Year 2021, Volume 8 , Issue 2, Pages 394 - 408 2021-06-10

Views of Teachers on the Potential Negative Effects of High Stake Tests

Mustafa İLHAN [1] , Neşe GÜLER [2] , Gülşen TAŞDELEN TEKER [3]

This study analyses teachers’ viewpoints on the potential undesirable influences of high stake exams. Seven stimulants related to undesirable influences of high stake exams on education were given to 191 teachers in a pairwise comparisons format. The participating teachers in this study were asked to choose one undesirable influence by comparing the stimulants given to them in pairwise and to determine the more prominent problem stemming from high stake exams. Data were analyzed via many-facet Rasch model. As a result, it was found that teachers considered the stimulant “school assessments turn into secondary importance in the eyes of students and parents” as the foremost problem stemming from high stake exams. On the other hand, the stimulant “administors focus on policies for increasing exam scores instead of policies for improving the learning–teaching process” ranked the last in the undesirable influences of high stake exams.
High–stake tests, Paired comparisons, Many facet Rasch model, Scaling method
  • Abrams, L. M. (2004). Teachers’ views on high–stakes testing: Implications for the classroom. Arizona: Policy Brief: Education Policy Studies Laboratory. Arizona State University College of Education.
  • Acar Güvendir, M. (2014). Student and school characteristics' relation to Turkish achievement in student achievement determination exam. Education and Science, 39(172), 163–180.
  • Adedoyin, O. O (2013). Public examinations and its influence on the Botswana educational system: Views of undergraduate education students at the University of Botswana. Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2), 124–134.
  • Almus, K. (2010). The beliefs of principals and assistant principals regarding high–stakes testing. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Houston, Houston, United States].
  • Amoako, I. (2019). What’s at stake in high–stakes testing in Ghana: Implication for curriculum ımplementation in basic schools. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 5(3), 72–82.
  • Amrein, A. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2003). The effects of high-stake testing on student motivation and learning. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 32 38.
  • Anıl, D., & Güler, N. (2006). An example of the scaling study by pair–wise comparison method. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 30, 30 36.
  • Assaf, L. Z. (2008) Professional identity of a reading teacher: Responding to high–stakes testing pressures. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14(3), 239 252.
  • Atılgan, H. (2018). Transition among education levels in Turkey: Past–present and a recommended model. Ege Journal of Education, 19(1), 1 18.
  • Banks, J., & Smyth, E. (2015). Your whole life depends on it’: academic stress and high–stakes testing in Ireland. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(5), 598 616.
  • Baykal, A. (2014). Sınavlardan sınav beğen. Eğitim sisteminde kademeler arası geçiş ve sınavlar [Like the exam from the exams. Transition between stages and exams in the education system]. Ege’den Eğitime Bakış Paneli, Ege Üniversitesi, İzmir.
  • Behizadeha, N., & Engelhard, G. (2014). Development and validation of a scale to measure perceived authenticity in writing. Assessing Writing, 21, 18 36.
  • Board of Education and Training. (2017). Our renewal and change studies in curriculum.
  • Brady, A. L. (2008). Effects of standardized testing on teachers' emotions, pedagogy and professional interactions with others. [Doctoral dissertation, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, United States].
  • Brockmeier, L. L, Green, R. B., Pate, J. L., Tsemunhu, R. T., & Bochenko, M. J. (2014). Teachers’ beliefs about the effects of high stakes testing. Journal of Education and Human Development, 3(4), 91-104.
  • Brooke, N. (2016). High–stakes accountability using teacher salary incentives in Brazil: An update. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 20(3), 207–250.
  • Bülbül, T., & Acar, M (2012). A pair–wise scaling study on the missions of education supervisors in Turkey. International Journal of Human Sciences, 9(2), 623–640.
  • Buyruk, H. (2014). Standardized examinations as a teacher performance ındicator and performance evaluation in education. Trakya University Journal of Education, 4(2), 28–42.
  • Can, E. (2017). Determination of the effects of central exams according to the view of students. The journal of Academic Social Science, 5(58), 108 122.
  • Çetin, A., & Ünsal, S. (2018). Social, psychological effects of central examinations on teachers and their reflections on teachers' curriculum implementations. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 34(2), 304-323.
