REALİST VE KURUMSALCI DÜŞÜNCE TARTIŞMALARINDA YENİ KURUMSAL KURAM NEREDE DURMAKTADIR? YENİ KURUMSAL KURAMIN DÜŞÜNSEL KÖKLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Salih Arslan

doi:10.32705/yorumyonetim.523466

REALİST VE KURUMSALCI DÜŞÜNCE TARTIŞMALARINDA YENİ KURUMSAL KURAM NEREDE DURMAKTADIR? YENİ KURUMSAL KURAMIN DÜŞÜNSEL KÖKLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Öz

Bu makalenin öncelikli amacı, örgütsel analizde kurumsalcı yaklaşımın ortaya çıkış sürecini temel nedenleriyle birlikte açıklamaktır. İkinci önemli amacı ise kurumsalcı yaklaşım geleneği içerisinde değerlendirilen Yeni Kurumsal Kuram’ın örgüt çalışmalarına katkılarını gösterebilmektir. Üçüncü amacı ise yeni kurumsal kuramın öne sürdüğü varsayım ve iddialara hem kuram içinden hem de örgütsel analizdeki diğer kuramlardan yöneltilen bazı temel eleştirileri tartışmaktır. Çalışmada benimsenen yöntem literatür taramasıdır. Çalışma teorik düzeyde yürütülmüş ve Türkçe literatüre teorik düzeyde katkı sunacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Örgütsel Analiz,Örgüt Kuramı,Yeni Kurumsal Kuram

Kaynakça

Arrow, K.J. (1974). The Limits of Organizations. Newyork: London. W.W. North.
Barley, S. R. ve P. S.Tolbert. (1997). Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links Between Action and Institution. Organization Studies, 18.1, 93-117.
Barley, S. R. (2010). Building an Institutional Field to Corral a Government: A Case to Set an Agenda for Organization Studies. Organization Studies, 31.6, 777-805.
Berger, P.L. ve T.Luckmann. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Doubleday.
Bowring, M.A. (2000). De/Constructing Theory: A Look at the Institutional Theory That Positivism Built. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9.3, 258-270.
Coleman, J.S. (1986). Social Theory, Social Research and a Theory of Action. American Journal of Sociology, 91.6, 1309-1335.
Collins, R. (1981). On the Microfoundations of Macrosociology. American Journal of Sociology, 86.5, 984-1014.
DiMaggio, P. J. ve W.W.Powell. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.

