Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori ve Uygulama’nın (2014–2025) Bibliyometrik Analizi

Zülfü Demirtaş; Müslim Alanoğlu; Alper Uslukaya; Cihat Turan

doi:10.58689/eibd.1946766

TR EN

Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori ve Uygulama’nın (2014–2025) Bibliyometrik Analizi

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori ve Uygulama dergisinde 2014–2025 yılları arasında yayımlanan makalelerin bibliyometrik özelliklerini incelemektir. Araştırma, betimsel bibliyometrik analiz deseninde yürütülmüştür. Veri setini, belirtilen yıllar arasında yayımlanan toplam 187 makale oluşturmaktadır. Veriler TR Dizin dergi arşivinden elde edilmiş; başlık, yayın yılı, yazar anahtar kelimeleri, araştırma yöntemleri, yayın dili, yazar ve kurum bilgileri ile atıf göstergeleri analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sürecinde makaleler yıllara ve sayılara göre sınıflandırılmış; yayın üretkenliği ve sayı başına düşen makale oranları hesaplanmıştır. Yazar anahtar kelimeleri standartlaştırılarak tematik gruplar oluşturulmuş ve dönemsel dağılımlar incelenmiştir. Araştırma yöntemleri nicel, nitel, karma ve derleme/kuramsal kategorilerinde sınıflandırılmıştır. Bulgular, derginin zaman içerisinde yayın üretkenliğini artırdığını ve özellikle son dönemde sayı başına düşen makale oranının yükseldiğini göstermektedir. Tematik açıdan çalışmaların ağırlıklı olarak öğretmen yetiştirme, eğitim yönetimi ve alan eğitimi konularında yoğunlaştığı belirlenmiştir. Araştırma yöntemleri bakımından nitel ve nicel çalışmaların öne çıktığı, karma ve derleme/kuramsal çalışmaların ise sınırlı düzeyde kaldığı görülmüştür. Makale başına ortalama yazar sayısı 1.86 olarak hesaplanmış ve bireysel ile ortak yazarlığın birlikte varlığını sürdürdüğü anlaşılmıştır. Yayınların büyük çoğunluğunun Türkçe olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Atıf göstergeleri, makalelerin %58.3’ünün en az bir atıf aldığını, makale başına ortalama atıf sayısının 2.41 olduğunu ve dergi öz atıf oranının %4.21 düzeyinde gerçekleştiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Atıf göstergeleri, derginin ulusal akademik literatürde belirli bir görünürlük düzeyine ulaştığına işaret etmektedir.

Keywords

Bibliometric Analysis of Education and Human Sciences: Theory and Practice (2014–2025)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the bibliometric characteristics of articles published in the Journal of Education and Humanities: Theory and Practice between 2014 and 2025. The research was conducted using a descriptive bibliometric analysis design. The dataset comprises a total of 187 articles published during the specified years. The data were obtained from the TR Dizin journal archive; the title, year of publication, author keywords, research methods, language of publication, author and institutional details, and citation indicators were analysed. During the analysis, articles were classified by year and issue; publication productivity and the ratio of articles per issue were calculated. Author keywords were standardised to form thematic groups, and their distribution over time was examined. Research methods were classified into quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods and review/theoretical categories. The findings indicate that the journal has increased its publication output over time and that the number of articles per issue has risen, particularly in the recent period. From a thematic perspective, it was determined that the studies were predominantly concentrated on teacher training, educational management and subject-specific education. In terms of research methods, it was observed that qualitative and quantitative studies predominated, whilst mixed-methods and review/theoretical studies remained limited in scope. The average number of authors per article was calculated as 1.86, and it was found that both individual and co-authorship continued to co-exist. It was established that the vast majority of publications were in Turkish. Citation metrics reveal that 58.3 per cent of the articles received at least one citation, the average number of citations per article was 2.41, and the journal’s self-citation rate stood at 4.21 per cent. These citation metrics indicate that the journal has achieved a certain level of visibility within the national academic literature.

