Journal of Nursing Effect

Guide for Authors

Manuscript Style:

The following format rules should be followed in the articles submitted to the journal for publication:
All manuscripts should be written in Microsoft Word program, with 12 pt font size and 1.5 line spacing on A4 paper size, with 1.5 cm margins from each side. Research and review articles should not exceed 20 pages, including references and tables/figures. Journal of Nursing Effect adheres to the APA style.

Due to our journal publication policy and article density, review articles will not be accepted for a temporary period starting from 1 March 2022.

As of May 1, 2023, articles on COVID-19 will not be accepted in our journal due to our journal publication policy, article density and the pandemic process.

Title page
Each page should be numbered consecutively, starting from 1 in the upper right corner of the page, excluding the cover page. The title page should be submitted separately to the main file. Also, a Running Head, a shortened form of the title that introduces the article to the reader should be placed in the title case letters at the top right of the Title Page and each page of the Manuscript. The running head can be up to 50 characters, maximum of 4 words, and should be written in title case with 9 pt. On the cover page of the article, in the Turkish and English title of the article, the first letter of the words should be written in capitals, bold and left-aligned. Recommended article title length is 10-12 words. Abbreviations should not be used in the title. Author names, titles, institutional affiliations and addresses, and the name of the corresponding author with contact details should be included. This information should be written left-aligned. All information on the title page should be written in 12 pt. Any previous presentation of the work must be declared with the place and date of the presentation. If any, funding from individuals or organizations should be declared. The ORCID number of the authors should be included.

Research Article
Research articles consist of Title page (to be uploaded separately), Abstract in Turkish and English, Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion, Implications for Practice, and References. If necessary, Acknowledgments should be placed before the References section; Abbreviations and Appendices should be placed after the References section.

For articles in English, a language edit certificate must be uploaded to the Dergipark system during article submission.

You can contact Cetus Publishing for Editing and Proofreading services. Please click here to contact Cetus Publishing.

Abstract
The abstract should be a comprehensive summary of the paper. It should be written in Turkish and English and should not exceed 250 words. Turkish and English abstracts should be on separate pages and should be divided into paragraphs with the following headings: Background, Purpose, Methods, Results, Conclusion, and Keywords. Three to five keywords should be provided in English and Turkish.
Main text
The main text should include Introduction, Purpose, Method, Results, Discussion, Implications for Practice, References sections, and Appendices, if any. Section titles should be in uppercase and sub-headings in lowercase and bold.
Introduction:
The purpose and the approach in the literature on the subject studied should be included. This section should include the purpose or research question/hypothesis (Purpose may or may not be in a separate heading).
Materials and Methods:
In the Material and Method Section, the Type of the Research, the Place of the Research, the Universe/Sample of the Research, Data Collection Instrument-Validity and reliability information, Action/Intervention (must be if the research is experimental or quasi-experimental), Evaluation of the Data, Variables of the Research and Ethical Aspect of the Research (Ethics committee permission/institutional permission-date and number, obtaining written/verbal consent from the individuals, information regarding the permission for use from the scale holders) should be included in the form of sub-headings. The article should include a statement that research and publication ethics are complied with.
Results:
In the results section, descriptive statistics of the data obtained (number, percentage, mean, standard deviation, etc.), statistical tests used, test, and probability (p) values should be provided clearly.
No leading zeros should be used when reporting Cronbach Alpha (α), correlation coefficients (r), and p values. p values should be given as three decimal, Factor loads, Alpha, and r values should be given as two decimal.
(Correct use: r =.34, p=.001)
If the ratio is written as “Percentage” in the table headings, the % sign should not be used.
Tables and Figures:
Tables should be prepared in Microsoft Word. The table number and the title of the table should be written in title case, above the table. Tables should not contain vertical lines. Each table must be cited in the text.
Example table
Table 1. Item-Total Score Correlation

Items	r	p
Item 1	.70	.001
Item 2	.90	.001
Item 3	.53	.001
Item 4	.68	.001

 - Figures/graphics should be numbered and titled, and the titles should be written in title case.

- The source should be indicated under the tables and figures taken from another source. Permission must be obtained for use.

- The number of tables or figures should not exceed 6. Figures must be in JPEG format. Tables should not be larger than one page. Tables larger than one page should be shortened.
- Abbreviations and related explanations should be given in 12 pt, using (*) under tables and figures.
- Tables and figures should be placed throughout the text, shortly after the parts of the text that refer to them.

