We are committed to prompt evaluation and publication of fully accepted papers in Journal for the Mathematics Education and Teaching Practices (JMETP). To maintain a high-quality publication, all submissions undergo a rigorous review process. Characteristics of the peer review process are as follows:


· Simultaneous submissions of the same papers to different journals will not be accepted.

· Manuscripts with contents different from of scope of JMETP will not be considered for review.

· The Editor asks the author and authors of conflict of interest when making the decision to accept publications and articles. In addition, authors cannot do unethical things such as adding authors in the article evaluation process.

· Depending on JMETP policy, submissions usually will be refereed at least by 2 experts as suggested by the editorial board.

· Besides, Editor(s) of JMETP will have the option of seeking additional reviews when needed.

· Publication decisions of JMETP are made by the Editors-in-Chief of JMETP in terms of the reviewers' reports.

· Submitted articles documents are in safe every time

· The articles must be submitted before the peer review of the plagiarism reports begins.

· The editor can receive the plagiarism report at the beginning, in the process and at the end of the review.

· In terms of the quality of the articles, the articles are blinded for the evaluation of the referee.


All these principles act within the commitment of the JMETP editor board. It receives and implements recommendations from the editorial board for the development of review policies.