SOCİOLOGY OF ADDICTION: CONCEPTS, PROCESSES, THEORIES

Öz

It is known that the use of intoxicating and recreational substances dates back to BC. However, in today's sense, substance use and the definition of addiction are important modern phenomena. With scientific developments in chemistry, pharmacology and various other fields, the nature and effects of addictive substances have changed. With this change, addiction has been defined and the it has been tried to be understood by many disciplines, especially psychology. It was only after the first quarter of the 20th century that sociology, which claims that addiction is not only individual and substance-related but also has a social aspect, entered the field of addiction. In this study, the phenomenon of addiction has been tried to be understood in the context of classical and modern sociological theories. In addition to the views of founding fathers such as Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim on substance abuse, the approaches of modern sociological theories such as Structural-Functionalism, Symbolic Interactionism, Phenomenology and Conflict Theory on addiction are included. In addition, researches based on these sociological theories are also included in this study. It has been observed that the studies under the title of sociology of addiction in the Turkish literature are limited. The study aims to make a modest contribution to the field of sociology of addiction.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• substance use
• sociological theories
• sociology of addiction

BAĞIMLILIK SOSYOLOJİSİ: KAVRAMLAR, SÜREÇLER, TEORİLER

Öz

Sarhoş edici ve keyif verici madde kullanımının Milattan Önceye kadar dayandığı bilinmektedir. Ancak günümüzdeki anlamıyla madde kullanımı ve buna bağlı olarak gelişen bağımlılık tanımı önemli ölçüde modern bir olgudur. Kimya, farmakoloji ve çeşitli alanlardaki bilimsel gelişmelerle birlikte bağımlılık yapıcı maddelerin de niteliği ve etkileri değişmiştir. Bu değişimle birlikte bağımlılık tanımı yapılmış ve fenomen başta psikoloji olmak üzere birçok disiplin tarafından anlaşılmaya çalışılmıştır. Bağımlılığın sadece bireysel ve maddeyle ilişkili olmadığını aynı zamanda toplumsal yönünün de olduğunu iddia eden sosyolojinin müstakil bir çalışmayla bağımlılık alanına girmesi 20. Yüzyılın ilk çeyreğinden sonra olmuştur. Bu çalışmada klasik ve modern sosyoloji teorileri bağlamında bağımlılık fenomeni anlaşılmaya çalışılmıştır. Karl Marx ve Emile Durkheim gibi kurucu babaların madde kullanımına ilişkin görüşlerinin yanı sıra Yapısal- İşlevselcilik, Sembolik Etkileşimcilik, Fenomenoloji ve Çatışma Teorisi gibi modern sosyoloji teorilerinin bağımlılığa ilişkin yaklaşımlarına yer verilmiştir. Bunun yanında söz konusu sosyolojik teorileri temel alan araştırmalar da bu çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Türkçe literatürde bağımlılık sosyolojisi başlığı altında yer alan çalışmaların sınırlı olduğu görülmüştür. Çalışma bağımlılık sosyolojisi alanına mütevazi bir katkıyı amaçlamıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• : bağımlılık sosyolojisi
• madde kullanımı
• sosyoloji teorileri

Kaynakça

1. Adrian, M. (2002). A Critical Perspective on Cross-Cultural Contexts for Addiction and Multiculturalism: Their Meanings and Implications in the Substance Use Field*. Substance Use & Misuse, 37(8-10), 853-900. https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120004157
2. Adrian, M. (2003). How Can Sociological Theory Help Our Understanding of Addictions?#. Substance use & misuse, 38, 1385-1423. https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023391
3. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). DSM-5: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
4. Battjes, R. J. (1984). Symbolic interaction theory: A perspective on drug abuse and its treatment. The International Journal of the Addictions, 19(6), 675-688. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826088409057214
5. Becker, G. S., & Murphy, K. M. (1988). A Theory of Rational Addiction. Journal of Political Economy, 96(4), 675-700. https://doi.org/10.1086/261558
6. Becker, H. S. (1953). Becoming a marihuana user. American journal of Sociology, 59(3), 235-242.
7. Bergeron, H. (2001). Drug Addiction: Sociological Aspects. İçinde N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (ss. 3852-3856). Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/01871-4
8. Booth, B. M., Curran, G., Han, X., Wright, P., Frith, S., Leukefeld, C., Falck, R., & Carlson, R. G. (2010). Longitudinal Relationship Between Psychological Distress and Multiple Substance Use: Results From a Three-Year Multisite Natural-History Study of Rural Stimulant Users. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 71(2), 258-267. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2010.71.258

