COMMODIFICATION OF NATURE IN SILA
Öz
When different ecological movements are examined, the common view is that nature is faced with various threats and needs conservation in a rapidly modernizing world. Capitalism with its instruments constitutes a threat to ecology. In this respect, commodification of nature is one of these threats, and frequently analyzed in the context of eco-criticism, a literary theory, and linked with politics and deep ecology as well. It is also of vital importance in society to consider to what extent the moral dimension of the commodification of nature is concerned or thoroughly evaluated. From this point of view, the share of reason and will is inevitable for every individual of the society in seeking for a solution against ecological problems in general. As a result of this reality, in the industrialized world, where ecological interests are ignored, ecological sensitivity and consciousness in the face of commodification of nature are gradually diminishing. In this sense, Karl Marx's political ecology and deep ecology, providing a philosophical point of view bring a different dimension to commodification. The purpose of this study is to explore the commodification of nature via politics and deep ecology in Sila by Chantal Bilodeau.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Atkinson, B. (1950). The Complete Essays and Other Writings of Ralph Waldo Emerson. New York: Random House Inc. Barry, J. (1999). Rethinking Green Politics: Nature, Virtue, and Progress. London: SAGE. B. Leduc, T. (2010). Climate, Culture, Change: Inuit and Western Dialogues with a Warming North. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press. Glotfelty C. and Fromm H. (1996). The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology. Athens: University of Georgia Press. Lloyd , D. (2003). Shakespeare Matters: History, Teaching, Performance. Newark: University of Delaware Press. Foster, J. B. (2000). Marx's Ecology: Materialism and Nature. New York: Monthly Review Press. Kayaoğlu, M. (2003). Politik Ekoloji ve Teorik Öncülleri. 1 Mart 2018: http://www.teorivepolitika.net/index.php/okunabilir-yazilar/item/343-politik-ekoloji-ve-teorik-onculleri Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County Almanac - And Sketches Here and There. New York: Oxford University Press. Naess, A. (1989). Ecology, Community and Lifestyle: Outline of an Ecosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Naess, A. (1973). The Shallow and The Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement. A summary, Inquiry, 16 (1). 95-100. Opperman, S. (2006). Theorizing Ecocriticism: Toward A Postmodern Ecocritical Practice. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 13 (2), 103-128 Polanyi, K. (2001). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press. Reed P. and Rothenberg D. (1993). Wisdom in the Open Air, the Norwegian Roots of Deep Ecology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Robbins, P. (2011). Political Ecology, A Critical Introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell Press. Smith, N. and Harvey, D. (2008). Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
-
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
30 Haziran 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi
13 Mayıs 2019
Kabul Tarihi
-
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2019 Sayı: 44