  • Christian, S. C. (2010). High–stakes testing and its relationship to stress levels of secondary teachers. [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, United States].
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th ed.). Routledge Falmer.
  • Coniam D., & Falvey P. (2007) High–stakes testing and assessment. In J. Cummins J., & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 456-471). Springer.
  • Davis, M. F. (2011). The influence of high–stakes testing on science teacher perceptions and practices. [Doctoral dissertation, Walden University, Minneapolis, United States].
  • Dawson, H. S. (2012). Teachers’ motivation and beliefs in a high–stakes testing context. [Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Ohio, United States].
  • Ekinci, A., Bindak, R., & Yıldırım, M. C. (2012). A research regarding the empathic approaches of school managers about professional problems of teachers by pair–wise comparisons method. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 11(3), 759–776.
  • Erkuş, A. (2011). Scientific research process for behavioral sciences. Seçkin.
  • Finkeldei, J. (2016). The influence of high stakes testing on elementary classroom instruction. [Doctoral dissertation, Wichita State University, United States].
  • Finn, B. (2015). Measuring motivation in low-stakes assessments. ETS Research Report Series, 2(2), 1-17.
  • Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E. & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw–Hill.
  • Güler, N., & Anıl, D. (2009). Scaling through pair–wise comparison method in required characteristics of students applying for post graduate programs. International Journal of Human Sciences, 6(1), 627 639. https://www.j
  • Güler, N., & İlhan, M. (2017, October). Comparision of the results obtained from t-test and ANOVA, and many facet Rasch analysis for difference based statistics. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Social Sciences, Vienna.
  • Güzeller, C. O., & Eser, M. T., & Aksu, G. (2016). Pair–wise comparison method application via R project and Microsoft Excel. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 7(1), 96–108.
  • Hirsch, P. J. (2016). High stakes testing and its effect on teacher methodologies. [Master’s thesis, Caldwell University].
  • İlhan, M. (2016). An analysis of researchers' difficulties in quantitative data analysis with the use of pairwise comparisons. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 7(1), 73–84.
  • İlhan, M., & Güler, M. (2017). The use of Rasch model in Likert types scales: An application on the fear of negative evaluation scale-Student form (FNE-SF). Trakya Journal of Education, 8(4), 756–775.
  • Johnson, P. (2007). High stakes testing and No Child Left Behind: Conceptual and empirical considerations. Long Island Economic & Social Policy Institute, Dowling College School of Education, Long Island, NY.
  • Kane, G. (2014). Accelerating sustainability using the 80/20 rule. Oxford: Do Sustaniablity.
  • Knapp, D. (2010). A guide to service desk concepts. Course Technology, Cengage Learning.
  • Kornhauser, Z. G. C., Minahan, J., Siedlecki, K. L., & Steedle, J. T. (2014, April). A strategy for İncreasing student motivation on low-stakes assessments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia.
  • Kruger, L. J., Wandle, C., & Struzziero, J. (2007). Coping with the stress of high stakes testing. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 23(2), 109 128,
  • Kumandaş, H., & Kutlu, Ö. (2015). High stake tests. Journal of Educational Science Research, 5(2), 63–75. 2015.52.4
  • Linacre, J. M. (2012). Many facet Rasch measurement: Facets tutorial2.
  • Linacre, J. M. (2014). A user's guide to FACETS Rasch–model computer programs.
  • Marchant, G. J. (2004). What is at stake with high stakes testing? A discussion of issues and research. The Ohio Journal of Science, 104(2), 2 7.
  • Minarechová, M. (2012). Negative impacts of high–stakes testing. Journal of Pedagogy, 3(1), 82–100.
  • Moses, M. S., & Nanna, M. J. (2007). The testing culture and the persistence of highstakes testing reforms. Education and Culture, 23(1), 55 72.
  • Nalbantoğlu Yılmaz, F. (2017). Investigation of the factors affecting occupation choices of high school students with paired comparison method. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 8(2), 224–236.
  • Nartgün, Z. (2006). Öğretmenlik meslek bilgisi derslerinin önem düzeyinin ikili karşılaştırmalarla ölçeklenmesi [Scaling the importance level of teaching profession courses using paired comparisons]. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 6(2), 161–176.
