Research Article

Evaluation of Carbon Footprint Reduction Strategies in Sustainable Tourism: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach

Volume: 9 Number: 1 February 27, 2026
TR EN

Evaluation of Carbon Footprint Reduction Strategies in Sustainable Tourism: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach

Abstract

This study evaluates carbon footprint reduction strategies in sustainable tourism using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches, focusing on medium to large-scale tourism facilities. The tourism sector accounts for about 8–10% of global greenhouse gas emissions due to energy-intensive activities like transport and accommodation. To address this, an integrated MCDM model combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is proposed. AHP determines the weights of criteria, while TOPSIS ranks strategies based on proximity to the ideal solution. The model assesses alternatives under environmental, economic, and social dimensions. Results indicate that renewable energy use, energy efficiency improvements, and waste management are the most effective strategies. “Increasing renewable energy use” ranks highest, followed by “Expanding energy-efficient technologies” and “Promoting sustainable transport models.” The study contributes a comprehensive, multidimensional framework, addressing prior research limitations focused on isolated strategies, and offers actionable insights for policymakers and tourism operators. Future research may extend this framework to other regions and evaluate long-term impacts.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

This study is not included in the study group that requires TR Index Ethics Committee Approval.

References

  1. Abdelhafez, A., Hewedi, M. M., Abdelhakim, A. S., & Gaber, A. M. (2025). Stakeholders’ barriers analysis in reducing carbon footprint in Hurghada hotels. International Journal of Heritage, Tourism and Hospitality, 19(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.21608/ijhth.2025.363209.1064
  2. Abdulvahitoğlu, A., Vural, D., & Abdulvahitoğlu, A. (2023). Optimising traffic safety – locating traffic gendarmes based on multi-criteria decision making. Promet – Traffic & Transportation, 35(6), 800–813. https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v35i6.318
  3. Becken, S., & Hay, J. E. (2007). Tourism and climate change: Risks and opportunities. Multilingual Matters.
  4. Becken, S., & Patterson, M. (2006). Measuring national carbon dioxide emissions from tourism as a key step towards achieving sustainable tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 14(4), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.2167/jost547.0
  5. Bohdanowicz, P. (2006). Environmental awareness and initiatives in the Swedish and Polish hotel industries—Survey results. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 25(4), 662–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2005.06.006
  6. Dodds, R., & Graci, S. (2012). Sustainable tourism in island destinations. Routledge.
  7. Dolnicar, S., & Leisch, F. (2008). An investigation of tourists’ patterns of obligation to protect the environment. Journal of Travel Research, 46(4), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287507308330
  8. Erkan, T. E., & Elsharida, W. M. (2020). Combining AHP and ROC with GIS for airport site selection: A case study in Libya. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(5), 312. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9050312

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Sustainable Tourism

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

December 16, 2025

Publication Date

February 27, 2026

Submission Date

March 13, 2025

Acceptance Date

October 3, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 9 Number: 1

APA
Vural, D. (2026). Evaluation of Carbon Footprint Reduction Strategies in Sustainable Tourism: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach. GSI Journals Serie A: Advancements in Tourism Recreation and Sports Sciences, 9(1), 23-35. https://doi.org/10.53353/atrss.1657114
AMA
1.Vural D. Evaluation of Carbon Footprint Reduction Strategies in Sustainable Tourism: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach. ATRSS. 2026;9(1):23-35. doi:10.53353/atrss.1657114
Chicago
Vural, Danışment. 2026. “Evaluation of Carbon Footprint Reduction Strategies in Sustainable Tourism: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach”. GSI Journals Serie A: Advancements in Tourism Recreation and Sports Sciences 9 (1): 23-35. https://doi.org/10.53353/atrss.1657114.
EndNote
Vural D (February 1, 2026) Evaluation of Carbon Footprint Reduction Strategies in Sustainable Tourism: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach. GSI Journals Serie A: Advancements in Tourism Recreation and Sports Sciences 9 1 23–35.
IEEE
[1]D. Vural, “Evaluation of Carbon Footprint Reduction Strategies in Sustainable Tourism: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach”, ATRSS, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 23–35, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.53353/atrss.1657114.
ISNAD
Vural, Danışment. “Evaluation of Carbon Footprint Reduction Strategies in Sustainable Tourism: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach”. GSI Journals Serie A: Advancements in Tourism Recreation and Sports Sciences 9/1 (February 1, 2026): 23-35. https://doi.org/10.53353/atrss.1657114.
JAMA
1.Vural D. Evaluation of Carbon Footprint Reduction Strategies in Sustainable Tourism: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach. ATRSS. 2026;9:23–35.
MLA
Vural, Danışment. “Evaluation of Carbon Footprint Reduction Strategies in Sustainable Tourism: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach”. GSI Journals Serie A: Advancements in Tourism Recreation and Sports Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, Feb. 2026, pp. 23-35, doi:10.53353/atrss.1657114.
Vancouver
1.Danışment Vural. Evaluation of Carbon Footprint Reduction Strategies in Sustainable Tourism: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach. ATRSS. 2026 Feb. 1;9(1):23-35. doi:10.53353/atrss.1657114

Cited By

22039
All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license permits the copying, distribution, and reuse of the published articles (the work) for non-commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given. Commercial use is subject to permission. Authors retain the copyright of their published articles and grant the journal a non-exclusive right to publish and distribute the work.