Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

The Moderating Role of Job Satisfaction in the Effect of Leader-Member Interaction on Workplace Happiness in Academia

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, 81 - 94, 30.04.2024

Beyza Erer , Yasemin Savaş

https://doi.org/10.53478/yuksekogretim.1298177
Cited By: 1

Öz

The aim of this study is to examine whether job satisfaction has a moderating role in the effect of leader-member exchange on workplace happiness. The data of the research, which was conducted within the scope of quantitative research model and correlational research design, were collected by convenience sampling method from 322 academicians working in the field of social sciences in Turkey. These data were analyzed using SPSS 25 and AMOS 25 statistical programs. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that there were positive and significant correlations between the variables of leader-member exchange, workplace happiness and job satisfaction. In addition, it was found that job satisfaction had a moderator role in the effect of leader-member exchange on workplace happiness. In other words, if job satisfaction is high, the effect of perceived leader-member exchange on workplace happiness is higher. There is no study in the relevant literature that evaluates the moderator role of job satisfaction in studies examining the relationship between leaders and members and workplace happiness. Therefore, it is believed that this research will provide a source and contribution to the field.

Anahtar Kelimeler

leader-member exchange workplace happiness job satisfaction

Kaynakça

  • Alken, L.S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. New York: Sage.
  • Al Sabei, S. D., Labrague, L. J., Miner Ross, A., Karkada, S., Albashayreh, A., Al Masroori, F., & Al Hashmi, N. (2020). Nursing work environment, turnover intention, job burnout and quality of care: The moderating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 52(1), 95-104.
  • Amirullah, M. (2017). Factors that lead to happiness at the workplace among academicians: A case of UiTM. Erişim adresi: https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/17260 (10 Nisan, 2023).
  • Arslan, Y., & Polat, S. (2017). Adaptation of well-being work scale to Turkish. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 23(4), 603-622.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  • Baş Paşaoğlu, D., Rençber, İ., & Osman, A. A. (2022). The mediating role of interactional justice in the effect of leader-member exchange on cyberloafing behavior. Gümüşhane University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 13(2), 690-707.
  • Başol, O., & Çömlekçi, M. F. (2020). Adaptation of the job satisfaction scale: validity and reliability study. Kırklareli University Journal of Vocational School of Social Sciences, 1(2), 17-31.
  • Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1538-1567.
  • Brayfıeld, A., & Rothe, H. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35(5), 307-311.
  • Butt, R. S., Wen, X., & Hussain, R. Y. (2020). Mediated effect of employee job satisfaction on employees’ happiness at work and analysis of motivational factors: Evidence from telecommunication sector. Asian Business Research Journal, 5, 19-27.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Örnekleme yöntemleri. Erişim adresi: http://cv.ankara.edu.tr/duzenleme/kisisel/dosyalar/ 21082015162828.pdf (02 Mayıs, 2023).
  • Büyükyılmaz, O., & Yenici, M. (2021). The attitudinal consequences of perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange for academic staff. Journal of Higher Education, 11(2), 495-507.
  • Chan, C., & Yeung, D. (2016). The impact of leader-member exchange (LMX) and empowerment on employee voice behavior. Nang Yan Business Journal, 4(1), 44-55. Chaiprasit, K., & Santidhiraku, O. (2011). Happiness at work of employees in small and medium-sized enterprisesThailand. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 25, 189-200.
  • Chen, X., Ran, L., Zhang, Y., Yang, J., Yao, H., Zhu, S., & Tan, X. (2019). Moderating role of job satisfaction on turnover intention and burnout among workers in primary care institutions: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 19, 1-10.
  • Coyle-Shapiro JA-M., & Conway, N. (2004). The employment relationship through the lens of social exchange theory. In Coyle-Shapiro J, Shore LM, Taylor MS, Tetrick LE (Eds.), The employment relationship: Examining psychological and contextual perspectives (pp. 5–28). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Çakır, A. A. (2019). Workplace happiness in academics in the context of its pioneers and results: A model application. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun.
  • Çiçek, B., & Çiçek, A. (2020). The effect of workplace incivility on employee creative performance: the mediator role of leader-member exchange. Journal of Human and Work, 7(2), 267-282.
  • Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 46-78.
  • Darrat, M. A., Amyx, D. A., & Bennett, R. J. (2017). Examining the impact of job embeddedness on salesperson deviance: The moderating role of job satisfaction. Industrial Marketing Management, 63, 158-166.
  • De Moura, G. R., Abrams, D., Retter, C., Gunnarsdottir, S., & Ando, K. (2009). Identification as an organizational anchor: How identification and job satisfaction combine to predict turnover intention. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 540-557.
  • Demirel, E. & Erer, B. (2022). Duygusal zekâ ve iş yeri mutluluğu arasındaki ilişkide iş özerkliğinin rolü. Çatalhöyük Uluslararası Turizm ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, (9), 75-86.
  • Derbis, R., & Jasiński, A. M. (2018). Work satisfaction, psychological resiliency and sense of coherence as correlates of work engagement. Cogent Psychology, 5(1), 451-610.
  • Diener, E., & Ryan, K. (2009). Subjective well-being: A general overview. South African Journal of Psychology, 39(4), 391–406.
  • Doğan, T., Eryılmaz, A., & Ercan, L. (2014). Predictive role of work engagement on subjective wellbeİng: an analysis on academics. Journal of Gazi University Industrial Arts Education Faculty, 33, 48-57.
  • Dolan, S., & Gosselin, E. (1998). Job satisfaction and life satisfaction: Analysis of a contingency model with social demographic moderators. Document de Recherche, (98-02), 1-8.
  • Dose, P.E., Desrumaux, P., Bernaud, J.L., & Hellemans, C. (2019). What makes happy counselors? from self-esteem and leader-member exchange to well-being at work: The mediating role of need satisfaction. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 15, 823-842.
  • Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38, 1715-1759.
  • Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard N. P. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 178-199.
  • Elayan, M. B., Albalawi, A. S., Shalan, H. M., Al-Hoorie, A. H., & Shamout, M. D. (2023). Perceived manager’s emotional ıntelligence and happiness at work: The mediating role of job satisfaction and affective organizational commitment. Organizacija, 56(1), 18-31.
  • Eleren, A., & Sadykova, G. (2016). Girişimcilik eğilimi ile mutluluk algısı arasındaki ilişki: Üniversite öğrencileri üzerinde bir araştırma. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(5), 189-209.
  • Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2005). From ideal to real: A longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 659-676.
  • Erer, B. (2021). İşyeri mutluluğunun öncülleri ve sonuçları üzerine nitel bir çalışma. Pamukkale University Journal of Business Research, 8(1), 215-229.
  • Erer, B., & Tekin, Ç. İ. (2021). Mediation effect of life satisfaction on the relationship of perceived manager support and job satisfaction. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 17(33), 95-111.