  • Nichols, S. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2005). The inevitable corruption of indicators and educators through high–stakes testing. Education Policy Research Unit (EPRU), Education Policy Studies Laboratory, Arizona State University.
  • Pbrreault, G. (2000). The classroom impact of high-stress testing. Education, 120(4), 705-710.
  • Phelps, R. P. (2003). Kill the messenger: The war on standardized testing. New Brunswick, Transaction.
  • Polesel, J., Dulfer N., & Turnbull, M. (2012). The experience of education: The impacts of high stakes testing on school students and their families. Sydney: Whitlam Institute Report, University of Western Sydney,
  • Ricketts, S.N., Engelhard, G., & Chang, M.L. (2015). Development and validation of a scale to measure academic resilience in mathematics. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33(2), 79–86.
  • Ritt, M. (2016). The impact of high–stakes testing on the learning environment. [Masters’ thesis, St. Catherine University/University of St. Thomas, United States of America].
  • Saito, Y. (2006). Consequences of high stakes testing on the family and schools in Japan. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy (KJEP), 3(1), 101–102.
  • Segool, N. K., Carlson, J. S., Goforth, A. N., von der Embse, N., & Barterian, J. A. (2013). Heightened test anxiety among young children: Elementary school students’ anxious responses to hig stakes testing. Psychology in Schools, 50(5), 489 499.
  • Shepard, L., & Dougherty, K. C. (1991, April). Effects of high–stakes testing on instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
  • Simpson, C. (2016). Effects of standardized testing on students’ well-being.
  • Spann, P., & Kaufman, D. (2015). The negative effects of high–stakes testing.
  • Stanley, G. K. (2004). High stakes hustle: Public schools and the new billion dollar accountability. The Educational Forum, 69(1), 8 16.
  • Stecher, B. M. (2002). Consequences of large-scale, high-stakes testing on school and classroom practice. In L. S. Hamilton, B. M. Stecher, & S. P. Klein (Eds.). Making sense of test-based accountability in education (pp. 79-100). RAND Corporation.
  • Stobart, G., & Eggen, T. (2012). High-stakes testing – value, fairness and consequences. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(1), 1 6.
  • Taylor, G., Sheppard, L., Kinner, F., & Rosenthal, J. (2003). A survey of teachers' perspectives on high-stakes testing in Colorado: Wwhat gets taught, what gets lost. (CSE Tech. Rep. 588). Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
  • Togut, T. D. (2004). High stakes testing: Educational barometer for success, or false prognosticator for failure.
  • Turgut, M. F., & Baykul, Y. (1992). Ölçekleme Teknikleri [Scaling techniques]. ÖSYM.
  • Vogler, K. E., & Virtue, D. (2007). “Just the Facts, Ma’am”: Teaching social studies in the era of standards and high–stakes. Testing, The Social Studies, 98(2), 54–58.
  • Westfall, D. M. (2010). Parental perceptions of the effects of the high–stakes TAKS test on the home lives of at–risk fifth grade students. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Houston, Houston, Texas].
  • Winters, M. A., Trivitt, J. R., & Greene, J. P. (2010). The impact of high–stakes testing on student proficiency in low–stakes subjects: Evidence from Florida’s elementary science exam. Economics of Education Review, 29(1), 138 146.
  • Wise, S. L., & DeMars, C. E. (2005). Low examinee effort in low-stakes assessment: Problems and potential solutions. Educational Assessment, 10(1), 1 17.
  • Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean–square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8, 370.
  • Wright, W. E. (2002). The effects of high stakes testing in an inner–city elementary school: The curriculum, the teachers, and the English language learners. Current Issues in Education, 5(5).
  • Yaşar, M. (2018). Scaling of ideal teachers characteristics with pairwise comparison judgments according to pre–service teachers’ opinions. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 5(1), 130–145.
  • Yeh, S. S. (2005). Limiting the unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(43).
  • Yılmaz, S. (2017). Evaluating the reflections of high stakes tests on school culture. [Master’s thesis, Trakya University].
Primary Language en
Subjects Education, Scientific Disciplines
Published Date June
Journal Section Articles

Orcid: 0000-0003-1804-002X
Author: Mustafa İLHAN
Country: Turkey

Orcid: 0000-0002-2836-3132
Author: Neşe GÜLER
Country: Turkey

Orcid: 0000-0003-3434-4373
Author: Gülşen TAŞDELEN TEKER (Primary Author)
Institution: Hacettepe Üniversitesi
Country: Turkey


Publication Date : June 10, 2021

APA İlhan, M , Güler, N , Taşdelen Teker, G . (2021). Views of Teachers on the Potential Negative Effects of High Stake Tests . International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education , 8 (2) , 394-408 . DOI: 10.21449/ijate.735232