COMMODIFICATION OF NATURE IN SILA

Yıl 2019, Sayı: 44, 41 - 51, 30.06.2019

Aydın Görmez Necip Karabulak

Öz

When
different ecological movements are examined, the common view is that nature is
faced with various threats and needs conservation in a rapidly modernizing
world. Capitalism with its instruments constitutes a threat to ecology. In this
respect, commodification of nature is one of these threats, and frequently
analyzed in the context of eco-criticism, a literary theory, and linked with
politics and deep ecology as well. It is also of vital importance in society to
consider to what extent the moral dimension of the commodification of nature is
concerned or thoroughly evaluated. From this point of view, the share of reason
and will is inevitable for every individual of the society in seeking for a
solution against ecological problems in general. As a result of this reality,
in the industrialized world, where ecological interests are ignored, ecological
sensitivity and consciousness in the face of commodification of nature are
gradually diminishing. In this sense, Karl Marx's political ecology and deep
ecology, providing a philosophical point of view bring a different dimension to
commodification. The purpose of this study is to explore the commodification of
nature via politics and deep ecology in Sila
by Chantal Bilodeau.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sila, ecocriticism, commodification, political and deep ecology

Kaynakça

• Atkinson, B. (1950). The Complete Essays and Other Writings of Ralph Waldo Emerson. New York: Random House Inc. Barry, J. (1999). Rethinking Green Politics: Nature, Virtue, and Progress. London: SAGE. B. Leduc, T. (2010). Climate, Culture, Change: Inuit and Western Dialogues with a Warming North. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press. Glotfelty C. and Fromm H. (1996). The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology. Athens: University of Georgia Press. Lloyd , D. (2003). Shakespeare Matters: History, Teaching, Performance. Newark: University of Delaware Press. Foster, J. B. (2000). Marx's Ecology: Materialism and Nature. New York: Monthly Review Press. Kayaoğlu, M. (2003). Politik Ekoloji ve Teorik Öncülleri. 1 Mart 2018: http://www.teorivepolitika.net/index.php/okunabilir-yazilar/item/343-politik-ekoloji-ve-teorik-onculleri Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County Almanac - And Sketches Here and There. New York: Oxford University Press. Naess, A. (1989). Ecology, Community and Lifestyle: Outline of an Ecosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Naess, A. (1973). The Shallow and The Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement. A summary, Inquiry, 16 (1). 95-100. Opperman, S. (2006). Theorizing Ecocriticism: Toward A Postmodern Ecocritical Practice. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 13 (2), 103-128 Polanyi, K. (2001). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press. Reed P. and Rothenberg D. (1993). Wisdom in the Open Air, the Norwegian Roots of Deep Ecology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Robbins, P. (2011). Political Ecology, A Critical Introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell Press. Smith, N. and Harvey, D. (2008). Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space. Athens: University of Georgia Press.