, L., (1998) “Beyond the productivity paradox”, Communications of the ACM, v 41 n8, pp 49-55.
• Cai, S., Jun, M., & Yang, Z., (2010) “Implementing supply chain information integration in China: The role of institutional forces and trust”. Journal of Operations Management, 28(3), 257–268.
• Cao, M., (2007) “Achieving collaborative advantage through IOS-enabled supply chain collaboration: An empirical examination.” The University of Toledo.
• Cao, M., & Zhang, Q. (2013). Antecedents of Supply Chain Collaboration. In Supply Chain Collaboration (pp. 31-54). Springer London.
• Chen, J. V., Yen, D. C., Rajkumar, T. M., and Tomochko, N. A. (2011). The antecedent factors on trust and commitment in supply chain relationships, Computer Standards & Interface, 33(3), 262–270.
• Christiaanse, E., ve Venkatraman, N., (2002), “Beyong SABRE: An emprical test of expertise exploitation in electronic channels”, MIS Quarterly, v26 n1, pp 15-38.
• Crook, T. R., Giunipero, L., Reus, T. H., Handfield, R., and Williams, S. K., (2008) “Antecedents and Outcomes of Supply Chain Effectiveness: An Exploratory Investigation”, Journal of Managerial Issues, 20 (2), 161-177.
• Croom, S., Romano, P. ve Giannakis, M. , (2000) “Supply chain management: An analytical framework for critical literature review”, european Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 6(1), 67-83.
• Das, T.K. ve Teng, B.A., (2002) “Social exchange theory of strategic alliances”, In Cooperative Strategies and Alliances, F.J. Contractor ve P. Lorange (eds.), Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK, 439-460.
• Doll, W.J., Raghunathan, T., Lim, S.J. ve Gupta, Y.P. , (1995) “A confirmatory factor analysis of the user information satisfaction instrument”, Information Systems Research, 6(2), 177- 188.
• Dyer, J.H. ve Singh, H., (1998), “The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of inter- organizational competitive advantage”, Academy of Management Review, v23 n4, pp 660- 679.
• Erik Eriksson, P. (2010). Improving construction supply chain collaboration and performance: a lean construction pilot project. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 15(5), 394-403.
• Eşkinat, R., & Tepecik, F., (2012), “İnşaat Sektörüne Küresel Bakış”, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, İİBF Dergisi C.XIV, SI.
• Fawcett, S. E., Wallin, C., Allred, C., Fawcett, A. M., and Magnan, G. M. (2011). “Information Technology as an Enabler of Supply Chain Collaboration: A Dynamic-Capabilities Perspective”. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(1), 38-56.
• Fawcett, Stanley E., Gregory M. Magnan, and Matthew W. McCarter, (2008), “A three-stage implementation model for supply chain collaboration”. Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1), 93-112.
• Frohlich, M.T., & Westbrook, R., (2001), “Archs of integration: An international study of supply chain strategies”, Journal of Operations Management, v19 n5, 2001, pp 185-200.
• Fynes, Brian, Chris Voss, and Seán de Bşrca (2005). The impact of supply chain relationship quality on quality performance. Int. J. Production Economics, 96 (3), 339–354.
• Grover, V., Segars, A., Teng, J., ve Fiedler, K., (1998), “The influence of information technology diffusion and business process change on perceived productivity: the IS executive’s perspective”, Information & Management, v34, pp 141-159.
• Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. ve Black, W.C., (1995), “Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings”, New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
• Handfield, R.B., ve Bechtel, C., (2002) “The role of trust and relationship structure in improving supply chain responsiveness”, Industrial Marketing Management, v31, pp 367-382.
• Hausman, W.H., (2000), “Supply chain metrics”, Stanford University, Working Paper.
• Holland, C.P., Lockett, A.G., Blackman, I.D., (1992), Planning for electronic data interchange Strategic Management Journal, 13, pp. 539–550
• Holland, C.P., (1995) “Cooperative supply chain management: The impact of interorganizational information systems”, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 4(2), 117-133.
• Howard, M., & Vidgen, R. (2003). Overcoming stakeholder barriers in the automotive industry: Building to order with extra-organizational systems. Journal of Information Technology, 18(1), 27–44.
