A Bibliometric Study on Turkey - Azerbaijan Economic Relations

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 31 Sayı: 2, 227 - 246, 29.06.2024

Cemal Zehir Merve Vural Allaham Zahid Mamedov

https://doi.org/10.18657/yonveek.1282263

Öz

This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of publications related to Turkey-Azerbaijan economic relations and cooperation spanning the years 1997 to 2022. Utilizing the Web of Science academic database with specific keywords such as "Turkey-Azerbaijan economic cooperation" and "Turkey-Azerbaijan economic relations," the research identified and analyzed 39 relevant publications. The research involves a comprehensive exploration of bibliometric data, encompassing aspects like bibliographic coupling, citation, co-citation, co-cited references, authors, topics, and research methodologies. The research comprises distinct sections, encompassing a concise review of literature focused on the economic relations between Turkey and Azerbaijan, additionally, it includes a thorough exploration of literature studies and bibliometric analyses related to the economic ties between these two nations. The research further incorporates an elucidation of the bibliometric analysis process and concludes with a section dedicated to evaluating the findings. The majority of publications, approximately 82%, are in the form of articles, with proceedings papers, reviews, and editorial materials contributing to the remainder. Keyword analysis revealed terms like "Turkey" and "Azerbaijan", "energy," "Caucasus," "Kazakhstan," "Russia," "pipeline," "oil," and "gas". Regarding research methods, qualitative research emerged as the preferred approach for review methods. The research findings also pointed to a notable inclination towards single-author contributions, a tendency likely influenced by the utilization of qualitative research methods. Conversely, studies adopting quantitative methods frequently involved multiple authors, often ranging from three to four. In conclusion, the research underscores the need for a more comprehensive, interdisciplinary, and quantitative examination of Turkey-Azerbaijan economic relations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Turkey - Azerbaijan, economic relation, economic cooperation, bibliometric analysis

Türkiye - Azerbaycan Ekonomik İlişkileri Üzerine Bibliyometrik Bir Çalışma

Öz

Bu çalışma, 1997-2022 yıllarını kapsayan, Türkiye-Azerbaycan ekonomik ilişkileri ve iş birliğine ilişkin yayınların kapsamlı bir bibliyometrik analizini sunmaktadır. Web of Science akademik veritabanından "Türkiye-Azerbaycan ekonomik iş birliği" ve "Türkiye-Azerbaycan ekonomik iş birliği" gibi spesifik anahtar kelimelerden yararlanılarak ilgili 39 yayını belirledi ve analiz edildi. Araştırma, bibliyografik eşleştirme, alıntı, ortak alıntı, ortak alıntı yapılan referanslar, yazarlar, konular ve araştırma metodolojileri gibi hususları kapsayan bibliyometrik verilerin kapsamlı bir incelemesini içermektedir. Araştırma, Türkiye ile Azerbaycan arasındaki ekonomik ilişkilere odaklanan literatürün kısa bir incelemesini içermekte, ayrıca bu iki ülke arasındaki ekonomik bağlara ilişkin literatür çalışmalarının kapsamlı bir incelemesini ve bibliyometrik analizleri içermektedir. Araştırma ayrıca bibliyometrik analiz sürecinin açıklamasını da içeriyor ve bulguların değerlendirilmesine ayrılmış bir bölümle sonuçlanıyor. Yayınların çoğunluğu, yaklaşık % 82'si makale türünde olup geri kalanında bildiriler, incelemeler ve editoryal materyaller katkıda bulunmaktadır. Anahtar kelime analizi "Türkiye" ve "Azerbaycan", "enerji", "Kafkaslar", "Kazakistan", "Rusya", "boru hattı", "petrol" ve "gaz" gibi terimleri ortaya çıkarmıştır. Araştırma yöntemleriyle ilgili olarak, özellikle inceleme yöntemleri için tercih edilen nitel araştırma yaklaşımı ön plandaydı. Çalışma ayrıca, muhtemelen nitel araştırma yönteminin kullanımına atfedilen, tek yazarlı yayın tercihini de ortaya koymaktadır. Tersine, niceliksel yöntemleri benimseyen çalışmalar sıklıkla birden fazla yazar -genellikle üç ile dört arasında sayıları değişen- iş birliği içermekteydi. Sonuç olarak araştırma, Türkiye-Azerbaycan ekonomik ilişkilerinin daha kapsamlı, disiplinler arası ve niceliksel olarak incelenmesi ihtiyacının altını çizmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Türkiye - Azerbaycan, ekonomik ilişki, ekonomik işbirliği, bibliyometrik analiz

