YAPAY ZEKÂNIN SOSYAL VE AKADEMİK TEMSİLİ: TÜRKİYE ADRESLİ YAYINLARDA BİBLİYOMETRİK VE SÖYLEMSEL EĞİLİMLER

Veysel Bilal Arslankara

doi:10.35379/cusosbil.1695604

TR EN

Abstract

YAPAY ZEKÂNIN SOSYAL VE AKADEMİK TEMSİLİ: TÜRKİYE ADRESLİ YAYINLARDA BİBLİYOMETRİK VE SÖYLEMSEL EĞİLİMLER

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye adresli yapay zekâ (YZ) temalı akademik yayınların sosyal ve akademik temsillerini hem bibliyometrik hem de söylemsel olarak incelemektir. Araştırmada, 2022-2025 yılları arasında yayımlanan 957 akademik makale analiz edilmiş olup yıllara göre dağılım, anahtar kelime frekansları, yazar kurum üretkenliği ve atıf yapısı gibi göstergeler ortaya konmuştur. Bibliyometrik bulgular, YZ’nin özellikle eğitim, sağlık ve etik gibi disiplinlerde yoğunlaştığını ve ChatGPT, Gemini gibi üretken YZ araçlarının öne çıktığını göstermektedir. Nitel doküman analizi ile gerçekleştirilen içerik çözümlemesinde ise maksimum çeşitlilik örneklemesi yoluyla belirlenen 250 makale incelenmiş olup YZ’nin sosyal rollerle (öğretmen, rehber, karar destekleyici), insani özelliklerle (öğrenme, empati, özerklik) ve felsefi zeminlerle (araçsalcı, determinist) temsil edildiği saptanmıştır. Ayrıca YZ’nin etik, hukuki ve kültürel boyutları üzerine hem ütopyacı hem de distopyacı anlatılar geliştirildiği gözlemlenmiştir. Bu çalışma, YZ’nin Türkiye’deki akademik söylemdeki çok boyutlu konumunu görünür kılmakta ve disiplinlerarası eğilimlerin haritalanmasına katkı sunmaktadır.

Keywords

THE SOCIAL AND ACADEMIC REPRESENTATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: BIBLIOMETRIC AND DISCURSIVE TRENDS IN PUBLICATIONS FROM TÜRKİYE

Abstract

This study aims to examine the social and academic representations of artificial intelligence (AI) in academic publications affiliated with Türkiye through both bibliometric and linguistic analyses. A total of 957 academic articles published between 2022 and 2025 were analyzed, revealing indicators such as publication trends by year, keyword frequencies, institutional productivity, and citation structures. The bibliometric findings demonstrate that AI research is particularly concentrated in disciplines such as education, health, and ethics, with generative AI tools such as ChatGPT and Gemini standing out. In the qualitative document analysis phase, 250 articles selected through maximum variation sampling were examined, and it was found that AI is represented through social roles (teacher, guide, decision-support agent), human-like attributes (learning, empathy, autonomy), and philosophical underpinnings (instrumentalism, determinism). Furthermore, both utopian and dystopian narratives regarding the ethical, legal, and cultural dimensions of AI were observed. This study makes the multidimensional position of AI within Türkiye’s academic discourse visible and contributes to mapping interdisciplinary trends.

Keywords

References

Alan, H., Güneş, M. H., Gökçe, Y., & Yalçın, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence and grand challenges: A bibliometric and thematic analysis. Preprints. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202406.0456
Alioğulları, E., Tüylü, D. & Sağıroğlu, A. (2025). Examining artificial intelligence and ethics in education with bibliometric analysis. In E. Alioğulları, D. Tüylü & A. Sağıroğlu (Eds.), Examining Artificial Intelligence and Ethics in Education With Bibliometric Analysis (pp. 1-30). IGI Global. https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/examining-artificial-intelligence-and-ethics-in-education-with-bibliometric-analysis/368512
Alper, A. E., & Alper, F. Ö. (2020). Industry 4.0 revolution and its impacts on labor markets. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 29(3), 441-460. https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.746361
Arslan, K. (2020). Eğitimde yapay zeka ve uygulamaları. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(1), 71-88.
Arslankara, V. B., & Usta, E. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence as a lifelong learning self efficacy: Usage and competence scale. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning, 6(2), 288-302. https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1489304
Arslankara, V. B., & Usta, E. (2025). Development and validation of the lifelong artificial ıntelligence ethical awareness scale (laieas). Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning, 7(2), 319-329. https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1813310
Aydın, N. (2024). Türkiye’de yapay zekâ alanında yapılan çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 27(52), 387-407. https://doi.org/10.31795/baunsobed.1545006
Aydoğmuş, H. Y., Aydoğmuş, U, & Türkan, Y. S. (2025). An in-depth bibliometric analysis to understand the impact and future of artificial intelligence in higher education. In H. Y. Aydogmus, U. Aydoğmuş, & Y. S. Türkan (Eds.), An In-Depth Bibliometric Analysis to Understand the Impact and Future of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education (pp. 117-152). IGI Global. https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/an-in-depth-bibliometric-analysis-to-understand-the-impact-and-future-of-artificial-intelligence-in-higher-education/368516

