‘’EBEVEYN OKULU’’ PROGRAM DEĞERLENDİRME: NİTEL BİR ÇALIŞMA

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 52 - 59, 20.09.2024

Ahu Çırlak , Ebru Kılıçarslan Törüner

Öz

Giriş: Çocukların sağlıklı gelişimi için sistematik eğitim programlarının uygulanması, çocukların bilişsel, sosyal, duygusal, motor ve dil gelişimi için temel yapı taşlarının öğrenilmesine katkı sağlarken, ebeveynlerin bilgi ve davranışlarını da geliştirebilir. Bu çalışma “Ebeveyn Okulu” programının ebeveynlere katkılarını değerlendirmek amacıyla yapılmıştır.
Materyal ve Yöntem: Çalışma 1-15 Temmuz 2023 tarihleri arasında nitel araştırma modellerinden fenomenoloji çalışma deseni kullanılarak odak grup tekniği ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. “Ebeveyn Okulu” programına toplam 23 ebeveyn aktif olarak katılmıştır. Ebeveyn arasından program sonrası değerlendirme yapmayı kabul eden 11 ebeveyn bu çalışmanın örneklemini oluşturmuştur. Veri toplamak için 5 sorudan oluşan tanımlayıcı veri formu ve 3 sorudan oluşan yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu kullanılmıştır. Katılımcıların görüşleri üç hemşire tarafından analiz edilmiş ve tematik kodlama yapılmıştır.
Bulgular: Ebeveynle yapılan görüşmelerde dört tema (Ebeveynde duygusal değişim, ebeveynde davranışsal değişim, çocukta değişim ve geçiş zorluğu) ve 14 alt tema (Farkındalık, disiplinde tutarlılık, öz güven, öz şefkat, öz yeterlilik, oyun, etkili iletişim, birlikte zaman geçirme, davranışsal değişim, büyüme ve gelişime katkı, duygu durumu, başkalarıyla kıyaslama, aile büyükleri ve beslenme davranışı) belirlenmiştir.
Sonuçlar: Program sonunda ebeveynlerle yapılan görüşmelerde kendilerinde ve çocuklarında değişimler olduğu ve bazı değişimlerde zorlandıkları tespit edilmiştir. Özellikle kıyaslama, aile büyükleri ile çatışma ya da beslenme konusunda zorlandıklarını belirtmişlerdir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

ebeveyn, ebeveynlik eğitimi, nitel araştırma, hemşirelik

Etik Beyan

The Declaration of Helsinki's guiding principles were followed in conducting the study. The Gazi University Ethics Committee gave its approval after reviewing the study's ethical acceptability (Research Code: 2023-816). The parents who decided to participate in the study were informed about it by the researchers prior to the data collection process, and their signed agreement was obtained once the study's aim was explained.

‘’PARENT SCHOOL’’ EVALUATION OF THE PROGRAM: A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Öz

Introduction: Implementation of systematic education programs for the healthy development of children can contribute to learning the basic building blocks for the cognitive, social, emotional, motor, and language development of children while improving the knowledge and behaviors of parent. This study was conducted to evaluate the contributions of the "Parent School" program to parents.
Material and Method: The study was conducted on July 1-15, 2023, using the focus group technique using the phenomenology study design, one of the qualitative research models. A total of 23 parent actively participated in the "Parent School" program. Among the parent, 11 parent who agreed to do post-program evaluation constituted the sample of this study. A descriptive data form consisting of 5 questions and a semi-structured interview form consisting of 3 questions were used to collect data. Three nurses analyzed participants' opinions, and thematic coding was performed.
Results: In the interviews conducted with the parent, four themes (Emotional change in the parent, behavioral change in the parent, change in the child, and difficulty in transition) and 14 sub-themes (Awareness, consistency in discipline, self-confidence, self-compassion, self-efficacy, playing, effective communication, spending time together, behavioral change, contribution to growth and development, emotional state, comparison with others, family elders and feeding behavior) were determined.
Conclusion: In the interviews with the parents at the end of the program, it was determined that there were changes in themselves and their children and that they had difficulty with some changes. In particular, they stated that they had difficulties with comparison, conflicts with family elders or feeding.

