Dear Foreign Authors:
ETUSBED attaches special importance to foreign publications and can take particular interest in the studies. Please do not hesitate to contact the editors about even the slightest problem you encounter.

The Copyright Agreement Form signed by all authors should be attached to the manuscripts to be sent to our journal via the Submit Manuscript link.
Researchers who will submit their studies to our journal should prepare their studies in accordance with internationally recognized ethical principles. At this point, although all scientific, ethical, and legal responsibility of the studies submitted to the journal belongs to the researchers, the editorial board may request an ethics committee certificate when necessary. Studies that the editorial board does not find appropriate for research and publication ethics are not subject to evaluation.

- Author name and address: Since the manuscripts are sent to the referees directly through the system (without making any changes in the file uploaded by the author), there should not be any information identifying the author of the article in order to ensure author-referee confidentiality. For this reason, the name(s) of the author(s) should not be included either in the manuscript or in the file name. For information about the author, the Article Cover Page should be filled in.

- Article Text: Manuscripts should not exceed 8,000 words, should be prepared as an MS Word file, and Book Antiqua font, 10.5 point font, should be used as the font, except for the special cases of some fields of study. If there is a special font used in the study, it must be sent with the manuscript. The study should begin with an Introduction, which should focus on the hypothesis, scope, and purpose of the study. The Development section, which can be divided into intermediate and sub-headings, should be supported by data, observations, opinions, comments and discussions. In the Conclusion section, the conclusions reached in the study should be explained by supporting them with suggestions. Except in mandatory cases, the study should be based on the current Spelling Guide of the Turkish Language Association.

- Title: Studies should be titled in Turkish and English. Titles should consist of a maximum of 12 (twelve) words, and only the first letters should be capitalized. All titles in the text should be written in bold with the first letter capitalized.

- Headings within the Article: In the article, main and subheadings should be created based on the number system according to the processing of the subject.

- Abstract: There should be an abstract in Turkish and English, which expresses the subject of the study in the shortest and most concise form, in the range of 150 - 180 words. Under both abstracts, at least 3 (three) and at most 5 (five) keywords and their English versions should be included. Abstract and Abstract sections should be written in 9 pt and single line spacing.

Authors are advised to make use of the Grammarly website to minimize errors in the abstract section. (Our journal has no interest with the web site)
- Headings in the Article: In the article, main and subheadings should be created based on the number system according to the processing of the subject. The following should be considered in the writing and positioning of the headings:

- Tables
Tables should be included in the main document numbered consecutively in the order cited in the text. Each table should have a descriptive heading above it, and any abbreviations used in the table should be defined below the table in the footnotes (even if they are defined in the text). Above the title, a descriptive caption in italics should encompass the entire title. Tables should be prepared using the "Insert Table" command in a Microsoft Office Word file and organized so that the data are easily read and understood. The data presented in the tables should be different from the data presented in the main text but should support and improve the main text.
- Image and Image Captions
Images, graphics and photos should be submitted as separate files in TIFF or JPEG format and attached to the Word document. If an image has sub-units, the sub-units should be combined into a single image and the images should be labeled (a, b, c, etc.). The minimum resolution for each figure should be 300 DPI and figures should be clear and easy to read. Image descriptions should be listed at the end of the main document. Images/pictures should be cited in the main text and numbered consecutively in the order in which they are mentioned.

- Citations and Footnotes
Direct quotations of less than five lines: either in quotation marks: "Quote" or italicized: Quote. Quotations longer than five lines should be written 0.5 cm from the left of the line, in 10 pt. and " ". Footnotes should be written in 9 pt, 3 pt before and after the paragraph, single line spacing and justified.


- Margins should be 2 cm.

Both in-text citations and the references must be prepared according to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA), Sixth or Seventh Edition (2020)

The reference styles for different types of publications are presented in the following examples.
Article: Klimonske, R., & Palmer, S. (1993). The ADA and The Hiring Process in Organizations. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 45(2), 10-36.
More Than One Author:
Jerrentrup, A., Mueller, T., Glowalla, U., Herder, M., Henrichs, N., Neubauer, A., & Schaefer, J. R. (2018). Teaching Medicine with The Help Of “Dr. House.” Plos ONE, 13(3), Article E0193972. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193972
Books
Ancient Author's Book
Evliya Çelebi Seyahatname. (sad. T. Temelkuran & N. Aktaş). 1986. Üçdal Publications.
Ksenophon. Anabasis. (trans. T. Gökçöl). 1974. Hürriyet Publications.
Ebû Abdullah Muhammed İbn Battûta Tancî. İbn Battûta Seyahatnamesi I (trans. A. Sait Aykut). 2004.
Yapı Kredi Publications.
By A Single Author:
Kimmel, M. S. (2007). The Gendered Society. Oxford University Press.
By Two or More Authors:
Difonzo, N., & Bordia, P. (2007). Rumor Psychology: Social and Organizational Approaches. American Psychological Association.
By A Corporate (Group) Author:
American Sociological Association. (1975). Approaches to The Study of Social Structure. Free Press.
Edited Book:
Rhodewalt, F. (Ed.). (2008). Personality and Social Behavior. Psychology Press.
Book Chapter
Mccormack, B., Mccance, T., & Maben, J. (2013). Outcome Evaluation in The Development of Person-Centred Practice. In B. Mccormack, K. Manley, & A. Titchen (Eds.), Practice development in nursing and healthcare (pp. 190-211). John Wiley & Sons.
Dissertation or Thesis:
Valentin, E. R. (2019, Summer). Narcissism Predicted by Snapchat Selfie Sharing, Filter Usage, And Editing [Master's thesis, California State University Dominguez Hills]. CSU Scholar Works. https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/concern/theses/3197xm925?locale=en
Çobanoğlu, S. (2021). Halkbilimi Bağlamında Dede Korkut Hikâyelerinin Halk Felsefesi ve Metaetiksel Çözümlemesi. [Ph.D. Thesis, Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Institute of Social Sciences]. Ankara.
Yıkan, Z. U. (2004). Peyami Safa’nın Server Bedi İmzalı Romanları. [Master's thesis, Gazi University Institute of Social Sciences]. Ankara.
No Author: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. (1974). U.S. Catholic Conference, Division of Latin America.
Web sites: Sparks, Dana. (2018, September 12). Mayo Mindfulness: Practicing Mindfulness Exercises. Mayo Clinic.