9. Brown, L. G. (1931). The Sociological Implications of Drug Addictions. The Journal of Educational Sociology, 4(6), 358-369. https://doi.org/10.2307/2961617
10. Collins, A. F. (1996). The pathological gambler and the government of gambling. History of the Human Sciences, 9(3), 69-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/095269519600900304
11. Copoeru, I. (2014). Understanding Addiction: A Threefold Phenomenological Approach. Human Studies, 37(3), 335-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-013-9307-8
12. Dembo, R., Burgos, W., Schmeidler, J., Farrow, D., & Allen, N. (1985). A Causal Analysis of Early Drug Involvement in Three Inner-City Neighborhood Settings. International Journal of the Addictions, 20(8), 1213-1237. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826088509056360
13. Dembo, R., Schmeidler, J., Taylor, R., & Burgos, W. (1985). Environmental Setting and Early Drug Involvement among Inner-City Junior High School Youths. International Journal of the Addictions, 20(8), 1239-1255. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826088509056361
14. Duman, H., & Ozkara, B. Y. (2021). The impact of social identity on online game addiction: The mediating role of the fear of missing out (FoMO) and the moderating role of the need to belong. Current Psychology, 40(9), 4571-4580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00392-w
15. Durkheim, E. (1973). On Morality and society (R. B. Bellah, Ed.). The university of chicago press.
16. Durkheim, E. (2013). Suicide. Snowballpublishing.
17. Duyndam, J. (2009). Sincerely me. Enjoyment and the truth of hedonism. İçinde B. Hofmeyr (Ed.), Radical passivity: Rethinking ethical agency in Levinas. Springer.
18. Elster, J. (1997). More than Enough. The University of Chicago Law Review, 64(2), 749-764. https://doi.org/10.2307/1600295
19. Erickson, P. G. (1980). Cannabis Criminals—The Social Effects of Punishment on Drug Users | Office of Justice Programs. Addiction Research Foundation. Toronto. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/cannabis-criminals-social-effects-punishment-drug-users
20. Fernandez, R. A. (1973). The Problem of Heroin Addiction and Radical Political Economy. The American Economic Review, 63(2), 257-262.
21. Field, P. B. (1962). A new cross-cultural study of drunkenness. 48-74.
22. Gorski, T. T., & Miller, M. (1991). Understanding addictive disease: A tool for preventing relapse. Herald House/Independent Press.
23. Goffman, E. (2014). Damga: Örselenmiş kimliğin idare edilişi üzerine notlar. Çev: S. N. Ağırnaslı. Heretik Yayıncılık.
24. Hammersley, R. (2018). Sociology of Addiction. İçinde The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy and Science of Addiction. Routledge.
25. Heim, D., Davies, J. B., Cheyne, B., & Smallwood, J. (2001). Addiction as a functional representation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 11(1), 57-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.575
26. Henden, E. (2018). Addiction as a disorder of self-control. Içinde H. Pickard & S. H. Ahmed (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy and Science of Addiction. Routledge.
27. Horton, D. (1943). The functions of alcohol in primitive societies: A cross-cultural study. Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 4, 199-320.
28. Inciardi, J., & Kurtz, S. (2007). African Americans, Crack, and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. İçinde J. Inciardi & K. McElrath (Ed.), American Drug Scene: An Anthology (ss. 252-263). Oxford University Press. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/shss_facbooks/75
29. Irvine, J. M. (2015). Regulated Passions The Invention of Inhibited Sexual Desire and Sex Addiction. Içinde R. Granfield & C. Reinarman (Ed.), Expanding addiction: Critical essays (1 Edition). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
30. Jellinek, E. M. (1943). The alcohol problem: formulations and attitudes. Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 4(3), 446-461.
31. Jellinek, E. M. (1962). “Phases of alcohol addiction.” Pp. 356-368 in David J. Pittman and Charles R. Snyder (eds.) Society Culture and Drinking Patterns. Carbondale (IL): Southern Illinois University Press.
32. Kang, E., & Thosuwanchot, N. (2014). An Application of Durkheim‟s Four Categories of Suicide to Organizational Crimes. Deviant Behavior, 38, 493-513.
33. Kovac, V. B. (2015). The More the Merrier A Multi-Sourced Model of Addiction. Içinde R. Granfield & C. Reinarman (Ed.), Expanding addiction: Critical essays (1 Edition, ss. 296-313). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
34. Lamis, D. A., & Malone, P. S. (2011). Alcohol-Related Problems and Risk of Suicide among College Students: The Mediating Roles of Belongingness and Burdensomeness: Alcohol-Related Problems and SuicideRisk. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 41(5), 543-553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1943-278X.2011.00052.x
35. Levine, H. G. (1985). The discovery of addiction: Changing conceptions of habitual drunkenness in America. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 2(1), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0740-5472(85)90022-4
36. Marx, K. (2011). Kapital. Cilt 1: Kapital: Ekonomi Politiğin Eleştirisi; 1. Cilt Sermayenin Üretim Süreci (M. Selik & N. Satlıgan, Çev.; 1. bas). Yordam Yayınları.
37. Matthews, S. (2019). Self-Stigma and Addiction. Içinde J. D. Avery & J. J. Avery (Ed.), The Stigma of Addiction: An Essential Guide (ss. 5-32). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02580-9_2