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Bircan, T., & Salah, A. A. A. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of the use of artificial intelligence in social sciences. Mathematics, 10(23), 4398.
Boztaş, G.D., Berigel, M. & Altınay, F. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of Educational Data Mining studies in global perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 8961-8985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12170-0
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bulut, M., Bulut, A., Kaban, A. & Kırbaş, A. (2023). Keyword survey and thematic focuses in educational research: A review of 2023. In M. Shelley, V. Akerson, & M. Unal (Eds.), Proceedings of IConSES 2023-- International Conference on Social and Education Sciences (pp. 515-527), Las Vegas, NV, USA. ISTES Organization.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Çetin, F. A., Öztürk, S. & Akarsu, O. N. (2024). Pazarlama ve muhasebede yapay zeka kullanımı: Görsel haritalama teknikleri ile bibliyometrik analiz. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Alanında Uluslararası Çalışmalar ve Değerlendirmeler. Serüven Yayınevi.
Çifci, B. S., & Şahin Başfırıncı, Ç. (2020). Yapay zeka konusunun toplumsal cinsiyet kapsamında incelenmesi: Mesleklere yönelik bir araştırma. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 29(4), 183-203. https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.819510
Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Business Review.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319-340.
Durak, G., Çankaya, S., Özdemir, D. & Can, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A bibliometric study on its role in transforming teaching and learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 219-244. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7757
Gökçe, Y., Çavuşoğlu, S., Göral, M., Bayatkara, Y., Bükey, A. & Gökçe, F. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of the technology acceptance model and the use of robots in tourism studies, Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 16(2), 178-189. https://doi.org/10.1108/WHATT-03-2024-0057
Gökdaş, İ., Karacaoğlu, Ö.C. & Özkaya, A. (2024). COVID-19 and teachers’ digital competencies: a comprehensive bibliometric and topic modeling analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 147. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04335-0
Gündoğdu, A., & Benzer, S. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of articles published on artificial intelligence in education during the last five years in Türkiye. The Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Human Sciences, 1(1), 15–28. https://yzib.com.tr/index.php/yzib/article/view/4
Gürkan, S., Duran, S., & Duran, V. (2024). Unveiling missing themes: An analysis of gender bias through artificial intelligence assisted bibliometric analysis. Kahramanmaraş İstiklal Üniversitesi Psikoloji Dergisi, 2(2), 1-24.
Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004
Karakose, T., Leithwood, K., & Tülübaş, T. (2024). The intellectual evolution of educational leadership research: A combined bibliometric and thematic analysis using SciMAT. Education Sciences, 14(4), 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040429
Karaoğlan Yılmaz, F. G., & Yılmaz, R. (2023). Adaptation of the artificial intelligence literacy scale into Turkish. Journal of Information and Communication Technologies, 5(2), 172-190. https://doi.org/10.53694/bited.1376831
Keser Ateş, S., Kaleci, F., & Erdoğan, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence in education: A bibliometric analysis. Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 14-36. Kırtıl, İ. G., & Aşkun, V. (2021). Artificial intelligence in tourism: a review and bibliometrics research. Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research, 9(1), 205-233.
Laupichler, M. C., Aster, A., Haverkamp, N., & Raupach, T. (2023). Development of the “scale for the assessment of non-experts’ YZ literacy” - An exploratory factor analysis. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 12, 100338.
Metli, A. (2023). Articles on education and artificial intelligence: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 11(2), 145-162.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
OECD (2021), OECD Digital education outlook 2021: Pushing the frontiers with artificial ıntelligence, blockchain and robots, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/589b283f-en
Ok, G., Kaya, D., & Kutluca, T. (2025). Artificial intelligence for a sustainable future in the 21st century: Impacts and reflections on education. Discourse and Communication in Sustainable Education, 16(1), 109-136.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 2.
Sur, Ö. (2025). Türkiye’de yapay zeka araştırmalarının bibliyometrik analizi (1992-2024), içinde Ed. R. Bayrak & V. Çavuş, Yapay Zeka ve Disiplinlerarası Yaklaşımlar, Çizgi Kitabevi: Konya.
UNESCO. (2021). YZ and education: Guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000376709
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Wahid, S. H. (2024). Exploring the intersection of Islam and digital technology: A bibliometric analysis. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 101085.
Yılmaz, G., & Şahin-Yılmaz, A. (2024). An overview of chatbots in tourism and hospitality using bibliometric and thematic content analysis Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 16(2), 232-256. https://doi.org/10.1108/whatt-03-2024-0069

