The Qualitative Research Process: How to Perform a Qualitative Research?

Yıl 2019, , 368 - 388, 24.12.2019

Ali Baltacı

https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.598299

Cited By: 455

Öz

In this research, the widely
used processes in qualitative research, and the theoretical foundations of the
research process and its strategies for implementation are discussed. In essence, this
study aims to provide a conceptual basis for the application problems of
qualitative researchers, which often arise from methodological deficiencies. With this study,
the conceptual ground will be formed which will be lacking in the qualitative
research process, and the applied strategies will be emphasized. In this
context, the qualitative patterns frequently emphasized in the literature were
searched and the data obtained were discussed in the theoretical dimension, and
information was given about the methods and strategies that will guide the
qualitative researches. As a result of the study, it has been
determined that the qualitative research process represents a very different
and subjective process than the quantitative research, and the problematic
subject to the qualitative research is to examine all the dynamics and in-depth. The aim of this study is to complete the deficiencies in the current and
easily applicable qualitative research methods, especially in Turkish literature. It is hoped that
this study will guide the researchers who will use qualitative research methods
in the selection and application of information collection, research, and
analysis related to the qualitative data.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Research, Qualitative Research, Qualitative Research Process, qualitative data collection, qualitative data analysis

Nitel Araştırma Süreci: Nitel Bir Araştırma Nasıl Yapılır?

Öz

Bu araştırmada, nitel araştırmalarda yaygın olarak
kullanılan süreçlerden bahsedilmiş, ayrıca araştırma sürecinin kuramsal
temelleri ve uygulamaya yönelik stratejileri ele alınmıştır. Bu çalışma özünde nitel
araştırmacıların sıklıkla yöntembilim eksikliklerinden doğan uygulama
sorunlarına karşı kavramsal bir zemin oluşturmayı hedeflemiştir. Çalışma ile
nitel araştırma sürecinde eksikliği hissedilen kavramsal zemin oluşturulacak ve
uygulamaya dönük stratejiler üzerinde durulacaktır. Bu amaçla belirtilen
çerçevede alanyazında sıklıkla vurgulanan nitel desenler taranarak, elde edilen
veriler kuramsal boyutta tartışılmış, bunun yanında nitel araştırmalara yön
verecek yöntemler ve stratejiler hakkında bilgi verilmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda,
nitel araştırma sürecinin, nicel araştırmalardan oldukça farklı ve öznel bir
süreci ifade ettiği, nitel araştırmaya konu olan sorunsalı tüm dinamikleriyle
ve derinlemesine incelemeye çalıştığı belirlenmiştir. Bu çalışma özellikle
Türkçe alanyazında eksikliği hissedilen güncel ve kolaylıkla uygulanabilir
nitel araştırma yöntemlerindeki eksikliğin tamamlanması amacını gütmektedir.
Çalışmanın, nitel araştırma yöntemlerini kullanacak araştırmacılara gerek nitel
verilere ilişkin bilgi toplama, araştırma ve gerekse analiz seçimi ve
uygulamalarında yol göstereceği umulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

araştırma, nitel araştırma, nitel araştırma süreci, nitel veri toplama, nitel veri analizi

Kaynakça

• Baltacı, A. (2017). Nitel veri analizinde Miles-Huberman modeli. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(1), 1-15.
• Baltacı, A. (2018). Nitel Araştırmalarda Örnekleme Yöntemleri ve Örnek Hacmi Sorunsalı Üzerine Kavramsal Bir İnceleme. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(1), 231–274.
• Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The qualitative report, 13(4), 544-559.
• Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8-14.
• Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1997). Qualitative research for education. Allyn & Bacon Boston, MA.
• Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: complementary research strategies. Sage Publications, Inc.
• Connelly, L. M. (2016). Trustworthiness in qualitative research. Medsurg Nursing, 25(6), 435-437.
• Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (1999). Doing qualitative research. sage publications.
• Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008a). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research.
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008b). The landscape of qualitative research (C. 1). Sage.
• Eysenbach, G., & Köhler, C. (2002). How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. Bmj, 324(7337), 573-577.
• Fossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry, 36(6), 717-732.
• Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The qualitative report, 8(4), 597-606.
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research, 2(163-194), 105.
• Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Suny Press.
• Hay, I. (2000). Qualitative research methods in human geography.
• Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research: introducing focus groups. Bmj, 311(7000), 299-302.
• Klenke, K. (2016). Qualitative research in the study of leadership. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• Kuş, E. (2007). Nicel-nitel araştırma teknikleri: sosyal bilimlerde araştırma teknikleri: Nicel mi? Nitel mi? Anı Yayıncılık.
• Kvale, S. (1994). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications, Inc.
• Makatouni, A. (2002). What motivates consumers to buy organic food in the UK? Results from a qualitative study. British Food Journal, 104(3/4/5), 345-352.
• Mallat, N. (2007). Exploring consumer adoption of mobile payments–A qualitative study. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16(4), 413-432.
• Malterud, K. (2001). Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. The lancet, 358(9280), 483-488.
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Sage publications.
• Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family practice, 13(6), 522-526.
• Maxwell, J. A. (2008). Designing a qualitative study. The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods, 2, 214-253.
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Revised and Expanded from" Case Study Research in Education.". ERIC.
• Merriam, S. B., & Grenier, R. S. (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. Jossey-Bass.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. New York: Sage Publications, Inc.
• Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups as qualitative research (C. 16). Sage publications.
• Morgan, Gareth, & Smircich, L. (1980). The case for qualitative research. Academy of management review, 5(4), 491-500.
• Morgan, George. (2016). Global Islamophobia: Muslims and moral panic in the West. Routledge.
• Morse, J. M. (2016). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. New York: Routledge.
• Neuman, W. L., & Robson, K. (2014). Basics of social research. Pearson Canada Toronto.
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, inc.
• Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2006). Analyzing qualitative data. Qualitative research in health care, 63-81.
• Sandelowski, M. (1986). The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in nursing science.
• Seale, C. (1999). Quality in qualitative research. Qualitative inquiry, 5(4), 465-478.
• Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers college press.
• Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for information, 22(2), 63-75.
• Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative research. Sage.
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Sage publications.
• Şimşek, H., & Yıldırım, A. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of mixed methods research, 1(1), 77-100.