Kaynakça

• Alkan, M. N., & Mehdizadehyoushanlouei, M. (2023). Türkiye-Azerbaijan Relations in the First and Second Karabakh Wars. UPA Strategic Affairs, 4(2), 204-227.
• Allaham, M. V. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of HR Analytics Literature. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(83), 1147-1169.
• Ambartsumyan, К. Р. (2019). Грузия нужна нам как временный буфер: международные факторы большевистской советизации Южного Кавказа (1920–1921 годы). Новый исторический вестник, (1 (59)), 88-105.
• Aslanlı, A. (2017). The importance of the trans-caspian energy cooperation of the Turkish Republics. Bilig, 83, 27-51.
• Aslanlı, A. (2018). Türkiye-Azerbaycan Ekonomik İlişkileri. Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 15-27.
• Aydin, M. (2004). Foucault's pendulum: Turkey in Central Asia and the Caucasus. Turkish studies, 5(2), 1-22.
• Balci, B. (2014). Strengths and constraints of Turkish policy in the South Caucasus. Insight Turkey, 16(2), 43.
• Baran, Z. (2008). Will Turkey Abandon NATO?. Wall Street Journal, 29, 8.
• Bilgin, M. (2010). Geo-economics of European Gas Security: trade, geography and international politics. Insight Turkey, 185-209.
• Bilgin, M. (2011). Energy in Turkey: Security, Markets, Supplies and Pipelines. Turkish Studies, 12(3), 399-417.
• Bond, A. R., & Levine, R. M. (1997). Development of the copper and molybdenum industries and the Armenian economy. Post-Soviet geography and economics, 38(2), 105-120.
• Cavusoglu, B., Eyupoglu, S. Z., Sharghi, P., & Saner, T. (2018, August). An Interval Number Based Input-Output Analysis for a Regional Economy. In International Conference on Theory and Applications of Fuzzy Systems and Soft Computing (435-443). Springer, Cham.
• Culnan, M. J. (1987). Mapping the intellectual structure of MIS, 1980-1985: A co-citation analysis. Mis Quarterly, 341-353.
• Çelik, F., & Güllü, K. (2023). DergiPark’ta Yayınlanan Türk Dünyası İçerikli Makalelerin Bibliyometrik Analizi. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 12, 128-140.
• Çelikpala, M. (2013). Turkish foreign policy and cross-border cooperation in the South Caucasus. Security and Cross-Border Cooperation in the EU, the Black Sea Region and Southern Caucasus, 107, 119.
• Çınar, K. (2013). Turkey and Turkic Nations: A Post-Cold War Analysis of Relations. Turkish Studies, 14(2), 256-271.
• De Tapia, S. (2012). Le Compartiment Centrasiatique Et Azerbaïdjanais Du Champ. Revue detudes comparatives Est-Ouest, (1), 229-249.
• Dikkaya, M., Doyar, B. V., & Kanbir, O. (2017). The Effects of Oil Prices on Turkey's Foreign Trade Relations to Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan: 1996-2016.
• Dölek, Ü. C., Gökçe, M. K., & Azimkhanova, G. (2023). Scientific Publication Efficiency of Organization of Turkic States Scientists in the Field of Medicine: A Bibliometric Study. Türkiye Klinikleri. Tip Bilimleri Dergisi, 43(2), 195-202.
• Emre, S. A., Iskandarov, O. I., Mahmudov, R. B., & Chernov, D. N. (2021). Does Turkey have a Central Asian Project?. Вестник МГИМО Университета, 14(3), 82-96.
• Gahramanov, Z. (2019). The Strong Energy Bridge Between Turkey and Azerbaijan. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 18(2), 121-126.
• Garibova, J. (2018). Formation of the language-identity relationship in Azerbaijan and the role of Turkish. Turkiyat Arastirmalari Dergisi, (44), 15-41.
• German, T. (2012). The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia: security issues in the Caucasus. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 32(2), 216-229.
• Goudarzi, M. R., Lashaki, A. B., & Lakani, S. F. M. (2015). Turkish Foreign Policy in South Caucasus and Its Impacts in Iran-Azerbaijan Relationship. J. Pol. & L., 8, 122.