DiMaggio, P.J. ve W.W.Powell. (1991-a). Introdiction. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (içinde). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1-38.
DiMaggio, P.J. ve W.W.Powell. (1991-b). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (içinde). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 63-82.
DiMaggio, P. J. (1997). Culture and Cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263-287.
Fligstein, N. (1997). Social Skill and Institutional Theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40.4, 397-405.
Friedland, R. ve R.R.Alford. (1991). Bringing Society Back in: Symbols, Practies and Institutional Contradictions. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (içinde). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 232-263.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Inc.
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Autline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Goffman, E. (1969). The Characteristics of Total Institutions. A.A. Etzioni (Ed). Sociological Reader an Complex Organizations (içinde). 2nd Ed. Newyork: Hall, Rinehart and Winsten. 312-338.
Goffman, E. (1983). The Interaction Order: American Sociological Association, 1982 Presidential Address. American Sociological Review, 48.1, 1-17.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure. The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91.3, 481-510.
Greenwood, R. ve C.R.Hinings. (1996). Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21.4, 1022-1054.
Greenwood, R., C.Oliver, K.Sahlin ve R.Suddaby. (2008). Introduction. R.Greenwood, C.Oliver, K.Sahlin ve R.Suddaby (Eds). Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (içinde), London: Sage. 1-46.
Haveman, H.A. ve H.Rao. (1997). Structuring a Theory Moral Sentiments: Institutional and Organizational Coevolution in the Early Thrift Industry. American Journal of Sociology, 102.6, 1606-1651.
Hirsch, P.M. (1997). Sociology without Social Structure: Neo-Institutional Theory Meets Brave New World. American Journal of Sociology, 102.6, 1702-1723.
Hirsch, P.M. ve M.Lounsbury. (1997). Ending the Family Quarrel: Toward a Reconciliation of Old and New İnstitutionalisms. American Behavioral Scientist, 40.4, 406-418.
Jepperson, R.L. (1991). Institutions, Institutional Effects and Institutionalism. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (içinde). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 143-163.
Jepperson, R.L. ve J.W.Meyer. (1991). The Puclic Order and the Construction of Formal Organization. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (içinde). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 204-231.
Jepperson, R.L. ve J.W.Meyer. (2011). Multiple Levels of Analysis and the Limitations of Methodological Individualisms. Sociological Theory, 29.1, 54-73.
Meyer, J.W. ve B. Rowan. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83.2, 340-363.
Meyer, J.W. ve B.Rowan. (1991). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (içinde). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 41-62.
Meyer, J.W. ve R.L.Jepperson. (2000). The Actors of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency. Sociological Theory, 18.1, 101-120.
Meyer, J.W. (2008). Reflections on Institutional Theories of Organizations. R.Greenwood, C.Oliver, K.Sahlin ve R.Suddaby (Ed). Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (içinde). London: Sage. 788-809. Meyer, J.W. (2010). World Society, Institutional Theories and the Actor. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 1-20.
Meyer, J.W. (2017). Reflections on Institutional Theories of Organizations. R.Greenwood, C.Oliver, K.Sahlin ve R.Suddaby (Ed). Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (içinde). 2nd Edition, London: Sage. 831-852.
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. Academy of Management Review, 16.1, 145-179.
Olsen, M. (1968). The Logic of Collective Action, Public Goods and Theory of Group. Newyork: Schocken Books. Parsons, T. (1956-a). Suggestions for a Sociological Approach to the Theory of Organizations-1. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1.1, 63-85.
Parsons, T. (1956-b). Suggestions for a Sociological Approach to the Theory of Organizations-2. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1.1, 225-239.
Parsons, T. (1960). Authority, Legitimation and Political Action. Structure and Process in Modern Societies (içinde). Glencae IL: Free Press. 170-198.
Parsons, T. (1991). The Social System. London: Routledge&Kegan Paul. Perrow, C. (1985). Overboard with Myth and Symbols. American Journal of Sociology, 91.1, 151-155.
Powell, W.W. (1991). Expanding the Scope of Institutional Analysis. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (içinde). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 183-203.
Powell, W.W. ve J.A.Colyvas. (2008). Microfoundations of Institutional Theory. R.Greenwood, C.Oliver, K.Sahlin ve R.Suddaby (Eds). Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (içinde), London: Sage. 276-298.
Scott, W.R. (1987). The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 493-511.
Scott, W.R. (1991). Unpacking Institutional Arguments. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (içinde). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 164-182.
Scott, W.R. and J.W.Meyer. (1991-a). The Organization of Societal Sectors: Propositions and Early Evidence. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (içinde). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 108-140.
Scott, W.R. ve J.W.Meyer. (1991-b). The Rise of Training Programs in Firms and Agencies: An Institutional Perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 297-326.
Scott, W.R. (1995). Contemporary Institutional Theory. Institutions and Organizations (içinde). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 33-61.
Scott, W.R. (1998). Conceptions of Environments. Organizations Rational, Natural and Open Systems (içinde). 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall. 123-148.
Scott, W.R. (2008). Approaching Adulthood: The Maturing of Institutional Theory. Theory Sociology. 37, 427-442.
Scott, W.R. (2017). Institutional Theory: Onward and Upward. R.Greenwood, C.Oliver, K.Sahlin ve R.Suddaby (Ed). Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (içinde). 2nd Edition, London: Sage. 853-871.
Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the Theory of Organization. American Sociological Review, 13.1, 25-35.
Selznick, P. (1990). TVA and Gross Roots. Berkeley: University of California.
Selznick, P. (1996). Institutionalism: Old and New. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 270-277.
Sewell, W.H. (1992). A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency and Transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98.1, 1-29.
Stinchcombe, A.L. (1997). On the Virtues of the Old Institutionalism. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 1-18.
Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies. American Sociological Review, 51.2, 273-286.
Tolbert, P.S. (1985). Institutional Environments and Resource Dependence: Source of Administrative Structure in Institutions of Higher Education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30.1, 1-13.
Tolbert, P. S. ve L.G.Zucker. (1983). Institutional Source of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 22-39.
Tolbert, P.S. ve L.G.Zucker. (1996). The Institutionalization of Institutional Theory. S.Clegg, C.Hardy ve W.Nord (Ed). Handbook of Organization Studies (içinde). London: Sage. 175-190.
Weick, K.E. (1969). The Social Psychology of Organizations. Reading Mass, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley Pub. Co.
Weick, K.E. (1993). The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38.4, 628-652.
Wiley, N. (1988). The Micro – Macro Problem in Social Theory. Sociological Theory, 6.2, 254-261.
Zucker, L.G. (1977). The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence. American Sociological Review, 42.5, 726-743.
Zucker, L.G. (1987). Institutional Theories of Organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443-464.
Zucker, L.G. (1991). The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence. W.W.Powell ve P.J.DiMaggio (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press. Chicago. 83-107.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Ekonomi