  • Fisher, C. D. (2010). Happiness at work. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 384-412.
  • García-Contreras, R., Muñoz-Chávez, J. P., Pineda-Celaya, L., & Rodríguez-Morales, J. I. (2022). Social exchange approach and happiness at work: Exploring the mediating effect of organizational commitment. OBETS. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 17(2), 221-236.
  • Ghulam, M., Mubarak, N., Khan, J, Nauman, M., & Riaz, A. (2022). Impact of leader-member exchange on ınnovative work behavior of ınformation technology project employees: Role of employee engagement and self-efficacy. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1-19.
  • Gilman, R., Huebner, E. S., & Laughlin, J. E. (2000). A first study of the multidimensional students' life satisfaction scale with adolescents. Social Indicators Research, 52(2), 135–160.
  • Gönül, F., Çalık A. (2022). The relationship of emotional intelligence, job satisfaction and burnout: a research on hospital employees. Ardahan University Journal of the Faculty of Economics Administrative Sciences, 4(1), 41-50.
  • Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
  • Greguras, G. J., & Ford, J. M. (2006). An examination of the multidimensionality of supervisor and subordinate perceptions of leader‐member exchange. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79(3), 433-465.
  • Güner, F., & Çetinkaya Bozkurt, Ö. (2017). A research on exploration the reasons of bank employees' happiness and unhappiness in the workplace. The Journal Of Organizational Behavior Research, 2(2), 85-105.
  • Gür, R. (2017). Development of the academic performance perception scale. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 69, 177-197.
  • Gürbüz, S. and Şahin, F. (2018). Research methods in social sciences (5th ed.) Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7rd ed.). Harlow: Pearson.
  • Hesli, V. L., & Lee, J. M. (2013). Job satisfaction in academia: Why are some faculty members happier than others? PS: Political Science & Politics, 46(2), 339-354.
  • Hofmann, D. A., Morgeson, F. P., & Gerras, S. J. (2003). Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: Safety climate as an exemplar. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 170–178.
  • Hoppock, R. (1935). Job satisfaction. New York: Harper and Brothers.
  • Huang, X., Chan, S. C. H., Lam, W., & Nan, X. (2010). The joint effect of leader-member exchange and emotional intelligence on burnout and work performance in call centers in China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(7), 1124-1144.
  • Hwang, E. (2019). Effects of the organizational culture type, job satisfaction, and job stress on nurses’ happiness: a cross-sectional study of the long-term care hospitals of South Korea. Japan Journal of Nursing Science, 16(3), 263-273.
  • Işık, M., & Uçar, Z. (2019). İş tatmini psikolojik sahiplenme ilişkisinde lider üye etkileşiminin düzenleyicilik etkisi. Dokuz Eylül University Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences, 21(4), 1119–1145.
  • Joo, B. K., & Lee, I. (2017). Workplace happiness: Work engagement, career satisfaction, and subjective well-being. Evidence-based HRM, 5(2), 206-221.
  • Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., Durham, C. C. & Kluger, A. N. (1998). Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: The role of core evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(1), 17.
  • Kang, D. S., & Stewart, J. (2007). Leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership and hrd: development of units of theory and laws of interaction. Leadership ve Organization Development Journal, 28(6), 531-551.
  • Karabati, S., Ensari, N., & Fiorentino, D. (2019). Job satisfaction, rumination, and subjective well-being: A moderated mediational model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(1), 251-268.
  • Kesebir, P., & Diener, E. (2008). In pursuit of happiness: Empirical answers to philosophical questions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 117–125.
  • Keser, A. (2018). Happiness at work survey. Paradoks Economics, Sociology and Policy Journal, 14(1), 43-57.
  • Kılıç, İ., & Bulgurcu Gürel, E. B. (2022). The effect leader member exchange and psyhchological empowerment on organizational identification: The case of Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University. Third Sector Social Economic Review, 57(3), 2449-2472.
  • Kim, P. B., Poulston, J., & Sankaran, A. C. (2016). An examination of leader-member Exchange (LMX), agreement between employees and their supervisors and its influence on work outcomes. Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management, 26(3), 1-51.
  • Kim, M. H., & Yi, Y. J. (2019). Impact of leader‐member‐exchange and team‐member exchange on nurses’ job satisfaction and turnover intention. International Nursing Review, 66(2), 242-249.
  • Kjerulf, A. (2015). Happy hour is 9 to 5: How to love your job, love your life and kick butt at work? (C. Yapalak, Çev.). İstanbul: Doğan Egmont Publishing.
  • Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4rd ed.). New York: The Guildford Press.
  • Koç, F., Giray, C., & Girişken, Y. (2017). The moderating effect of trust in the system and perceived risk on the relationship between consumer innovativeness and behavioral intentions: A research on Instagram shop application. Beykoz Academy Journal, 5(2), 232-252.
  • Koçak, D. (2018). Person-organization fit, compulsory citizenship behavior and leadermember exchange relationship. Atatürk University Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences, 22(3), 1487-1508.
  • Kök, B. S. (2006). İş tatmini ve örgütsel bağlılığın incelenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 20 (1), 291-317.
  • Lambert, E. G., Jiang, S., Liu, J., Zhang, J., & Choi, E. (2018). A happy life: Exploring how job stress, job involvement, and job satisfaction are related to the life satisfaction of Chinese prison staff. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25(4), 619-636.
  • Li, L., Zhu, Y., & Park, C. (2018). Leader–member exchange, sales performance, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment affect turnover intention. Social Behavior and Personality, 46(11), 1909–1922.
  • Liu, Y., An, J., Sun, Y., & Liu, C. (2022). Work-family conflict and job stress among seafarers: The moderating role of job satisfaction. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 27(9), 1989-1995.
  • Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297– 1349). Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Loi, R., Chan, K. W., & Lam, L. W. (2014). Leader–member exchange, organizational identification, and job satisfaction: A social identity perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 42-61.
  • Luthans, F. (2010). Organizational behavior (12th. Ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
  • Manata, B., & Grubb, S. (2022). Conceptualizing leader–member exchange as a second-order construct. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-13.
  • Marsh, H. W., & Hattie, J. (2002). The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness: Complementary, antagonistic, or independent constructs?. The Journal Of Higher Education, 73(5), 603-641.
  • Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 738–748.
  • Matic, M., Mariani, M. G., Curcuruto, M., González, P., & Zurriaga, R. (2017). The role of psychological ownership in the relationship between leader-member exchange and job satisfaction. TPM. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodologies in Applied Psychology, 24.
  • Mehdad, A., & Iranpour, M. (2014). Relationship between religious beliefs, Workplace happiness and organizational commitment. International Journal of Scientific Management and Development, 2(10), 562-568.