• Jap, S.D., (1999), “Pie-Expansion efforts: Collaboration processes in buyer supplier relationships”, Journal of Marketing Research, v36, pp 461-475.
• Jin Y. and Hong P. (2007). Coordinating global inter-firm product development. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 20 (5), 544- 561.
• Johnson, J.J. ve Sohi, R.S. , (2003), “The development of interfirm partnering competence: Platforms for learning, learning activities and consequences of learning”, Journal of Business Research, 56(9), 757-766.
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications (Vol. 2). Chicago: Spss.
• Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80 for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
• Kalafatis S. P. (2000) Buyer–seller Relationships along Channels of Distribution. Industrial Marketing Management 31: 215–228
• Kalwani, M.U. ve Narayandas, N., (1995), “Long-term manufacturer-supplier relationships: Do they pay?”, Jornal of Marketing, 15(6/7), 416-437.
• Kambil, A., Friesen, G. B., & Sundaram, A. (1999). Co-creation: A new source of value. Outlook Magazine, 3(2), 23-29.
• Kumar, K., van Dissel, H.G., ve Bielli, P., (1998), “The merchant of Prato revisited: Toward a third rationality of information systems”, MIS Quarterly, 22(2), , 199-226.
• Kumar, R. ve Nti, K. O., (1998),“Differential learning and interaction in alliance dynamics: A process and outcome discrepancy model”, Organiztion Science, 9(3), 356-367.
• Kwon, G. ve Suh T. (2004). Factors Affecting the Level of Trust and Commitment in Supply Chain Relationship. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 40 (2). 4-14.
• Lambert, D.M., Knemeyer, A.M. ve Gardener, J.T., (2004), “Supply chain partnerships: Model validation and implementation”, Journal of Business Logistics, 25(2), 21-42.
• Larson, P.D. ve Kulchitsky, J.D., (2000), “The use and impact of communication media in purchasing and supply management”, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 5(2), 29-37.
• Lavie, D. (2006). The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource- based view. Academy of management review, 31(3), 638-658.
• öLee, J., Palekar, U. S., & Qualls, W. (2011). Supply chain efficiency and security: Coordination for collaborative investment in technology. European Journal of Operational Research, 210(3), 568–578.
• Lejeune, N. ve Yakova, N., (2005), “On characterizing the 4 C’s in supply chain management”, Journal of Operations Management”, 23(1), 81-100.
• Liu Y. and Wang S. (2011). Research on Collaborative Management in Supply Chain Crisis. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 10, 141 – 146.
• Lockamy, A. ve McCormack, K., (2004), “Linking SCOR planning practices to supply chain performance: An exploratory study”, International journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(12), 1192-1218.
• Lundval, B.A., (1992), “National Systems of Innovation and Network Evolution”, Routledge, London.
• Mabert, V.A. ve Venkatraman, M.A., (1998), “Special research focus on supply chain linkages: challenges for design and management in the 21st century”, Desicion Sciences, v29 n3,pp 537-552.
• Malhotra, A., Gasain, S. ve El Sawy, O. A., (2005), “Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: Gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation”, MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 145 -187.
• Mentzer, J.T., Foggin, J.H. ve Golicic, S.L., (2000), “Collaboration: The enablers, impediments, and benefits”, Supply Chain Management Review, 5(6), 52-58.
• Narasimhan, R., and Jayaram, J., (1998), “Causal linkages in supply chain management: An exploratory study of North American manufacturing firms”, Decision Sciences, v29 n3, pp 579-606.
• Narasimhan, R. and Kim, S. W., (2001), “Information system utilization strategy for supply chain integration”, Journal o f Business Logistics, v22 n2, pp 51-75.
• Narus, J.A. ve Anderson, J.C., (1996), “Rethinking distribution: Adaptive channels”, Harvard Business Review, 74(4), 112-120.
• Nath, T., & Standing, C. (2010). Drivers of information technology use in the supply chain. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 12(1), 70-84.
• Nesheim, T., (2001), “Externalization of the core: Antecedents of collaborative relationships with suppliers”, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7(4), 217-225.
• Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Nyaga, G. N., Whipple, J. M., & Lynch, D. F. (2010). Examining supply chain relationships: do buyer and supplier perspectives on collaborative relationships differ?. Journal of Operations Management, 28(2), 101-114.