Keywords

References

Al, U., & Çoştur, R. (2007). Türk psikoloji dergisi’nin bibliyometrik profili. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 21(2), 142-163. https://izlik.org/JA96MJ95SW
Al, U., & Çoştur, R. (2007). Türk psikoloji dergisi’nin bibliyometrik profili. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 21(2), 142-163. https://izlik.org/JA96MJ95SW
Altunışık, M. (2023). Eğitim ve Bilim dergisi’nin bibliyometrik ve içerik analizi (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi.
Altunışık, M. (2023). Eğitim ve Bilim dergisi’nin bibliyometrik ve içerik analizi (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi.
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11, 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11, 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Arslan, E., Gürbüz, S., & Berk, M. E. (2024). İstem dergisinin bibliyometrik analizi. İstem, (44), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.31591/istem.1507977
Arslan, E., Gürbüz, S., & Berk, M. E. (2024). İstem dergisinin bibliyometrik analizi. İstem, (44), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.31591/istem.1507977

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Hallinger, P., & Narong, D. K. (2024). A bibliometric review of service learning research, 1950–2022. Journal of Experiential Education, 47(4), 566-590. https://doi.org/10.1177/10538259241245137
Hallinger, P., & Narong, D. K. (2024). A bibliometric review of service learning research, 1950–2022. Journal of Experiential Education, 47(4), 566-590. https://doi.org/10.1177/10538259241245137
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The leiden manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The leiden manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a
Karabatak, S., Alanoğlu, M., & Kuloğlu, A. (2025). Understanding teacher reality shock: A systematic bibliometric review. Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori ve Uygulama, 16(31), 53-86.
Karabatak, S., Alanoğlu, M., & Kuloğlu, A. (2025). Understanding teacher reality shock: A systematic bibliometric review. Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori ve Uygulama, 16(31), 53-86.
Konu Kadirhanogullari, M., & Ozay Kose, E. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of articles on bibliometric studies in science education. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 10(2), 315-339. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3370
Konu Kadirhanogullari, M., & Ozay Kose, E. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of articles on bibliometric studies in science education. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 10(2), 315-339. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3370
Kutluca, T., & Demirkol, M. (2016). Dicle üniversitesi ziya gökalp eğitim fakültesi dergisinin bibliyometrik analizi. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (28), 108–118.
Kutluca, T., & Demirkol, M. (2016). Dicle üniversitesi ziya gökalp eğitim fakültesi dergisinin bibliyometrik analizi. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (28), 108–118.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
Özcan, H. V., & Acar, Ç. (2024). Ulusal eğitim dergisinde yayınlanan makalelerin bibliyometrik analizi. Ulusal Eğitim Dergisi, 4(1), 456-467. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10605970
Özcan, H. V., & Acar, Ç. (2024). Ulusal eğitim dergisinde yayınlanan makalelerin bibliyometrik analizi. Ulusal Eğitim Dergisi, 4(1), 456-467. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10605970
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25, 348-349.
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25, 348-349.
Turan, C., Demirtas, Z., & Alanoglu, M. (2025). A bibliometric review of innovative behavior in education, 1980–2023. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2025.2576116
Turan, C., Demirtas, Z., & Alanoglu, M. (2025). A bibliometric review of innovative behavior in education, 1980–2023. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2025.2576116
Ulaşkın, Ş. (2025). Organization Dergisinin bibliyometrik ve tematik analizi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 25(1), 79-102. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1547586
Ulaşkın, Ş. (2025). Organization Dergisinin bibliyometrik ve tematik analizi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 25(1), 79-102. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1547586
Varışoğlu, B., Şahin, A., & Göktaş, Y. (2013). Türkçe eğitimi araştırmalarında eğilimler. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 13(3), 1767–1781. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2013.3.1609
Varışoğlu, B., Şahin, A., & Göktaş, Y. (2013). Türkçe eğitimi araştırmalarında eğilimler. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 13(3), 1767–1781. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2013.3.1609
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Specialist Studies in Education (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Zülfü Demirtaş
0000-0002-1072-5772
Türkiye

