21. Yüzyıl Becerilerinin Gelişen Dinamikleri: Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, 21. yüzyıl becerileri ile ilgili olarak son dönemlerde tartışılan konuları analiz etmektir. Bir çalışmanın konusunu tanımlama yaklaşımlarından biri, o alanla ilgili araştırma çalışmalarını incelemektir. Bu çalışmanın amacına uygun araştırmalar yayımlayan "Thinking Skills and Creativity" adlı dergi, ana veri kaynağı olarak kullanılmıştır. Bu dergiden elde edilen verileri (972 yayın) incelemek için bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi uygulanmıştır. Toplanan veriler, başlangıçta Web of Science (WOS) sistemi aracılığıyla tanımlayıcı istatistikler kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Daha sonra, bibliyometrik analizler için VOSviewer yazılımı kullanılmıştır. Bu dergide ele alınan araştırma konularına ilişkin bulgular, şu şekilde belirlenen dokuz temayı öne çıkarmaktadır: Eğitimde Yaratıcılığı ve Öğrenmeyi Geliştirme, STEM Eğitiminde Yaratıcılığı ve Problem Çözmeyi Teşvik Etme, Ergen Eğitiminde Yaratıcılığı ve Gelişimi Destekleme, Eğitimde Bütünsel Öğrenme ve Başarıyı Teşvik Etme, 21. Yüzyıl Eğitiminde Yaratıcılığı ve Eleştirel Düşünmeyi Güçlendirme, Çocuklarda Yaratıcılığı ve Öğrenmeyi Destekleme, Yaratıcı Düşünme ve Bireysel Farklılıkları Keşfetme, Eğitimde Eleştirel Düşünme ve Yaratıcılığı Teşvik Etme, Ortaöğretimde Yaratıcılığı ve İşbirliğini Güçlendirme.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bibliyometrik analiz
• yaratıcılık
• eleştirel düşünme
• araştırma eğilimleri
• düşünme becerileri
• 21. yüzyıl becerileri

Evolving Dynamics of 21st Century Skills: A Bibliometric Analysis

Öz

The aim of this study was to analyze recent topics discussed regarding 21st century skills. One of the approaches to defining a study’s subject is to examine research studies related to that field. The journal titled “Thinking Skills and Creativity,” which publishes research aligned with the purpose of this study, was used as the main data source. Bibliometric analysis was employed to scrutinize the data (972 publications) obtained from this journal. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics via the Web of Science (WOS) system initially. Subsequently, the VOSviewer software was employed for bibliometric analyses. The findings pertaining to research topics covered in this journal highlighted nine themes, which have been designated as follows: Enhancing Creativity and Learning in Education, Promoting Creativity and Problem-Solving in STEM Education, Nurturing Creativity and Development in Adolescent Education, Fostering Holistic Learning and Success in Education, Fostering Creativity and Critical Thinking in 21st Century Education, Nurturing Creativity and Learning in Children, Exploring Creative Thinking and Individual Differences, Promoting Critical Thinking and Creativity in Education, Fostering Creativity and Collaboration in Secondary Education.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bibliometric analysis
• creativity
• critical thinking
• research trends
• thinking skills
• 21st century skills

Kaynakça

1. Akcaoğlu, M. Ö., Mor, E., & Külekçi, E. (2023). The mediating role of metacognitive awareness in the relationship between critical thinking and self-regulation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 1-11. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101187
2. Aktoprak, A., & Hursen, C. (2022). A bibliometric and content analysis of critical thinking in primary education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101029
3. Antons, D., Breidbach, C. F., Joshi, A. M., & Salge, T. O. (2021). Computational literature reviews: Method, algorithms, and roadmap. Organizational Research Methods. 26(1), 107-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428121991230
4. Ceh, S. M., Christensen, A. P., Lebuda, I., & Benedek, M. (2023). #creativity: Exploring lay conceptualizations of creativity with twitter hashtags. Creativity Research Journal, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2214472
5. Chang, Y., Li, B.-. D., Chen, H.-. C., & Chiu, F.-. C. (2015). Investigating the synergy of critical thinking and creative thinking in the course of integrated activity in Taiwan. Educational Psychology, 35(3), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.920079
6. Chen, J., Zhou, Y., & Lv, L. (2022). Significant and hierarchy of variables affecting online knowledge-sharing using an integrated logit-ISM analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 741–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11173-7
7. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053
8. Dede, C. (2011). Reconceptualizing technology integration to meet the challenges of educational transformation. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 5(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.3776/joci.2011.v5n1p4-16

