Dark Leadership at the Workplace

Volume: 3 Number: 2 October 21, 2016
EN TR

Dark Leadership at the Workplace

Abstract

The aim of this research is to uncover the behaviors that constitute the dark side of leadership, the impacts of these behaviors on employees and the employees’ reactions to these behaviors in Turkish context. The data were collected through structured face-to-face interviews, a focus group interview and observations and analyzed according to content analysis technique.  Interviews were done with 9 and focus group interview was done with 4 participants. Observations were made in an open plan office. Participants were selected from researchers’ social network according to purposive sampling technique. At the end of the analyses, dark leadership was explained by themes of wearisome, narcissistic, insincere and tyrannous leader behaviors, impacts of dark leadership on employees were explained by themes of physiological and psychological effects and employees’ reactions to dark leadership were explained by themes of active and passive reactions. Findings were discussed in terms of their contributions to the management and organization literature and practical implications.

Keywords

References

  1. Ashforth, B. E. (1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, 47, 755-778.
  2. Ashforth, B. E. (1997). Petty tyranny in organizations: A preliminary examination of antecedents and consequences. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 14(2), 126-140.
  3. Aasland, M. S., Skogstad, A.,Notelaers, G., Birkeland, M. & Einarsen, S. (2010). The Prevalence of Destructive Leadership Behaviour. British Journal of Management, 21, 438-452.
  4. Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F. & Walumba, F. O. (2004). Authentic leadership: Theory building for veritable sustained performance. Working paper: Gallup Leadership Institute, University of Nebraska–Lincoln.
  5. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
  6. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
  7. Bass, B. M. & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181–217.
  8. Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (2000). Multifactor leadership questionnaire. Redwood City, CA: Mindgarden.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Publication Date

October 21, 2016

Submission Date

July 5, 2016

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2016 Volume: 3 Number: 2

APA
Başar, U., Sığrı, Ü., & Basım, N. (2016). İş Yerinde Karanlık Liderlik. İş Ve İnsan Dergisi, 3(2), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.61037
AMA
1.Başar U, Sığrı Ü, Basım N. İş Yerinde Karanlık Liderlik. İş ve İnsan Dergisi. 2016;3(2):65-76. doi:10.18394/iid.61037
Chicago
Başar, Ufuk, Ünsal Sığrı, and Nejat Basım. 2016. “İş Yerinde Karanlık Liderlik”. İş Ve İnsan Dergisi 3 (2): 65-76. https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.61037.
EndNote
Başar U, Sığrı Ü, Basım N (October 1, 2016) İş Yerinde Karanlık Liderlik. İş ve İnsan Dergisi 3 2 65–76.
IEEE
[1]U. Başar, Ü. Sığrı, and N. Basım, “İş Yerinde Karanlık Liderlik”, İş ve İnsan Dergisi, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 65–76, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.18394/iid.61037.
ISNAD
Başar, Ufuk - Sığrı, Ünsal - Basım, Nejat. “İş Yerinde Karanlık Liderlik”. İş ve İnsan Dergisi 3/2 (October 1, 2016): 65-76. https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.61037.
JAMA
1.Başar U, Sığrı Ü, Basım N. İş Yerinde Karanlık Liderlik. İş ve İnsan Dergisi. 2016;3:65–76.
MLA
Başar, Ufuk, et al. “İş Yerinde Karanlık Liderlik”. İş Ve İnsan Dergisi, vol. 3, no. 2, Oct. 2016, pp. 65-76, doi:10.18394/iid.61037.
Vancouver
1.Ufuk Başar, Ünsal Sığrı, Nejat Basım. İş Yerinde Karanlık Liderlik. İş ve İnsan Dergisi. 2016 Oct. 1;3(2):65-76. doi:10.18394/iid.61037

Cited By

Liderliğin Görünmeyen Yüzü: Karanlık Liderlik

Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.504220

LİDERLİĞİN DOĞASI: GÜÇLÜ LİDERLİK VAR MIDIR?

Uluslararası Liderlik Çalışmaları Dergisi: Kuram ve Uygulama

https://doi.org/10.52848/ijls.1724644