  • Meliana, I. (2018). How of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Relationship and work satisfaction with employee performance?. Advanced Science Letters, 24(4), 2682-2685.
  • Michael, D.F., Harris, S.G., Giles, W.F., & Field, H.S. (2005). The influence of supportive supervisor communication on LMX and performance: The test of a theoretical model. Academy of Management Best Conference Paper.
  • Miner, J. B. (1992). Industrial-organizational psychology. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Inc.
  • Mumcu, A. (2021). The mediator effect of leader- member exchange (lmx) on the relationship between impression management tactics and organizational cynicism. Doğuş University Journal, 22(1), 151-165.
  • Murphy, S., M., Wayne, S., J., Liden, R., C., & Erdogan, B. (2003). Understanding social loafing: The role of justice perceptions and exchange relationships. Human Relations, 56(1), 61-84.
  • Öztürk, A.T., & Okçu, İ. (2020). The determination of the mediating role of stress on the relationship between job satisfaction and work performance. Gazi Journal of Economics and Business, 6(3) , 210-234.
  • Polatcı, S. & Ünüvar, H. (2021). Happiness at work scale: A scale development study. Journal of Research in Busines, 6(1), 177-202.
  • Pryce-Jones, J. (2010). Happiness at work: Maximizing your psychological capital for success. United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Salas-Valina. A., & Alegre, J. (2018). Unselfish leaders? understanding the role of altruistic leadership and organizational learning on happiness at work (HAW). Leadership & Organizaiton Development Journal, 39(5), 633-649.
  • Salas-Vallina, A., Alegre, J., & López-Cabrales, A. (2020). The challenge of ıncreasing employees' well-being and performance: How human resource management practices and engaging leadership work together toward reaching this goal. Human Resources Management, 1-15.
  • Scandura, T. A., Graen, G. B. & Novak, M. A. (1986). When managers decide not to decide autocratically: An investigation of leader-member exchange and decision influence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(4), 579-584.
  • Scandura, T.A., & Pellegrini, E.K. (2008). Trust and leader–member exchange a closer look at relational vulnerability. Journal of Leadership Organizational Studies, 15(2), 101-110.
  • Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., Zhou, X. T., & Yammarino, F. J. (2001). The folly of theorizing “A” but testing “B”: A selective level-of-analysis review of the field and a detailed leader–member exchange illustration. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(4), 515-551.
  • Serinkan, C., & Tülü, M. (2020). Üniversitelerdeki personelin örgütsel destek algılamaları: Pamukkale Üniversitesi örneği. Pamukkale İşletme ve Bilişim Yönetimi Dergisi, 7 (1), 46-63.
  • Sok, J., Blomme, R., & Tromp, D. (2014). Positive and negative spillover from work to home: The role of organizational culture and supportive arrangements. British Journal of Management, 25(3), 456-472.
  • Sökmen, A. (2020). The relationship between leader-member exchange, job satisfaction and organizational ıdentification: an empirical study in hotel businesses in Ankara. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 8(3), 2132-2143.
  • Spector, P., E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences. California: Sage Publications.
  • Suojanen, I. I. (2017). Young Professionals and the Pursuit of Happiness at Work. Unpublished doctoral thesis. The University of Edinburgh.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Tadić, M., Bakker, A. B., & Oerlemans, W. G. M. (2013). Work happiness among teachers: A day reconstruction study on the role of self-concordance. Journal of School Psychology, 51(6), 735–750.
  • Tekin, E. (2019). An investigation on the effect of paternalist leadership on job satisfaction and employee performance. Third Sector Social Economic Review, 54(1), 178-204.
  • Thakkar, J. J. (2020). Structural equation modelling: Application for Research and Practice (with AMOS and R). Singapore: Springer.
  • Thiagaraj, D., & Thangaswamy, A. (2017). Theoretical concept of job satisfaction – A bStudy. Internatıonal Journal of Research Graanthaalayah, 5(6), 464-470.
  • Tobing, S. J. L., & Kennedy, P. S. J. (2018). The influence of organizational culture toward work satisfaction and motivation to organizational commitment in Indonesian plantation company (Case of AALI Tbk). Advanced Science Letters, 24(7), 5059-5062.
  • Turan, N. (2018). Happiness at work: concept and content. Uludağ Journal of Economy and Society, 37(1), 169-212.
  • Turan, N. (2019). Factors affecting happiness of a public university staff: case of qualitative research. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, (60), 187-205.
  • Turan, N. (2022). A study on the level of academic staff happiness at work and factors affecting it: a public university case. Journal of Higher Education, 12(3), 450-459.
  • Turunç, Ö., & Çelik, M. (2012). İş tatmini-kişi örgüt uyumu ve amire güven-kişi-örgüt uyumu ilişkisinde dağıtım adaletinin düzenleyici rolü. The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 14(2), 57-78.
  • Tülübaş, T., & Göktürk, Ş. (2018). Opinions of academicians in middle career towards profession of academics. Kocaeli University Journal of Education, 1(1), 35-51.
  • Unanue, W., Gómez, M. E., Cortez, D., Oyanedel, J. C., & Mendiburo-Seguel, A. (2017). Revisiting the link between job satisfaction and life satisfaction: The role of basic psychological needs. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(680), 1-17.
  • Uzunbacak, H. H., & Karagöz, Ş. (2022). The effect of self-commission and forgiveness on workplace happiness. International Journal of Business, Economics and Management Perspectives, 6(1), 16-38.
  • Veenhoven, R., & Dumludağ, D. (2015). Economics and happiness. Journal of Economics and Society, 58, 46-51.
  • Walumbwa, F. O., Cropanzano, R., & Goldman, B. M. (2011). How leader–member exchange influences effective work behaviors: Social exchange and internal–external efficacy perspectives. Personnel Psychology, 64(3), 739-770.
  • Wang, H., Jin, Y., Wang, D., Zhao, S., Sang, X., & Yuan, B. (2020). Job satisfaction, burnout and turnover ıntention among primary care providers in rural China: Results from structural equation modeling. BMC Family Practice, 21(12), 1-10.
  • Wang, P. Q., Kim, P. B., & Milne, S. (2017). Leader-member exchange (LMX) and its work outcomes: The moderating role of gender. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 26(2), 125–143.
  • Wesarat, P., Sharif, M. Y., & Majid, A. H. (2015). A conceptual framework of happiness at the workplace. Asian Social Science, 11(2), 78-88.
  • Williams, P., Kern L. M., & Waters, L. (2017). The role of reprocessing of attitudes in fostering employee work happiness: An intervention study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-12.
  • Windeler, J. B., & Riemenschneider, C. K. (2016). The influence of ethnicity on organizational commitment and merit pay of IT workers: The role of leader support. Information Systems Journal, 26 (2), 157-190.
  • Xue, J., Wang, H., Chen, M., Ding, X., & Zhu, M. (2022). Signifying the relationship between psychological factors and turnover intension: The mediating role of work-related stress and moderating role of job satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
  • Yalvaç, H. A. (2022). Examination of the moderator role of psychological contract perception in the relationship between leader member interaction and workplace happiness. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Marmara University, İstanbul.
  • Zeynel, E. (2021). The study aimed for the mediation role of occupational motivation on the effect of leader member exchange on the organizational identification. Alanya Academic Review Journal, 5(3), 1533-1552.