9. De-Marchis, G. P., & Shchebetenko, S. (2022). Creativity studies within the European Union: A bibliometric analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 36, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2022.2067961
10. Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G.G., Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Information processing & Management, 37(6), 817–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(00)00051-0
11. Dragicˇevic ́, N., Vladova, G., & Ullrich. A. (2023). Design thinking capabilities in the digital world: A bibliometric analysis of emerging trends. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1012478
12. Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Davarzani, H. (2015). Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 162, 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003
13. Feist, G. J., & Runco, M. A. (1993). Trends in the creativity literature: An analysis of research in the journal of creative behavior (1967–1989). Creativity Research Journal, 6, 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419309534483
14. Geisinger, K. F. (2016). 21st Century skills: What are they and how do we assess them? Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209207
15. Gonz´alez-P´erez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: Systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493
16. H¨akkinen, P., J¨arvel¨a, S., M¨akitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., N¨aykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): A framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1203772
17. Hallinger, P., & Suriyankietkaew, S. (2018). Science mapping of the knowledge base on sustainable leadership, 1990-2018. Sustainability, 10(12), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124846
18. Hernandez-Torrano, D., & Ibrayeva, L. (2020). Creativity and education: A bibliometric mapping of the research literature (1975–2019). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35,100625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100625
19. Hoegl, M., & Parboteeah, K. P. (2007). Creativity in innovative projects: How teamwork matters. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 24(1–2), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2007.01.008
20. Johansson-Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., and Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: Past, present and possible futures. Creat. Innovat. Manag. 22, 121–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12023
21. Kahl, C. H., Da Fonseca, L. H., & Witte, E. H. (2009). Revisiting creativity research: An investigation of contemporary approaches. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802633350
22. Kanaki, K., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2022). Assessing algorithmic thinking skills in relation to age in early childhood STEM education. Education Sciences. 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12060380
23. Kaya, S. (2023). A bibliometric journey into research trends in curriculum field: Analysis of two journals. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 10(3), 496-506. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1278728
24. Kroth, M., Carr-Chellman, D. J., & Rogers-Shaw, C. (2022). Formation as an organizing framework for the processes of lifelong learning. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 34(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20348
25. Kuo, H., Yang, T. Y. C., Chen, J. S., Hou, T. W., and Ho, M. T. (2022). The impact of design thinking pbl robot course on college students learning motivation and creative thinking. IEEE Trans. Educ. 65, 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2021.3098295
26. Kyllonen, P. C. (2012). Measurement of 21st century skills within the common core state standards. Paper presented at the Invitational Research Symposium on Technology Enhanced Assessments, May 7-8. https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/session5-kyllonen-paper-tea2012.pdf
27. Li, L. (2016). Thinking skills and creativity in second language education: Where are we now? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 267-272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.005
28. Luna Scott, C. (2015). The futures of learning 2: What kind of learning for the 21st century? https://doi.org/10.30707/IJBE164.1.1690386168.68154
29. Martin, L., & Wilson, N. (2017). Defining creativity with discovery. Creativity Research Journal, 29, 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.1376543
30. Mejia, C., DIppolito, B., and Kajikawa, Y. (2021). Major and recent trends in creativity research: An overview of the field with the aid of computational methods. Creativity and Innovation Management, 30, 475–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12453
31. Miri B, David BC & Uri Z 2007. Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education, 37, 353-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9029-2
32. Ozyurt, O. (2015). Examining the critical thinking dispositions and the problem solving skills of computer engineering students. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(2), 353-361. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1342a
33. Partnership for 21st Century Learning (2015). P21 Framework Definitions. http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework
34. Partnership for 21st Century Learning (P21). (2007). Framework for 21st century learning. http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework
35. Powell, J. J. W. (2020). Comparative education in an age of competition and collaboration. Comparative Education, 56(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2019.1701248
36. Puryear, J. S., & Lamb, K. N. (2020). Defining creativity: How far have we come since Plucker, Beghetto, and Dow? Creativity Research Journal, 32, 206–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1821552
37. Rodríguez-Sabiote, C., Olmedo-Moreno, E. M., & Exp´osito-L´opez, J. (2022). The effects of teamwork on critical thinking: A serial mediation analysis of the influence of work skills and educational motivation in secondary school students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101063
38. Romanelli, J. P., Fujimoto, J. T., Ferreira, M. D., & Milanez, D. H. (2018). Assessing ecological restoration as a research topic using bibliometric indicators. Ecological engineering, 120, 311-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.06.015
39. Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
40. Schmidt, E. (2022). AI, great power competition & national security. Daedalus, 151(2), 288–298. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01916
41. Simonton, D. K. (2018). Defining creativity: Don’t we also need to define what is Not creative? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 52, 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.137
42. Slavich, B., & Svejenova, S. (2016). Managing creativity: A critical examination, synthesis, and new frontiers. European Management Review, 13, 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12078
43. Staton-Spicer, A. Q, & Wulff, D. H. (1984). Research in communication and instruction: Categorization and synthesis. Communicative Education, 33(4), 377-391.https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528409384767
44. Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069349
45. Taimur, S., & Onuki, M. (2022). Design thinking as digital transformative pedagogy in higher sustainability education: Cases from Japan and Germany. International Journal of Educational Research, 114, . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101994
46. Tight, M. (2021a). Twenty-first century skills: Meaning, usage and value. European Journal of Higher Education, 11(2), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2020.1835517
47. Tight, M. (2021b). Twenty-first century skills: Meaning, usage and value. European Journal of Higher Education, 11(2), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2020.1835517
48. Tijsma, G., Hilverda, F., Scheffelaar, A., Alders, S., Schoonmade, L., Blignaut, N., et al. (2020). Becoming productive 21 st century citizens: A systematic review uncovering design principles for integrating community service learning into higher education courses. Educational Research, 62(4), 390–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2020.1836987
49. Tindowen, D. J. C., Bassig, J. M., & Cagurangan, J.-. A. (2017). Twenty-first-century skills of alternative learning system learners. SAGE open, 7(3), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017726116
50. Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. https://ardian.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/21st_Century_Skills_Learning_for_Life_in_Our_Times____2009-3.pdf
51. TS&C (Thinking Skills and Creativity). (2023). Aims and scope. Accessed online at https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/thinking-skills-and-creativity/about/aims-and-scope.
52. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2021). VOSviewer Manual (version 1.6.17). Univeristeit Leiden.
53. van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010
54. Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21 st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
55. Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2013). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12029
56. Wagner, T. (2010). The global achievement gap: Why even our best schools don't teach the new survival skills our children need-and what we can do about it. Basic Books.
57. Wechsler, S. M., Saiz, C., Rivas, S. F., Vendramini, C. M. M., Almeida, L. S., Mundim, M. C., et al. (2018). Creative and critical thinking: Independent or overlapping components? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.003
58. Wegerif, R. (2006). A dialogic understanding of the relationship between. CSCL and teaching thinking skills. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-68408
59. Wehner, L., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Magyari-Beck, I. (1991). Current approaches used in studying creativity: An exploratory investigation. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419109534398
60. Williams, R., Runco, M. A., & Berlow, E. (2016). Mapping the themes, impact, and cohesion of creativity research over the last 25 years. Creativity Research Journal, 28, 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1230358
61. Zhang, W., Zhang, Q., Yu, B., & Zhao, L. (2015). Knowledge map of creativity research based on keywords network and co-word analysis, 1992–2011. Quality and Quantity, 49, 1023–1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0032-9
62. Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629