Organizational Transparency

Öz

The unprecedented access to information enabled by information technologies is driving fundamental changes across all spheres - from production to consumption, and from daily life to public domains. The current information explosion has made information increasingly visible and central to modern life. While information has always been crucial throughout history, it has become particularly defining of our recent era through the combined forces of technology and globalization. Throughout history, as the concept of society has continuously evolved from agricultural to industrial and recently into an information society through technology's pervasive influence, transparency has emerged as a core society. The negative consequences of major scandals and corruption cases involving governmental bodies and organizations, particularly over the past few decades, have also been instrumental in establishing transparency as a fundamental value of this society. The environmental, economic, and social devastation caused by these incidents has led to increased pressure from employees, customers, and other stakeholders for greater organizational transparency. In today's environment of enhanced information accessibility and advocacy, transparency has taken on even greater significance, introducing new dynamics for organizations to navigate. In both academic discourse and everyday context, transparency has become a buzzword, characterizing various aspects - from transparent organization to transparent communication, from transparent climate to transparent leadership, from transparent governance to transparent processes (e.g. transparent recruitment policy, transparent financial reporting, transparent...). However, what really is meant by transparency? How does organizational transparency fit within these various applications? Based on these questions, this study presents a comprehensive literature review regarding the relatively novel concept of organizational transparency, including the definition of the concept, its historical roots, and the examination of its relationships with different organizational variables.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Organizational Transparency
• Accountability
• Information

Örgütsel Şeffaflık

Öz

Bilgi teknolojilerinin benzeri görülmemiş miktarda bilgiye erişim sağlaması üretimden tüketime, günlük yaşamdan kamusal alana kadar büyük değişimlere yol açmaktadır. Yaşanan bilgi patlaması, bilgiyi çok daha fazla görünür kılmakta ve onu hayatın merkezine taşımaktadır. Böylelikle evvel ezel önemli olan ‘‘bilgi’’, teknolojinin ve küreselleşmenin de etkisiyle yakın döneme damgasını vurmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, tarih boyunca değişim ve dönüşüm içerisinde devinen toplum kavramı, tarımdan sanayiye ve günümüzde teknolojinin hayatın her alanına nüfuz etmesiyle birlikte de bilgi toplumuna doğru evrimleşmektedir. ‘‘Şeffaflık’’ ise bilgi toplumunun sosyal değerlerinden biri olarak kabul edilmektedir. Özellikle son birkaç on yıllık süreç içerisinde, devlet yönetimleri ve örgütler ile ilgili yaşanan büyük çaplı skandalların ve yolsuzlukların yarattığı olumsuz sonuçlar, bu kavramın bilgi toplumunun bir değeri olarak benimsenmesinde büyük bir rol oynamıştır. Çevresel, ekonomik ve sosyal birçok yıkıma neden olan skandalların ve yolsuzlukların sonucunda çalışanların, müşterilerin ve diğer tüm paydaşların beklentileri; örgütlerin daha şeffaf davranması için bir baskı ortamı oluşturmaktadır. Yaşanan tüm bu gelişmelerle birlikte bilgiye erişimin çok daha kolay bir hale geldiği ve teşvik edildiği günümüzde şeffaflık, daha da önemli bir role bürünerek örgütler açısından birtakım farklı dinamikleri beraberinde getirmektedir. Gerek akademik gerekse gündelik hayatta şeffaflık; şeffaf örgütten şeffaf iletişime, şeffaf iklimden şeffaf liderliğe, şeffaf yönetişimden şeffaf süreçlere (ör. şeffaf işe alım politikası, şeffaf finansal raporlama, şeffaf…) kadar birçok farklı dinamiği ‘‘niteleyerek’’ dillere pelesenk olan bir kavram olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır... Peki ama ‘‘şeffaflık’’ ile tam olarak ne kastedilmektedir? Örgütsel şeffaflık bu kullanımların neresinde konumlanmaktadır? Bu sorulardan da yola çıkarak, bu çalışmada görece yeni sayılabilecek örgütsel şeffaflık kavramı ile ilgili yapılan kapsamlı literatür taraması paylaşılmakta; şeffaflığın tanımına, tarihsel kökenlerine değinilmekte ve örgütsel değişkenlerle olan ilişkisi incelenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• örgütsel şeffaflık
• hesap verebilirlik
• bilgi

Kaynakça

1. Adams, R. (2018, 8 Kasım). The illusion of transparency: Neoliberalism, depoliticisation and information as commodity. SSRN Electronic Journal. Erişim adresi: https://ssrn.com/abstract=795547
2. Alloa, E. (2018). Transparency: A magic concept of modernity. E. Alloa ve D. Thomä (Ed.). Transparency, Society and Subjectivity: Critical Perspectives (s. 21-55) içinde. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77161-8_3
3. Alloa, E. ve Thomä, D. (2018). Transparency: Thinking through an opaque concept. E. Alloa ve D., Thomä (Ed.). Transparency, Society and Subjectivity: Critical Perspectives (s. 1-15) içinde. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77161-8_1
