Türkiye'nin Ara Ürünler Sorununa Stratejik Bir Çözüm: Ceyhan Enerji İhtisas Endüstri Bölgesi

Year 2019, Volume: 34 Issue: 3, 109 - 122, 30.09.2019

Fırat Ekinci Mehmet Bilgili

https://doi.org/10.21605/cukurovaummfd.637688

Abstract

Hem üretim hem de ara ürün ihtiyacını karşılamada hidrokarbon bileşiklerinden ve ara ürünlerden enerji için devam eden bir talep vardır. Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye’nin enerji ve ara ürünlere olan ihtiyacı, coğrafi olarak en yakın enerji bölgelerinden boru hatları aracılığıyla ithal edilen petrol ve doğal gaz ile sağlanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’de enerji talebine yönelik stratejik bir çözüm önerilmiştir. Ayrıca, Türkiye’nin enerji durumu, kimya sektörü ve ara mal ithalatı hakkında bilgi verilmektedir. Ceyhan Enerji İhtisas Sanayi Bölgesi'nde (CESIZ) Azerbaycan ve Irak’tan petrolün çıkışı ve Doğu Akdeniz bölgesinde potansiyel bir lojistik enerji üssü olarak kurulacak petrokimya tesislerinin gelişime açık kapasiteleri üzerine dikkate alınacak hususlar sunulmuştur. Türkiye’de ve yakın bölgedeki ilk enerji bölgesi olan Ceyhan Enerji İhtisas Sanayi Bölgesi tanıtılmıştır ve bölgeye kurulması planlanan petrokimya tesisleri hakkında yatırımcılar bilgilendirilmiştir. Ceyhan Enerji İhtisas Sanayi Bölgesi’nde kurulacak olan petrokimya tesisleri tarafından üretilen ara kimyasal ürünlerin, ülkenin dış ticaret açığını azaltmadaki önemi açıklanmıştır. Literatürde CESIZ konusunda yapılan çalışmaların yetersizliği nedeniyle, bu çalışma potansiyel yatırımcı ve akademisyenlere katkı sağlayacaktır.

Keywords

Enerji, Ara ürünler, Ceyhan enerji ihtisas sanayi bölgesi (CESIZ), Stratejik çözüm, Potansiyel lojistik enerji

A Strategic Solution to Turkey’s Intermediate Goods Problem: Ceyhan Energy Specialized Industrial Zone

Abstract

There is an on-going demand for energy from hydrocarbon compounds and intermediate goods in meeting the need for both production and intermediate products. The European Union and Turkey’s need for energy and intermediate goods are provided by petroleum and natural gas imported from geographically nearest energy regions through pipelines. In this study, a strategic solution to demand for energy in Turkey is proposed. Furthermore, information about the energy status, the chemical sector and intermediate goods imports of Turkey is provided. Considerations are proposed on the capabilities of petrochemical plants to be established in Ceyhan Energy Specialized Industrial Zone (CESIZ) as an outlet of petroleum from Azerbaijan and Iraq and a potential logistic energy base in the Eastern Mediterranean region. Ceyhan Energy Specialized Industrial Zone, as the first energy zone in Turkey and the nearby region, is introduced and the investors are briefed on the petrochemical facilities planned to be established in the zone. The importance of intermediate chemical products produced by petrochemical plants to be established in Ceyhan Energy Specialized Industrial Zone in reducing the country’s foreign trade deficit is revealed. Due to lack of studies conducted on CESIZ in the literature, this study would contribute to potential investors and academicians.

Keywords

Energy, Intermediate goods, Ceyhan energy specialized industrial zone (CESIZ), Strategic solution, Potential logistic energy