38. McIntyre, S. (2021). The (Capitalist) making of an addict: A Marxian and Durkheimian perspective on modern manifestations of addiction. International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 13(4), 135-141. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJSA2021.0929
39. McNeill, F., & Dawson, M. (2014). SOCIAL SOLIDARITY, PENAL EVOLUTION AND PROBATION. British Journal of Criminology, 54(5), 892-907.
40. Mele, A. R. (1996). Addiction and Self-Control. Behavior and Philosophy, 24(2), 99-117.
41. Mendoza, S., Hatcher, A. E., & Hansen, H. (2019). Race, Stigma, and Addiction. Içinde J. D. Avery & J. J. Avery (Ed.), The Stigma of Addiction: An Essential Guide (ss. 131-152). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02580-9_8
42. Merton, R. K. (1938). Social Structure and Anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672-682. https://doi.org/10.2307/2084686
43. Moore, S. (1995). Adolescent Black Males‟ Drug Trafficking and Addiction: Three Theoretical Perspectives. . . Journal of Black Studies, 26(2), 99-116.
44. Moskalewicz, M. (2016). Three Modes of Distorted Temporal Experience in Addiction: Daily Life, Drug Ecstasy, and Recovery. A Phenomenological Perspective. Archiwum Historii Filozofii i Myśli Społecznej, 61supl., 197-212.
45. National Center for Health Statistics. (2024, Şubat 14). Products—Vital Statistics Rapid Release—Provisional Drug Overdose Data. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/drug-overdose-data.htm
46. O’Connor, J. (1978). The Young Drinkers: A Cross-national Study of Social and Cultural Influences. Tavistock Publications.
47. Orphanides, A., & Zervos, D. (1995). Rational Addiction with Learning and Regret. Journal of Political Economy, 103(4), 739-758. https://doi.org/10.1086/262001
48. Reinarman, C., & Granfield, R. (2015). Addiction Is Not Just a Brain Disease Critical Studies of Addiction. Içinde R. Granfield & C. Reinarman (Ed.), Expanding addiction: Critical essays (1 Edition, ss. 1-25). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
49. Reith, G. (2004). Consumption and its discontents: Addiction, identity and the problems of freedom. The British Journal of Sociology, 55(2), 283-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2004.00019.x
50. Richman, A., & Dunham, H. W. (1976). A sociological theory of the diffusion and social setting of opiate addiction. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 1(6), 383-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-8716(76)90003-X
51. Ritzer, G., & Stepnisky, J. (2014). Sosyoloji kuramları (H. Hülür, Çev.). de ki basım yayım.
52. Robbins, T. W., Everitt, B. J., & Nutt, D. J. (2010). The Neurobiology of Addiction: New Vistas. Oxford University Press.
53. Robins, N. (2017). Dünyayı Değiştiren Şirket (İ. Özekmekçi & S. Tarla, Çev.). H2O kitap.
54. Rogeberg, O. (2004). Taking Absurd Theories Seriously: Economics and the Case of Rational Addiction Theories. Philosophy of Science, 71(3), 263-285. https://doi.org/10.1086/421535
55. Rogeberg, O. (2020). The theory of Rational Addiction. Addiction, 115(1), 184-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14822
56. Schalow, F. (2017). Toward a Phenomenology of Addiction: Embodiment, Technology, Transcendence (C. 93). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66942-7
57. Schivelbusch, W. (2012). Keyif verici maddelerin tarihi (Z. Aksu Yılmazer, Çev.).
58. Schlimme, J. E. (2010). Addiction and self-determination: A phenomenological approach. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 31(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-010-9134-0
59. Skog, O.-J. (1991). Alcohol and Suicide—Durkheim Revisited. Acta Sociologica, 34(3), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169939103400303
60. Slattery, M. (2010). Sosyolojide temel fikirler (Ü. Tatlıcan, G. Demiriz, & Ö. Balkız, Çev.; 3.baskı). Sentez Yayıncılık.
61. Snoek, A. (2023). Addiction and living in the shadow of death: İmpact of the body on agency and self-control. Addiction Research & Theory, 0(0), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2023.2230874
62. Taipale, J. (2017). Controlling the uncontrollable. Self-regulation and the dynamics of addiction. The Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 40(1), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/01062301.2017.1343546
63. Thio, A. (1998). Deviant behavior (5th ed). Longman.
64. Vale, P. H. (2010). Addiction – and rational choice theory. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(1), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00826.x
65. Weinberg, D. (2011). Sociological Perspectives on Addiction. Sociology Compass, 5(4), 298-310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00363.x
66. Weinberg, T. S. (2012). THE SOCIOLOGY OF ADDICTION. Içinde Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). UNESCO.
67. West, R. (2006). Towards a comprehensive theory of addiction. Drugs and Alcohol Today, 6(1), 28-32. https://doi.org/10.1108/17459265200600011
68. West, R., & Brown, J. (2013). Theory of Addiction. John Wiley & Sons.
69. World Drug Report. (2023). World Drug Report 2023—Special Points of Interests. United Nations : Office on Drugs and Crime. //www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/wdr-2023_Special_Points.html
70. Yeşilay (2024, 10 Ekim), Bağımlılık nedir?, www.yesiay.org.tr/bağımlilik/bağimlilik-nedir
71. Young, K. S. (1996). Psychology of Computer Use: XL. Addictive Use of the Internet: A Case That Breaks the Stereotype. Psychological Reports, 79(3), 899-902. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1996.79.3.899