• Park, N.K., Mezias, J.M. ve Song, J., (2004), “A resource-based view of strategic alliances and firm value in the electronic marketplace”, Journal of Management, 30(1), 7-27.
• Prahalad, C.K. ve Hamel, G., (1990), “The core competence of the corporation”, Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
• Ramadas, K., and Spekman, R, E., (2000), “Chain or Shackles: Understanding What Drives Supply Chain Performance”, Interfaces, v30 n4, pp 3-21.
• Saeed, K.A., (2004), “Information technology antecedents to supply chain integration and firm performance”, Unpublished Dissertation. University of South Carolina.
• Sheu, C., Yen, H.R. ve Chae, D., (2006), “Determinants of supplier-retailer collaboration: Evidence from an international study”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 26(1), 24-49.
• Simatupang, T.M. ve Sridharan, R., (2002), “The collaborative supply chain”, International Journal of Logistics Management”, 13(1), 15-30.
• Simatupang, T.M., Wright, A.C. ve Sridharan, R., (2002), “The knowledge of coordination for supply chain integration”, Business Process Management Journal, 8(3), 289-308.
• Simatupang, T. M., Wright, A. C., & Sridharan, R. (2004). Applying the theory of constraints to supply chain collaboration. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(1), 57-70.
• Simatupang, T.M. ve Sridharan, R., (2005(a)) “An integrative framework for supply chain collaboration”, International Journal of Logistics Management, 16/2), 257-274.
• Simatupang, T.M ve Sridharan, R., (2005(b)) “Supply chain discontent”, Business Process Management Journal, 11(4), 349-369.
• Simatupang, T. M., & Sridharan, R. (2005(c)). The collaboration index: a measure for supply chain collaboration. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 35(1), 44-62.
• Son, J., Narasimhan, S. ve Riggins, F.J., (2005), “Effects of relational factors and channel climate on EDI Usage in the customer-supplier relationship”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(1), 321-353.
• Spekman, R.E., (1988), “Strategic supplier selection: Understanding long-term buyer relationships”, Business Horizos, 31(4), 75-81.
• Stank, T. P., Keller, S. B., and Daugherty, P. J. (2001). Supply chain collaboration and logistical service performance. Journal of Business logistics, 22(1), 29-48.
• Subramani, M., (2004) “How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships?”, MIS Quarterly, v28 n l, pp 45-73.
• Tan, K. C., (2001), “A framework of supply chain management literature”, European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, v7, pp 39-48.
• Tan, E. N., Smith, G., and Saad, M. (2006). Managing the global supply chain: a SME perspective. Production Planning & Control, 17 (3), 238–246.
• Tan, K.C., Kannan, V.R. ve Handfield, R.B., (1998), “Supply chain management: Supplier performance and firm performance”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 34(3), 2-9.
• Teece, D.J., Pisano, P.G. ve Shuen, A., (1997), “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
• Tsui, E., (2003), “Tracking the role and evolution of commercial knowledge management software”. In Handbook on Knowledge Management”, 2, C. W. Holsapple (ed), Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 5-27.
• Vereecke, A., & Muylle, S. (2006). Performance improvement through supply chain collaboration in Europe. International journal of operations & production management, 26(11), 1176- 1198.
• Verwaal, E. ve Hesselmans, M., (2004), “Drivers of supply network governance: An explorative study of the dutch chemical industry”, European Management Journal, 22(4), 442-451.
• Von Hippel, E., (1988), “The Sources of Innovation”, Oxford University Press, New York.
• Walter A. (2003). Relationship-specific factors influencing supplier involvement in customer new product development. Journal of Business Research, 56(9), 721–733. EKLER
• İkinci Düzey Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi Verileri Yapı Kurumlararası Sistem Model Birinci Düzey 2 405.35 62 100% İkinci Düzey 405.35 62
• Tedarik Zinciri İşbirliği Birinci Düzey 440.30 109 90% İkinci Düzey 487.49 114
• İşletme Performansı Birinci Düzey İkinci Düzey 225.62 225.62 100% 51
• * T katsayısı = Birinci Düzey 2 / İkinci Düzey 2 ( 0,80 < T katsayısı =< 1.00 )