Discussion:
The results of the study should be discussed and interpreted in the light of the literature, with the results of other studies.
Limitations: Limitations of the study (factors that researchers encountered for reasons beyond their control, which may affect the results of the study).
Implications for Practice: The contributions of the results obtained from the study to the field of practice should be explained, and recommendations should be made based on the results.
Disclosure: It should be stated that the researchers do not have a conflict of interest and if any organization provided funding for the project, should be stated. At the end of the manuscript, as a separate paragraphs, the authors' contribution rate, the repetition of the name of the ethics committee, the date, and the decision number (must be included twice; in the method section and at the end of the manuscript), conflict of interest statement, acknowledgment and support (project-fund, etc.) statement should be included. Acknowledgments of the authors should be included if any.
Appendices
This section includes appendices such as scales and questionnaires used in the research. It should be given on a new page.

Review Articles

Review articles will be accepted upon an invitation of the editor.

Turkish and English Abstract: The importance of the subject, the purpose of the study, and the structure related to the subject should be indicated. Turkish abstract should not exceed 200 words.
Three to five keywords should be provided in English and Turkish.
Main text: The main text should consist of Introduction, Development, Conclusion, and References sections.
In the introduction section, the subject frame should be drawn, and the importance of the subject and the purpose of the review should be explained. A structure related to the subject area should be created in the development section.

Case Report
The aim/focus of the study and the “case report” should be included in the title.
Turkish and English Abstract: A structure should be created regarding the importance of the case report, the purpose of the study, and the subject it covers. The abstract should fully reflect the general content of the study and should not contain subheadings.
Turkish Abstracts should contain 150 to 200 words.
Three to five keywords should be provided in English and Turkish.
Main Text: The main text should consist of Abstract, Introduction, Case Report, Discussion, and References sections. It should be no more than 2000 words.
In the introduction, the importance and originality of the case and the purpose of the case report should be explained.
The case report section should include patient information, main problems and symptoms, past interventions and results, physical examination, clinical results, diagnostic evaluations, treatment plan, patient follow-up, appropriate nursing interventions, and patient outcomes.
In the discussion section, the relevant literature, implications for practice, the contribution of the results to nursing science, the difficulties and limitations of the case report, and the main conclusions drawn from this case report should be included.
In case reports, it is obligatory to obtain written informed consent from the patient.
The required number of figures or tables related to the case can be included.

Systematic Review
It should be indicated in the study title that the article is a systematic review.
Turkish and English Abstract: The importance of the subject and the purpose of the study should be indicated, and a structure related to the subject should be created. Turkish abstract should not exceed 200 words.
Three to five keywords should be provided in English and Turkish.
Main text: The main text should consist of Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Results, Implications for Practice, and References sections.

The rationale/purpose of the systematic review should be explained in line with the literature, and the goal/research question of the study should be stated in line with the PICOS (participants, interventions, comparisons, outcomes, and study design) framework.
In the method section, it should be indicated that the study is a systematic review, the inclusion criteria of the studies, the problem of the studies, the interventions, and comparisons should be explained.
In the Results section, the characteristics of the extracted data for each study (sample size, PICOS, follow-up time) should be indicated. All results should be cited for each study included in the systematic review.
The discussion section should summarize the main results and discuss the strength of the evidence (for example, considering its relevance to healthcare providers, healthcare recipients, and policymakers) within the framework of the research question and purpose.
In the Limitations section, limitations regarding the screening, study, and results should be indicated.
In the conclusion, a general interpretation of the results in the context of other evidence and recommendations for future studies are expected.

Ethical Rules
Studies submitted to the journal for publication should not have been previously published in a journal as a full-text paper or article in any congress, should not have been accepted for publication, and should not have been evaluated.
Studies published abroad can be submitted to the journal for consideration by obtaining written permission from the editor of the published journal. Studies presented at the congress or symposium should be mentioned on the title page.
The authors are requested to upload a plagiarism report (iThenticate scan) with a maximum of 20%, "Excluding Abstract, Bibliography, Tables, and Figures".
The ethics committee document and copyright transfer form must be uploaded to the system. Ethics committee certificate should be obtained within the last five years at most.
All research submitted for publication in the journal must comply with the Declaration of Helsinki, Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, COPE, and ICMJE.
It should be stated in the submitted Manuscript that informed consent was obtained from the participants. For individuals (children, comatose patients, etc.) who are not competent to make a decision, it should be stated that informed consent was obtained from the legal guardian or another person with legal authority to act on the individual's behalf.
If any funding has been provided, the authors should declare whether they have a conflict of interest with the institutions providing this support.
The compliance of the manuscripts with ethical, scientific, legal, etc. rules is the responsibility of the authors.
Submission of manuscripts that are under consideration elsewhere is rejected.
During the submission, the author(s) accept that the manuscript has not been submitted for consideration in another journal; otherwise, all responsibility belongs to the author(s). The journal reserves the right to take necessary official actions.
LEGAL NOTICE: The copyright of all manuscripts published or to be published in the journal belongs to E-Journal of Dokuz Eylul University Nursing Faculty. Full text or any part of the manuscripts cannot be published without the approval of the editorial board.