Müslim Alanoğlu
0000-0003-1828-4593
Türkiye

Alper Uslukaya
0000-0003-1455-8438
Türkiye

Cihat Turan ^*
0000-0002-8464-6129
Türkiye

Publication Date

September 6, 2026

Submission Date

May 7, 2026

Acceptance Date

August 12, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Number: 34

DOI

https://doi.org/10.58689/eibd.1946766

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA77DD36FZ

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Demirtaş, Z., Alanoğlu, M., Uslukaya, A., & Turan, C. (2026). Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori ve Uygulama’nın (2014–2025) Bibliyometrik Analizi. Eğitim Ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori Ve Uygulama, 34, 247-268. https://doi.org/10.58689/eibd.1946766

AMA

1.Demirtaş Z, Alanoğlu M, Uslukaya A, Turan C. Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori ve Uygulama’nın (2014–2025) Bibliyometrik Analizi. Eğitim Ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori Ve Uygulama. 2026;(34):247-268. doi:10.58689/eibd.1946766

Chicago

Demirtaş, Zülfü, Müslim Alanoğlu, Alper Uslukaya, and Cihat Turan. 2026. “Eğitim Ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori Ve Uygulama’nın (2014–2025) Bibliyometrik Analizi”. Eğitim Ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori Ve Uygulama, nos. 34: 247-68. https://doi.org/10.58689/eibd.1946766.

EndNote

Demirtaş Z, Alanoğlu M, Uslukaya A, Turan C (September 1, 2026) Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori ve Uygulama’nın (2014–2025) Bibliyometrik Analizi. Eğitim Ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori Ve Uygulama 34 247–268.

IEEE

[1]Z. Demirtaş, M. Alanoğlu, A. Uslukaya, and C. Turan, “Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori ve Uygulama’nın (2014–2025) Bibliyometrik Analizi”, Eğitim Ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori Ve Uygulama, no. 34, pp. 247–268, Sept. 2026, doi: 10.58689/eibd.1946766.

ISNAD

Demirtaş, Zülfü - Alanoğlu, Müslim - Uslukaya, Alper - Turan, Cihat. “Eğitim Ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori Ve Uygulama’nın (2014–2025) Bibliyometrik Analizi”. Eğitim Ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori Ve Uygulama. 34 (September 1, 2026): 247-268. https://doi.org/10.58689/eibd.1946766.

JAMA

1.Demirtaş Z, Alanoğlu M, Uslukaya A, Turan C. Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori ve Uygulama’nın (2014–2025) Bibliyometrik Analizi. Eğitim Ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori Ve Uygulama. 2026;:247–268.

MLA

Demirtaş, Zülfü, et al. “Eğitim Ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori Ve Uygulama’nın (2014–2025) Bibliyometrik Analizi”. Eğitim Ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori Ve Uygulama, no. 34, Sept. 2026, pp. 247-68, doi:10.58689/eibd.1946766.

Vancouver

1.Zülfü Demirtaş, Müslim Alanoğlu, Alper Uslukaya, Cihat Turan. Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori ve Uygulama’nın (2014–2025) Bibliyometrik Analizi. Eğitim Ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori Ve Uygulama. 2026 Sep. 1;(34):247-68. doi:10.58689/eibd.1946766

Journal of Education and Humanities: Theory and Practice is a peer-reviewed journal published twice a year by the Union of Educators [Eğitim-Bir-Sen]. The journal aims to publish theoretical and applied studies related to educational sciences and the teaching profession. In particular, priority is given to studies addressing the working lives, labor rights, and professional development of teachers and administrators. Studies in other areas of the humanities will be considered for publication only if they are related to educational sciences and the teaching profession.

As of 2026, EIBD has transitioned to a continuous publication model and is published twice a year (in the summer and fall) in both print and online formats. Under the continuous publication model, studies that successfully complete the peer review process and are accepted are published immediately as the current issue. The aim is to ensure that accepted works are published without delay and made available to academics. Except for delays caused by the authors, it is planned that the peer review process for articles submitted to the journal will be completed within 3–6 months (including revision and re-evaluation processes).

