Matematik Eğitiminde GeoGebra Üzerine Yapılan Makalelerin Bibliyometrik Analizi

Öz

Bu çalışmada, matematik eğitiminde GeoGebra ile ilgili yapılan makalelerin bibliyometrik analizle incelenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, 6 Mayıs 2025 tarihine kadar Web of Science veri tabanında yayımlanmış GeoGebra ile ilişkili olan makaleler PRISMA protokolü kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Araştırmada, GeoGebra odaklı çalışmaların zamansal eğilimleri incelenmiş; yazar, dergi, kurum ve ülke düzeyinde atıf temelli değerlendirmeler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Buna ek olarak, kurumsal iş birlikleri, yazarlar arasındaki ortak atıf örüntüleri ve yayınlarda öne çıkan anahtar kelimeler ağ temelli analiz yöntemleriyle ayrıntılı biçimde incelenmiştir. Araştırma bulgularına göre, en fazla yayın yapan yazarların Türkiye’den olduğu, en fazla yayına sahip kurumun ise Dicle Üniversitesi olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Kapsamlı bibliyometrik analiz, GeoGebra’nın matematik eğitimindeki araştırma eğilimlerini, iş birliği ağlarını ve tematik odaklarını bütüncül biçimde ortaya koyarak gelecekteki GeoGebra odaklı çalışmalara bir çerçeve sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• GeoGebra
• Matematik Eğitimi
• Bibliyometrik Analiz

Bibliometric Analysis of Articles on GeoGebra in Mathematics Education

Abstract

This study aims to examine research articles related to GeoGebra in the field of mathematics education using bibliometric analysis. To this end, studies associated with GeoGebra published in the Web of Science database up to May 6, 2025, were reviewed using the PRISMA protocol. The research explored the temporal trends of GeoGebra-focused studies and carried out citation-based evaluations at the authors, journals, institutions, and country levels. In addition, institutional collaborations, co-authorship networks, and keyword co-occurrence patterns were analyzed in detail through network-based visualization techniques. The findings revealed that the most prolific authors were predominantly affiliated with Turkey, with Dicle University was identified as the institution with the highest number of publications. Overall, the comprehensive bibliometric analysis provides a holistic overview of research trends, collaboration networks, and thematic foci of GeoGebra studies in mathematics education, offering a framework to guide future research on GeoGebra and technology integration in mathematics education.

Keywords

• GeoGebra
• Mathematics Education
• Bibliometric analysis

Kaynakça

1. Açıkgül, K., & Onuk Keskin, K. (2025). GeoGebra in educational research: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 13(2), 481-497. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.4620
2. Amalia, A. R., & Supandi, S. (2022). Fostering spatial visualization in GeoGebra-assisted geometry lesson: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(7), 15170. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15170
3. Azis, Y. M., & Rohaeti, E. E. (2025). A systematic literature review on implementation of GeoGebra: benefits and challenges in mathematics education. Infinity Journal, 14(3), 665-672. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v14i3.p655-672
4. Awaji, B. M., Halil, İ., & Alzahrani, A. (2025). A bibliometrics study of two decades of GeoGebra research in mathematics education. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 15(1), 130-150. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2025-0011
5. Balcı Şeker, H., & Erdoğan, A. (2017). GeoGebra yazılımı ile geometri öğretiminin geometri ders başarısına ve geometri öz-yeterliğine etkisi. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 7(12), 82-97. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.313072
6. Berger, M. (2013). Examining mathematical discourse to understand in-service teachers’ mathematical activities. Pythagoras, 34(1), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v34i1.197
7. Bintaş, J., Ceylan, B., & Dönmez, O. (2006, 29 Nisan). Dinamik geometri yazılımları aracılığıyla ispat yoluyla öğrenme, Eğitimde Çağdaş̧ Yönelimler–3 Yapılandırmacılık ve Eğitime Yansımaları Çalıştayı. Tevfik Fikret Okulları. İzmir, Türkiye.
8. Birgin, O., & Acar, H. (2020). The effect of computer-supported collaborative learning using GeoGebra software on 11th grade students’ mathematics achievement in exponential and logarithmic functions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(4), 872-889. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2020.1788186

9. Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual review of information science and technology, 37(1), 179-255. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370106
10. Chang, C., & Bhagat, K. K. (2015). Incorporating GeoGebra into geometry learning- a lesson from India. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1307a
11. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
12. Dede, E., & Özdemir, E. (2022). Matematik eğitiminde fark etme becerisi üzerine yapılan araştırmaların bibliyometrik analizi. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(36), 1547-1571. https://doi.org/10.35675/befdergi.1145811
13. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
14. Doruk, K. B., Aktümen, M., & Aytekin, C. (2013). Pre-service elementary mathematics teachers' opinions about using GeoGebra in mathematics education with reference to 'teaching practices'. Teaching Mathematics and its Application: An International Journal of the IMA, 32, 140-157. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrt009
15. Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?. Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809-1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
16. Gökçe, S., & Güner, P. (2022). Dynamics of GeoGebra ecosystem in mathematics education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 5301-5323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10836-1
17. Gürbüz, R. (2007). Olasılık konusunda geliştirilen materyallere dayalı öğretime ilişkin öğretmen ve öğrenci görüşleri, Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 15(1), 259–270. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kefdergi/article/626721
18. Hall, J. S., & Chamblee, G. (2013). Teaching algebra and geometry with GeoGebra: preparing pre-service teachers for middle grades/secondary mathematics classrooms. Teaching and Learning Faculty Publıcations. 30(1-2), 12-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2013.764276
19. Heid, M. K. (2002). How theories about the learning and knowing of mathematics can inform the use of CAS in school mathematics: one perspective. International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education, 9(2), 95-112. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ654552
20. Hohenwarter, M., & Lavicza, Z. (2007, November 3). Mathematics teacher development with ICT: Towards an ınternational GeoGebra ınstitute [Conference presentation], Proceedings of British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics Conference, United Kingom.
21. Hohenwarter, M., & Fuchs, K. (2004, May 21-22). Combination of dynamic geometry, algebra and calculus in the software system GeoGebra [Conference presentation]. Computer Algebra Systems and Dynamic Geometry Systems in Mathematics Teaching Conference, Hungary.
22. Hohenwarter, M., Jarvis, D., & Lavicza, Z. (2009). Linking geometry, algebra and mathematics teachers: GeoGebra software and the establishment of the International GeoGebra Institute. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 83-87. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2998492
23. Julius, R., Halim, M. S. A. H., Hadi, N. A., Alias, A. N., Khalid, M. H. M., Mahfodz, Z., & Ramli, F. F. (2021), Bibliometric analysis of research in mathematics education using scopus database, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(12), https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11329
24. Kusharyadi, R., Pertiwi, S., Siahaan, E. Y. S., & Dasari, D. (2023). Bibliometric analysis: Sofware usage trends GeoGebra in mathematics learning from 2017-2022. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 11(1), 196. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v11i1.6786
25. Kutluca, T. (2009). İkinci dereceden fonksiyonlar konusu için tasarlanan bilgisayar destekli öğrenme ortamının değerlendirilmesi [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi.
26. Küçük Demir, B., & Çolakoğlu, S. (2018). Çember konusunun GeoGebra yazılımıyla öğretiminin 7.sınıf öğrencilerinin yaratıcı düşünme becerilerine etkisi. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 5(1), 20-44. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jgedc/article/449475
27. Lavicza, Z. (2010). Integrating technology into mathematics teaching: A review. ZDM: The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 42(1), 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0225-1
28. Meagher, M., (2005). The processes of learning in a computer algebra system (CAS) environment for college students learning calculus (Tez No: osu1124113975) [Doktora tezi, Ohio State Üniversitesi]. OhioLINK Electronic Tez Merkezi.
29. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM Publications.
30. Nicolaisen, J. (2010). Bibliometrics and citation analiysis: from the science citation ındex to cybermetrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 205-207. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21181
31. Özkaya A. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of the studies in the field of mathematics education. Educational Research and Reviews, 13(22), 723-734. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2018.3603
32. Preiner, J. (2008). Introducing dynamics mathematics software to mathematics teacher: the case of GeoGebra [Dissertation in Mathematics Education]. Salzburg Üniversitesi.
33. Rehn, C., & Kronman, U. (2008). Bibliometric handbook for Karolinska Institutet. National Library of Sweden. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1480.9447
34. Reis, Z. A., & Özdemir, Ş. (2010). Using GeoGebra as an ınformation technology tool: parabola teaching. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 9, 565-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.198
35. Saha, R. A., Ayub, A. F. M., & Tarmizi, R. A. (2010). The effect of GeoGebra on mathematics achievement: enlightening coordinate geometry learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 8, 686-693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.095
36. Şimşek, N., & Yaşar, A. (2019) GeoGebra ile ilgili lisansüstü tezlerin tematik ve yöntemsel eğilimleri: Bir içerik analizi. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education. 10(2), 290-313. https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.450566
37. Tatar, E., & Zengin, Y. (2016). Conceptual understanding of definite ıntegral with GeoGebra. Computers in the Schools, 33(2), 120-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2016.1177480
38. Trigo, M. S., & Perez, H. E. (2002). Searching and exploring properties of geometric configurations using dynamic software. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390110087129
39. Üsdiken, B., & Pasadeos, Y. (1995). Organizational analysis in North America and Europe: A compariso co-citation networks. Organization Studies, 16(3), 503-526. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069501600306
40. Van Eck N. J., & Waltman L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. Y. Ding, R. Rousseau & D. Wolfram (Ed.), Measuring scholarly ımpact (ss. 285-320) içinde. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
41. Zengin, Y. (2018). Examination of the constructed dynamic bridge between the concepts of differential and derivative with the integration of GeoGebra and the ACODESA method. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99(3), 311-333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9832-5
42. Zengin, Y. (2019). Development of mathematical connection skills in a dynamic learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 24(3), 2175-2194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09870-x
43. Zan, B. U. (2012). Türkiye’de bilim dallarında karşılaştırmalı bibliyometrik analiz çalışması [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. Ankara Üniversitesi.
44. Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629