Bölüm

Derleme

Yazarlar

Salih Arslan ^*
0000-0002-4993-5611
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Nisan 2019

Gönderilme Tarihi

6 Şubat 2019

Kabul Tarihi

1 Nisan 2019

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2019 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32705/yorumyonetim.523466

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA22UW27UW

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Arslan, S. (2019). REALİST VE KURUMSALCI DÜŞÜNCE TARTIŞMALARINDA YENİ KURUMSAL KURAM NEREDE DURMAKTADIR? YENİ KURUMSAL KURAMIN DÜŞÜNSEL KÖKLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Yorum Yönetim Yöntem Uluslararası Yönetim Ekonomi ve Felsefe Dergisi, 7(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.32705/yorumyonetim.523466

AMA

1.Arslan S. REALİST VE KURUMSALCI DÜŞÜNCE TARTIŞMALARINDA YENİ KURUMSAL KURAM NEREDE DURMAKTADIR? YENİ KURUMSAL KURAMIN DÜŞÜNSEL KÖKLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Yorum-Yönetim-Yöntem (JIMM). 2019;7(1):17-34. doi:10.32705/yorumyonetim.523466

Chicago

Arslan, Salih. 2019. “REALİST VE KURUMSALCI DÜŞÜNCE TARTIŞMALARINDA YENİ KURUMSAL KURAM NEREDE DURMAKTADIR? YENİ KURUMSAL KURAMIN DÜŞÜNSEL KÖKLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME”. Yorum Yönetim Yöntem Uluslararası Yönetim Ekonomi ve Felsefe Dergisi 7 (1): 17-34. https://doi.org/10.32705/yorumyonetim.523466.

EndNote

Arslan S (01 Nisan 2019) REALİST VE KURUMSALCI DÜŞÜNCE TARTIŞMALARINDA YENİ KURUMSAL KURAM NEREDE DURMAKTADIR? YENİ KURUMSAL KURAMIN DÜŞÜNSEL KÖKLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Yorum Yönetim Yöntem Uluslararası Yönetim Ekonomi ve Felsefe Dergisi 7 1 17–34.

IEEE

[1]S. Arslan, “REALİST VE KURUMSALCI DÜŞÜNCE TARTIŞMALARINDA YENİ KURUMSAL KURAM NEREDE DURMAKTADIR? YENİ KURUMSAL KURAMIN DÜŞÜNSEL KÖKLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME”, Yorum-Yönetim-Yöntem (JIMM), c. 7, sy 1, ss. 17–34, Nis. 2019, doi: 10.32705/yorumyonetim.523466.

ISNAD

Arslan, Salih. “REALİST VE KURUMSALCI DÜŞÜNCE TARTIŞMALARINDA YENİ KURUMSAL KURAM NEREDE DURMAKTADIR? YENİ KURUMSAL KURAMIN DÜŞÜNSEL KÖKLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME”. Yorum Yönetim Yöntem Uluslararası Yönetim Ekonomi ve Felsefe Dergisi 7/1 (01 Nisan 2019): 17-34. https://doi.org/10.32705/yorumyonetim.523466.

JAMA

1.Arslan S. REALİST VE KURUMSALCI DÜŞÜNCE TARTIŞMALARINDA YENİ KURUMSAL KURAM NEREDE DURMAKTADIR? YENİ KURUMSAL KURAMIN DÜŞÜNSEL KÖKLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Yorum-Yönetim-Yöntem (JIMM). 2019;7:17–34.

MLA

Arslan, Salih. “REALİST VE KURUMSALCI DÜŞÜNCE TARTIŞMALARINDA YENİ KURUMSAL KURAM NEREDE DURMAKTADIR? YENİ KURUMSAL KURAMIN DÜŞÜNSEL KÖKLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME”. Yorum Yönetim Yöntem Uluslararası Yönetim Ekonomi ve Felsefe Dergisi, c. 7, sy 1, Nisan 2019, ss. 17-34, doi:10.32705/yorumyonetim.523466.

Vancouver

1.Salih Arslan. REALİST VE KURUMSALCI DÜŞÜNCE TARTIŞMALARINDA YENİ KURUMSAL KURAM NEREDE DURMAKTADIR? YENİ KURUMSAL KURAMIN DÜŞÜNSEL KÖKLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Yorum-Yönetim-Yöntem (JIMM). 01 Nisan 2019;7(1):17-34. doi:10.32705/yorumyonetim.523466

Cited By

Türk Hava Harp Sanayiinde Bilgi Ve Teknoloji Transferi: Yabancı Rol Modellerin İzomorfik Kullanımı

Kamu Yönetimi ve Teknoloji Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.58307/kaytek.1444021