Araştırma Makalesi

Performances of ‘Okıtsu’ and ‘Clausellına’ Satsuma Mandarıns on Dıfferent Rootstocks in Eastern Medıterranean of Turkey

Cilt: 55 Sayı: 2 27 Haziran 2018
PDF İndir
TR EN

Performances of ‘Okıtsu’ and ‘Clausellına’ Satsuma Mandarıns on Dıfferent Rootstocks in Eastern Medıterranean of Turkey

Abstract

The experiment was installed in Dörtyol, Turkey with the aim of evaluating the effects of the rootstocks of sour orange, Carrizo and Troyer citranges on plant growth, yield and fruit quality of 'Okitsu' and 'Clausellina' Satsuma mandarins (Citrus unshiu Marc.). 'Okitsu' Satsuma trees had the highest cumulative yield on Carrizo and Troyer citranges. Plants of this cultivar on sour orange had significant higher yield efficiency than trees on the other rootstocks. While 'Clausellina' Satsuma trees budded on Carrizo citrange had higher cumulative yield, yield efficiency of this cultivar had higher on Troyer citrange. The larger trees of 'Clausellina' Satsuma were those on Carrizo citrange, although canopy growth of 'Okitsu' Satsuma tress budded on Carrizo and Troyer citranges were similar. Fruit weight was highest in fruits of both 'Okitsu' and 'Clausellina' Satsuma cultivars budded on sour orange. The rind thickness and total soluble solids (TSS) of both cultivars were not affected by the rootstocks. The fruits of 'Okitsu' Satsuma trees on Carrizo citrange had higher juice content and high TSS:titratable acidity (TA) ratios were observed in fruits of 'Clausellina' Satsuma trees on Carrizo citrange. Instead of sour orange, Troyer citrange is suitable rootstocks for 'Clausellina' Satsuma, whereas both rootstocks evaluated are adequate for 'Okitsu' Satsuma. 

Keywords

Citrus unshiu Marc.,cultivar,canopy growth,yield efficiency,fruit quality

Kaynakça

  1. Bassal, MA. 2009. Growth, yield and fruit quality of ‘Marisol’ clementine grown on four rootstocks in Egypt. Scientia Horticulturae, 119:132-137.
  2. Bisio, L., B. Vignale, F. Carrau and DJ. Diez. 2000. Evaluation of nine rootstocks for ‘Owari’ Satsuma mandarin in Uruguay. Proceedings of the 9rd International Society of Citriculture (3-7 December, USA), p. 479-481.
  3. Cantuarias-Aviles, T., FAAM. Filho, ES. Stuchi, SR. Silva and E. Espinoza-Nunez. 2010. Tree performance and fruit yield and quality of ‘Okitsu’ Satsuma mandarin grafted on 12 rootstocks. Scientia Horticulturae, 123:318-322.
  4. Cinar, A. 2004. The structure of citrus cultivation in Turkey and some developments in recent years (in Turkish with an English summary). Cine Tarım, 7:14-17.
  5. Davies, FS. and LG. Albrigo. 1998. Citrus. CABI Publication, Florida, USA. 254 p.
  6. Demirkeser, TH., M. Kaplankiran, C. Toplu and E. Yildiz. 2009. Yield and fruit quality performance of ‘Nova’ and ‘Robinson’ mandarins on three rootstocks in Eastern Mediterranean. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4:262-268.
  7. Demirkeser, TH., M. Kaplankıran, E. Yıldız, C. Toplu, M. Kamiloğlu, AE. Özdemir, E. Çandir. 2011. Yield and fruit quality performance of Fremont mandarin on different rootstocks in Dörtyol (Turkey) conditions (in Turkish with an English summary). The 6th National Symposium on Horticulture (4-8 October, Turkey). p. 889-894.
  8. El-Otmani, M., CJ. Lovatt, F. Taibi, B. Lmoufid and A. Ait-Oubahou. 2004. Improved use of foliar urea on Clementine mandarin to manipulate cropping in a sustainable production system. Acta Horticulturae, 632:167-175.
  9. Espinoza-Nunez, E., FAAM. Filho and ES. Stuchi. 2007. Desenvolvimento vegetativo, produção e qualidade de frutos da tangerina ‘Fremont’ sobre quatro porta-enxertos. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 29:308-312.
  10. Fallahi, E. and DR. Rodney. 1992. Tree size, yield, fruit quality and leaf mineral nutrient concentration of ‘Fairchild’ mandarin on six rootstocks. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 117:28-37.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Yıldız, E., & Kaplankıran, M. (2018). Performances of ‘Okıtsu’ and ‘Clausellına’ Satsuma Mandarıns on Dıfferent Rootstocks in Eastern Medıterranean of Turkey. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 55(2), 139-145. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.408806