Anahtar Kelimeler

parent, parenting education, qualitative research, nursing

Kaynakça

• 1. Mooney KE, Bywater T, Hinde S, Richardson G, Wright J, Dickerson J, et al. A quasi-experimental effectiveness evaluation of the ‘Incredible Years Toddler’ parenting programme on children’s development aged 5: A study protocol. 2023;18(9):e0291557. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291557
• 2. Morris AS, Robinson LR, Hays-Grudo J, Claussen AH, Hartwig SA, Treat AE. Targeting parenting in early childhood: a public health approach to improve outcomes for children living in poverty. Child Development. 2017;88(2):388-397. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fcdev.12743
• 3. World Health Organization (2021). Newborn improving survival and wellbeing. Available from URL: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/newborns-reducing-mortality
• 4. Julian MM, Leung CYY, Rosenblum KL, LeBourgeois MK, Lumeng JC, Kaciroti N, et al. Parenting and toddler self-regulation in low-income families: What does sleep have to do with it? Infant Mental Health Journal. 2019;40(4):479-495. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21783
• 5. Barimani M, Frykedal KF, Rosander M, Berlin, A. Childbirth and parenting preparation in antenatal classes. Midwifery. 2017;57:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.10.021
• 6. Morawska A, Dittman CK, Rusby JC. Promoting Self-Regulation in Young Children: The Role of Parenting Interventions. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 2019;22(1):43-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-019-00281-5
• 7. Huang W, Weinert S, von Maurice J, Attig M. Specific parenting behaviors link maternal education to toddlers’ language and social competence. Journal of Psychology. 2022;36(6):998-1009. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000950
• 8. Nandy A, Nixon E, Quigley J. Parental toy play and toddlers socioemotional development: the moderating role of coparenting dynamics. Infant Behavior&Development. 2020; 60:101465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. infbeh.2020.101465
• 9. Dave S, Mastergeorge AM, Olswang LB. Motherese, affect, and vocabulary development: dyadic communicative interactions in infants and toddlers. Journal of Child Language. 2018; 45(4):917-938. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000917000551
• 10. Buoen ES, Lekhal R, Lydersen S, Berg-Nielsen TS, Drugli MB. Promoting the quality of teacher-toddler interaction: a randomized controlled trial of ‘’thrive by three’’ in-service Professional development in 187 Norwegian toddler classrooms. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12:778777. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2021.778777
• 11. Cirlak A. (2023). Effectiveness of the technology-based parent school education program. Doctoral Thesis, Gazi University Health Sciences Institute (in Turkiye)
• 12. Bjorknes R, Barreda GO. Are the voices of parents heard? A scoping review of satisfaction in parenting programs. Evaluation Program Planning. 2021;88:101928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101928
• 13. Minton HM, Murray L, Allan MJ, Perry R, Bettencourt AF, Gross D, et al. Implementation of a Parent Training Program During Community-Based Dissemination (From In-Person to Hybrid): Mixed Methods Evaluation. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting. 2024;7:e55280. https://doi.org/10.2196/55280
• 14. Chan CKY, Fu K, Liu SKY. Incorporating emotion coaching into behavioral parent training program: evaluation of its effectiveness. Child Psychiatry and Human Development. 2024;55(1):236-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-022-01402-y
• 15. Keown LJ, Sanders MR, Franke N, Shepherd M. Te Whanau Pou Toru: a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a culturally adapted low-intensity variant of the Triple P-Positive Parenting program for Indigenous Maöri families in New Zealand. Prevention Science. 2018;19(7):954–965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0886-5
• 16. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
• 17. World Medical Association (WMA) World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
• 18. Doubt J, Bray R, Loening-Voysey H, Cluver L, Byrne J, Nzima, D, et al. “It has changed”: understanding change in a parenting program in South Africa. Annals of Global Health. 2017;83(5-6):767-776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2017.10.021
• 19. Rheu M, Peng W, Haung KT. Leveraging Upward Social Comparison in Social Media to Promote Healthy Parenting. Health Communication. 2023;38(2):205-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1943891
• 20. Sanders MR, Burke K, Prinz RJ, Morawska A. Achieving population-level change through a system-contextual approach to supporting competent parenting. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 2017;20(1):36-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-017-0227-4
• 21. Butler J, Gregg L, Calam R, Wittkowski A. Parents’ perceptions and experiences of parenting programmes: a systematic review and metasynthesis of the qualitative literature. Clinical Child Family Psychology Review. 2020;23(2):176-204. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10567-019-00307-y
• 22. Benzies KM, Kurilova J, van der Merwe M. Parental attitudinal and behavioral change associated with prevention-focused parenting education: an interpretive description. Health Education & Behavior. 2023;50(1):144-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981211033233
• 23. Day JJ, Sanders MR. Do parents benefit from help when completing a selfguided parenting program online? a randomized controlled trial comparing triple p online with and without telephone support. Behavior Therapy. 2018;49(6):1020-1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2018.03.002
• 24. Spencer CM, Topham GL, King EL. Do online parenting programs create change?: a meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology. 2020;34(3):364–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000605
• 25. Lansford JE. Annual Research Review: Cross-cultural similarities and differences in parenting. Journal of Child Psychology Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines. 2022;63(4): 466-479. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13539
• 26. Sharma N, Hooberman A. Parenting and family-based care. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics North America. 2022;31(2):313-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2022.01.003
• 27. Streit C, Carlo G, Knight GP, White RMB, Maiya S. Relations among parenting, culture, and prosocial behaviors in u.s. mexican youth: an integrative socialization approach. Child Development. 2021;92(4):e383-e397. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13550