4. Arslantaş, C. C. (2006). Örgütsel öğrenmenin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı üzerindeki etkisini belirlemeye yönelik görgül bir araştırma. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(3), 153-170. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gaziuiibfd/issue/28334/301133
5. Auger, G. A. (2014). Trust me, trust me not: An experimental analysis of the effect of transparency on organizations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(4), 325-343. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2014.908722
6. Avolio, B., Walumbwa, F. ve Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Management Department Faculty Publications, 60, 421-449. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621
7. Bakan, İ., Güler, B. ve Kara, E. (2017). Örgütsel demokrasinin örgütsel adalet ve örgütsel destek algıları üzerine etkileri: Otel çalışanlarına yönelik bir araştırma. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(4), 1031-1048. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sduiibfd/issue/52995/704346
8. Ball, C. (2009). What is transparency?. Public Integrity, 11(4), 293–308. doi:10.2753/pin1099-9922110400

9. Berger, C. R. ve Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(2), 99-112. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x
10. Berggren, E. ve Bernshteyn, R. (2007). Organizational transparency drives company performance. Journal of Management Development, 26(5), 411-417. doi:10.1108/02621710710748248
11. Bernstein, E. S. (2012). The transparency paradox: A role for privacy in organizational learning and operational control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57(2), 181–216. doi:10.1177/0001839212453028
12. Bernstein, E. (2014, Ekim). The transparency trap. Harvard Business Review Magazine. Erişim adresi: https://hbr.org/2014/10/the-transparency-trap.
13. Bird, J. J. ve Wang, C. (2013). Superintendents describe their leadership styles: Implications for practice. Management in Education, 27(1), 14–18. doi:10.1177/0892020612459287
14. Bordia, P., Hobman, E., Jones, E., Gallois, C. ve Callan, V. J. (2003). Uncertainty during organizational change: Types, consequences, and management strategies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18(4), 507–532. doi:10.1023/b:jobu.0000028449.99127.f7
15. Brough, P., Hassan, Z. ve O’Driscoll, M. (2014). Work-Life enrichment. M. Dollard, A. Shimazu, R. Bin Nordin, P. Brough ve M. Tuckey (Ed.). Psychosocial Factors at Work in the Asia Pacific (s. 323-336) içinde. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8975-2_17
16. Bushman, R. M. ve Smith, Abbie J. (2003, 7 Eylül). Transparency, financial accounting information, and corporate governance. Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 65-87. Erişim adresi: https://ssrn.com/abstract=795547
17. Cable, D. ve Birkinshaw, J. (2017). Too much information?. London Business School Review, 28(3), 6-9. doi:10.1111/2057-1615.12184
18. Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., Wayne, J. H. ve Grzywacz, J. G. (2006). Measuring the positive side of the work–family interface: Development and validation of a work–family enrichment scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(1), 131–164. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2005.02.002
19. Castaldo, S., Premazzi, K. ve Zerbini, F. (2010). The meaning(s) of trust. A content analysis on the diverse conceptualizations of trust in scholarly research on business relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(4), 657–668. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0491-4
20. Chamorro-Premuzic, T. ve Bailie, I. (2020, 21 Ekim). Tech is transforming people analytics. Is that a good thing?. Harvard Business Review Magazine. Erişim adresi: https://hbr.org/2020/10/tech-is-transforming-people-analytics-is-thata-good-thing
21. Christensen, L. T. ve Cornelissen, J. (2015). Organizational transparency as myth and metaphor. European Journal of Social Theory, 18(2), 132-149. doi:10.1177/1368431014555256
22. Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S. ve Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89-136. doi:10.1111/j.17446570.2010.01203.x
23. Congdon, C., Flynn, D. ve Redman, M. (October, 2014). Balancing “we” and “me”: The best collaborative spaces also support solitude. Harvard Business Review Magazine. Erişim adresi: https://hbr.org/2014/10/balancing-we-and-me-the-best-collaborative-spaces-also-support-solitude
24. Deniz, G. (2022). Otel işletmeleri işgörenlerinin kurumsal itibar algılarının aidiyet algıları üzerindeki etkisinde şeffaflığın aracılık rolü. Turizm Akademik Dergisi. 9(1), 1-15. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/touraj/is sue/70329/1077033
25. Ekin, T.B. (2019). The relationship between organizational transparency and employee engagement (Yayımlanmamış yüksel lisans tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul. Erbay, Ö.E., Turgut, T. ve Barış, Ö. (2018). Örgütsel adalet algısı. T. Turgut (Ed.). Örgütsel Davranış Gündemdeki Kavramlar (s. 1-21) içinde. İstanbul: Çağlayan Yayıncılık.
