Öğrencilerin Biyoteknoloji İle İlgili Bilgi ve Tutumların Farklı Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 183 - 201, 01.06.2015

Olcay Sinan

Öz

Bu çalışmada üniversitede biyoloji eğitimi almakta olan öğrencilerin biyoteknoloji ile ilgili bilgi ve tutumlarının öğretim öncesi ve sonrasındaki durumları incelenmiştir. Araştırmaya bir devlet üniversitesinin Eğitim ve Fen-Edebiyat Fakültelerinde biyoloji programına kayıtlı toplam 60 öğrenci dahil edilmiştir. Öğrencilere biyoteknoloji ile ilgili bilgi ve tutum testi öğretim öncesi ve sonrasında uygulanmıştır. Ayrıca ön testte öğrencilerin lise yıllarındaki biyoloji ile ilgili deneyimlerinin araştırıldığı bir anket de kullanılmıştır. Bilgi testi hem nitel hem de nicel olarak analiz edilmiştir. Öğrencilerin biyoteknoloji ile ilgili tutumları spss paket programı kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Aynı program kullanılarak öğrencilerin biyoloji ile ilgili lise deneyimleri ve tutumları karşılaştırılmıştır. Araştırmadan elde edilen sonuçlara göre biyoteknoloji dersi ile öğrencilerin biyoteknolojiye ilişkin bilgi düzeylerinde önemli oranda artış olduğu, ancak tutumlarında anlamlı bir değişiklik olmadığı tespit edilmiştir. Çalışmanın son aşmasında elde edilen bulgular göre biyoteknoloji ile ilgili tutumların uygun şekilde gelişimi için bazı öneriler sunulmuştur

Anahtar Kelimeler

Biyoteknoloji, Tutum, Biyoloji, Biyoloji Eğitimi, Lise Biyoloji Deneyimi

Investigation of the Students’ Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Biotechnology According To Different Variables

Öz

In this study, students’ knowledge and attitudes about biotechnology in undergraduate were investigated before and after the instruction. A total of 60 students registered in the biology program in a state university’s Faculties of Education and Science-Literature participated in the research. Biotechnology knowledge and attitude test was administered to the students as pre and post-test. In addition, a survey investigating the experiences associated with biology in the years of high school students was also used only in the pre-test. Data in the knowledge test about biotechnology were analyzed both qualitative and quantitative. Students’ attitudes about biotechnology were analyzed using the SPSS software. Students’ high school experiences related to biotechnology and their attitudes were compared using the software. According to the results obtained from the research, it was determined that students’ knowledge about biotechnology by the biotechnology course was a significant increase, but there was no significant change in their attitudes. Finally, some suggestions relating to better development of attitudes about biotechnology were presented with the support of the findings obtained from this study

Anahtar Kelimeler

Biotechnology, Attitude, Biology, Biology Education, High School Biology Experience

