Transforming Driver Management in Enterprises: A Flutter-Powered Approach
Abstract
In this study underscores the critical necessity for efficient driver management, challenging traditional enterprises entangled in paper-based processes and outdated systems. A meticulous examination reveals the constraints hindering operational efficiency, underscoring the need for a digital transformation in driver management. This research not only articulates the prevalent challenges of conventional methods but also advocates for a transformative shift, positioning Flutter as a pivotal catalyst in this evolution. Delving deep into the issues inherent in traditional approaches, the study unveils constraints, paving the way for a discussion on the multifaceted benefits of digital transformation—ranging from enhanced workflow optimization to cost-effectiveness and the establishment of a driver-centric platform. Flutter, renowned for its versatile user interface (UI) toolkit, emerges as an innovative beacon, offering a comprehensive solution to the persistent challenges in driver management. Beyond a mere technological upgrade, the integration of Flutter is presented as a paradigm shift, providing a holistic and efficient solution to the intricate demands of driver management processes.
Keywords
Driver management, Digitization, Flutter, Cross-Platform development, Operational efficiency, Workflow optimization, Digital transformation, Driver-Centric platform
References
- Aditya G., Hoode A., Anvesh K., Biradar G., Kumara M., V M. et al. (2021, October). Machine learning based platform and recommendation system for food ordering services within premises. 2021 2nd Global Conference for Advancement in Technology (GCAT). (pp. 1-8). Bangalore, India. https://doi.org/10.1109/gcat52182.2021.9587601.
- Agarwal S. and Rajan K. (2017). Analyzing the performance of nosql vs. sql databases for spatial and aggregate queries. OSGeo Journal Volume 17, Issue 1, 7-14 . https://doi.org/10.7275/r5736p26.
- Akid H., Frey G., Ayed M., and Lachiche N. (2022). Performance of nosql graph implementations of star vs. snowflake schemas. IEEE Access, 10, 48603-48614. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3171256.
- AL-atraqchi O. (2022). A proposed model for build a secure restful api to connect between server side and mobile application using laravel framework with flutter toolkits. Cihan University-Erbil Scientific Journal, 6(2), 28-35. https://doi.org/10.24086/cuesj.v6n2y2022.pp28-35.
- Binani S., Gutti A., and Upadhyay S. (2016). Sql vs. nosql vs. newsql- a comparative study. Communications on Applied Electronics, 6(1), 43-46. https://doi.org/10.5120/cae2016652418.
- Bjeladinović S., Marjanović Z., and Babarogić S. (2020). A proposal of architecture for integration and uniform use of hybrid sql/nosql database components. Journal of Systems and Software, 168, 110633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.110633.
- Bonnet L., Laurent A., Sala M., Laurent B., and Sicard N. (2011). Reduce, you say: what nosql can do for data aggregation and bi in large repositories. 2011 22nd International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications. (pp. 483-488). City: Toulouse, France. https://doi.org/10.1109/dexa.2011.71.
- Boukhary S. and Colmenares E. (2019, December). A clean approach to flutter development through the flutter clean architecture package. 2019 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI). (pp. 1115-1120). Las Vegas, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/csci49370.2019.00211.
- Budiman S., Fadhila F., Saputro V., Utami E., and Khusnawi K. (2021). Perbandingan performa sql dan nosql dengan php pada 5 juta data. IJCIT (Indonesian Journal on Computer and Information Technology), 6(1), 38-42. https://doi.org/10.31294/ijcit.v6i1.9692.
- Butgereit L. (2016, September). Four nosqls in four fun fortnights. SAICSIT '16: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologis. (pp. 1-6). Johannesburg, South Africa. https://doi.org/10.1145/2987491.2987494.