References

• 1. IEA, 2016. International Energy Agency. Energy statistics manual. Accessed September 8, 2018. https://www.iea.org.
• 2. Bilgili, M., Bilirgen, H., Ozbek, A., Ekinci, F., Demirdelen, T., 2018. The Role of Hydropower Installations for Sustainable Energy Development in Turkey and the world, Renewable Energy 126, 755-764.
• 3. Konoplyanik, A.A., 2012. Russian Gas at European Energy Market: Why Adaptation is Inevitable, Energy Strategy Reviews 1, 42-56.
• 4. Sirin, S.M., 2017. A Panel Data Analysis on the Costs of Turkish Electricity Distribution Companies, Energy Strategy Reviews 18, 250-259.
• 5. Ruble, I., 2017. European Union Energy Supply Security: The Benefits of Natural Gas Imports from the Eastern Mediterranean, Energy Policy 105, 341-353.
• 6. Kok, B., Benli, H., 2017. Energy Diversity and Nuclear Energy for Sustainable Development in Turkey, Renewable Energy 111, 870-877.
• 7. Ozturk, M., Yuksel, Y.E., Ozek, N., 2011. A Bridge Between East and West: Turkey’s natural Gas Policy, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15, 4286-4294.
• 8. Dastan, S.A., Selcuk, O., 2016. Review of the Security of Supply in Turkish Energy Markets: Lessons from the Winter Shortages, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 59, 958-971.
• 9. Akdemir, I.O., 2011. Global Energy Circulation, Turkey’s Geographical Location and Petropolitics, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 19, 71-80.
• 10. BP, 2016. British Petroleum, World Energy Statics Report. Accessed September 4, 2018. www.bp.com.
• 11. TSI, 2016. Turkish Statistical Institute, Annual Report. Accessed October 1, 2018. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/.
• 12. Ibrahim, S.A., 2016. Maintaining the energy Security of Turkey in the Era of Geopolitical Turmoil, Discussion Paper no. 17., Durham University, HH Sheikh Nasser Al-Sabah Programme, Durham.
• 13. TEIAS, 2018. Turkish Electricity Transmission Company, Electricity Statistics. Accessed September 16, 2018. https://www.teias.gov.tr/.
• 14. Austvika, O.G., Rzayevab, G., 2017. Turkey in the Geopolitics of Energy, Energy Policy 107, 539-547.
• 15. IEA, 2016. International Energy Agency. Energy Policies of IEA Countries, Turkey. Accessed September 8, 2018. https://www.iea.org.
• 16. Austvik, O.G., Lembo, C. 2017. EU-Russian gas Trade and the Shortcomings of International Law, Journal of World Trade 4, 645-674.
• 17. BOTAS, 2016. Petroleum Pipeline Company, Gas Supply Contracts. Accessed September 3, 2018. http://www.botas.gov.tr/.
• 18. EMRA, 2016. Energy Market Regulatory Authority, Annual report. Accesseed September 7, 2018. http://www.enerji.gov.tr/.
• 19. Elder, M., 2009. Behind the Russia–Ukraine gas conflict, Business Week. Accessed September 6, 2018. http://www.businessweek.com.tr/.
• 20. GAZPROM, 2016. Public Joint Stock Company. Accessed September 29, 2018. www.gazprom.com.
• 21. Younkyoo, K., Stephen, B., 2015. The New Great Game of Caspian Energy in 2013-14: ‘Turk Stream’, Russia and Turkey, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 18, 37-55.
• 22. Tagliapietra, S., 2015. Turkey and the Regional Natural Gas Geopolitics. The “Hub Vision” in Light of the Future Prospects of the Southern Gas Corridor. Quad. Mediterrian. 22, 177-184.
• 23. RTME, 2016. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Economy, Chemical Sector. Accessed September 13, 2018. https://www.ekonomi.gov. tr/.
• 24. RTMSIT, 2014. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology, Chemical Sector Report. Accessed September 14, 2018. https://www.sanayi.gov.tr/.
• 25. CEFIC, 2016. European Chemical Industry Council, Annual Report. Accessed September 5, 2018. http://www.cefic.org/.
• 26. ITC, 2016. International Trade Center, Annual Report. Accessed September 12, 2018. http://www.intracen.org/.
• 27. TUPRAŞ, 2017. Turkey Petroleum Refineries Inc., Annual Report. Accessed October 2, 2018. https://www.tupras.com.tr/.
• 28. SOCAR, the State Oil Company of the Azerbaijan Republic, Annual Report. Accessed September 15, 2018. http://www.socar.az/socar /en/home.
• 29. BIST, 2016. (Borsa İstanbul), Annual Report.
• 30. Kearney, A.T., 2015. Ceyhan specialized energy zone report, Adana Chamber of Industry.