Akademide Lider-Üye Etkileşiminin İşyeri Mutluluğuna Etkisinde İş Tatmininin Düzenleyici Rolü

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, 81 - 94, 30.04.2024

Beyza Erer , Yasemin Savaş

https://doi.org/10.53478/yuksekogretim.1298177
Cited By: 1

Öz

Çalışmanın amacı, lider-üye etkileşiminin işyeri mutluluğuna
etkisinde iş tatmininin düzenleyici rolünü test etmektir. Nicel
araştırma modeli ve ilişkisel araştırma tasarımı kapsamında yürütülen
bu araştırmanın verileri Türkiye’de sosyal bilimler alanında görev
yapmakta olan 322 akademisyenden kolayda örnekleme yöntemiyle
toplanmıştır. Elde edilen bu veriler SPSS 25 istatistik programı
kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Yapılan analizler sonucunda liderüye
etkileşimi, işyeri mutluluğu ve iş tatmini değişkenleri arasında
pozitif yönlü ve anlamlı düzeyde ilişkilerin olduğu tespit edilmiştir.
Ayrıca lider-üye etkileşiminin işyeri mutluluğuna etkisinde iş
tatmininin düzenleyici role sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Diğer bir
ifade ile iş tatmininin yüksek olması durumunda, algılanan liderüye
etkileşiminin işyeri mutluluğuna etkisi daha yüksektir. İlgili
yazında lider-üye ile işyeri mutluluğu arasındaki ilişkiyi inceleyen
çalışmalarda iş tatmininin düzenleyici rolünü birlikte değerlendiren
çalışma bulunmamaktadır. Dolayısıyla bu araştırmanın kaynak ve
katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Lider-Üye Etkileşimi İş Yeri Mutluluğu İş Tatmini Akademisyenlik Mesleği.