REFERENCES
Citation in text
Journal of Nursing Effect adheres to the APA style. The journal’s citation check is done using the Crossref Similarity Check.

Cited articles should date within the last five years. If necessary, sources up to 10 years can be used. If a source is the main source, cannot be dispensed with, and must be cited, then older sources can be used.

Reference list
At the end of the text, the references should be in alphabetical order and given in a separate list in the references section. A maximum of 45 references should be cited in the articles.

A maximum of 45 references should be cited in the articles.

Please click for reference.

NOTE: The templates from which you can follow the author guidelines during the article submission process can be downloaded from the Article Templates section at the bottom of the journal homepage.

Considerations in the Journal Publication Process
1. If the corresponding author is informed about the technical correction and spelling rules three times, but the requested correction is not made, the manuscript is removed from the consideration process and the author is informed.
2. The authors are given 4 weeks for the minor and major revision suggestions of the referees.
3. Corrections made according to the suggestions from the referees should be marked in different colors on the main text and written as a separate text and uploaded to the system.
4. No information is given to the author(s) about in which issue the accepted manuscript will be published.
5. The publication order of the accepted manuscript is ordered according to the acceptance order.
6. The final version of the manuscript accepted for publication is sent to the corresponding author for approval as a Pdf template. No changes are made after approval.
7. Referee opinions are included in the information mail while informing the author(s) about the rejected manuscripts.
8. The consideration period of the journal is at least 6 months.
9. Referees are given 7 days to accept article review invitations and 30 days to review the article.
10. In case of problems during uploading the manuscript corrections to the system, the relevant field editor or secretary should be contacted. The manuscript should not be re-uploaded to the system as a new manuscript.

ETHICAL PRINCIPLES AND PUBLICATION POLICY
Ethics in publishing
All manuscripts submitted for publication in the journal must comply with the Declaration of Helsinki, Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, COPE, and ICMJE.
Peer-reviewed studies are studies that embody and support the scientific method. At this point, all stakeholders of the process (authors, readers, researchers, publisher, referees, and editors) must comply with the standards for ethical principles.
All stakeholders are expected to comply with the following ethical responsibilities within the scope of publication ethics ofJournal of Nursing Effect.

LEGAL NOTICE: By signing the Copyright License Agreement, authors agree that the article, if accepted for publication byJournal of Nursing Effect , will be licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The authors agree to transfer the copyright to E-Journal of Dokuz Eylul University Nursing Faculty if the article is accepted for publication. However, the authors retain the following rights:

-Registered rights rather than copyrights such as patent etc.
-The right to use it no charge in all educational activities except for publication in journals or books.
-The right to multiply manuscript provided that it is not commercial.

The copyright form must be filled, signed by all authors, scanned and uploaded to online submission/evaluation system.

All articles published byJournal of Nursing Effect are subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This License permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any platform, provided that the article is properly cited, the usage is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made. For more information on the conditions of the license please look at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Permission is required for the protection of copyright holder and author rights in the case of commercial use (sales etc.) of material published under this license. The content can be used as a reference in scientific publications and presentations. Except these conditions, permissions for re- use of manuscripts should be obtained from editorial office.

 The Journal is the official publication of Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Nursing.

Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Author(s) submitting a manuscript to the journal are expected to comply with the following ethical responsibilities:
• Manuscripts submitted to the journal for publication should not have been previously published in a journal as a full-text paper or article in a congress, accepted for publication, and should not be under consideration.
• Authors should have an informed consent document showing that they have the rights to use the data, the necessary permissions for the research/analysis, or that the consent of the experimental subjects has been obtained. In the method and information sections of the submitted manuscripts, the "institution and ethics committee approvals were obtained" statement should be included, together with the institution information, date, and decision number. Ethics committee documents should be uploaded to the system during submission. Published articles contain data from a maximum of 5 years ago.
• It should be stated in the submitted Manuscript that informed consent was obtained from the participants. For individuals (children, comatose patients, etc.) who are not competent to make a decision, it should be stated that informed consent was obtained from the legal guardian or another person with legal authority to act on the individual's behalf.
• Studies published abroad can be submitted to the journal for consideration by obtaining written permission from the editor of the published journal. Studies presented at the congress or symposium should be mentioned on the title page.
• If any funding has been provided, the authors should declare whether they have a conflict of interest with the institutions providing this support.
• The compliance of the manuscripts with ethical, scientific, legal, etc. rules is the responsibility of the authors.
• Submission of manuscripts that are under consideration elsewhere is rejected.
• Submission of manuscripts that are under consideration elsewhere is rejected. During the submission, the author(s) accept that the manuscript has not been submitted for consideration in another journal; otherwise, all responsibility belongs to the author(s). The journal reserves the right to take necessary official actions.
• The manuscripts submitted by the author(s) are expected to be original. If the author(s) benefit from or use other studies, they are required to cite and/or quote completely and accurately.
• Author contribution rates should be given as initials (A.B. etc.) next to the relevant title such as Idea, Design, Consultancy, Data Collection and Processing, Analysis and Interpretation, Literature Review, Writing the Manuscript, Preparing to the Journal Submission. Persons who did not contribute adequately to the creation of the work should not be cited as authors.
• Situations that may constitute a conflict of interest, if any, should be explained in the information section of the manuscript submitted for publication.
• Details such as financial support, project, acknowledgments should also be included in the information section of the manuscript.
• During the consideration process, the author(s) may be asked for raw data regarding their manuscripts, in such a case the author(s) should be ready to present the expected data and information to the editorial board.
• In cases that the author(s) notices an error in their published, pending, or under consideration manuscripts, the author(s) have an obligation to inform the journal editor or publisher, to cooperate with the editor in the process of correcting or withdrawing the manuscript.
• Changes in author responsibilities (adding an author, changing the order of authors, removing an author) cannot be proposed for manuscripts whose consideration process has begun.

Ethical Duties and Responsibilities of Editors
General duties and responsibilities
Editors are responsible for every publication published in the journal. In the context of this responsibility, editors have the following roles and responsibilities:
• Making efforts to meet the information needs of readers and authors,
• Ensuring the continuous development of the journal,
• Managing the processes to improve the quality of studies published in the journal,
• Supporting freedom of thought,
• Ensuring academic integrity,
• Continuing the publication processes without compromising intellectual property rights and ethical standards,
• To show openness and transparency in terms of publication on issues that requires correction, clarification.

Relations with readers
Editors should make decisions by considering the knowledge, skills, and experience expectations of all readers, researchers, and practitioners. Editors should pay attention to the fact that the published works contribute to the reader, researcher, practitioner, and scientific literature and are original. In addition, editors are obliged to consider the feedback from readers, researchers, and practitioners, and to provide explanatory and informative feedback.

Relations with authors
The duties and responsibilities of the editors towards the authors are as follows:
• Editors should make decisions based on the significance, originality, validity, clarity of the studies, and the journal's goals and objectives.
• Studies that are suitable for the scope of publication should be taken to the preliminary evaluation stage unless they have serious problems.
• New editors should not change the decisions made by the previous editor(s) for manuscripts unless there is a serious problem.
• "Blind Refereeing and Consideration Process" must be published and the editors must prevent any possible problems in the defined processes.
• Editors should provide descriptive and informative feedback to authors.

Relations with referees
The duties and responsibilities of the editors towards the authors are as follows:
• Editors should determine the referees in accordance with the subject of the study.
• Editors are obliged to provide the information and guides that the referees will need during the evaluation phase.
• Editors have to consider whether there is a conflict of interest between the authors and the referees.
• Editors should keep the identity of reviewers confidential in the context of blind reviewing.
• Editors should encourage referees to evaluate the manuscript in an unbiased, scientific, and objective language.
• Editors should determine practices and policies that increase the performance of referees.
• Editors should take the necessary steps to keep the referee pool dynamically updated.
• Editors should not allow rude and unscientific reviews.
• Editors should take steps to ensure that the referee pool is broad.

