Prospective Elementary Science Teachers’ Experiences with Offered Textbooks in Teacher Education

Abstract

Textbooks have often been used for accomplish learning and teaching in teacher education, despite the prevalence of digital technologies. However, little has been done so far to understand the experiences of the users in higher education with textbooks. The purpose of this study is, therefore, to understand the experiences of senior prospective elementary science teachers (N=141) with offered textbooks and with instructors’ textbook use. The data were gathered qualitatively and analyzed by using the technique of content analysis to reveal the emerging themes. Findings suggest that the participants have positive and negative experiences with textbooks in regard to content, language/exposition, pedagogy, and physical/visual aspects. They also state their positive and negative experiences with instructors’ practice of selection, use, and instruction. Findings present important implications regarding the design, selection, and use of textbooks

Keywords

• Textbook,learning materials,Elementary Science,teacher education

Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Öğretmen Yetiştirme Sürecinde Önerilen Ders Kitaplarına Olan Deneyimleri

Öz

Öğretim teknolojilerinin yaygınlaşmasına rağmen, ders kitapları öğretmen yetiştirme sürecinde öğretme ve öğrenmenin gerçekleştirilmesi amacıyla sıklıkla kullanılmaktadır. Ancak üniversite öğrencilerinin kitaplarla olan deneyimlerini anlamaya yönelik pek az çalışma yapılmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Fen Bilgisi Öğretmenliği Programı son sınıfındaki öğretmen adaylarının (N=141) öğretmen yetiştirme sürecinde önerilen ders kitaplarıyla ve öğretim elemanlarının bu kitapları kullanımıyla ilgili deneyimlerini saptamaktır. Nitel yolla toplanan veriler içerik analizi tekniğiyle çözümlenerek temalar elde edilmiştir. Araştırmanın bulguları, öğretmen adaylarının ders kitaplarına yönelik içerik, dil/anlatım, pedagojik ve fiziksel/görsel boyutlarındaki; ders kitaplarını öğretim elemanlarının kullanımıyla ilgili olarak kitap seçimi, kitap kullanımı ve öğretim boyutlarındaki olumlu ve olumsuz deneyimlerini ortaya çıkarmıştır. Bulgular ders kitaplarının tasarımı, seçimi ve kullanımına yönelik önemli ipuçları sunmaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ders kitabı,öğretim materyalleri,Fen Bilgisi,öğretmen yetiştirme

Kaynakça

1. Abraham, M. R., Grzybowski, E. B., Renner, J. W. & Marek, E. A. (1992). Understandings and misunderstandings of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 105–120.
2. Ball, D. L. & Feiman-Nemser, S. (1988). Using textbooks and teacher’s guides: A dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators. Curriculum Inquiry, 18, 401–423.
3. Besser, D., Stone, G. & Nan, L. (1999). Textbooks and teaching: A lesson from students. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 53(4), 4–17.
4. Bishop, B. A. & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(5), 415–427.
5. Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
6. Carney, R. N. & Levin J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students’ learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 5–26.
7. Daniels, H. & Zemelman, S. (2004). Out with textbooks, in with learning. Educational leadership, 61(4), 36–40.
8. Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