Kaynakça

  • Alken, L.S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. New York: Sage.
  • Al Sabei, S. D., Labrague, L. J., Miner Ross, A., Karkada, S., Albashayreh, A., Al Masroori, F., & Al Hashmi, N. (2020). Nursing work environment, turnover intention, job burnout and quality of care: The moderating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 52(1), 95-104.
  • Amirullah, M. (2017). Factors that lead to happiness at the workplace among academicians: A case of UiTM. Erişim adresi: https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/17260 (10 Nisan, 2023).
  • Arslan, Y., & Polat, S. (2017). Adaptation of well-being work scale to Turkish. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 23(4), 603-622.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  • Baş Paşaoğlu, D., Rençber, İ., & Osman, A. A. (2022). The mediating role of interactional justice in the effect of leader-member exchange on cyberloafing behavior. Gümüşhane University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 13(2), 690-707.
  • Başol, O., & Çömlekçi, M. F. (2020). Adaptation of the job satisfaction scale: validity and reliability study. Kırklareli University Journal of Vocational School of Social Sciences, 1(2), 17-31.
  • Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1538-1567.
  • Brayfıeld, A., & Rothe, H. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35(5), 307-311.
  • Butt, R. S., Wen, X., & Hussain, R. Y. (2020). Mediated effect of employee job satisfaction on employees’ happiness at work and analysis of motivational factors: Evidence from telecommunication sector. Asian Business Research Journal, 5, 19-27.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Örnekleme yöntemleri. Erişim adresi: http://cv.ankara.edu.tr/duzenleme/kisisel/dosyalar/ 21082015162828.pdf (02 Mayıs, 2023).
  • Büyükyılmaz, O., & Yenici, M. (2021). The attitudinal consequences of perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange for academic staff. Journal of Higher Education, 11(2), 495-507.
  • Chan, C., & Yeung, D. (2016). The impact of leader-member exchange (LMX) and empowerment on employee voice behavior. Nang Yan Business Journal, 4(1), 44-55. Chaiprasit, K., & Santidhiraku, O. (2011). Happiness at work of employees in small and medium-sized enterprisesThailand. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 25, 189-200.
  • Chen, X., Ran, L., Zhang, Y., Yang, J., Yao, H., Zhu, S., & Tan, X. (2019). Moderating role of job satisfaction on turnover intention and burnout among workers in primary care institutions: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 19, 1-10.
  • Coyle-Shapiro JA-M., & Conway, N. (2004). The employment relationship through the lens of social exchange theory. In Coyle-Shapiro J, Shore LM, Taylor MS, Tetrick LE (Eds.), The employment relationship: Examining psychological and contextual perspectives (pp. 5–28). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Çakır, A. A. (2019). Workplace happiness in academics in the context of its pioneers and results: A model application. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun.
  • Çiçek, B., & Çiçek, A. (2020). The effect of workplace incivility on employee creative performance: the mediator role of leader-member exchange. Journal of Human and Work, 7(2), 267-282.
  • Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 46-78.
  • Darrat, M. A., Amyx, D. A., & Bennett, R. J. (2017). Examining the impact of job embeddedness on salesperson deviance: The moderating role of job satisfaction. Industrial Marketing Management, 63, 158-166.
  • De Moura, G. R., Abrams, D., Retter, C., Gunnarsdottir, S., & Ando, K. (2009). Identification as an organizational anchor: How identification and job satisfaction combine to predict turnover intention. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 540-557.
  • Demirel, E. & Erer, B. (2022). Duygusal zekâ ve iş yeri mutluluğu arasındaki ilişkide iş özerkliğinin rolü. Çatalhöyük Uluslararası Turizm ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, (9), 75-86.
  • Derbis, R., & Jasiński, A. M. (2018). Work satisfaction, psychological resiliency and sense of coherence as correlates of work engagement. Cogent Psychology, 5(1), 451-610.
  • Diener, E., & Ryan, K. (2009). Subjective well-being: A general overview. South African Journal of Psychology, 39(4), 391–406.
  • Doğan, T., Eryılmaz, A., & Ercan, L. (2014). Predictive role of work engagement on subjective wellbeİng: an analysis on academics. Journal of Gazi University Industrial Arts Education Faculty, 33, 48-57.
  • Dolan, S., & Gosselin, E. (1998). Job satisfaction and life satisfaction: Analysis of a contingency model with social demographic moderators. Document de Recherche, (98-02), 1-8.
  • Dose, P.E., Desrumaux, P., Bernaud, J.L., & Hellemans, C. (2019). What makes happy counselors? from self-esteem and leader-member exchange to well-being at work: The mediating role of need satisfaction. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 15, 823-842.
  • Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38, 1715-1759.
  • Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard N. P. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 178-199.
  • Elayan, M. B., Albalawi, A. S., Shalan, H. M., Al-Hoorie, A. H., & Shamout, M. D. (2023). Perceived manager’s emotional ıntelligence and happiness at work: The mediating role of job satisfaction and affective organizational commitment. Organizacija, 56(1), 18-31.
  • Eleren, A., & Sadykova, G. (2016). Girişimcilik eğilimi ile mutluluk algısı arasındaki ilişki: Üniversite öğrencileri üzerinde bir araştırma. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(5), 189-209.
  • Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2005). From ideal to real: A longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 659-676.
  • Erer, B. (2021). İşyeri mutluluğunun öncülleri ve sonuçları üzerine nitel bir çalışma. Pamukkale University Journal of Business Research, 8(1), 215-229.
  • Erer, B., & Tekin, Ç. İ. (2021). Mediation effect of life satisfaction on the relationship of perceived manager support and job satisfaction. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 17(33), 95-111.
  • Fisher, C. D. (2010). Happiness at work. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 384-412.
  • García-Contreras, R., Muñoz-Chávez, J. P., Pineda-Celaya, L., & Rodríguez-Morales, J. I. (2022). Social exchange approach and happiness at work: Exploring the mediating effect of organizational commitment. OBETS. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 17(2), 221-236.
  • Ghulam, M., Mubarak, N., Khan, J, Nauman, M., & Riaz, A. (2022). Impact of leader-member exchange on ınnovative work behavior of ınformation technology project employees: Role of employee engagement and self-efficacy. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1-19.
  • Gilman, R., Huebner, E. S., & Laughlin, J. E. (2000). A first study of the multidimensional students' life satisfaction scale with adolescents. Social Indicators Research, 52(2), 135–160.
  • Gönül, F., Çalık A. (2022). The relationship of emotional intelligence, job satisfaction and burnout: a research on hospital employees. Ardahan University Journal of the Faculty of Economics Administrative Sciences, 4(1), 41-50.
  • Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
  • Greguras, G. J., & Ford, J. M. (2006). An examination of the multidimensionality of supervisor and subordinate perceptions of leader‐member exchange. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79(3), 433-465.
  • Güner, F., & Çetinkaya Bozkurt, Ö. (2017). A research on exploration the reasons of bank employees' happiness and unhappiness in the workplace. The Journal Of Organizational Behavior Research, 2(2), 85-105.
  • Gür, R. (2017). Development of the academic performance perception scale. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 69, 177-197.
  • Gürbüz, S. and Şahin, F. (2018). Research methods in social sciences (5th ed.) Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7rd ed.). Harlow: Pearson.
  • Hesli, V. L., & Lee, J. M. (2013). Job satisfaction in academia: Why are some faculty members happier than others? PS: Political Science & Politics, 46(2), 339-354.
  • Hofmann, D. A., Morgeson, F. P., & Gerras, S. J. (2003). Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: Safety climate as an exemplar. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 170–178.
  • Hoppock, R. (1935). Job satisfaction. New York: Harper and Brothers.
  • Huang, X., Chan, S. C. H., Lam, W., & Nan, X. (2010). The joint effect of leader-member exchange and emotional intelligence on burnout and work performance in call centers in China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(7), 1124-1144.
  • Hwang, E. (2019). Effects of the organizational culture type, job satisfaction, and job stress on nurses’ happiness: a cross-sectional study of the long-term care hospitals of South Korea. Japan Journal of Nursing Science, 16(3), 263-273.
  • Işık, M., & Uçar, Z. (2019). İş tatmini psikolojik sahiplenme ilişkisinde lider üye etkileşiminin düzenleyicilik etkisi. Dokuz Eylül University Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences, 21(4), 1119–1145.
  • Joo, B. K., & Lee, I. (2017). Workplace happiness: Work engagement, career satisfaction, and subjective well-being. Evidence-based HRM, 5(2), 206-221.
  • Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., Durham, C. C. & Kluger, A. N. (1998). Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: The role of core evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(1), 17.
  • Kang, D. S., & Stewart, J. (2007). Leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership and hrd: development of units of theory and laws of interaction. Leadership ve Organization Development Journal, 28(6), 531-551.
  • Karabati, S., Ensari, N., & Fiorentino, D. (2019). Job satisfaction, rumination, and subjective well-being: A moderated mediational model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(1), 251-268.
  • Kesebir, P., & Diener, E. (2008). In pursuit of happiness: Empirical answers to philosophical questions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 117–125.
  • Keser, A. (2018). Happiness at work survey. Paradoks Economics, Sociology and Policy Journal, 14(1), 43-57.
  • Kılıç, İ., & Bulgurcu Gürel, E. B. (2022). The effect leader member exchange and psyhchological empowerment on organizational identification: The case of Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University. Third Sector Social Economic Review, 57(3), 2449-2472.
  • Kim, P. B., Poulston, J., & Sankaran, A. C. (2016). An examination of leader-member Exchange (LMX), agreement between employees and their supervisors and its influence on work outcomes. Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management, 26(3), 1-51.
  • Kim, M. H., & Yi, Y. J. (2019). Impact of leader‐member‐exchange and team‐member exchange on nurses’ job satisfaction and turnover intention. International Nursing Review, 66(2), 242-249.
  • Kjerulf, A. (2015). Happy hour is 9 to 5: How to love your job, love your life and kick butt at work? (C. Yapalak, Çev.). İstanbul: Doğan Egmont Publishing.
  • Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4rd ed.). New York: The Guildford Press.
  • Koç, F., Giray, C., & Girişken, Y. (2017). The moderating effect of trust in the system and perceived risk on the relationship between consumer innovativeness and behavioral intentions: A research on Instagram shop application. Beykoz Academy Journal, 5(2), 232-252.
  • Koçak, D. (2018). Person-organization fit, compulsory citizenship behavior and leadermember exchange relationship. Atatürk University Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences, 22(3), 1487-1508.
  • Kök, B. S. (2006). İş tatmini ve örgütsel bağlılığın incelenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 20 (1), 291-317.
  • Lambert, E. G., Jiang, S., Liu, J., Zhang, J., & Choi, E. (2018). A happy life: Exploring how job stress, job involvement, and job satisfaction are related to the life satisfaction of Chinese prison staff. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25(4), 619-636.
  • Li, L., Zhu, Y., & Park, C. (2018). Leader–member exchange, sales performance, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment affect turnover intention. Social Behavior and Personality, 46(11), 1909–1922.
  • Liu, Y., An, J., Sun, Y., & Liu, C. (2022). Work-family conflict and job stress among seafarers: The moderating role of job satisfaction. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 27(9), 1989-1995.
  • Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297– 1349). Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Loi, R., Chan, K. W., & Lam, L. W. (2014). Leader–member exchange, organizational identification, and job satisfaction: A social identity perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 42-61.
  • Luthans, F. (2010). Organizational behavior (12th. Ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
  • Manata, B., & Grubb, S. (2022). Conceptualizing leader–member exchange as a second-order construct. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-13.
  • Marsh, H. W., & Hattie, J. (2002). The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness: Complementary, antagonistic, or independent constructs?. The Journal Of Higher Education, 73(5), 603-641.
  • Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 738–748.
  • Matic, M., Mariani, M. G., Curcuruto, M., González, P., & Zurriaga, R. (2017). The role of psychological ownership in the relationship between leader-member exchange and job satisfaction. TPM. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodologies in Applied Psychology, 24.
  • Mehdad, A., & Iranpour, M. (2014). Relationship between religious beliefs, Workplace happiness and organizational commitment. International Journal of Scientific Management and Development, 2(10), 562-568.
  • Meliana, I. (2018). How of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Relationship and work satisfaction with employee performance?. Advanced Science Letters, 24(4), 2682-2685.
  • Michael, D.F., Harris, S.G., Giles, W.F., & Field, H.S. (2005). The influence of supportive supervisor communication on LMX and performance: The test of a theoretical model. Academy of Management Best Conference Paper.
  • Miner, J. B. (1992). Industrial-organizational psychology. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Inc.
  • Mumcu, A. (2021). The mediator effect of leader- member exchange (lmx) on the relationship between impression management tactics and organizational cynicism. Doğuş University Journal, 22(1), 151-165.