• Göksel, O. (2015). Beyond countering Iran: A political economy of Azerbaijan-Israel relations. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 42(4), 655-675.
• Gunay, E. D., & Gunay, G. E. (2021). The Turkish and Azerbaijani laws on unfair competition via standardised terms of contract-assessments and suggestions. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 6(1), 309-322.
• Guzansky, Y. (2014). Israel's Periphery Doctrine 2.0: The Mediterranean Plus. Mediterranean Politics, 19(1), 99-116.
• Güvendi, N. E. (2023). Evaluation Of Research On The'Turkish World'In The Context Of Intercultural Communıcatıon and Communication Sociology. Ulusal ve Uluslararası Sosyoloji ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 5(2), 281-291.
• Herzig, E. (2004). Regionalism, Iran and Central Asia. International Affairs, 80(3), 503-517.
• Humbatov, M., & Sari, K. (2017). Turkic Council Countries: Infrastructure, Trade, Logistics and Transportation. Center for Strategic Studies, volume 18-19.
• Ibrahim, K. (2018). Tanap: Influencer Well Beyond Energy. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 17(3), 47-52. Ibrahimov, R. (2015). Turkish-Azerbaijani energy relations: significant leverage in the implementation of the foreign policy interests of both countries. Insight Turkey, 17(2), 83-100.
• Ismailov, E., & Papava, V. (2008). A new concept for the Caucasus. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 8(3), 283-298.
• İpek, P. (2008). Azerbaijan: Oil Boom and Challenges. In M. Kibarouglu (Ed.), Turkey’s Neighborhood. Foreign Policy Institute.
• Kardaş, S. (2011). Turkish – Azerbaijani Energy Cooperation and Nabaco: Limits of the New Turkish Foreign Policy Rhetoric. Turkish Studies, 12(1), 55-77.
• Karimli, I. (2019). Structural model of economic development of Azerbaijan: challenges and outlooks. Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, 253-260.
• Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American documentation, 14(1), 10-25. Kim, Y., & Blank, S. (2016). The new great game of Caspian energy in 2013–14:‘Turk Stream’, Russia and Turkey. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 18(1), 37-55.
• Kim, Y., & Eom, G. H. (2008). The Geopolitics of Caspian Oil: Rivalries of the US, Russia, and Turkey in the South Caucasus. Global Economic Review, 37(1), 85-106.
• Kluge, P. (2010). MÜSIAD, the Green capital of Turkey, and Armenia. Iran and the Caucasus, 14(2), 387-406. Kok, R., Ekinci, R., Yalcinkaya, A., & Ay, E. (2017). The Effect of Country Risk Components on Real Sector: The Case of Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Russia and Turkey. Bilig, (83), 281-302.
• Kravtsov, A. A. (2019). Russia’s scientific collaboration with the Post-Soviet States: assessment on Web of Science publications. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 89, 351-369.
• McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American society for information science, 41(6), 433-443.
• Mousavi, M. (2010). Some notes on the Caspian energy and ethnic conflicts in the Caucasus. Iran and the Caucasus, 14(1), 159-168.
• Nagle, C. (2008). Whither Transcaucasia?. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 7(2), 71-81.
• Naieni, K. H., Malekafzali, H., Rashidian, A., Vazirian, P., Moradi, G., Mirzazadeh, A., ... & Shamshiri, A. (2012). Malaria status in economic cooperation countries; achievement and gaps toward United Nations Millennium Development Goals. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 41(7), 7.
• Nurmammadov, E. (2016). Azerbaijan–Turkey relations through the prism of economic transactions: A view from Azerbaijan. Turkish-Azerbaijani Relations (pp. 88-112).