9. Ekiz, D. (2003). Eğitimde Araştırma Yöntem ve Metotlarına Giriş. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
10. Elgar, A. G. (2004). Science textbooks for lower secondary schools in Brunei: Issues of gender equity. INT. J. SCI. EDUC., 26(7), 875–894.
11. Evans, L. & Davies, K. (2000). No sissy boys here: A content analysis of the representation of masculinity in elementary school reading textbooks. Sex Roles, 42(3/4), 255–270.
12. Gauld, C. (1997). It must be true—it’s in the textbook . Australian Science Teachers Journal, 43(2), 21–25.
13. Gay, L. R. (1996). Educational research competencies for analysis and application. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14. Gökdere, M. & Keleş, E. (2004). Öğretmen ve Öğrencilerin Fen Bilgisi Ders Kitaplarını Kullanma Düzeyleri Üzerine Müfredat Değişikliğinin Etkisi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 33(161), [Online] http://yayim.meb.gov.tr/dergiler/161/gokdere-keles.htm adresinden 03/01/2008 tarihinde indirilmiştir.
15. Haggarty, L. & Pepin, B. (2002). An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: who gets an opportunity to learn what? British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 567–590.
16. Helvacıoğlu, F. (1996). Ders Kitaplarında Cinsiyetçilik. İstanbul: Kaynak Yayınları.
17. Horsley, M. & Lambert, D. (2001). The secret garden of classroom and textbooks. In M.Horsley (Ed.), The future of textbooks? Research about emerging trends. Sydney: TREAT.
18. Hubisz, J. (2001). Popular science textbooks found prone to error. Curriculum Review, 40(8), 1– 5.
19. Iding, M. K. (1997). How analogies foster learning from science texts. Instructional Science, 25, 233–253.
20. Kearsey, J. & Turner, S. (1999). How useful are the figures in school biology textbooks. Journal of Biological Education, 33(2), 87–94.
21. Kılıç, A. & Seven, S. (2004). Konu Alanı Ders Kitabı İncelemesi. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
22. Lubben, F., Campbell, B., Kasanda, C., Kapenda, H., Gaoseb, N. & Kandjeo-Marenga, U. (2003). Teachers’ use of textbooks’ practice in Namibian science classrooms. Educational Studies, 29(2/3), 109–124.
23. Luke, C., De Castell, S. & Luke, A. (1989). Beyond criticism: The authority of the schoolbook. In S. De Castell, A. Luke & C.Luke (Eds), Language, Authority and Criticism (pp. 245–260). London: Falmer Press.
24. McCutcheon, G. (1981). How do elementary school teachers plan? Elementary School Journal, 81, 4–23.
25. Merritt, M. (1992). Socialising multilingualism: Determinants of code switching in Kenyan primary schools. Journal of Multicultural and Multilingual Development, 13(2), 103– 121.
26. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Moulton, J. (1997). How do teachers use textbooks? A review of the research literature. (Tech. Rep. No:74) U.S. Agency for International Development.
28. Penney, K., Norris, S. P., Phillips L. M. & Clark, G. (2003). The anatomy of junior high school science textbooks: An analysis of textual characteristics and a comparison of media reports of science. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 3(4), 415–436.
29. Phillips, B. J. & Phillips, F. (2007). Sink or skim: Textbook reading behaviors of introductory accounting students. Issues in Accounting Education, 22(1), 21–44.
30. Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
31. Selander, S. (2005). “How do teachers evaluate, select and use textbooks? Results from surveys in Norway and Finland.” Paper presented at the Eighth International Conference on Learning and Educational Media (France, October 26–29, 2005).
32. Stake, E. R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.
33. Stern, L. & Roseman, E. (2004). Can middle-school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from project 2061’s curriculum evaluation study: life science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 538–568.
34. Stylianidou, F., Ormerod, F. & Ogborn, J. (2002). Analysis of science textbook pictures about energy and pupil’s readings of them. International Journal of Science Education, 24(3), 257–283.
35. Synder, V. L. & Broadway, F. S. (2004). Queering high school biology textbooks and pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 617–636.
36. Turgut, M. F., Baker, D., Cunningham, R. & Piburn, M. (1997). İlköğretim Fen Öğretimi. YÖK/Dünya Bankası, Milli Eğitimi Geliştirme Projesi, Hizmet Öncesi Öğretmen Eğitimi, Ankara.
37. Uhlik, K. S. (2004). Midnight at the IDL: Student confusion and textbook error. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 28(2), 197–207.
38. Uzuntiryaki, E. & Boz, Y. (2006). Öğretmen Adaylarının Ders Kitabı Kullanımıyla İlgili Görüşleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31, 212–220.
39. Wilkinson, J. (1999). A quantitative analysis of physics textbooks for scientific literacy themes. Research in Science Education, 29(3), 385–399.
40. Woodward, A. & Elliott, D. L. (1990). Textbooks: Consensus and Controversy. In D. L. Elliott & A. Woodward (Ed.), Textbooks and Schooling in the United States: Eighty-ninth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41. Yager, R. E. (1983). The importance of terminology in teaching K-12 science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 577–588.
42. Yıldırım, A. (1999). An assessment of high school history textbooks in Turkey: Teachers’ and students’ perceptions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Montreal, Quebec, Canada, April 19–23, 1999).
43. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
44. Zahorik, J. A. (1991). Teaching style and textbooks. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(2), 185–196.