  • Murphy, S., M., Wayne, S., J., Liden, R., C., & Erdogan, B. (2003). Understanding social loafing: The role of justice perceptions and exchange relationships. Human Relations, 56(1), 61-84.
  • Öztürk, A.T., & Okçu, İ. (2020). The determination of the mediating role of stress on the relationship between job satisfaction and work performance. Gazi Journal of Economics and Business, 6(3) , 210-234.
  • Polatcı, S. & Ünüvar, H. (2021). Happiness at work scale: A scale development study. Journal of Research in Busines, 6(1), 177-202.
  • Pryce-Jones, J. (2010). Happiness at work: Maximizing your psychological capital for success. United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Salas-Valina. A., & Alegre, J. (2018). Unselfish leaders? understanding the role of altruistic leadership and organizational learning on happiness at work (HAW). Leadership & Organizaiton Development Journal, 39(5), 633-649.
  • Salas-Vallina, A., Alegre, J., & López-Cabrales, A. (2020). The challenge of ıncreasing employees' well-being and performance: How human resource management practices and engaging leadership work together toward reaching this goal. Human Resources Management, 1-15.
  • Scandura, T. A., Graen, G. B. & Novak, M. A. (1986). When managers decide not to decide autocratically: An investigation of leader-member exchange and decision influence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(4), 579-584.
  • Scandura, T.A., & Pellegrini, E.K. (2008). Trust and leader–member exchange a closer look at relational vulnerability. Journal of Leadership Organizational Studies, 15(2), 101-110.
  • Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., Zhou, X. T., & Yammarino, F. J. (2001). The folly of theorizing “A” but testing “B”: A selective level-of-analysis review of the field and a detailed leader–member exchange illustration. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(4), 515-551.
  • Serinkan, C., & Tülü, M. (2020). Üniversitelerdeki personelin örgütsel destek algılamaları: Pamukkale Üniversitesi örneği. Pamukkale İşletme ve Bilişim Yönetimi Dergisi, 7 (1), 46-63.
  • Sok, J., Blomme, R., & Tromp, D. (2014). Positive and negative spillover from work to home: The role of organizational culture and supportive arrangements. British Journal of Management, 25(3), 456-472.
  • Sökmen, A. (2020). The relationship between leader-member exchange, job satisfaction and organizational ıdentification: an empirical study in hotel businesses in Ankara. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 8(3), 2132-2143.
  • Spector, P., E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences. California: Sage Publications.
  • Suojanen, I. I. (2017). Young Professionals and the Pursuit of Happiness at Work. Unpublished doctoral thesis. The University of Edinburgh.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Tadić, M., Bakker, A. B., & Oerlemans, W. G. M. (2013). Work happiness among teachers: A day reconstruction study on the role of self-concordance. Journal of School Psychology, 51(6), 735–750.
  • Tekin, E. (2019). An investigation on the effect of paternalist leadership on job satisfaction and employee performance. Third Sector Social Economic Review, 54(1), 178-204.
  • Thakkar, J. J. (2020). Structural equation modelling: Application for Research and Practice (with AMOS and R). Singapore: Springer.
  • Thiagaraj, D., & Thangaswamy, A. (2017). Theoretical concept of job satisfaction – A bStudy. Internatıonal Journal of Research Graanthaalayah, 5(6), 464-470.
  • Tobing, S. J. L., & Kennedy, P. S. J. (2018). The influence of organizational culture toward work satisfaction and motivation to organizational commitment in Indonesian plantation company (Case of AALI Tbk). Advanced Science Letters, 24(7), 5059-5062.
  • Turan, N. (2018). Happiness at work: concept and content. Uludağ Journal of Economy and Society, 37(1), 169-212.
  • Turan, N. (2019). Factors affecting happiness of a public university staff: case of qualitative research. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, (60), 187-205.
  • Turan, N. (2022). A study on the level of academic staff happiness at work and factors affecting it: a public university case. Journal of Higher Education, 12(3), 450-459.
  • Turunç, Ö., & Çelik, M. (2012). İş tatmini-kişi örgüt uyumu ve amire güven-kişi-örgüt uyumu ilişkisinde dağıtım adaletinin düzenleyici rolü. The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 14(2), 57-78.
  • Tülübaş, T., & Göktürk, Ş. (2018). Opinions of academicians in middle career towards profession of academics. Kocaeli University Journal of Education, 1(1), 35-51.
  • Unanue, W., Gómez, M. E., Cortez, D., Oyanedel, J. C., & Mendiburo-Seguel, A. (2017). Revisiting the link between job satisfaction and life satisfaction: The role of basic psychological needs. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(680), 1-17.
  • Uzunbacak, H. H., & Karagöz, Ş. (2022). The effect of self-commission and forgiveness on workplace happiness. International Journal of Business, Economics and Management Perspectives, 6(1), 16-38.
  • Veenhoven, R., & Dumludağ, D. (2015). Economics and happiness. Journal of Economics and Society, 58, 46-51.
  • Walumbwa, F. O., Cropanzano, R., & Goldman, B. M. (2011). How leader–member exchange influences effective work behaviors: Social exchange and internal–external efficacy perspectives. Personnel Psychology, 64(3), 739-770.
  • Wang, H., Jin, Y., Wang, D., Zhao, S., Sang, X., & Yuan, B. (2020). Job satisfaction, burnout and turnover ıntention among primary care providers in rural China: Results from structural equation modeling. BMC Family Practice, 21(12), 1-10.
  • Wang, P. Q., Kim, P. B., & Milne, S. (2017). Leader-member exchange (LMX) and its work outcomes: The moderating role of gender. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 26(2), 125–143.
  • Wesarat, P., Sharif, M. Y., & Majid, A. H. (2015). A conceptual framework of happiness at the workplace. Asian Social Science, 11(2), 78-88.
  • Williams, P., Kern L. M., & Waters, L. (2017). The role of reprocessing of attitudes in fostering employee work happiness: An intervention study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-12.
  • Windeler, J. B., & Riemenschneider, C. K. (2016). The influence of ethnicity on organizational commitment and merit pay of IT workers: The role of leader support. Information Systems Journal, 26 (2), 157-190.
  • Xue, J., Wang, H., Chen, M., Ding, X., & Zhu, M. (2022). Signifying the relationship between psychological factors and turnover intension: The mediating role of work-related stress and moderating role of job satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
  • Yalvaç, H. A. (2022). Examination of the moderator role of psychological contract perception in the relationship between leader member interaction and workplace happiness. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Marmara University, İstanbul.
  • Zeynel, E. (2021). The study aimed for the mediation role of occupational motivation on the effect of leader member exchange on the organizational identification. Alanya Academic Review Journal, 5(3), 1533-1552.
Toplam 116 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar
Bölüm Ampirik Araştırma
Yazarlar