Relations with the editorial board
Editors should ensure that all editorial board members manage the processes in accordance with editorial policies and guidelines. Editors should inform the members of the Editorial Board about the editorial policies and keep them informed of the developments.
In addition, editors should:
• ensure that members of the Editorial Board consider the studies impartially and independently.
• select new editorial board members from those who can contribute and are qualified.
• consider their areas of expertise when submitting manuscripts to Editorial board members for consideration.
• interact with the Editorial Board regularly.
• hold regular meetings with the Editorial Board for the improvement of editorial policies and the journal.
Relations with the journal owner and publisher
The relationship between the editors and the publisher is based on the principle of editorial independence. In accordance with the written contract between the editors and the publisher, all decisions taken by the editors are independent of the publisher and the journal owner.

Editorial and blind review processes
Editors are responsible for implementing the "Blind Refereeing and Evaluation Process" policy of the journal publication policies. In this context, the editors ensure that the consideration process of each manuscript is completed fairly, impartially, and timely.

Quality assurance
Editors are responsible for publishing manuscripts in accordance with journal publication policies and international standards.

Protection of personal data
The editors are obliged to ensure the protection of personal data regarding the subjects or images included in the considered manuscripts. Unless the written consent of the individuals who participated in the studies is documented, editors are responsible for rejecting the study. In addition, editors are responsible for protecting the individual data of authors, referees, and readers.



Ethics committee, human and animal rights
Editors are responsible for ensuring the protection of human and animal rights in the considered manuscripts. In the absence of ethics committee approval and permissions for experimental research, the editors are responsible for rejecting the study.

Precaution against possible abuse and misconduct
Editors are obliged to take precautions against possible abuse and misconduct. Editors are responsible for conducting a rigorous and objective investigation on the identification and evaluation of complaints about such a situation and sharing relevant findings.

Ensuring academic publication integrity
Editors should ensure that judgments containing errors, inconsistencies, or misdirection in manuscripts are promptly corrected.

Protection of intellectual property rights
Editors are obliged to protect the intellectual property rights of all published manuscripts and to defend the rights of the journal and the author(s) in case of possible violations. In addition, the editors are obliged to take the necessary measures so that the contents of all published manuscripts do not violate the intellectual property rights of other publications.

Constructivism and openness to discussion
• Editors should consider persuasive criticisms of the manuscripts published in the journal and should adopt a constructive attitude towards these criticisms.
• Editors should give the right to reply to the author(s) of the criticized manuscripts.
• Editors should not ignore or exclude manuscripts with negative results.

Complaints
Editors are responsible for carefully examining and responding to complaints from authors, referees, or readers in an enlightening and explanatory manner.

Political and Commercial Concerns
The journal owner, publisher, and no other political or commercial factors affect the editors' independent decision making.

Conflicts of interest
The editors ensure that the publication process of the manuscripts is completed independently and impartially, taking into account the conflicts of interest between the author(s), referees, and other editors.


Ethical Responsibilities of Referees
Consideration of all manuscripts with "Blind Refereeing" directly affects the quality of the publication. This process provides confidence through an objective and independent evaluation of the publication. The journal consideration process is based on double-blind peer-review principles. Referees cannot directly communicate with authors, evaluations and comments are submitted through the journal management system. In this process, referee comments written on evaluation forms and full texts are forwarded to the author(s) through the editor. In this regard, it is expected that the referees considering the manuscripts for journal have the following ethical responsibilities:
• Agreeing to evaluate only studies related to the area of expertise.
• Evaluating with impartiality and confidentiality.
• In cases of a conflict of interest during the evaluation process, refusing to review the manuscript and informing the journal editor.
• Deleting the manuscripts examined in accordance with the confidentiality principle after the evaluation process. Using only the final versions of the reviewed manuscripts, but only after they are published.
• To objectively evaluate only the content of the manuscript. Not allowing nationality, gender, religious beliefs, political beliefs, and commercial concerns to influence the assessment.
• Evaluating in constructive and kind language. Not to make derogatory personal comments that includes hostility, slander, and insults.
• To perform the evaluation of the manuscripts in a timely manner and with the above ethical responsibilities.

Ethical Responsibilities of Publisher
The journals of Editors and Editorial Board act with the awareness of the following ethical responsibilities:
• The editors are responsible for all processes of the manuscripts submitted to the journal. In this regard, editors are the decision-makers, regardless of economic or political gains.
• It undertakes to create an independent editorial decision.
• It protects the property and copyright of every manuscript published in the journal and undertakes to keep a record of every published copy.
• It has the responsibility to take precautions against all kinds of scientific abuse, citation fraud, and plagiarism regarding the editors.
If you encounter a situation of unethical behavior
If you encounter any unethical behavior or content in the journal other than the ethical responsibilities mentioned above, please report it via e-mail to hande.yagcan@gmail.com.