The ethical principles and rules in ETUSBE Journal have been prepared in accordance with the guidelines of the 'Committe on Publication Ethics - COPE (https://publicationethics.org)).

AUTHOR(S)

* The author(s) should not send a work published in any journal or sent for publication to ETUSBE Journal.
* Although the author(s) are expected to submit works of original value to ETUSBE Journal, they should cite all sources used in their studies in line with ethical principles.
* The author(s) should indicate the people who contributed to the study. It should not be recommended to add authors to people who did not contribute to the study (especially for the study that is about to be published).
* If there is a conflict of interest or a union of interests regarding the author(s), the editor(s) must be notified.
* The author(s) should make the mistakes they noticed in their published, preview or evaluation stages in cooperation with the editor (such as informing, retracting or correcting the work).
* The author(s) must upload the ethics committee approval they have received for research that requires an ethics committee decision to the system during the article application. However, the author(s) should cite on the first and last page of the study and in the method section. You can also access the Tr Index Ethical Principles Flow Chart by clicking.
* In case raw data is requested from the author(s) regarding their research, they are obliged to send the necessary data and information to the editorial board and scientific committee.

REFEREE(S)

All studies submitted to ETUSBE Journal are evaluated by double-blind peer-review. While aiming an impartial, objective and independent evaluation process in this applied refereeing, the information of the author(s) and referee(s) will be kept confidential.
* The referee(s) should only accept studies related to their field of expertise.
* The referee(s) should evaluate the work in line with purely scientific principles, impartiality and confidentiality.
* The referee(s) are required to state their evaluations about the study in detail by filling out the Referee Evaluation Form and stating their opinions about the study in detail in the Comments About the Article section below this form.
* The reviewer(s) should reject the evaluation by informing the editor when they realize that there is a conflict of interest or interest.
* The referee(s) should make their evaluations within the framework of an academic language. Personal comments with hostility and insults should be avoided. The referee(s) who make non-scientific comments may be requested to review and correct their comments. However, referee evaluations that do not meet the required standards will not be taken into account.
* The referee(s) are required to complete the work they evaluate within the specified timeframe and comply with the ethical responsibilities stated above.

EDITOR(S)
General Duties and Responsibilities

* The editor(s) should strive to meet the reviewers', authors' and readers' knowledge needs about the process.
* The editor(s) should strive to ensure that the publication quality and process of ETUSBE Journal is carried out and developed in accordance with the determined rules.
* Editor(s), within the framework of publication policies, should activate the processes to improve the quality of the studies, respect the freedom of thought, and make an effort to ensure academic integrity.
* The editor(s) must ensure the protection of the personal data of the author, referee and reader within the framework of the publication policy of ETUSBE Journal.
* Editor(s) must protect the intellectual property rights of all works submitted to ETUSBE Journal. In case of infringement, it should defend the rights of the work and the author(s).
* The editor(s) constantly updates the referee pool and sends the studies to the referees according to their fields of expertise.
* Editor(s) should communicate effectively with everyone involved in the review of all studies submitted to ETUSBE Journal and take precautions against misconduct.

Relations with the Reader(s)

* The editor(s) should pay attention to the contribution of the studies published in the ETUSBE Journal to the scientific literature and to their originality.
* Editor(s) are obliged to give explanatory and informative answers, taking into account the feedback.

Relations with the Author(s)

* Editor(s) should arrange the publication policy and writing rules on sample templates in line with the expectations of the authors.
* Editor(s) should convey the necessary information in a way that does not affect the refereeing process, if the authors request it.
* The editor(s) should advance the process by taking into account the referee's suggestions, unless there are serious problems with the studies.

Relations with the Referee(s)

* The editor(s) should ask the referees to evaluate the articles according to their knowledge and expertise.
* The editor(s) is responsible for providing auxiliary resources such as information, guides, and forms that the referee(s) may need.
* The editor(s) should create a database of referees and update this database according to the performances of the referees.
* The editor(s) should remove the referees from the database who behave in an unfamiliar language and do not comply with the specified deadlines.
* The editor(s) should encourage the referee(s) to evaluate the work in an impartial and scientific language.

UNTHETHIC BEHAVIOR

All studies submitted to ETUSBE Journal are scanned with the iThenticate (http://www.ithenticate.com) software program at the preflight stage. Studies with a similarity rate of less than 25%, complying with the spelling rules and receiving the approval of the language editor are included in the evaluation process. In addition, if the following unethical behaviors are detected, the study is rejected.
* Among the authors of the study, there are people who did not contribute intellectually.
* If the study is produced from any of the studies such as master's / doctorate / project / academic presentation, it is not stated.
* Transforming the work into more than one work by dividing it into parts.
* Failure to report conflict of interest or association of interests of the study.
* Interfering with the refereeing process of the study.