Beyza Erer 0000-0003-0083-7102

Yasemin Savaş

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 26 Nisan 2024
Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Nisan 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Erer, B., & Savaş, Y. (2024). The Moderating Role of Job Satisfaction in the Effect of Leader-Member Interaction on Workplace Happiness in Academia. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 14(1), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.53478/yuksekogretim.1298177

Cited By

İşyeri Mutluluğunun Duygusal Emeğe Etkisinde Algılanan Yönetici Desteğinin Aracı Rolü
Mevzu – Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.56720/mevzu.1661664
 Kapak Resmi İndir

Yayıncı

34633
Vedat Dalokay Caddesi No: 112 Çankaya 06670 ANKARA

(+90) (212) 513 48 24
tuba-her@tuba.gov.tr 

     34636  34637  34638   34988

Yükseköğretim Dergisi / TÜBA Higher Education Research/Review (TÜBA-HER), dergide yayımlanan makalelerde ifade edilen görüşleri resmî olarak benimsememekte ve derginin basılı ya da çevrim içi sürümlerinde yer alan herhangi bir ürün veya hizmet reklamı konusunda garanti vermemektedir. Yayımlanan makalelerin bilimsel ve hukuki sorumluluğu yazar(lar)a aittir.

Makalelerle birlikte gönderilen resim, şekil, tablo vb. materyaller özgün olmalı ya da daha önce yayımlanmışlarsa, hem basılı hem de çevrim içi sürümlerde yayımlanmak üzere eser sahibinden alınmış yazılı izinle birlikte sunulmalıdır. Yazar(lar), dergide yayımlanan çalışmalarının telif hakkını saklı tutar. Makale dergide yayımlandığında, mali haklar ve umuma iletim hakları, işleme, çoğaltma, temsil, basım, yayın ve dağıtım hakları TÜBA’ya devredilecektir. Yayımlanan tüm içeriklerin (metin ve görsel materyaller) telif hakları dergiye aittir. Dergide yayımlanmak üzere kabul edilen makaleler için telif hakkı ya da başka bir ad altında ödeme yapılmaz ve yazar(lar)dan makale işlem ücreti alınmaz; ancak yeniden baskı (reprint) talepleri yazarın sorumluluğundadır.

Bilimsel bilgi ve araştırmalara küresel açık erişimi teşvik etmek amacıyla TÜBA, çevrim içi olarak yayımlanan tüm içeriklerin (aksi belirtilmedikçe) okuyucular, araştırmacılar ve kurumlar tarafından serbestçe kullanılmasına izin vermektedir. Bu kullanım, eserin kaynağının belirtilmesi koşuluyla ve ticari amaç dışında, herhangi bir değişiklik yapılmaksızın Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Uluslararası Lisansı kapsamında mümkündür. Ticari kullanım için lütfen yayıncı ile iletişime geçiniz.