INFORMATION FOR AUTHORS

Articles submitted to the Journal of Education and Humanities: Theory and Practice must be formatted in accordance with the Journal’s Publication Guidelines and uploaded via the Dergipark system. Submitted articles are first reviewed by the Editorial Board for compliance with the journal’s purpose, subject matter, content, and general publication and formatting guidelines. Manuscripts deemed unsuitable are returned to the authors without further evaluation. Manuscripts deemed suitable for publication are submitted to at least two referees in the relevant field for scientific evaluation. In the event of a disagreement among the referees, the opinion of a third referee may be sought. For a manuscript to be published in the journal, at least two referees in the relevant field must provide a positive review.

Authors who have received revision suggestions must indicate the revisions, along with the suggestions, either by writing in the comment boxes on the manuscript, using the track changes feature, or by providing a separate report specifying the page, paragraph, and line numbers. If the changes suggested by the reviewers are not accepted by the author(s), the manuscript may be withdrawn by the author(s). Furthermore, in such cases, the Editorial Board has full authority to return the manuscript to the author or to seek a review from another reviewer. Communication between the author(s) and the reviewers is facilitated solely by the editor or editorial assistants. Unless otherwise specified, the Editorial Board conducts communication with the first author.

The Journal of Education and Humanities: Theory and Practice publishes theoretical and applied studies related to education and the teaching profession. In particular, it prioritises studies on the working lives, personal rights, and professional development of teachers and administrators. Studies in other fields of the humanities will only be considered if they are related to education and the teaching profession.

All articles submitted to the journal are subject to a preliminary review by the Editorial Board to ensure they comply with the formatting guidelines listed below. During the preliminary review, the following aspects are considered: (1) the article’s alignment with the journal’s objectives and scope, (2) compliance with the journal’s publication principles, (3) adherence to the journal’s formatting guidelines, and (4) the scientific originality and relevance of the content. In accordance with the journal’s plagiarism policy, submitted manuscripts are screened using plagiarism detection software such as Turnitin or iThenticate. Manuscripts are accepted for peer review only if the similarity rate in the plagiarism report does not exceed 20%. Therefore, a similarity report must be obtained for all works submitted to the Dergipark system and uploaded to the system along with the manuscript. For articles deemed suitable, a double-blind peer review process is initiated; those deemed unsuitable are returned to the authors.

Manuscripts submitted to the journal must be in an A4-sized Word document with 2.5 cm margins on all sides and without hyphenation at the end of lines. Manuscripts must be prepared in accordance with the APA 7 Publication Guidelines and formatted as specified below:

The formatting guidelines for sections to be published after July 31, 2024, have been updated; therefore, manuscripts submitted as of April 1, 2024, must be prepared in accordance with the current formatting guidelines available on the website.

Manuscripts submitted to the journal must follow the journal’s ARTICLE TEMPLATE

The title page must include the article title along with the full names of the author(s), their affiliations, and their ORCID numbers. The article title should be in 14-point font and centered.

The article file must consist of the following sections:

The title should be in 14-point font and centered.

Abstract, 150–200 words.

The abstract should be followed by 3–5 keywords.

The abstract must clearly state the purpose of the research, the methodology, and the key findings.

Main Text: Empirical studies should include an introduction, methodology [population-sample, data collection tools, data analysis], findings, and a discussion section. Review articles should identify the problem, analyze the relevant literature competently, highlight gaps, inconsistencies, and shortcomings in the literature, and discuss the steps needed to address them. For other types of studies, the structure may vary depending on the subject; however, care must be taken to ensure that subheadings do not include excessive detail that might bore the reader or hinder their ability to benefit from the text.

• In the article;

First-level headings (Times New Roman 12 pt—all words should be capitalized).

