Editorial
BibTex RIS Cite

An Overview of E-Assessment

Year 2020, Volume: 35 Issue: Special Issue, 1 - 5, 30.09.2020

Abstract

Along with technological developments, electronic devices/tools have been affecting our lives in many aspects. Inevitably, these developments have affected the learning and teaching processes. In the last decade, there has been an increase in the usage of electronic tools/devices in teaching and learning processes, as well as the assessment of these processes. Parallel to the increasing discussions on the use of e-learning methods in the learning-teaching process, how to use these tools on assessment and evaluation processes has become a hot topic in educational research. We observed different terms used to emphasize the same assessment approach in the literature, such as electronic assessment/evaluation, online assessment/evaluation, etc. Hence, we used these terms interchangeably in this paper.

References

  • Bartram, D. (1997). Distance assessment: Psychological assessment through the Internet. Selection Development Review, 13, 10–14.
  • Bartram, D. (2005). Computer-based testing and the Internet. In A. Evers, O. Smit-Voskuyl, & N. Anderson (Eds.), The handbook of selection. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Benson, R., & Brack, C. (2010). Online learning and assessment in higher education: A planning guide. Chandos Publishing, Oxford.
  • Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399–413.
  • Carless, D. (2007). Learning-oriented assessment: Conceptual bases and practical implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 57–66.
  • Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association of Higher Education Bulletin, 39(7), 3–7.
  • Dann, R. (2002). Promoting assessment as learning: Improving the learning process. Taylor & Francis Group, London.
  • Earl, L. M. (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Gibbs, G., Habeshaw, S. & Habeshaw, T. (1988). 53 Interesting ways to assess your students. Bristol: Technical and Educational Services Ltd.
  • Knight, P. (2006). The local practices of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 435–52.
  • Mason, R., & Kaye, A. (Eds.) (1989). Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education. Oxford: Pergamon.
  • Mead, A. D., & Drasgow, F. (1993). Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 449–458.
  • Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.
  • Nichols, M. (2008). Institutional perspectives: The challenges of e-learning diffusion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 598–609.
  • O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved 20 December 2019 from http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
  • Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Richardson, W. (2009). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • The International Test Commission (2006). International guidelines on computer-based and internet-delivered testing. International Journal of Testing, 6(2), 143-171. doi: 10.1207/s15327574ijt0602_4

An Overview of E-Assessment

Year 2020, Volume: 35 Issue: Special Issue, 1 - 5, 30.09.2020

Abstract

Along with technological developments, electronic devices/tools have been affecting our lives in many aspects. Inevitably, these developments have affected the learning and teaching processes. In the last decade, there has been an increase in the usage of electronic tools/devices in teaching and learning processes, as well as the assessment of these processes. Parallel to the increasing discussions on the use of e-learning methods in the learning-teaching process, how to use these tools on assessment and evaluation processes has become a hot topic in educational research. We observed different terms used to emphasize the same assessment approach in the literature, such as electronic assessment/evaluation, online assessment/evaluation, etc. Hence, we used these terms interchangeably in this paper.

References

  • Bartram, D. (1997). Distance assessment: Psychological assessment through the Internet. Selection Development Review, 13, 10–14.
  • Bartram, D. (2005). Computer-based testing and the Internet. In A. Evers, O. Smit-Voskuyl, & N. Anderson (Eds.), The handbook of selection. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Benson, R., & Brack, C. (2010). Online learning and assessment in higher education: A planning guide. Chandos Publishing, Oxford.
  • Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399–413.
  • Carless, D. (2007). Learning-oriented assessment: Conceptual bases and practical implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 57–66.
  • Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association of Higher Education Bulletin, 39(7), 3–7.
  • Dann, R. (2002). Promoting assessment as learning: Improving the learning process. Taylor & Francis Group, London.
  • Earl, L. M. (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Gibbs, G., Habeshaw, S. & Habeshaw, T. (1988). 53 Interesting ways to assess your students. Bristol: Technical and Educational Services Ltd.
  • Knight, P. (2006). The local practices of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 435–52.
  • Mason, R., & Kaye, A. (Eds.) (1989). Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education. Oxford: Pergamon.
  • Mead, A. D., & Drasgow, F. (1993). Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 449–458.
  • Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.
  • Nichols, M. (2008). Institutional perspectives: The challenges of e-learning diffusion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 598–609.
  • O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved 20 December 2019 from http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
  • Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Richardson, W. (2009). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • The International Test Commission (2006). International guidelines on computer-based and internet-delivered testing. International Journal of Testing, 6(2), 143-171. doi: 10.1207/s15327574ijt0602_4
There are 18 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Other Fields of Education
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Nuri Doğan 0000-0001-6274-2016

Nermin Kıbrıslıoğlu This is me 0000-0002-9592-469X

Hülya Kelecioğlu 0000-0001-6274-2016

Ronald K. Hambleton This is me 0000-0003-4297-421X

Publication Date September 30, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 35 Issue: Special Issue

Cite

APA Doğan, N., Kıbrıslıoğlu, N., Kelecioğlu, H., Hambleton, R. K. (2020). An Overview of E-Assessment. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(Special Issue), 1-5.