Research Article

Non-Destructive chlorophyll meters: a comparison of three types of meters for grain yield estimation of durum wheat under semi-arid environments

Volume: 9 Number: 1 March 17, 2025
EN

Non-Destructive chlorophyll meters: a comparison of three types of meters for grain yield estimation of durum wheat under semi-arid environments

Abstract

Optimizing management practices to maximize crop yield and efficiency necessitates real-time monitoring of plant growth throughout the growing season. Utilizing spectral indices, such as normalized difference vegetation index, SPAD chlorophyll meter readings, and the CM-1000 chlorophyll meter, can provide quantitative data to aid in making informed management decisions. This study investigated the relationships between spectral indices (NDVI, SPAD, CM-1000) and grain yield in five durum wheat genotypes under semi-arid conditions. Spectral indices were taken at three growth stages: heading, anthesis, and maturity. Our findings revealed significant variations in spectral reflectance values among the genotypes and across growth stages. NDVI values were highest during the early growth stages and declined towards maturity. SPAD values also exhibited a similar trend, peaking at heading and anthesis. Chlorophyll content, as measured by SPAD readings, varied across growth stages, with different genotypes exhibiting peak chlorophyll content at different times. CM-1000 measurements showed significant differences among genotypes at all stages, with 'Fırat 93' and 'Hasanbey' generally exhibiting higher chlorophyll content. Correlation analysis revealed significant positive relationships between NDVI values at different stages, as well as between CM-1000 measurements and grain yield. Conversely, SPAD values showed a negative correlation with grain yield. These findings suggest that CM-1000 measurements could be a valuable tool for selecting high-yielding durum wheat genotypes under semi-arid conditions.

Keywords

NDVI, SPAD, CM-1000 chlorophyll meter, Durum wheat, Growing stages

References

  1. Aparicio, N., Villegas, D., Araus, J. L., Casadesus, J., Royo, C. (2002). Relationship between growth traits and spectral vegetation indices in durum wheat. Crop science, 42 (5), 1547-1555. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.1547
  2. Ashourloo, D., Mobasheri, M. R., Huete, A. (2014). Evaluating the effect of different wheat rust disease symptoms on vegetation indices using hyperspectral measurements. Remote Sensing, 6 (6), 5107-5123. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6065107
  3. Cooper, M., Messina, C. D., Podlich, D., Totir, L. R., Baumgarten, A., Hausmann, N. J., Graham, G. (2014). Predicting the future of plant breeding: complementing empirical evaluation with genetic prediction. Crop and Pasture Science, 65 (4), 311-336. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP14007
  4. Giunta, F., Motzo, R., Deidda, M. (2002). SPAD readings and associated leaf traits in durum wheat, barley and triticale cultivars. Euphytica, 125, 197-205. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP14007
  5. Grosse-Heilmann, M., Cristiano, E., Deidda, R., Viola, F. (2024). Durum wheat productivity today and tomorrow: A review of influencing factors and climate change effects. Resources Environment and Sustainability, 17, 100170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2024.100170
  6. Hassan, M. A., Yang, M., Rasheed, A., Yang, G., Reynolds, M., Xia, X., He, Z. (2019). A rapid monitoring of NDVI across the wheat growth cycle for grain yield prediction using a multi-spectral UAV platform. Plant science, 282, 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.10.022
  7. Jackson, P., Robertson, M., Cooper, M., Hammer, G. (1996). The role of physiological understanding in plant breeding; from a breeding perspective. Field Crops Research, 49 (1), 11-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(96)01012-X
  8. Kızılgeçi, F., Yıldırım, M., Akıncı, C., Albayrak, Ö., Sesiz, U., Tazebay, N. (2018). Evaluation of relationships between yield and yield components with physiological parameters in barley. DUFED, 7(2), 61-66.
  9. Kizilgeci, F., Akıncı, C., Yıldırım, M. (2019). Improving grain yield, protein ratio and nitrogen use efficiency of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) hybrids using spad meter as a selection criterion. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, 3 (3), 112-120. https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2019.3.1
  10. Kizilgeci, F. (2020). Diallel analysis of spad, yield component and nitrogen use efficiency of some bread wheat genotypes under low and high nitrogen levels. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 29 (8), 7071-7080. https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2022.27.3.2241
APA
Kızılgeçi, F., Tebrizli, N., Eliş, S., Özkan, R., Bayhan, M., & Yıldırım, M. (2025). Non-Destructive chlorophyll meters: a comparison of three types of meters for grain yield estimation of durum wheat under semi-arid environments. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, 9(1), 115-122. https://doi.org/10.31015/2025.1.14
AMA
1.Kızılgeçi F, Tebrizli N, Eliş S, Özkan R, Bayhan M, Yıldırım M. Non-Destructive chlorophyll meters: a comparison of three types of meters for grain yield estimation of durum wheat under semi-arid environments. int. j. agric. environ. food sci. 2025;9(1):115-122. doi:10.31015/2025.1.14
Chicago
Kızılgeçi, Ferhat, Negar Tebrizli, Seval Eliş, Remzi Özkan, Merve Bayhan, and Mehmet Yıldırım. 2025. “Non-Destructive Chlorophyll Meters: A Comparison of Three Types of Meters for Grain Yield Estimation of Durum Wheat under Semi-Arid Environments”. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 9 (1): 115-22. https://doi.org/10.31015/2025.1.14.
EndNote
Kızılgeçi F, Tebrizli N, Eliş S, Özkan R, Bayhan M, Yıldırım M (March 1, 2025) Non-Destructive chlorophyll meters: a comparison of three types of meters for grain yield estimation of durum wheat under semi-arid environments. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 9 1 115–122.
IEEE
[1]F. Kızılgeçi, N. Tebrizli, S. Eliş, R. Özkan, M. Bayhan, and M. Yıldırım, “Non-Destructive chlorophyll meters: a comparison of three types of meters for grain yield estimation of durum wheat under semi-arid environments”, int. j. agric. environ. food sci., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 115–122, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.31015/2025.1.14.
ISNAD
Kızılgeçi, Ferhat - Tebrizli, Negar - Eliş, Seval - Özkan, Remzi - Bayhan, Merve - Yıldırım, Mehmet. “Non-Destructive Chlorophyll Meters: A Comparison of Three Types of Meters for Grain Yield Estimation of Durum Wheat under Semi-Arid Environments”. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 9/1 (March 1, 2025): 115-122. https://doi.org/10.31015/2025.1.14.
JAMA
1.Kızılgeçi F, Tebrizli N, Eliş S, Özkan R, Bayhan M, Yıldırım M. Non-Destructive chlorophyll meters: a comparison of three types of meters for grain yield estimation of durum wheat under semi-arid environments. int. j. agric. environ. food sci. 2025;9:115–122.
MLA
Kızılgeçi, Ferhat, et al. “Non-Destructive Chlorophyll Meters: A Comparison of Three Types of Meters for Grain Yield Estimation of Durum Wheat under Semi-Arid Environments”. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, Mar. 2025, pp. 115-22, doi:10.31015/2025.1.14.
Vancouver
1.Ferhat Kızılgeçi, Negar Tebrizli, Seval Eliş, Remzi Özkan, Merve Bayhan, Mehmet Yıldırım. Non-Destructive chlorophyll meters: a comparison of three types of meters for grain yield estimation of durum wheat under semi-arid environments. int. j. agric. environ. food sci. 2025 Mar. 1;9(1):115-22. doi:10.31015/2025.1.14