The main text should be in Times New Roman 12 pt, justified, with no paragraph indentation. The entire article should not exceed 8,000 words.

Second-level headings (Times New Roman 12-point—only the first letter of the first word should be capitalized).

Third-level headings (Times New Roman 12-point italic—only the first letter of the first word should be capitalized)

To ensure tables, figures, images, graphs, and similar elements do not extend beyond the journal’s page dimensions and for easier use, smaller font sizes and single spacing may be used for these elements. Decimal parts in the text and tables must be separated by a period, and the decimal part must consist of two digits.

In-text citations should follow the format shown below; in cases where this format is not applicable, APA 7 guidelines should be followed.

Single author:

According to Demirtaş (2005) …

The journal’s formatting guidelines are clearly defined (Demirtaş, 2005).

Two authors:

According to Demirtaş and Alanoğlu (2020) …

In-text citations should follow APA 7 guidelines (Demirtaş & Alanoğlu, 2021).

Publications with three or more authors:

From the first citation onward, the first author’s last name followed by “et al.” (year) is used (Demirtaş et al., 2021)

According to Demirtaş et al. (2001) (…)

If the author is an organization or government agency;

When an abbreviation is not used: According to the American Psychological Association (2018).

If there are multiple references and the agency’s abbreviation is used;

First reference: (Ministry of National Education [MoNE], 1973)

Second citation: (MoNE, 1973)

If multiple works are cited within the same parentheses;

Works should be listed in alphabetical order and separated by semicolons: (Çalışkan, 2008; Demirtaş, 2010; Podgorica, 2020)

When citing works by the same author published in the same year;

The letters a, b, c… are placed before the year based on the first occurrence in the text. The first work is cited as (Demirtaş, 2021a), the second as (Demirtaş, 2021b); if these works are listed within the same set of parentheses, they should be formatted as (Demirtaş, 2021a; 2021b).

For authors with the same last name, the first initial of the first name is also used to avoid confusion; (H. Demirtaş, 2020; Z. Demirtaş, 2019)

In direct quotations; “the quotation must be provided in quotation marks and the page number must be included” (Demirtaş, 2019, p.12).

Citation from a secondary source: ……… (Demirtaş, 1995; cited in Alanoğlu, 2014).

Only the source from which the information was cited is listed in the References. The secondary source is not listed (Alanoğlu, 2014 must be included in the References).

Care should be taken to ensure that there are no more than FIVE (5) tables in the study. If it is necessary to include more than five tables, this must be explained in a Note to the Editor with justification. Additionally, each prepared table must not take up more than one page.

Care should be taken to ensure that there are no more than FIVE (5) Figures in the study. If it is necessary to include more than five Figures, this must be explained with justification in a Note to the Editor.

Following the changes made to the TR Index Journal Evaluation Criteria for 2020, “Ethics Committee Approval” is now required for articles in all scientific disciplines, including the social sciences. Therefore, for studies submitted to our journal that involve human subjects -such as surveys, collection of social and demographic data, and measurement of user experience- “Ethics Committee Approval” must be obtained from the relevant university’s ethics committee. Studies without ethics committee approval will not be included in the review process.

The ethics committee approval certificate must be uploaded to the system via Dergipark when the article is uploaded, additionally;

‘Ethical approval for this research was obtained from the Ethics Committee of ............... University ..................... Ethics Committee on .................... dated ....................... No. ....................’ This statement must appear both at the end of the Methods section and immediately before the References.

References

Single author:

Demirtaş, Z. (2007). Elementary schools and the organization of primary education in the Ottoman Empire. Fırat University Journal of Social Sciences, 17(1), 173-183.

Two authors:

Alanoğlu, M. and Demirtaş, Z. (2020). An examination of the relationship between bureaucratic school structure and principals’ management styles. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 48, 199-213. doi: 10.9779/pauefd.560610

Studies with up to six authors:

All author names must be listed.

For studies with more than six authors:

After listing the first six authors’ names, add an ellipsis (…) followed by the last author’s name. No more than seven names should be included.