26. Farrell, M. (2016). Transparency. Journal of Library Administration, 56(4), 444-452. doi:10.1080/01930826.2016.1157426
27. Fenster, M. (2015). Transparency in search of a theory. European Journal of Social Theory, 18(2), 150–167. doi:10.1177/1368431014555257
28. Flood, M., Huisman, R., Koedijk, K. ve Mahieu, R. (1999). Quote disclosure and price discovery in multiple-dealer financial markets. Review of Financial Studies, 1, 37-59. Erişim adresi: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2645986
29. Fulmer, C. A. ve Gelfand, M. J. (2012). At what level (and in whom) we trust: Trust across multiple organizational levels. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1167–1230. doi: 10.1177/0149206312439327
30. George, J. F. (1996). Computer-Based monitoring: Common perceptions and emprical results. MIS Quarterly, 20(4), 459-480. Erişim adresi: https://www.jstor.org/stable/249564
31. Giles, M. (2018, 20 Mart). The cambridge analytica affair reveals facebook’s “transparency paradox”. MIT Technology Review. Erişim adresi: https://www.technologyreview.com/2018/03/20/144577/the-cambridge-analytica-affair-reveals-facebooks-transparency-paradox/
32. Gökçe, V. ve Levent, A. F. (2022). Okullarda şeffaflık ile örgütsel sinizm düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 55(55), 292-317. doi:10.15285/maruaebd.1029927
33. Green, D. (2018, 19 Mart). Ethics and People Analytics [Blog yazısı]. Erişim adresi: https://www.myhrfuture.com/blog/2018/3/19/ethics-people-analytics
34. Greenhaus, J. H. ve Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. The Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72-92. doi:10.2307/20159186
35. Hall, D.T., Schneider, B. ve Harold, T.N. (1970). Personal factors in organizational identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 176-190. doi:10.2307/2391488
36. Hartmann, F. ve Slapničar, S. (2012). Pay fairness and intrinsic motivation: The role of pay transparency. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(20), 4283-4300. doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.664962
37. Heise, J. A. (1985). Toward closing the confidence gap: An alternative approach to communication between public and government. Public Affairs Quarterly, 9, 196-217. Erişim adresi: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40862274
38. HRD Connect, (2024, 25 Haziran). The role of whistleblowing in modern workplaces. Erişim adresi: https://www.hrdconnect.com/2024/06/25/the-role-of-whistleblowing-in-modern-workplaces/
39. Jahansoozi, J. (2006). Organization‐stakeholder relationships: Exploring trust and transparency. Journal of Management Development, 25(10), 942-955. doi:10.1108/02621710610708577
40. Jiang, H. ve Men, L.R. (2017). Creating an engaged workforce: the impact of authentic leadership,transparent communication and work-life enrichment. Communication Research, 44(2), 225-243. doi:10.1177/0093650215613137
41. Jiang, H. ve Shen, H. (2020). Toward a relational theory of employee engagement: Understanding authenticity, transparency, and employee behaviors. International Journal of Business Communication, 60(3), 948-975. doi:10.1177/2329488420954236
42. Kaptein, M. (2008). Developing and testing a measure for the ethical culture of organizations: The corporate ethical virtues model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(7), 923-947. doi:10.1002/job.520
43. Karaevli, Ö. ve Levent, F. (2015). Okul yönetiminde şeffaflığın farklı kariyer evrelerinde bulunan öğretmenler üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 40(40), 89-108.Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/maruaebd/issue/389/2707
44. Karanika-Murray, M., Duncan, N., Pontes, H. M. ve Griffiths, M. D. (2015). Organizational identification, work engagement, and job satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(8), 1019-1033. doi:10.1108/jmp-11-2013-0359
45. Knobloch, L.K. (2015). Uncertainty reduction theory. C.R. Berger, M.E. Roloff, S.R. Wilson, J.P. Dillard, J. Caughlin ve D. Solomon (Ed.). The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication (s. 1-9) içinde. John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic144
46. Larsson, R., Bengtsson, L., Henriksson, K. ve Sparks, J. (1998). The interorganizational learning dilemma: Collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organization Science, 9, 285-305. doi:10.1287/or sc.9.3.285
47. Mael, F. A.ve Ashfort, B. E. (2001). Identification in work, war, sports, and religion: Contrasting the benefits and risks. Journal For The Theory of Social Behaviour, 31(2), 196-222. doi:10.1111/1468-5914.00154