OPEN ACCESS POLICY
The journal is published with open access policy.
Privacy Statement
Personal information such as names and e-mail addresses registered to the journal management system will only be used for the scientific purposes of this journal. This information will not be used for any other purpose or department and will not be shared with third parties.

Archiving
• Metadata and full texts of all manuscripts published in the journal are stored in Word, XML, and Pdf format, inaccessible.
• In addition, all manuscripts are stored and presented in Word, XML, and Pdf formats on ULAKBİM servers through the TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Database.


PUBLICATION POLICY
• The journal is an open access journal and users are allowed to read and download the full text by accessing it free of charge through the Dergipark Index.
• Authors are not charged for the evaluation and publication of the manuscripts.
• Priority will be given to the publication of studies on COVID-19.
• The entire evaluation process of the manuscripts submitted for publication in the journal is carried out by the double-blind method. The identities of the referees and authors are kept confidential. After the process is completed, the corresponding author is notified whether the manuscript is accepted or not.

Consideration process
• The consideration process of manuscripts begins with the application process to the online article submission system. The author team uploads the main text file of the research, the Ethics Committee Approval Form (except for review articles), Institution Permission (if case report), and Author Copyright Transfer Form to the system.
• After the articles submitted in English are checked by language editors registered on the journal Dergipark platform, language editing is requested from the authors.

Author Responsibilities
• Statements and opinions expressed in the journal are the responsibility of the author(s).
• The scientific language of the text to be published and the responsibility of meeting the ethical requirements of the research conducted belong to the author(s).
• If the corresponding author is informed about the technical correction and spelling rules three times, but the requested correction is not made, the manuscript is removed from the consideration process and the author is informed.
• The author(s) are given four (4) weeks for the minor and major revision suggestions of the referees.
• Corrections made according to the suggestions from the referees should be marked in different colors on the main text and written as a separate text and uploaded to the system.
• No information is given to the author(s) about in which issue the accepted manuscript will be published.
• The publication order of the accepted manuscript is ordered according to the acceptance order.
• The final version of the manuscript accepted for publication is sent to the corresponding author for approval as a Pdf template. No changes are made after approval.
• Referee opinions are included in the information mail while informing the author(s) about the rejected manuscripts.
• The consideration period of the journal is at least six (6) months.

Editor and Referee Responsibilities
• Articles that are considered unsuitable for publication in the journal are rejected without being sent to the referees by the decision of the editor and the section editor.
• The editor reviews the decisions of the section editors about the manuscripts. It conveys its decision to the section editors with the secretariat.
• Two (2) assistant editors serve, one responsible for the scientific content and index committee and the other for the web and archive committee.
• The term of office of assistant editors is three (3) years.
• The assistant editor responsible for scientific content makes a preliminary evaluation of the articles submitted to the Dergipark system. It evaluates the spelling rules and requests corrections to the manuscript, if necessary. It makes the necessary notice and rejects the articles that do not make the corrections. The scientific evaluation process is initiated by directing the texts whose originality is sufficient and which meet the application requirements to the section editors.
• The editor appoints the relevant section editor according to the subject areas of the manuscripts and regulates the distribution and number of articles among the section editors.
• The Assistant Editor in charge of technical affairs plans and executes the quarterly publication process of the Journal together with the editor and section editor.
• Section editors follow the submissions and direct them to the referees through the Dergipark system. After the referee's feedback, section editors notify the author(s) about the consideration result of the manuscript within at least six (6) months.
• Delays caused by the author regarding the fulfillment of the revision request are considered as a reason for the rejection of the manuscript.
• Each manuscript is reviewed by three (3) independent referees who are experts in their fields. The manuscript approved for publication is directed to the editor-in-chief after receiving the approval of the section editor. The final decision in the publication of the manuscript belongs to the editor-in-chief.
• The referees are given four (4) weeks to respond to the consideration invitations.
• Referees are given 30 days to evaluate the manuscript. The referees who do not accept the evaluation of the manuscripts three times in a row or who evaluate it late are removed from the journal Dergipark referee pool.

Archive Policy

The archive of the issues published by Journal of Nursing Effect is provided by one of the long-term preservation service/services "LOCKSS": https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/deuhfed/lockss-manifest".

Ücretsizdir.