NASIL BİR ÖĞRENME ORTAMI? BİYOLOJİ SINIFLARINDA ÖĞRENME ORTAMI YAPISININ BELİRLENMESİ

Öz

TÜBİTAK tarafından kariyer geliştirme programı çerçevesinde desteklenen “işbirlikli öğretme yöntemlerinin grup liderleri yardımıyla yaygınlaştırılması ve uygulama aşamasındaki problemlere çözüm üretilmesi” adlı, 3 yıl (2005–8) süreli proje bünyesinde yapılan bu çalışmada, biyoloji sınıflarında mevcut öğrenme ortamlarının yapısı araştırılmıştır. Araştırma 2005–2006 öğretim yılında, Diyarbakır şehir merkezinde, 5 ortaöğretim kurumundaki 10 Lise I. sınıf şebeleri olmak üzere toplam 340 öğrenciyi kapsamaktadır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak Fraser ve arkadaşları tarafından geliştirilen “Öğrenme Ortamı Anketi” uyarlanarak kullanılmıştır Analiz sonucunda, öğrenme ortamı olarak sınıflarda öğrencilerin değişik ilgi ve yeteneklere sahip olmalarına karşın bu doğrultuda sınıf içi aktivite ve öğrenme yöntemlerinin uygulanmadığı açığa çıkmıştır. Derslerin hızlı işlendiği ve öğretmenlerin ders sırasında başarılı öğrencilerle daha fazla ilgilenerek öğrenciler arasında ayrımcılık yapktıkları ortaya çıkmaıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Öğrenme Ortamı,Öğrenci İhtiyaçları,Biyoloji Eğitimi

What Type of Learning Environment? Finding out the Nature of Learning Environment in Biology Classes

Abstract

In this study, the current learning environments in biology classroom were investigated. The study is a part of the 3 years research that is funded by TUBITAK and titled “prevailing cooperative learning methods through group leaders and finding solution to problems occurred during the application” which was carried out in 10 classrooms in 5 secondary schools throughout Diyarbakir with participation of 340 students in total. An adopted version of “Learning Environment Inventory” that was developed by Fraser et al was used. The findings suggest that despite the fact that students have different interests and abilities, classroom activities and learning methods matching up with these interests and abilities are not being used. Also, subject topics are covered fast and teachers pay more attention to more successful students, which is seen by students as discrimination.

Keywords

• Learning Environment,Student Needs,Biology Education.

Kaynakça

1. Aldridge, J.M. & Fraser, B.J. (2000). A cross-cultural study of classroom learning environments in Avustralia and Taiwan, Learning Environment Research, 3, 101-134.
2. Dorman, J. (2001) Associations between classroom environment and academic efficacy, Learning Environment Research, 4, pp. 243-257.
3. Fraser, B.J. (1999). Using Learning Environment Assessment to Improve Classroom and School Climates. In H.J. Freiberg (Eds.), School Climate: Measuring, improving and sustaining healthy learning environments (pp.65-83), London, Falmer Press.
4. Fraser, B.J.(1998). Science Learning Environments: Assessment, effect and determinents. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 527-564), Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Kluwer.
5. Groccia, J., Miller, E., & Judith, E. (1996). Collegiality in the Classroom: the Use of Peer Learning Assistants in Cooperative Learning Introductory Biology. Innovative Higher Education, 21(2), 87-100.
6. Hergenhahn, B.R. & Olson, M.H. (2000). Introduction to Theories of Learning, New Jersey, Prentice Hall
7. Hofstein, A., Nahum, T. L. & Shore, R. (2001). Assessment of the Learning Environment of Inquiry-Type Laboratories in High School Chemistry, Learning Environment Research, 4, pp.193-207.
8. Lord, T. (1998). Cooperative Learning that Really Works in Biology Teaching. American Biology Teacher, 60(8), 580-588.

9. McRobbie, C. & Thomas, G.P. (2000). Changing the learning environment to enhance explaining and understanding in a year 12 Chemistry classroom, Learning Environment Research, 3, pp.209-227
10. McRobbie, C. & Tobin, K. (1997). A social constructivist perspective on learning environments, International Journal of Science Education, 19, pp.193-207
11. Moar, D. & Fraser, B.J. (1996) Use of classroom environment perceptions in evaluating inquiry- based computer assisted learning, International Journal of Science Education, 18, 401-421
12. Petegem, V. P., Donche, V.,&Vanhoof, J. (2005). Relating pre-service teachers’ approaches to learning and preferences for constructivist learning environments, Learning Environment Research, 8, pp.309-332
13. She, H. C. & Fisher, D. (2000). The Development of a Questionnaire to describe Science Teacher Communication Behavior in Taiwan and Australia, Science Education, 84, pp.706-726
14. Sherman, S. J. (1994). Cooperative Learning and Science. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Handbook of Cooperative Learning Methods (pp. 226-244). London: Greenwood Press.
15. Thomas, G.P. & Mee, D. A (2005). Changing Learning Environment to Enhance Students’ Metacognition in Hong Kong Primary School Classrooms, Learning Environment Research, 8, pp.221-243
16. Tobin, K., Capie, W. & Bettencourt, E. (1988). Active teaching for higher cognitive learning in science, International Journal of Science Education, 10,pp.17-27
17. Waldrip, J. & Fisher, D.L (2000). The development and validation of a learning environment queastionnaire using both quantitative and qualitative methods, Journal of Classroom İnteraction, 35, pp. 25-37
18. Wallace, J., Venville, G. & Chou, C. (2001). “Cooperate is When You Don’t Fight”: Students’ Understanding of Their Classroom, Learning Environment, 5, pp. 133-153