48. Mavibaş, A. (2022). Spor bilimleri fakültelerindeki akademisyenlerin örgütsel etik iklim ve örgütsel şeffaflık algıları ile bilgi ifşa yönelimlerinin (whistleblowing) incelenmesi (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Atatürk Üniversitesi Kış Sporları ve Spor Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum. Mazutis, D. ve Slawinski, N. (2008). Leading organizational learning through authentic dialogue. Management Learning, 39, 437-456. doi:/10.1177/135050 7608093713
49. Meijer, A. (2015). Government transparency in historical perspective: From the ancient regime to open data in the netherlands. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(3), 189-199. doi:10.1080/01900692.2014.934837
50. Men, L. R. ve Hung-Baesecke, C. F. (2015). Engaging employees in China. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(4), 448-467. doi:10.1108/ccij-11-2014-0079
51. Men, L. R. ve Stacks, D. (2014). The effects of authentic leadership on strategic internal communication and employee-organization relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(4), 301-324. doi:10.1080/106 2726x.2014.908720
52. Men, L. R., O’Neil, J. ve Ewing, M. (2020a). From the employee perspective: organizations’ administration of ınternal social media and the relationship between social media engagement and relationship cultivation. International Journal of Business Communication, 60(2), 375-402. doi:10.1177/23 29488420949968
53. Men, L. R., O’Neil, J. ve Ewing, M. (2020b). Examining the effects of internal social media on employee engagement. Public Relations Review, 46(2). doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101880
54. Mishra, A. K. ve Mishra, K. E. (2013). The research on trust in leadership: The need for context. Journal of Trust Research, 3(1), 59-69. doi:10.1080/21 515581.2013.771507
55. Mott, P.E. (1972). The characteristics of effective organizations. New York: Harper&Row.
56. Nicolaou, A. I. ve McKnight, D. H. (2006). Perceived information quality in data exchanges: Effects on risk, trust, and intention to use. Information Systems Research, 17, 332-351. doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0103
57. Orhan, U. (2016). Yönetişimin hatalı karar vermeye etkisi: Çimento sektöründe bir araştırma. Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1). Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/uaifd/issue/21602/232010
58. Palanski, M.E., Kahai, S.S. ve Yammarino, F.J. (2011). Team virtues and performance: An examination of transparency, behavioral integrity, and trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(2), 201-216. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0650-7
59. Parreira, A., Moura, R. D. ve Lorga da Silva, A. (2019). Constitutional knowledge and its impact on citizenship exercise in a networked society. A. Melro ve L. Oliveira (Ed.). Knowledge Society: Participation, Transparency, and Trust as Factors of Citizenship (s. 27-54) içinde. IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-8350-9.ch002
60. Parris, D. L., Dapko, J. L., Arnold, R. W. ve Arnold, D. (2016). Exploring transparency: A new framework for responsible business management. Management Decision, 54(1), 222-247. doi:10.1108/md-07-2015-0279
61. Phillips, F., Yu, C.-Y., Hameed, T. ve El Akhdary, M. A. (2017). The knowledge society’s origins and current trajectory. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 1(3), 175-191. doi:10.1016/j.ijis.2017.08.001
62. Rawlins, B. (2009). Give the emperor a mirror: Toward developing a stakeholder measurement of organizational transparency. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(1), 71-99. doi:10.1080/10627260802153421
63. Ruppel, C., Stranzl, J. ve Einwiller, S. (2022). Employee-centric perspective on organizational crisis: How organizational transparency and support help to mitigate employees’ uncertainty, negative emotions and job disengagement. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 27(5), 1-22. doi:10.1108/CCIJ-04-2022-0045
64. Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-618.doi:10.1108/02683940610690169
65. Schnackenberg, A. K. ve Tomlinson, E. C. (2016). Organizational transparency. Journal of Management, 42(7), 1784-1810.doi:10.1177/0149206314525202
66. Schnackenberg, A. K., Tomlinson, E. ve Coen, C. (2020). The dimensional structure of transparency: A construct validation of transparency as disclosure, clarity, and accuracy in organizations. Human Relations, 74(10), 1628-1660. doi:10.1177/0018726720933317
67. Schyns, B., Torka, N. ve Gössling, T. (2007). Turnover intention and preparedness for change: Exploring leader‐member exchange and occupational self‐efficacy as antecedents of two employability predictors. Career Development International, 12(7), 660-679. doi:10.1108/13620430710834413