If two or more works by the same author are cited, the references should be arranged in chronological order.

Demirtaş, Z. (2015).

Demirtaş, Z. (2020).

If an author has works published with different co-authors, the order is determined alphabetically based on the second or subsequent name.

Journals and periodicals:

Author, A. A., Author, B. B., and Author, C. C. (Year). Article title. Journal title, volume No. (issue No.), pages. doi:http://dx.doi.org/xx.xxx/yyyyy

Book:

Author, A. A. (Publication year). Title of the work. Publisher.

Book Chapter:

Author, A. A. and Author, B. B. (Publication year). Chapter title. In A. Editor and B. Editor (Eds.), Title of the book (pp. 1–10). Publisher.

Unpublished thesis;

Last Name, F. N. (Year). Title of doctoral thesis. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Institution Name.

Alanoğlu, M. (2019). An analysis of the relationship between perceived school principal leadership styles and teachers’ perceptions of decision-making participation, organizational justice, job satisfaction, and burnout. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Fırat University.

Conference paper:

Author, A. A., Author, B. B., and Author, C. C. (July 2019). Paper title. In Conference Title (pp. 20–25), Fırat University, Elazığ.

Extended Abstract:

For Turkish articles, a structured English abstract of 500–750 words must be included at the end of the article; for English articles, a structured Turkish abstract of 1,500–2,000 words must be included. The structured abstract must include at least three of the following headings, depending on the content of the article: Introduction, Literature Review/Conceptual Framework, Method, Findings, and Conclusion/Discussion. For a Turkish article, the English extended abstract should be as follows:

Manuscript Title

Extended Abstract

Introduction

Method

Results

Conclusion

Authors must clearly disclose in the article (1) all financial contributions, sponsorships, or project support received for the articles, and (2) whether the work has previously been presented at national or international scientific meetings in the academic field, such as congresses, conferences, or symposia. Such works may be accepted and undergo the peer-review process provided they have not been published elsewhere—other than as an abstract—or submitted for publication.

With the ULAKBIM decision of 25 February 2020, the condition "For all disciplines (including social sciences), for studies requiring an ethics committee decision, ethics committee approval must be obtained and this approval must be specified and documented in the article" has been introduced. For this reason, it is important that authors submitting studies to our journal whose process started in 2020 or will start in the following years pay attention to this issue and upload the ETHICS COMMITTEE APPROVAL as an additional file when uploading the article. In addition, authors are required to include the information about the ethics committee approval (name of the committee, date and number) in the Methods section and on the last page of the article.

The types of research that require ethics committee approval are as follows

1 - All types of research using qualitative or quantitative approaches that involve the collection of data from participants using survey, interview, focus group study, observation, experiment, interview techniques.
2 - Use of humans and animals (including materials/data) for experimental or other scientific purposes,
3-Clinical research involving human subjects,
4- Research on animals,
5- Retrospective studies in accordance with the law on the protection of personal data,

Also

1- Indication that the "informed consent form" has been obtained in case presentations,
2- Obtaining and stating permission from the owners for the use of scales, questionnaires and photographs belonging to others,
3-Stating that the copyright of the intellectual and artistic works used has been respected.

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors, Assistant Editors, and Field Editors

The ethical responsibilities of the editors, assistant editors, and field editors of the Journal of Education and Human Sciences: Theory and Practice are listed below.

· To formulate journal policies by discussing them in the editorial board and to evaluate the impact of these policies.

· To inform reviewers, authors, and researchers about the journal's publication and ethical principles and to consider traditional feedback.

· To conduct a preliminary evaluation of articles submitted for publication in terms of compliance with the journal's publication policy, originality, contribution to the field, and adequacy.

· To inform authors of articles deemed unsuitable for publication and to include those deemed suitable for publication in the publication scope.

· To assign field experts and/or reviewers with expertise in the subject matter of articles received through publication.

· To provide supplementary peer review and evaluation services for articles received from publications.

· To maintain a detailed guide archive for authors submitting articles to the journal and to answer authors' questions in an explanatory manner.