• Onifade, S. T., Erdoğan, S., Alagöz, M., & Bekun, F. V. (2021). Renewables as a pathway to environmental sustainability targets in the era of trade liberalization: empirical evidence from Turkey and the Caspian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(31), 41663-41674.
• Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N. J. (2016). Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1178-1195.
• Pinto, M. J., & Fernandes, S. (2015). New questions arise: are bibliometric indicators adequate for evaluating the scientific production of the Social Sciences and Humanities?. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 161-169.
• Rafi, H., & Mazloumi, I. (2012). Obstacles toward Cooperation of Iran and Turkey in Central Asia and Caucasus. Central Eurasia Studies, 5(10), 79-98.
• Rehn, C., & Kronman, U. (2014). Bibliometric handbook for Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska Institutet. Swedia: Thomson Reuters.
• Reyes-Gonzalez, L., Gonzalez-Brambila, C. N., & Veloso, F. (2016). Using co-authorship and citation analysis to identify research groups: a new way to assess performance. Scientometrics, 108, 1171-1191.
• Saari, S. (2011). Managing distrust in the wider Black Sea region. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 11(3), 215-225.
• Shiraliyev, M. (2022). Uluslararası Hukuk Açısından Suşa Beyannamesi ve Önemi. Kafkasya’nın Geleceği Kongresi, 103-111.
• Shiriyev, Z. (2013). Impact of Afghanistan on Energy Security in the Caspian Sea Basin: The Role of Azerbaijan. In Afghanistan and Central Asia: NATO's Role in Regional Security since 9/11 (112-126). IOS Press.
• Sobirov, J. (2020). International Relations Between Turkic Speaking States. The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 2(12), 144-149.
• Sooryamoorthy, R. (2017). Do types of collaboration change citation? A scientometric analysis of social science publications in South Africa. Scientometrics, 111(1), 379-400.
• Starr, F., & Cornell, S. (2005). The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline: Oil window to the west. Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program.
• Stergiou, A., & Kollias, C. (2022). The Political Economy of Turkish Foreign Policy. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 24(1), 42-59.
• Strakes, J. E. (2013). Situating the ‘Balanced Foreign Policy’: The Role of System Structure in Azerbaijan's Multi-Vector Diplomacy. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 15(1), 37-67.
• Surwase G., Sagar, A., Kademani, B. S., & Bhanumurthy, K. (2011). Co-citation analysis: an overview. Şahin, K., & Candan, G. (2018). Scientific productivity and cooperation in Turkic world: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 115, 1199-1229.
• Toklu, M., C. (2023). Türk Dünyasında Bilim ve Teknoloji: Karşılaştırmalı Performans Analizi. Şahin, K. ve Kol, S. (Ed.), Bağımsızlığın 30. Yılında Türk Dünyası Analizleri (s. 48-67). Sakarya: Sakarya Üniversitesi Yayınları. Torbakov, I. (2008). The Georgia Crisis and Russia-Turkey Relations.
• Uslu, R. (2015). Turkey-Azerbaijan political relations (1920-1922) on the basis of Soviet Russian documents. White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1997). Visualization of literatures. Annual review of information science and technology, 32, 99-168.
• Yalowitz, K., & Cornell, S. E. (2004). The critical but perilous Caucasus. Orbis, 48(1), 105-116. Yorgun, S. (2018). Influence of economic and political changes on industrial relations between Turkey and Azerbaijan. In Comparative Capitalism and the Transitional Periphery. Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Yulu, A. (2014). The Effects of the Dilucu Border Gate on Igdir. Journal of Geography-Cografya Dergisi, (28), 21-36.