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Communication and Media Studies (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Veysel Bilal Arslankara ^*
0000-0002-9062-9210
Türkiye

Publication Date

July 21, 2026

Submission Date

May 10, 2025

Acceptance Date

November 21, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 35

DOI

https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1695604

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA96BZ47DS

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Arslankara, V. B. (2026). YAPAY ZEKÂNIN SOSYAL VE AKADEMİK TEMSİLİ: TÜRKİYE ADRESLİ YAYINLARDA BİBLİYOMETRİK VE SÖYLEMSEL EĞİLİMLER. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 35. https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1695604

AMA

1.Arslankara VB. YAPAY ZEKÂNIN SOSYAL VE AKADEMİK TEMSİLİ: TÜRKİYE ADRESLİ YAYINLARDA BİBLİYOMETRİK VE SÖYLEMSEL EĞİLİMLER. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2026;35. doi:10.35379/cusosbil.1695604

Chicago

Arslankara, Veysel Bilal. 2026. “YAPAY ZEKÂNIN SOSYAL VE AKADEMİK TEMSİLİ: TÜRKİYE ADRESLİ YAYINLARDA BİBLİYOMETRİK VE SÖYLEMSEL EĞİLİMLER”. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 35 (July). https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1695604.

EndNote

Arslankara VB (July 1, 2026) YAPAY ZEKÂNIN SOSYAL VE AKADEMİK TEMSİLİ: TÜRKİYE ADRESLİ YAYINLARDA BİBLİYOMETRİK VE SÖYLEMSEL EĞİLİMLER. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 35

IEEE

[1]V. B. Arslankara, “YAPAY ZEKÂNIN SOSYAL VE AKADEMİK TEMSİLİ: TÜRKİYE ADRESLİ YAYINLARDA BİBLİYOMETRİK VE SÖYLEMSEL EĞİLİMLER”, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 35, July 2026, doi: 10.35379/cusosbil.1695604.

ISNAD

Arslankara, Veysel Bilal. “YAPAY ZEKÂNIN SOSYAL VE AKADEMİK TEMSİLİ: TÜRKİYE ADRESLİ YAYINLARDA BİBLİYOMETRİK VE SÖYLEMSEL EĞİLİMLER”. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 35 (July 1, 2026). https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1695604.

JAMA

1.Arslankara VB. YAPAY ZEKÂNIN SOSYAL VE AKADEMİK TEMSİLİ: TÜRKİYE ADRESLİ YAYINLARDA BİBLİYOMETRİK VE SÖYLEMSEL EĞİLİMLER. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2026;35. doi:10.35379/cusosbil.1695604.

MLA

Arslankara, Veysel Bilal. “YAPAY ZEKÂNIN SOSYAL VE AKADEMİK TEMSİLİ: TÜRKİYE ADRESLİ YAYINLARDA BİBLİYOMETRİK VE SÖYLEMSEL EĞİLİMLER”. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 35, July 2026, doi:10.35379/cusosbil.1695604.

Vancouver

1.Veysel Bilal Arslankara. YAPAY ZEKÂNIN SOSYAL VE AKADEMİK TEMSİLİ: TÜRKİYE ADRESLİ YAYINLARDA BİBLİYOMETRİK VE SÖYLEMSEL EĞİLİMLER. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2026 Jul. 1;35. doi:10.35379/cusosbil.1695604

The rules that must be followed when writing articles to be sent to the journal are summarized below:

1. Çukurova University Journal of Social Sciences Institute is a refereed journal published in Continuous Publication Model.

2. The article to be sent must not have been published anywhere before.

3. Articles can be published in Turkish, English, French or German. If the article is written in English, French or German, a Turkish abstract and title must be included.

4. Articles must be written in accordance with the Turkish Language Association spelling rules.

5. Articles must be written in Microsoft Word 2003 or later versions and sent online via the internet.

6. The title of the article must be appropriate to the text, centered; short and clear; written in capital letters.

7. The author's name must be centered in the article; if there is more than one author, their names must be written side by side. Information about the authors (University name, Faculty name, e-mail address, Orcid No) must be given in a footnote.