68. Seyfullahoğulları, Ç. A. (2018). İşten ayrılma niyeti. İstanbul: Türkmen Kitabevi.
69. Shore, L. M., Tetrick, L. E., Taylor, M. S., Shapiro, J. A.-M. C., Liden, R. C., Parks, J. M., Morrison, E. W., ... Dyne, L. (2004). The employee-organization relationship: A timely concept in a period of transition. J. J. Martocchio (Ed.). Research in personnel and human resources management (23, s. 291–370) içinde. Elsevier Science/JAI Press. doi:10.1016/S0742-7301(04)23007-9
70. Smit, B. W. ve Montag-Smit, T. (2018). The role of pay secrecy policies and employee secrecy preferences in shaping job attitudes. Human Resource Management Journal, 28(2), 304-324. doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12180 Strom, K. (2022, 30 Mart). On transparency [Blog yazısı]. Erişim adresi: https://ethicspolicy.unc.edu/new s/2022/03/30/on-transparency/
71. Teresi, M., Pietroni, D.D., Barattucci M., Giannella, V.A. ve Pagliaro, S. (2019). Ethical climate(s), organizational identification, and employees’ behavior. Front. Psychol. 10:1356. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01356
72. Thomä, D. (2018). Seeing it all, doing it all, saying it all: Transparency, subject, and the world. E. Alloa ve D. Thomä (Ed.). Transparency, Society and Subjectivity: Critical Perspectives (s. 57 – 84) içinde. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77161-8_4
73. Tinypulse, (2013). 7 vital trends disrupting today’s workplace. Erişim adresi: https://www.tinypulse.com/re sources/employee-engagement-survey-2013
74. Tomczak, D. L., Lanzo, L. A. ve Aguinis, H. (2018). Evidence-based recommendations for employee performance monitoring. Business Horizons, 61(2), 251-259. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2017.11.006
75. Ton, H. N. N., Nguyen, P. V., Vuong, L.T. ve Tran, H. Q. (2021). Employee engagement and best practices of internal public relations tomharvest job performance in organizations. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(3), 408-420. doi:10.21511/ppm.19(3).2021.33
76. Tosun, A. (2022). Örgütsel şeffaflık, örgütsel güven ve örgüt sağlığının okul etkililiğine etkisi (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Denizli. Turgut, T. (2011). Çalışmaya tutkunluk: iş yükü, esnek çalışma saatleri, yönetici desteği ve iş-aile çatışması ile ilişkileri. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 25 (3-4), 155-179. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.or g.tr/tr/pub/atauniiibd/issue/2703/35540
77. Tursunbayeva, A., Pagliari, C., Di Lauro, S. ve Antonelli, G. (2022). The ethics of people analytics: risks, opportunities and recommendations. Personnel Review, 51(3), 900-921. doi:10.1108/PR-12-2019-0680
78. United Nations (2016). Knowledge Societies Policy Handbook. Erişim adresi: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ar k:/48223/pf0000245654
79. Üçler, Ç. ve Taştan, S., (2017). Investigating the relations of psychological contract, organizational transparency and leader-member exchange with employee performance behaviors. İşte Davranış Dergisi, 2, 89-107.Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/idd/issue/28955/344708
80. Ünal, Z. M. ve Turgut, T. (2015). The buzzword: Employee engagement. Does person-organization fit have a contribution on employee engagement. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 8(2), 157-179. Erişim adresi: https://ijms.ut.ac.ir/article_52320.html
81. Van Vulpen, E. (2020, 7 Aralık). A practitioner’s guide to organizational effectiveness [Blog yazısı]. Erişim adresi: https://www.aihr.com/blog/organizational-effectiveness/
82. Vogelgesang, G.R. ve Lester, P.B. (2009). Transparency: How leaders can get results by laying it on the line. Organizational Dynamics, 38(4), 252-260. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2009.07.003
83. Vujnovic, M. ve Kruckeberg, D. (2016). Pitfalls and promises of transparency in the digital age. Public Relations Inquiry, 5(2), 121-143. doi:10.1177/2046147x16635227
84. Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., Avey, J. B. ve Oke, A. (2011). Authentically leading groups: The mediating role of collective psychological capital and trust. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(1), 4-24. doi:10.1002/job.653
85. Wehmeier, S. ve Raaz, O. (2012). Transparency matters: The concept of organizational transparency in the academic discourse. Public Relations Inquiry, 1(3), 337-366. doi:10.1177/2046147x12448580