· To objectively determine the field editors and reviewers to be assigned to articles, in accordance with the relevant publication's field of study.

· To ensure that the double-blind review process between reviewers and authors is recorded.

· To allow for the replacement of reviewers in cases of conflict of interest between reviewers and authors.

· To ensure that reviewers conduct timely, sound, and effective evaluations. To encourage participation in this field.

Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers

All articles in the Journal of Education and Human Sciences: Theory and Practice are reviewed using a double-blind peer-review system (1 editor/field expert and at least 2 reviewers). Authors have no knowledge of the reviewers evaluating their articles, nor do the reviewers have knowledge of the authors. Communication between authors and reviewers is facilitated by the editors. For this physical EİBD, reviewers evaluating articles have the following ethical responsibilities:

· Refusal to evaluate articles outside their area of expertise

· Evaluating articles according to the double-blind principle

· Adhering to principles and guidelines during the evaluation process

· Understanding the reasons for the peer review system's evaluation of the article's publication method

· Using a scientifically sound, polite, and democratic language

· Evaluating articles within the allotted time

Ethical Responsibilities of Authors

· Articles submitted to the Journal of Education and Human Sciences: Theory and Practice must not be simultaneously submitted to another journal.

· To write articles objectively, in accordance with scientific research methodology and report writing principles.

· To include all citations in the bibliography, and to ensure that the sources listed in the bibliography are present in the text.

· To avoid engaging in actions contrary to scientific research and publication ethics as stated in Article 4 of the Interuniversity Board Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Guidelines (https://www.uak.gov.tr/documents/documents/68838b0a08031.pdf) in the articles.

Auto-generated board - Please Edit This Title

AD

Ali DENIZ

Education Management, Philosophical and Social Foundations of Education, Teacher Education and Professional Development of Educators, Development of Physical Education and Education Programs, Higher Education Policies, Program Development and Qualifications in Higher Education, Education Policy

Editor in Chief

Zülfü DEMIRTAŞ

Education Planning, Leadership in Education, Organisation and Management Theory

Editors

Müslim ALANOĞLU

Education Management, Leadership in Education, Higher Education Policies

Alper USLUKAYA

Education, Education Management, Philosophy of Education, History of Philosophy

Field Editor

Selim GÜNDOĞAN

Psychological Counseling and Guidance, Drug Addiction Consultancy, School Counseling, Psychological Counseling Education

Editorial Board

SG

Sedat GÜMÜŞ

Education Management

HY

Hongwei YANG

Statistical Analysis Methods, Classical Test Theories, Item Response Theory, Modelling, Measurement Equivalence, Testing, Assessment and Psychometrics (Other)

MA

Muhammad AKRAM

Leadership in Education

Abdurrahman İLĞAN

Education, Education Management, Higher Education Management

Soner DURMUŞ

Mathematics Education

Türker KURT

Education

Muhammed ZINCIRLI

Education, Education Management, Supervision in Education, Leadership in Education

Enes GÖK

Higher Education Policies, Higher Education Management, Internationalization in Higher Education

Mehmet Şükrü BELLIBAŞ

Education Management, Leadership in Education, Educational Administration, Supervision, Planning and Economics (Other)

Mehmet Ali AKIN

Education, Education Planning

TA

Taner ALTUN

Education, Basic Training, Classroom Education

Bekir S. GÜR

Higher Education Studies, Higher Education Policies, Higher Education Systems, Higher Education Management, Education Policy

İbrahim Hakan KARATAŞ

Education Management, Education Planning, Higher Education Policies, Higher Education Management, Internationalization in Higher Education

İlker DERE

History Education, Social Studies Education, History of The Republic of Turkiye, Oral History

Muhammmet Baki MINAZ

Education Management

Hacı İbrahim DELICE

Language Studies, Linguistics, Linguistic Structures (Incl. Phonology, Morphology and Syntax), New Turkish Language (Turkish of Old Anatolia, Ottoman, Turkiye)