8. The first page of the article should consist of only ABSTRACT and ABSTRACT, and this page should be created by placing it in the Article Template (see Article Template)

9. Paper size in articles: A-4 vertical, page structure bottom: 2.5 cm, top: 2.5 cm, left: 2.5 cm, right: 2.5 cm, header: 3 cm, footer: 3 cm, font: Times New Roman, point: 10, line spacing: single. The entire article should not exceed 8000 words.

10. Footnotes should be written in Times New Roman font, 8 point and line spacing “single”. Footnotes should not be used except for notes on old-lettered text studies and important explanations about the study.

11. The abstract should be written in 8 point and Times New Roman font. It should consist of one paragraph (even if it consists of several paragraphs, it should fit into one paragraph), and line spacing should be set to “single”. It should consist of at least 150 and at most 200 words. The abstract should be placed in capital letters on the left side of the text.

12. In original articles, sections should be organized as follows:
INTRODUCTION (maximum 3 pages)
LITERATURE REVIEW
METHOD
RESEARCH FINDINGS
CONCLUSION

13. The main section headings above should be written in bold, capital letters, aligned to the left. Headings should not be numbered, and there should be no paragraph indentation.

14. Subsection headings should be written in bold, with the first letter of each word capitalized, and should start 0.5 cm. indentation. All paragraph indents should be aligned.

15. If tables are to be included in the text, they should be shown as follows: “Table 1.”. The name of the table should be written centered above the table, with the first letter of each word capitalized, and should not be italicized. In figures, it should be written centered under the figure, with the word “Figure 1.” capitalized. Figures and graphics should be drawn on the computer; photos or pictures should have high resolution and should be numbered.

16. If hypotheses will be included in the study, the hypothesis indication should be as follows: “H1:”. Hypotheses should not be written in italics.

17. The sources used in the article should be given under the title “RESOURCES” after the “RESULTS” section. It should be prepared with Times New Roman font, 10 points, right-left 0, hanging 1.25, and line spacing “single”. 1 line space should be left after each source.

18. The sources in the article should be written in accordance with APA 7 (https://apastyle.apa.org/) style.

Guidelines for writing articles to be sent to the journal:

1. The Journal of Institute of Social Sciences of Çukurova University is a peer-reviewed journal published Continious Publication Model.
2. Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere.
3. The articles can be written in Turkish, English, French or German. If the article has been written in English, French or German, a summary in Turkish must also be included.
4. The articles should be written in accordance with the spelling rules of the Turkish Language Association.
5. Articles should be written in Microsoft Word 2003 or higher and they should be submitted through the online system.
6. Use a concise and clearly written title that reflects the paper's content. Use capital letters and center alignment.
7. Author names should be center aligned on the article; if there is more than one author, their names should be written side by side. Authorship information (University name, Faculty name, e-mail address, ORCID number) should be given in the footnote.
8. The first page of the article should consist of only SUMMARY and ABSTRACT using the Article Template (see Article Template).
9. Please adhere to the following formatting guidelines: a. Paper size: A-4 vertical b. Page layout: bottom 2.5 cm, top: 2.5 cm, left: 2.5 cm, right: 2.5 cm, header: 3 cm, footer: 3 cm.
c. Font: Times New Roman

Ethical Principles

This guideline should be carefully reviewed by all researchers who will submit a study to the Journal.

Çukurova University Journal of Social Sciences Institute is a peer-reviewed journal published in accordance with the ethical principles and rules specified below, with the aim of publishing qualified scientific articles in the field of Social Sciences.
Articles sent to Çukurova University Journal of Social Sciences Institute are evaluated through a double-blind peer-review process.
The journal is published electronically with free access.
The journal only accepts articles through the Dergi Park system.
Çukurova University Journal of Social Sciences Institute is a journal aware of the fact that information must be easily accessible in order for scientific studies to advance, and supports the initiative to make refereed journal literature open access, as stated in the Budapest Open Access Declaration, and offers all published articles in an environment where everyone can read and download them, free of charge.
In this declaration, open access is used in the sense that “scientific literature can be accessed, read, saved, copied, printed, scanned, linked to full text, indexed, transferred to software as data and used for any lawful purpose via the Internet without financial, legal and technical barriers”.
Considering the role of knowledge sharing in the advancement of science, open access is of great importance for researchers and readers. For this reason, articles in this journal can be used as long as the author and original source are cited. Permission from authors or publishers is not required.
It is aimed that all stakeholders (author, editor, referee, publisher and reader) who present a scientific study contribute to the correct advancement of science. In accordance with this goal, compliance with scientific ethical principles is important in scientific studies prepared.
These ethical principles have been accepted by us based on the guidelines prepared by COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) and are presented below with some of them, with the recommendation that stakeholders adopt them as well.
Accordingly, the ethical responsibilities, roles and duties of authors, journal editor, referees and publisher are included in our Journal. In addition, information is provided regarding plagiarism and unethical behaviors in Çukurova University Social Sciences Institute Journal. The sources used while preparing these policies are stated at the end of the guide.

Author(s)
• Articles sent to Çukurova University Social Sciences Institute Journal must be original studies in the field of Social Sciences.

All sources used in the articles (authors, online pages, personal interviews, etc.) must be cited correctly and appropriately.

• It must be stated that the articles sent to the journal have not been sent to another journal and the Copyright Transfer Form must be filled out.

People who have not contributed to the article intellectually should not be listed as authors.

• Conflicts of interest regarding the submitted article must be stated and the reason must be explained.

• Authors may be asked to submit the raw data of their work to the editorial board during the refereeing process, in which case the authors are expected to share their raw data with the editorial board. Authors are obliged to keep the data related to a published article for 5 years.

• Authors must inform the editor and the editorial board when they detect an error in their work and cooperate for the correction or retraction process.

Authors cannot use language and attitudes that degrade or belittle any individual, community or institution in their articles.

Referees
All articles sent to Çukurova University Journal of Social Sciences are evaluated with a double-blind refereeing process. Double-blind refereeing means that authors are kept confidential from referees and referees are kept confidential from authors in order to ensure an impartial, objective and independent evaluation process.
Articles are sent to the referees for evaluation through the Dergi Park system.
Referees are required to fill out a form that includes the contribution of the article they are evaluating to their field, their decisions on whether the article is publishable or not, and the reasons for these decisions.
The ethical responsibilities and roles of referees of Çukurova University Journal of Social Sciences are as follows:
• Referees are required to referee articles related to their fields of expertise only.
• Referees are expected to agree to referee articles that do not have any conflicts of interest. If referees discover any conflicts of interest, they must inform the editor and decline to referee the relevant article.

• Referees must evaluate articles impartially and objectively.

• Referees are required to fill out the Referee Evaluation Form for the articles they evaluate, and

İmtiyaz Sahibi (Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Adına)

Hüseyin GÜLER

Econometric and Statistical Methods, Statistics

Editor

Mustafa YAŞAR

Psychological Counseling Education, Adult Education, Early Childhood Education, Educational Psychology

Mizanpaj Editörü

Mustafa Can KIZGINDEMIR

Information Systems User Experience Design and Development, Visual Communication Design, Graphic Design, Video Design, Web Design

Son Okuyucu

Ayşenur SÖYÜ

Psychology of Religion, Religious Studies (Other)

Alan Editörü

C. Hakan ÇUHADAR

Music, Interpretation in Western Classical Music, Theories of Music, Musicology and Ethnomusicology

Marella BODUR ÜN

Comparative Political Movement, Gender and Politics, Political Sociology, European Union-Turkiye Relations, Globalisation, International Relations Theories

Engin ÇETIN

Turkish Language and Literature, Old Turkic Language (Orhon, Uyghur, Karahan), Historical North East Turkish Language (Khwarezm, Kipchak, Chagatai)

Ebru ÖZGÜR GÜLER

Econometric and Statistical Methods, Quantitative Decision Methods

NÖ

Nurcihan ÖZDOĞAN

Equity and Trusts Law

EK

Ebru KAYA

English As A Second Language

AB

Ayten Pınar BAL

Education, Curriculum and Instration , Mathematics Education

Nuran ÖZTÜRK

Turkish Islamic Literature, Classical Turkish Literature of Ottoman Field

Fehime Yeşim GÜRANI

Built Environment and Design, Interior Architecture , Sustainable Architecture

Fatma ŞAHIN

Archaeological Science, Ceramics in Archeology, Early Bronze Age Archeology, Neolithic Age Archeology, The Archaeology of Middle Bronze Age

Aydın ÇAM

Cinema Sociology, Cinema Theories, Cinema History

Birsel AYBEK

Education

AB

Almıla BURGAÇ ÇIL

International Economics

Raziye GÜNAY BILALOĞLU

Early Childhood Education

Mustafa MAVAŞOĞLU

Applied Linguistics and Educational Linguistics

Özlem USLU

Fine Arts Education, Museum Education, Photography, Interdisciplinary Art, Installation

İÜ

İlksun Didem ÜLBEĞI

Industrial Organisation, Entrepreneurship, Organizasyon, Organisation and Management Theory, Organisational Planning and Management, Organisational Behaviour, Strategy, Management and Organisational Behaviour (Other)