Kaynakça

• Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980).Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.
• Altun, A., Çelik, S., Elçin, A.E. (2011). Genetik Mühendisliği, Biyoteknoloji ve Moleküler Biyolojiyle İlgili Rehber Materyallerin Öğrenci Başarısına Etkisi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 40:21-32
• Barmby, P., Kind, P. M., Jones, K. (2008). Examining Changing Attitudes in Secondary School Science, International Journal of Science Education, 30:8, 1075-1093
• Baron RA, Byrne D (1977). Understanding Human Interaction,2nd ed. , Allyn and. Bacon, Boston.
• Bergland, M., Lundeberg, M.A., Klyczek, K. , Emmons, J., Martin, C., Marsh, K., Sweet,J., Werner,J. (2006). Exploring biotechnology using case-based multimedia. American Biology Teacher, vol. 68(2): 81-86.
• Bigler, A.M., Hanegan, N.L. (2011). Student Content Knowledge Increases After Participation in a Hands-on Biotechnology Intervention, J Sci Educ Technol 20:246–257. DOI 10.1007/s10956- 010-9250-7
• Bredahl, L. (2001). Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified foods – Results of a cross-national survey. Journal of Consumer Policy, 24, 23–61.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Veri Analizi El Kitabı (14. bs). Ankara: Pegem/A Yayıncılık.
• Chakrabarti, D. (2009). A methods-based biotechnology course for undergraduates. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ., 37:227–231. doi:10.1002/bmb.20302
• Chen, S. Y. and Raffan, J. (1999). Biotechnology: student’s knowledge and attitudes in the UK and Taiwan. Journal of Biological Education, 34, 17–23.
• Darçın, E. S., Güven, T. (2008). Development of an Attitude Measure Oriented to Biotechnology for the Pre-Service Science Teachers.Journal of Turkish Science Education. 5(3), 72-81
• Darçın, E.S. (2007).Fen-Teknoloji Ve Biyoloji Öğretmen Adayları İçin Biyoteknoloji Eğitiminin Deneysel Planlanması Gazi Üniversitesi, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi
• Dawson, V., Schibeci., R. (2003). Western Australian school students’ understanding of biotechnology. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 25(1): 57-69.
• Dawson V, Soames C (2006). The Effect of biotechnology education on Australian high school students’ understandings and attitudes about biotechnology processes. Res. Sci. Tech. Educ. 24(2): 183-198.
• Dawson V (2007). An Exploration of high school (12–17 year old) students’ understandings of, and attitudes towards biotechnology processes. Res. Sci. Educ. 39: 59-73.
• Eroğlu, S., (2006).Görsel ve İşitsel Materyal Kullanımının Ortaöğretim 3. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Biyoteknoloji İle İlgili Kavramları Öğrenmeleri ve Tutumları Üzerine Etkisi. Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi
• Gardner, G. E., & Jones, M. G. (2011). Science Instructors’ Perceptions of the Risks of Biotechnology: Implications for Science Education, Research in Science Education, 41(5):711– 738.
• Garrett, S. (2009). Professional development for the integration of biotechnology education. Unpublished Maters of Education thesis. Queensland University of Technology.
• Gaskell, G., Bauer, M., Durant, J., Allum, N., (1999). Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S. Science 285, 384– 387.
• Gunter, B., Kinderlerer, J., & Beyleveld, D. (1998). Teenagers and biotechnology: A survey of understanding and opinion in Britain. Studies in Science Education, 32, 81–112
• Hilton, A., Nichols, K. and Kanasa, H. (2011).Developing tomorrow's decision-makers: Opportunities for biotechnology education research. Australian Educational Researcher, 38 4: 449-465.
• Jenkins, R.O. (1997). Computer-assisted learning materials and the practice of biotechnology, Journal of Biological Education, 31:1, 65-69
• Ketpichainarong, W., Panijpan, B., Ruenwongsa, P. (2012). Enhanced learning of biotechnology students by an inquiry-based cellulase laboratory. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education. Vol. 5, No. 2, 169-187
• Kirkpatrick, G., Orvis, K., Pittendrigh, B. (2002). A teaching model for biotechnology and genomics education, Journal of Biological Education, 37:1, 31-35
• Lamanauskas, V., & Makarskaitė-Petkevičienė, R. (2008). Lithuanian University students’knowledge of biotechnology and their attitudes to the taught subject. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4 (3), 269-277.
• Lysaght, T., Rosenberger III, P.J. and Kerridge, I. (2006). Australian undergraduate biotechnology student attitudes towards the teaching of ethics. International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), 1225–1239.
• Olsher G, Dreyfus A (1999). The ‘ostension-teaching’ approach as a means to develop junior-high student attitudes towards biotechnologies. J. Biol. Educ. 34(1): 24-30.
• Özden, M., Uşak, M., Prokop, P., Türkoglu, A., & Bahar, M. (2008). Student teachers' knowledge of and attitudes toward chemical hormone usage in biotechnology. African Journal of Biotechnology. 7(21), 3892-3899
• Özel, M., Erdoğan, M., Uşak, M., Prokop, P. (2009). Attitudes Regarding Biotechnology applications. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 9 (1) 321-328
• Pardo, R., Midden, C., Miller, J.D. (2002). Attitudes toward biotechnology in the European Union. J.Biotech. 98,9–24.
• Prokop P, Lešková A, Kubiatko M, Diran C (2007). Slovakian students' knowledge of and attitudes toward biotechnology. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 29(7): 895-907.
• Qin, W., & Brown, J. L. (2007). Public reactions to information about genetically engineered foods: Effects of information formats and male/female differences. Public Understand of Science, 16, 471-488.
• Reynolds, J. M., Hancock, D. R. (2010). Problem-based learning in a higher education environmental biotechnology course. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(2), 175–186. doi:10.1080/14703291003718919
• Rothhaar, R., Pittendrigh, B.R. and Orvis, K.S. (2006). The Lego® analogy model for teaching gene sequencing and biotechnology.Journal of Biological Education, 40(4): 166–171.
• Šorgo, A.; Ambrožič-Dolinšek, J.; Usak, M. and Özel, M. (2011). Knowledge about and acceptance of genetically modified organisms among pre-service teachers: A comparative study of Turkey and Slovenia. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 14, no. 4.
• Saez, M. J., Nino, A. G., & Carretero, A. (2008). Matching society values: Students’ views of biotechnology. International Journal of Science Education, 30 (2 ), 167-183.
• Sturgis, Patrick , Cooper, Helen and Fife-schaw, Chris (2005). Attitudes to biotechnology: Estimating the opinions of a better-informed public, New Genetics and Society, 24: 1, 31 — 56
• Sürmeli, H. ve Şahin, F. (2010). Üniversite öğrencilerinin biyoteknoloji çalışmalarına yönelik tutumları. Eğitim ve Bilim, 35(155), 145-157.
• Turkmen, L., (2007). The Influences Of Elementary Science Teaching Method Courses On A Turkish Teachers College Elementary Education Major Students’ Attitudes Towards Science And Science Teaching. Journal of Baltic Science Education, Vol. 6, No. 1, 66-77
• Usak, M., Erdogan, M., Prokop, P., Ozel, M. (2009). High School and University Students’ Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Biotechnology. Biochemistry And Molecular Biology Education. Vol.37,No.2, pp.123–130.
• Pattison, B. Van Beuzekam, A. Wyckoff (2001). Internationally comparable industries on biotechnology: A stock-taking, a proposal for work and supporting materials, Statistics Canada. 88F0017MIE No. 9: www.statscan.gov.ca
• Wohl, J. B. (1998). Consumers’ decision-making and risk perceptions regarding foods produced with biotechnology, Journal of Consumer Policy, 21, 387–404.
• Yıldırım, A., Şimşek, H., (2000). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara.